In The Beginning Was The Word Quantum~Remediated by Doug Renselle

In [The] Beginning(s)...Was(Is) [The] Word(ings)...

by Doug Renselle - 8May2014

Are you familiar with Magdalene's Fourth Gospel?

It's narrative commences, paraphrased by Doug,

"In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was God, and the Word was with God.
The Word became flesh and dwelt among us with grace and truth."

Of all biblical texts, for Doug, that is most impressive.

Why?

It is Gnostic (wisdom of sophia, wisdom as feminine),
it is Sepher Yetsiral (a book of life's formation),
it partially unentangles Sefirot (a tree of life),
it is Qabalic (how to play the game of life),
it is unlimited potentia (cosmic energy),
it is Autiot (quantum~linguistic),
it is cosmic~consciousness,
it is quantum (almost),
it is semasiological,
it is ontological,
etc.

"But Doug, What isn't it?"

Quantum~Remediated.

"So, just do it!"

OK, then, remediated it becomings...

"Perpetually evolving are all Wordings, and all Wordings are God, and all Wordings are with God.
All Wordings become flesh and ubiquitously dwell among us with grace and truth."

"Doug, omnistinguish that unremediated_c text and your remediation_q of it, please."

What linguistic and other facets, artefacts, features of that unremediated_c text stick out like a sore thumb? Let's make a list:


	past tense
	radical beginism
	singularism
	state-ism
	definiteness
	unity
	monism
	socialism_c
	dialectic (and its metastatic linguistic disease)
	classicism
	externalism
	universalism
	stuxicity
	six-focus
	probability
	death-dead (dead 'things')
	radical finalism (implied, inferred)
	temporality (monistic)
	specificity
	closure (conservation)
	dogma
	inclusion (only gnostic facet)
	etc.

To Doug, that (only partial) list shows us that translators of ancient biblical texts reified
(except for middle~inclusion) text's original linguistic (Qabalic, Sepher Yetsiral) semiosy.

We may choose to perceive a kind of Pirsigean Value reversal from Subject_q over Object_q to Object_c over Subject_c.

Suares explains, partially, what Doug is attempting to convey,
"The reversing of values, thanks to which the psyche_c anaesthetizes itself,
transforms at all costs a myth_q into an historical [probabilistic] reality whose existence
is violently denied by those who believe in a contradictory myth_q."
Page 202, Suares' Trilogy. Doug's subscripts and brackets.

Doug asks readers to compare Heraclitus' Diels Kranz B1 and B2 quotes.

"Doug, How would you quantum~remediate those classical linguistic facets?"

Like this,


	present~future tense
	using quantum~radicals like comtext~sensitivity
	quantons(monism,pluralism): coherent islandicity
	stindyanic~evolution assa quantons(scin,quan)
	quantum~uncertainty, indetermination
	omnity
	multiplicity
	socialism_q
	hologra
	quantumism and its plethora of cobenchmarkings
	finding one's inner
	islandic plurality
	fluxicity
	twelve-focus
	stochastics_q: pastings, nowings, futurings
	living~reality_q
	in all endings are new beginnings, there is n¤ 'end_c'
	atemporality (heterogeneous)
	genericityings_q cowithin specificityings_q
	openness (unlimited potentia)
	antinomial~complementarity; complamentalism
	radical_q middle~inclusion_q
	etc.

Doug's emphasis here, in his quantum~remediation is living~life_q hyper dead-death_c.

Jesus emphasized, "Living~Father," while denigrating, "dead-father (YahWeh) demiurge."

Here we see "dead-father" as Peteresque Earth's Satanic hegemon (Çatholiçism).

Doug says, "Worseship is about common reverence of dead icons (e.g., 'saints'). Bettership issi about Sepher
Yetsiral pragma as living iconoclasms:" Gnostic~individual agents of Qabalic action!

Classical language as evidenced by unremediated text above is dead, by dialectical 'intelligent design.'

Quantum language (Autiot) offers us an living analog, through individual's intuitive radical quantum~evolutionary unending redemptive~remediating processings.

Suares shows how classical mind and its static-stuxic-final-determinate facets worseships death:

""It may well be that the greatest error of the Christian dogma is the assertion that the Holy Ghost engendered an infant only once, and at a certain date..."

Can you fathom how 'christians' see Jesus as dead: an icon of radical finalism? An evolving reality cann¤t be classically dead!

However, Jesus told us (and this is Gaffney's Naassene Gnostic Secret) that Jesus is
perpetually and ubiquitously alive and pragmatic in all of us (who have found our inner).

He goes on to imply that said infant is reborne in all of us (all of Jesus' church of humanity) perpetually and ubiquitously:
Jesus expressed it allegorically restating, "In the (many novel and evolving) beginning(s)..." like this:

All of you, from Magdalene's Farewell Discourse, paraphrased by Doug,
"I am in you and you are in me. I am in God and God is in me. God is in you:"
i.e., "Aleph in Blood:" A~dam: Aleph~Dallet~Mem.

All of us are radical quantum~middle~inclusion~quantons living perpetually and ubiquitously.
Clearly that is n¤t a dead~father's sword-bearing incisit forcing us to worsehip dead iconic things.

8May2014 - Doug.
(I'm n¤t 'done' here...)

Doug Renselle
Quantonics, Inc.
Suite 18 #368 1950 East Greyhound Pass
Carmel, INdiana 46033-7730
USA
1-317-THOUGHT

Arches