Ad Hoc Financial-Economic-Political Comments
These remarks are
Doug's opinions only.
Doug is n¤t a certified broker.
Doug is n¤t a licensed counselor.
Ponder at your own risk.
Archive of prior years' HodgePodge
HodgePodge CeodE 2011
Doug's HodgePodge CeodE 2010
Doug's HodgePodge CeodE 2009
EconVal FeuiChau Chs1-3
updates through 26Aug2012, 7Sep2012, 11Oct2012, 20Dec2012, 27Jan2013,
5Feb2013, 12Feb2013... - Doug.
Chapter Four Index to Doug's
Re-Commencing 11Sep2010 Feuilleton Chautauqua on Economic
Four Prologue Readers be aware that this prologue is still
located in Doug's 2011 edition of HodgePodge.
||Topic 16 -
|Topic 1 - Evolution
[Vv]alue Comparisons Doug - Restart Topic 1 of Chapter 4.
Doug has left groundwork for Topic 1 in Doug's 2011 edition of
HodgePodge. When this Chapter is finally published, all
of prior groundwork will be included in Chapter 4 Prologue. 17Aug2012.
It has taken Doug 18 months to gather enough personal qua
to feel somewhat qualified to proceed on quantum omniscussions
of quantum~evolution and its intimate attendees quantum~equilibrium
and quantum~chaos. Quantum~evolution proceeds perpetually and
ubiquitously given gradient changings in our cosmos' quantum~energy
as omnitored by chaos of quanta "moving and resting"
(as verbs) equilibria.
||Topic 17 -
|Topic 2 -
||Topic 18 -
|Topic 3 -
||Topic 19 -
|Topic 4 -
||Topic 20 -
|Topic 5 -
||Topic 21 -
|Topic 6 -
||Topic 22 -
|Topic 7 -
||Topic 23 -
|Topic 8 -
||Topic 24 -
|Topic 9 -
||Topic 25 -
|Topic 10 -
||Topic 26 -
|Topic 11 -
||Topic 27 -
|Topic 12 -
||Topic 28 -
|Topic 13 -
||Topic 29 -
|Topic 14 -
||Topic 30 -
|Topic 15 -
||Topic 31 -
||Chapter Four Epilogue
Chapter 4, Topic 1 - Value vis-à-vis value,
A Quantonics Chautauqua in Quantum~Economics
Topic 1: Evolution [Vv]alue
Eighteen months ago Doug had finished writing Chapter
4's Prologue. He commenced an omniscussion of his first Topic,
Topic 1 'Evolution [Vv]alue Comparisons.'
So good, so far.
Then it dawned on Doug that he simply didn't 'understand'
what quantum~evolution is in terms of legacy work Doug has done
over several decades of seemingly endless effort.
Key here of course is "If Keynesians want stability
in economics, does that mean they deny evolution1?,
since evolution is anything but 'classical stability'." Doug
surmised, then, that their version of 'stability' must be classical
and Doug wants to omniscuss in this first Topic of Chapter 4 omnifferencings
in classical 'stability' and quantum~stability. Doug sees classical
'stability' as 'value,' and he sees quantum~stability as Value.
Let's call latter QELRed "stæbihlity."
That remediation puts DQ (Quality as flux) Value
back into pure SQ's 'stability.'
Doug's Value link is to Chapter 3's PBing 17 on, 'Real
Value Preservation (quantum~equilibrium) vis-à-vis
Fiat value Debasement (classical-chaos).' Link and text added
25Aug2012 - Doug.
What happened to Doug is profound. He reread Prigogine
and Stenger's Order Out of Chaos. He realized, again, there
isn't an appropriate
vocabulary for expressing in a way lay humans can understand
omnifferencings in 'classical stability' and quantum~stæbihlity. Comtextually, ephemerally, and
enthymemetically countless memes and vocabulary attend those omnifferencings.
Doug has spent one and one-half years re~understanding countless
language semantics, both classical and quantum, in order to have
memes of 'stability.'
Two terms immediately strained Doug's self~assessed
credibility: equilibrium and chaos.
Keynesians want equilibrium as purely classical thus
always analytically, mathematically2, formally,
mechanically linear and holds-stillable.
Keynesians want an ideal, linear, circular,
predicable, repeatable, reusable, (re-)instantiable, verifiable,
y=f(t), determinate event-state ontological 'stability.'
In order to do that, Keynesians have to either deny any chaos, or
find classical means to 'control
But they use classical assumptions, both explicit (tacit, i.e.,
in Doug's sense of unsaid explicits) and implicit (~unknown, unsaid)
to do so.
Doug's view is simply, "A classical approach to
evolution, chaos, and equilibrium is dead AKA extinct and self-defeating
from any get-go."
Quantonics adepts ostensibly agree absent argument. Our choir
isn't our problem. Our problem is classical Keynesian-Marxist
beliefs, thoughts and actions.
Doug chooses (as a self declared heretic, a quantum~heretic)
to unseat Keynesian-Marxists based upon Value
Our first topic is, therefore, 'Evolution [Vv]alue
Comparisons.' Much of Doug's Chapter 4 groundwork appears in HodgePodge 2011.
Bold violet text are obvious (in Doug's opine) classical
. . .
"Doug, what language semantics attend [Vv]alue
comparisons of evolution?"
Here are some Doug has tackled so far: [Peircean]abduction,
adiabaticity, asymmetry, atemporality, [Suares']autiot, auto,
autsimilarity, aware, becoming, being, belief, believe,
[flux]cancellation, chance, change, chaos, choice, circular, cognition,
coherence, commutation, complementarity, complex, conscious, con(m)text,
decoherence, devolution, deceit, dissipation, do, due, [Bergsonian]duration,
emergence, energy, ensemble, entanglement, entropy, equilibrium,
event, evolution, fractal,
generation, gnosis, gradience, grail, hermeneutics, hologra[[il][m][ph]]icity,
immanence, indetermination, individual, inertia, interference,
interrelationships, [Peircean]interpretant, islandicity,
likely, linear, metaphysics, monism, motion
(absolute), mutation, negation, network, ontology, partiality,
perpetuity, phase, philosophy, plan, plausible, pluralism, positive,
quanta, quantization, reality, recognition, recursion, reference,
scintillation, self, sema, semasiology, [Peircean]semiosy,
semiot, semiotics, simple, social, spirit, spontaneity, state,
stochastic, symmetry, temporality, think, transmutation,
ubiquity, unbecoming, uncertainty, understand, [Vv]alue, wave,
Doug's view is that we cann¤t do our due re
comparisons without, goalwise, being capable and having capacity
to both understand and describe those terms comparatively,
both classical and quantum. Many of our QELRs of
those terms are now revised toward that goal.
QELR revisioning represents much of Doug's endeavor over past
. . .
We must grasp a core success
issue here: Quantonics is Strategic.
Doug's efforts here on evolution
as Value vis-à-vis value, in Doug's opinion, elucidates
Quantonics' strategic Value.
Too, we grasp how understanding evolution requires a baser familiarity
issues surrounding both equilibrium and its
Chaos is equilibrium's master by quantum memeo of flux masters
stux AKA spontaneity explains (masters) inertia. Doug - 25Aug2012.
Then we may infer, "Understanding both equilibrium
and chaos are core success issues relevant evolution."
Doug is focusing much of his attention on those issues and many
of their assumed relevancies now and recently over a period of
Compare Carlo Suares' "Aleph
(chaos) masters Yod (equilibria)," in his Cipher
of Genesis, pp. 80-81, Shambala, 1970.
Compare Carl G. Jung's "Spirit of the Depths masters Spirit
of this Time," in his Red Book, Liber Primus, Norton,
Doug - 27Jan2013.
Doug's tentative set of
graphics (See A Quantum
Cuneiform Primer, and graphics below.) compare classical evolution-chaos
and quantum æv¤luti¤n~cha¤s.
Doug is story boarding those now. Writing about them here will
assist that story boarding process (evolution of those graphics),
and fecundate a better textbook product.
Doug's last sentence, essentially
and quintessentially, describes what is greatest Topic
1 narrative Value
in terms of assessing PBings
of classical vis-à-vis quantum evolution, its equilibria
Suares claims that human
kind must embrace Aleph (chaosq) over Yod
Chaosq wins. Equilbriac lose (e.g., Hyman
Minsky's 'stabilityc'). Win-lose what? Cosmic~reality's
Doug isn't sure about this, but it appears Jung crowned himself
near end of Liber Secundus.
Crowned himself what? A winner for embracing Spirit of the Depths'
Doug - 27Jan2013, 12Feb2013 - Add classical
quantum subscripts to clarify quantum~hyper
From his story boarding
so far, Doug has emersed at least one strategic-comparative epiphany:
Doug's epiphany desnouers
a plethora, a horn of plenty, an abundance of strategic potentia
for human kind during its Millennium III self~other evolutionings.
classical facets of evolution:
- state-event ontology
- serial product obsolescence (fathom Thomas
Kuhn's 'scientific paradigms')
- Newtonian object-reality
quantum facets of evolution:
- in situ autotransmutation ontology
healing (ponder a quantum~circle)
- quantum wave~reality
To autodidactically prepare yourself for this avalanche of abundance
see Doug's coining of emerscenture
and read about a Harley gas tank's self~evolution.
An enormous strategem may become eidetic for you: emerscenture
is 'green.' Classical manufacturing is an antithesis
Emerscenture doesn't litter our planet with 'throw aways,' and
planned obsolescence, i.e., classical, 'products.'
Apple's iPhone is nearly there: they only need a quantum
leap of emerscenturing imagination.
Classical manufacture proliferates endless series of aging-obsolete
which require decommissioning and recycling-dumping.
Strategic HotMeme "Classical
manufacturing's reproduction is dead!"
Quantonics Strategic HotMeme.
A metaphor of that HotMeme
might be "...classical ontological state-event evolution
of product is dead." That's our take-away.
Words are easy, though.
Doing it and making that great leap from classical to quantum
offers enormous challenges and changes in what we believe, think,
write, say and do.
To Doug our issue, bottom
line, is quantum 'evolution of product.' Quantum~emerscenture
We compared classical-manufacture and reproduction of product,
and showed its classical inferiorities.
We de(omni)scribe quantum~emerscenture.
We aren't worrying nowings
about how we make it happen.
Three years ago, in Doug's
2009 HodgePodge, Doug wrote this in his 21Nov2009 edition,
Steve Jobs' iPhones evolve
their content (in situ). Whatings nextings? Steve Jobs'
hardware evolves (in situ)!
|"Dialectic believes mechanism is about
reproduction. Quantum rhetoric shows financial innovation is
about evolution, quantum~evolution of systems. <br> Quantum
systems do n¤t just rearrange 'standard parts,' rather
they perpetually emersce n¤væl m¤dælings.
Exemplar? Compare Bell Telephone's antique phone 'technology'
to Steve Jobs' iPhones."
gas tank programmed evolution strategem.
That's about as strategic
as one may be...in Doug's opine.
If you want to see a great
exemplar of in situ which hasn't evolved to a point of
'physical' (fermionic) in situ evolution, see A. I. Artificial
Intelligence DVD, 2001.
Many of those software (~bosonic) evolvable (love[v]able?) beings
are throw-aways. Actually humans are too, but they last about
Goal is to emerscenture
'physical' which can both hardware and software morph into several
Countless issues and n¤væl quantum~requirements here
unobtainable using classical notions, ideas, and formal objective
. . .
We have to put all that together in some kind of systemic
omniscription which makes fathoming and understanding easier.
Partially and more recently Doug is developing some novel graphics
to assist in that regard.
Let's review some of that effort to, perhaps, enhance
our individual complementarospectives:
A Quantum Cuneiform
Applied Quantum Cuneiform
Following two graphics are gedankenments (thought tools,
nous tools) for Doug.
Doug is unsure of their quality and abilities to describe both
quantum~relative low and
gradience chaos energies
and their implicit quantum~complementarities.
Doug is unsure whether to share them with you, but thinks some
of you may benefit from seeing Doug's thought processings.
They may assist you in seeing Doug's struggles with
issues surrounding chaos and equilibria,
especially gradiencings of chaos and their quantum~relative descriptive
Keep in mind a Doug HotMeme
that chaos measures
equilibria (i.e., equilibrium as varying in its quantum~relative
stability vav instability).
It may be OK to view 10-4 o'clocks as complementary,
and 8-2 o'clocks as complementary.
Comparisons of LGC and HGC gradiencings are very subjective!
Too, and this may further complicate our gedankenments,
LGC and HGC are quantum~complementary.
(perhaps not so) Clearly quantum~uncertainty reigns
here, but we already
assume that in our HotMeme
"Embrace uncertainty, embrace indetermination."
So we, "...boldly go where (and when)..."
It will take awhile to make this simpler and to correlate
it with our recent efforts in A Quantum Cuneiform Primer.
See link above.
. . .
Above two graphics aren't
simple to understand. If you disagree, try to understand them
A key enigma of those graphics
is an aspect of quantum~reality which enthusiasts and aficionados
of classical-reality ignore: rqcs.
Radical quantum comtext
sensitivity partially explains complexity of those two quantum~relative
Our assessments of better
and worse are radically comtext sensitive. See detail arrow
We see here why so many classical-critics of quantum~theory describe
it as, "sophist, prevaricative, equivocal, perverse, etc."
You may see why Doug spends so much time on QELR, coining novel
dealing with language problematics, and innovating new
philosophial~wayves of thinkqing.
Doug - 25Aug2012.
Sometimes a low gradient increase in energy change in chaos is
better, sometimes worse.
Simply, that is partial essence of rqcs: ie., from any classical
conspective, "sophism, prevarication, equivocation,
A quantum way to express
this memeo is
that LGC and HGC memes are not only quantum~relative,
rqcs, they are enthymemetic
too: partial~hologra[[il][m][ph]]ic coquecigrues
Doug has some new graphics
to help you more easily learn a quantum~wayve of viewing this,
hopefully it will show itself compatible with Doug's quantum~cuneiform.
In evolving equilibrium~chaos
changings, lots is going on all mixed together.
This kind of processing is omnifficult for most humans to wrap
their noodles around.
Thus: graphics as a memory (mæmæ¤ry)
asked Doug, "Doug, Why has your work on Chaos-Equilibria
been so omnifficult?"
Here is Doug's 20Dec2012
response to Dale's query:
Doug - 20Dec2012.
See whether these are self
evident based upon Doug's remarks just above:
Worse, Better, Energy coquecigruesical graphic tools.
Increasing energy LGC:
Decreasing energy LGC:
Increasing energy HGC:
Decreasing energy HGC:
Most frequently Doug will
use left most columns showing better and worse under
at least four equilibria~chaos energy~changing
Doug will use third column
when it is necessary to exhibit a both~and of better and
Fourth column likely will
be seldom~used except to "make explicit" arrows are
showing energy~changing regimes combined with better, worse,
and better and worse.
21Aug2012 - Doug.
Dialectically 'chaos' is a 'state.' Dialectically 'equilibrium'
is a 'state.' Dialectically chaos, equilibria, and all other
reified reality, by canon 'law,' cannot 'evolve.'
Dialectically 'chaos' is 'opposite' 'equilibrium.' Classical
binary alternative denial: BAD AKA classical negation's 'contradiction.'
Negation cannot 'be' in quantum~reality due quantum~complementarity
of only positive flux.
In quantum~reality flux cancellation takes classical negation's
is a process (flux), an evolutionary process (fluxe
of fluxp, FoF):
variable rate absolute fractal~recursive change (flux). Quantumly
a process, an evolutionary process: variable rate stochastic
uncertainty. Key here is seeing, "Chaos
are ihn equilihbria
and equilihbria are ihn
chaos: n¤n classically
'contradictory,' n¤n classically negatable quantum~flux~complementation."
AKA "Sophism." Quantum~redemption!
Quantumly 'chaos' is complementary
'equilibrium.' Compare down and up. Compare wrong and right.
Compare east and west. Compare position and momentum. Etc. Quantum~HotMeme
"Either-or n¤ more!"
Dialectically theory is "value-free." I.e., classical
'science' is value-free. Classical 'science' says, following
Hume, "There is 'no' bridge twixt fact and Value."
See Doug's January,
2007 TQS News for detail.
Quantumly reality is 'not' dialectically "value-free,"
rather is holographically~pragma~empirically "Value~full."
View pragma here as roughly: transmutative interrelationshipings'
ubiquitous and perpetual scintilla enabled by ubiquitous and
perpetual quantization of flux. See graphical QVH loop in QVH Table.
But Value is radically quantum~flux~interrelativ[[e][ity]] (rqfi)
and radically quantum~comtext sensitiv[[e][ity]] (rqcs):
quantum~holographic. For example, a hot stove is great for cooking
but horrible for sitting (Pirsig). A bullet is good for shooting
animal protein and horrible for shooting humans. All of reality
is flux Value~relative like that. Much omnifficulty(ings). "Flux
can explain 'state,' but 'state' cannot explain flux." Bergson,
paraphrased. See QQA on 'measure.'
More challenging ... both chaos and equilibria have evolving
Value has evolving gradience(ings). We can
monitor (omnitor) (inter)relative Value based upon rqcs and relative
flux rates and their gradience(ings). But gradience of Value
has gradience too (gradience of gradience, GoG) so it too is
Value (inter)relative. We see manifesta of systemic fractal~recursion
very similar, e.g., velocity (Value) vav acceleration (gradience
That scratches surface of our omnifficulties. Exegesis of 'how'
quantum~reality 'works' in those terms is n¤n trivial
(perhaps only for Doug). I understood none of this two years
ago!!! Of late, gradually, I am becoming one with it...
I am working on it, (a never ending story...)
Doug - 20Dec2012.
Here is Doug's effort on
using tools, Believe-Think-Write-Say-Do, plus up and down arrows
to compare evolutionq,
23Aug2012, 5Feb2013 - Doug
did significant updates to above link's web page.
Doug is also working on
new graphics which will show systemic equilibrium changes
both classically (Planck clock off state-event ontology),
and quantumly (Planck clock on in situ transmutationings
Fathom how latter m¤dals financial, economic, and political
more really as we experience them evolving gradually, day-by-day.
Thank you for reading,
Topic 1 will take some time...a
familiar refrain 'tis... and you may quantum~pneumatically
Doug - 18-20-21,23,25Aug2012.
Topic 1 Notes:
1 - Readers re cognize this is same issue recurring which manifested
for Doug during his short stay on 'The Lila Squad.' Pirsig refereed this issue for
us. Was he on a Good track?
2 - Maths, classical maths, are bogus in Doug's opinion. To
grasp why Doug makes this claim, see his Suggested
Requirements for a Quantum Mathematics.
To contact Quantonics write to or call:
Suite 18 #368 1950 East Greyhound Pass
Carmel, INdiana 46033-7730
©Quantonics, Inc., 2011-2029 — Rev. 2Jul2015
PDR — Created 17Aug2012 PDR
(21-23Aug2012 rev - Add energy changing regime graphics as tools.
Clean up and add some clarifying text. Compare 'c' vav 'q' evolution
(25Aug2012 rev - Repair a typo and offer exegeses of chaos as
master of equilibrium. Add top of page Value link to Chapter 3,
PBing 17 on Value. Update recent text edits.)
(31Aug2012 rev - Add [Bergsonian]duration to list of QELR revisioning
(7Sep2012 rev - Add some QELR revisioning terms.)
(11Oct2012 rev - Add 'Real Value' link to Doug's QELR of Value
near page top. Add a question mark nearby...)
(20Dec2012 rev - Add Doug's response to Dale's query, "Why
has your work on Chaos-Equilibria been so omnifficult?")
(27Jan2013 rev - Add 'Chaos as Master of Equilibria' anchor to
20Aug2012, 7Sep2012 segment of 2012 Hodgepodge. Add Suares'
and Jung's chaos masters equilibria comparisons.)
(5Feb2013 rev - Update web page 'http://www.quantonics.com/C4T1_Belief_Evolve_CvavQ.html'
on quantum vav classical evolution.)
(12Feb2013 rev - Update 27Jan2013 'updates' with quantum vav classical
subscripts omnistinguishing chaosq
(29Apr2014 rev - Repair missing right parenthesis near Minsky.
Reset legacy markups. Make page current.)
(2Jul2015 rev - Repair Qycloid link.)