Doug's translation of Magdalene XIX:1-10 verses

Doug's Translation
of
John XIX
[Rather, Magdalene XIX]
Verses 1-10
Mimicking Carlo Suares'
Thermodynamic Qabala

Regarding Magdalene XIX:1-10:

Doug is following a Hebrew version of John [Magdalene] which he found on Internet.

It is good to keep in mind that contemporary Hebrew, excepting Autiot and Gematria do not carry sema of Abraham's Autiot. Modern Hebrew idiom (apparently) carries little resemblance to symbols sema of Abraham's time. Doug is assuming that Abraham had a grasp of Autiot more metabolic than its modern versions' more intransigent objective, formal, dialectical idiom. Mosheh shows us a clear exemplar of that in his sema for Ehieh Esher Ehieh. Modern translator's view that as, "I am that I am." Mosheh, according Carlo Suares, said very metabolically, "Qabala witnesses Qabala." "I am that I am," ciphered as degenerate dialectic becomes much more objective Ani Be'Aatsmee Ani (i.e., "I am myself I am."). So what does Ehieh mean metabolically? This: Aleph~living, Yod living. Any Qabalist might say, "I am that I am," however, said Qabalist would not mean that Qabala witnesses itself. Suares claims that much modern sema and semasiology is abominable idiom when compared to Abraham's hermeneutics.

To retranslate Magdalene in Suares' quantum~hologral~fluxodynamic language, we need a legend of Autiot and their Gematria. Let's use Suares' Letter~Numbers as our reference:

Table of Autiot's 27 Letters in Three Rows of Nine
Transcribed from Carlo Suares' Cipher of Genesis
by
Doug Renselle
22Jul2010

Magdalene XIX:1	Magdalene XIX:2	Magdalene XIX:3	Magdalene XIX:4	Magdalene XIX:5	Magdalene XIX:6	Magdalene XIX:7
		Magdalene XIX:8	Magdalene XIX:9	Magdalene XIX:10

©Quantonics, Inc., 2017-2033

Retranslation of John_c XIX:1 assa Magdalene_q XIX:1

Any Fake Spins?

This chapter is interesting.

Pilate appears intimidated by YhShWh's proclamation, "I am before Abraham."
Pilate may be asking self, "What if YhShWh's claim holds?"

Genesis I:1 validates YhShWh's claim commencing: "BereShyt Bara Elohim..."
Therein lies one ancient answer to YhShWh's proclamation.

Suares shows us that YhShWh claims 'he' issi ~Aleph.1~.
Suares shows us in Cipher of Genesis that Bar means "Son of Aleph." Son of ~Aleph.[1 of ~Aleph.1000]~.

Iff anyone believes that they are all children of ~Aleph.1~.

"Doug what happens after that?"

Over simply, Ben Adam happens assa,
"Vital metabolic_q evolution_q of us_q via ~Aleph.1~ quantized cowithihn_q all of us_q, cowithihn_q our_q blood_q."

HotMeme™
"Beware any fake dialectical idiom which spins otherwise..."™
HotMeme™

"The first divine was the first rogue to meet the first fool." Voltaire.

Try this, "The first divine was the first rogue to dialectically spin and fake the first fool."

Any Fake Spins?

Doug - 1Sep2017.

Magdalene XIX Letter~Text Spelled Out
Gematria
Pronunciation
(some guesses)
An Internet Literal
(some altered by Doug)
Doug's Suaresian Qabalic Translation
Comcision

1 Aleph~Zayn
((1.7))
[Az:

..."Then;"
Then...]

2 Yod~Qof~Hhayt
(10.100.8)
[Yaqahh:

..."shall take;"
shall take and attempt to protect spiritings_q from dialectic...]
~{10 100}~ ~8~ ~{~{iso1000}~}~

3 Pay~Yod~Lammed~Tayt~Waw~Sammekh
(80.10.30.9.6.60)
[Pilatos:

..."Pilate;"
Pilate...]
~80.10.30.9~ ~{6 60}~ ~{~{iso1000}~}~

4 Aleph~Tav
((1.400))
[At:

..."thoroughly;"
thoroughly...]

5 Yod~Sheen~Waw~Ayn
(10.300.6.70)
[Yeshooaa:

..."YhShWh;"
YhShWh...]

6 Vav~Yod~Yod~Sammekh~Raysh
(6.10.10.60.200)
[Ve'Yeyeessar:

..."punish;"
punish via interrelative_q struggle...]
~{6 ~{~{10 10}~}~ ~60}~ ~200~ ~{~{iso1000}~}

. . .

"Qwf~cavitationing masculine fecundationings being divinely projected_q ihnto feminine fecundationings cowithihn_q cosmic emerqancyings."

Best allegory Doug can offer for that is, "sexual intercourse comceiving_q sperm and egg cowithihn_q a womb."

Of course, role_q and situationally_q that does n¤t fit here, at least n¤t apparently.

Webster's says this means punish. Perhaps this is etymologically a source of "fuck you?" LOL

Keep in mind a key quantum meme of Qabala: complementary_q~antinomialism_q.

In this role_q and situation_q:

quanton(punishment,reproduction)

quanton(hard~work,joy~of~newborn)

quanton(sexual~pleasure,laborious~struggle~of~birth)

Complementary_q~antinomialism_q really does make sense_q. Too, what Doug just showed you applies ubiquitously in Qabala. For example:

quanton(problem,solution): "Problems arera cowithihn_q solutions and solutions arera cowithihn_q problems."

problems nissin solutions

love nissin hate

good nissin evil

etc.

None of those pairs is dialectically lisr.

There is no 'opposition.'

Is tiger opposite you? 'Splain.

Is tiger in you and you in tiger?

Read Thomas Gospel, Scholars' Translation.

Doug - 1Sep2017.

7 Aleph~Tav~Waw
(1.400.6)
[Ato:

..."fecundly, thoroughly;"
fecundly, thoroughly...]

8 Bayt~Sheen~Waw~Tayt~Yod~finalMem
(2.300.6.9.10.600)
[Ba'Shotim:

..."using whips.;"
using whips....]
~2.300~ ~{6 ~9.10~ ~600}~ ~{~{iso1000}~}~

©Quantonics, Inc., 2017-2033

Then
shall take and attempt to protect spiritings_q from dialectic
Pilate
thoroughly
YhShWh
punish via interrelative_q struggle
fecundly, thoroughly
using whips.

Doug - 1Sep2017.

index

©Quantonics, Inc., 2017-2033

Retranslation of John_c XIX:2 assa Magdalene_q XIX:2

In verses two through six we see five more uses of ~Qof.100~.

These occurrences of cosmic vital~impetusings destroying dialectic are important translation_q mutatives_q of semantic_q Value_q.

They omnistinguish Doug's translation_q radically from traditional_c, so called, 'consecrated' canon_c.

One meme which interests Doug is how most of word spellings_q using ~Qof~ are, so far, omnique.

Doug - 1Sep2017.

Magdalene XIX Letter~Text Spelled Out
Gematria
Pronunciation
(some guesses)
An Internet Literal
(some altered by Doug)
Doug's Suaresian Qabalic Translation
Comcision

1 Vav~Aleph~Noun~Sheen~Yod
(6.1.50.300.10)
[Ve'Anashi:

..."And soldiers;"
And soldiers...]
~6~ ~{1 ~50.300~ ~10}~ ~{~{iso1000}~}~

2 Hay~Tsadde~Vayt~Aleph
(5.90.2.1)
[Ha'Tsavae:

..."of the standing army;"
of the standing army...]

3 Sheen~Raysh~Ghimel~Waw
(300.200.3.6)
[Sherago:

..."platted;"
platted...]
~{~{300 200}~ ~3}~ ~6~ ~{~{iso1000}~}~

4 Khaf~Tayt~Raysh
(20.9.200)
[Keter:

..."a crown;"
a crown...]
~{20 ~9~ ~200}~ ~{~{iso1000}~}~

5 Qof~Waw~Tsadde~Yod~finalMem
(100.6.90.10.600)
[Qootsim:

..."of thorny dialectic;"
of thorny dialectic from any existential_q structurationings_q...]
~{100 ~{6 ~90~ ~10}~ ~600}~ ~{~{iso1000}~}~

. . .

Wæ sææ only one standing wayve_q ihn this script: ~90~.

Rest of wayves_q represent_q QCS™ qwf~cavs:

both
~{100 ~{6 ~90~ ~10}~: declination from ~{100 to 10}~.
and
~{6 ~90~ ~10}~ ~600}~: exaltation from ~{6 to 600}~.

We may semiotically_q hermeneut_q both patterns_q overlapping_q on ~90~.

Tsadde represents existential structuration: ~90~.

As our link shows, all Tsadde appear to be measurable.
Thus all Tsadde arera quantum~assessable.

If all Tsadde arera quantum~assessable, any assessment_q may be used to re form, re emerq said evolveing_q Tsadde qwf~pattern of Value_q.

What wæ sææ here, role_q and situationally_q, is an explicit_q of Qof's hatred of any thorny dialectic from any qwf's wayve_q patterns_q of Value_q.

~{100 ~{6 ~90~ ~10}~: issi fecundly_q, qwf~cavitationally (metabolically) mutateing_q some existential_q ~Tsadde~.

as a result

~{6 ~90~ ~10}~ ~600}~: issi fecundly_q exalting_q (due removal of dialectic) said existential_q ~Tsadde~ ihnto and cowithihn_q cosmic biosphereings of isoenergyings.

Putting a thorny crown on YhShWh is an attempt to re forge his being, from spiritual into concrete Roman dialectic.

It's like calling him a christ, a kristos, a messiah, etc. Such behavior is to remake YhShWh into a phony Roman king.

To YhShWh 'Roman Kingship' represents Satan, the beast, the creature of Revelation. We have mentioned this many times prior.

Recall this is Peter's method forgery too, though Suares offers an apology on Peter's behalf. Similar an apology for Judas. Said forgery is part of a three millennial strategic plan to skirt all dialectic.

What an abomination.

Doug - 1Sep2017.

6 Vav~Yod~Sheen~Yod~Mem~Waw
(6.10.300.10.40.6)
[Ve'Yeshimo:

..."and put it;"
and put it...]
~{6 ~{~{10 ~300~ ~10}~}~ ~40~ ~6}~ ~{~{iso1000}~}~

7 Ayn~Lammed
((70.30))
[Aal:

..."upon;"
upon...]

8 Raysh~Aleph~Sheen~Waw
(2.1.300.6)
[Rosho:

..."his head;"
his head...]

9 Vav~Yod~Lammed~Bayt~Yod~Sheen~Hay~Waw
(6.10.30.2.10.300.5.6)
[Ve'Yelvishaho:

..."with a purple;"
with a purple...]
~{6 ~{10 ~{30 ~2~ ~10}~ ~300}~ ~5~ ~6}~ ~{~{iso1000}~}~

10 Mem~Ayn~Waw~Lammed
(40.70.6.30)
[Me'Aaol:

..."garment;"
garment...]

11 Aleph~Raysh~Ghimel~Mem~finalNoun
(1.200.3.40.700)
[Argemon:

..."array;"
array....]

©Quantonics, Inc., 2017-2033

And soldiers
of the standing army
platted
a crown
of thorny dialectic from any existential_q structurationings_q
and put it
upon
his head
with a purple
garment
array.

Doug - 1Sep2017.

index

©Quantonics, Inc., 2017-2033

Retranslation of John_c XIX:3 assa Magdalene_q XIX:3

Word 3 of this verse is important, perhaps so important it may be beyond qua of some to fathom.

Spend some time with Comcision there. To Doug, it unfolds a much better story.
A story not unlike one wæ arera experienceing k~n¤w~ings at MIII's beginning[s].

Doug - 1Sep2017.

Magdalene XIX Letter~Text Spelled Out
Gematria
Pronunciation
(some guesses)
An Internet Literal
(some altered by Doug)
Doug's Suaresian Qabalic Translation
Comcision

1 Vav~Yod~Ghimel~Sheen~Waw
(6.10.3.300.6)
[Ve'Yegesho:

..."And they came;"
And they came to witness YhShWh's demise, dialectically believing it as his eschaton...]
~{6 ~10~ ~{3 300}~ ~6}~ ~{~{iso1000}~}~

. . .

"Fecund qwf~cavitationings of all existenceings_q qwf~cavitationally exalted from ogranic movementings ihnto cosmic~metabolismings."

Column three represents all archetypal_q organic_q existential_q and cosmic metabolismings_q of actuality_q cowithihn_q ~{~{isofluxings}~}~.

Ihn this schema wæ sææ metabolic_q exaltation_q of all qwfal standing_q wayve_q existenceings_q cowithihn_q perpetual_q fecundationings_q.

If this ~10~ swf (standing_q wayve_q function_q of existenceings_q) is about YhShWh, then we find him metabolically_q coming to an end of his Bayt life_q trajectory_q cowithihn_q a prolific_q reality_q.

Bayt happens to all! Thence Veyn too recurs.

In this case, strategically_q, Bayt's happening is intentionally_q premature: by YhShWh's and Judas' complicit Last Supper accord.

Doug - 1Sep2017.

2 Aleph~Lammed~Yod~Waw
(1.30.10.6)
[Alio:

..."unto YhShWh;"
unto YhShWh,...]
~{1 ~30~ ~10}~ ~6~

3 Vav~Yod~Qof~Raysh~Aleph~Waw
(6.10.100.200.1.6)
[Veiqrao:

..."desiderate Romans' imposition of dialectic;"
desiderate Romans' imposition of dialectic and prevent fecund qwf~cavitationings of ~Qof.100's~ qwf~cavitational existential_q ~Yod.10~ to archetypal_q ~Aleph.1's~ Shyt~metabolic_q evolutionary_q desiderational_q reshapeings_q of ~Raysh.200~...]
~{6 ~{10 ~{100}~ ~200~ ~1}~ ~6}~ ~{~{iso1000}~}~

. . .

Roman Imposition of Dialectic

This word we have encountered prior. In Mag IV:40 word 4, and in Rev VII:10 word 1. In latter, Doug used desiderate as idiom. But we may, as an act of heresy, choose to view_q desiderate assa desire_q to eliminate dialectic.

A base meme we must obtain here is: those who are about to 'kill' YhShWh love dialectic. Antinomially, YhShWh hates dialectic.

One way our Veiqrao's Gematraic QCS™ script may be parsed issi:

"Fecund_q qwf~cavitationings of ~Qof.100's~ qwf~cavitational existential_q ~Yod.10~ to archetypal_q ~Aleph.1's~ Shyt~metabolic_q evolutionary_q desiderational_q reshapeings_q of ~Raysh.200~. "

Romans and Jews imposition of dialectic upon YhShWh, from YhShWh's antinomial_q complementarospective, is about as strategic as possible, since it, long term (approximately three millennia), solves what Doug refers, The System Problem.

But how does their imposition of dialectic strategically help us remove dialectic from our lives?

Doug responds, their imposition of dialectic garners a multi millennial strategic exposure to it, and we metabolically_q evolve_q learning_q gradually becomeing aware that wæ must stop using dialectic.

If we couch liaison nature metabolically_q evolveing_q us_q out of dialectic, that is a much omniffering story which requires much Peircean hypothetical guessing_q and plausible_q expectationings_q. So alternatively...

...Doug believes perhaps Neo sapiens arera imminent. Seven brain lobes, one corpus callosum, etc. Recall Jean Auel's Clan of the Cave Bear and its sequels. Neandertal and Cro Magnon being evolutionarily_q, metabolically_q replaced by Homo sapiens. Now its our turn.

Doug surmises two brain lobes have much to do with Pirsig's meme of a "genetic defect in human reason." Thus memetically "two lobes" has much to do with The System Problem.

Neocon elites shall soon be playing male protagonist roles autsimilar Pontius Pilate.

Pilate was a politician and elevated his political survival above a just assessment of YhShWh. YhShWh counted on this Pilatean dialectical-immaturity.

. . .

Assa BTW FYE:

Dialect issi Neev in Autiot.

Doug wants to make dialect into dialectic:

Neevteekh: Noun.Yod.Vayt.Tav.Yod.finalKhaf.

Using Doug's spelling: Nivtikh: |50.10.2.400.10.500|.

Realize how finalKhaf.500 issi an n¤n~columnar exaltation of Khaf.20. It is apropos to think_q of Khaf here in dialectical abstraction to satisfy a concrete_c semantic_c of Nivtikh.

If we allow linguistic_c kin and ken of Khaf and finalKhaf, then Doug can write that we concretely have two comtainments (Vayt, and finalKhaf) and one resistance (Tav) in Nivtikh, making it very dialectical, very classical.

. . .

Following Doug's premier exemplar from previous verse's Qootsim:

We see only one standing wayve ~200~: Raysh: cosmic comtainmentings, aka cosmic~emerqancyings.

It is good here to remind selves there are two classes of detending fluxes in Autiot's QR: column 2 of Autiot (con(m)tainers) and column 4 (resistanceings) of Autiot.

Both beg ESQ vav SQ vav DQ issues beyond scope of this comcision. Those categories roughly correspond |Mawt~HaMawt| vav ~Yod~ vav ~{~{Iht.iso.1000}~}~ in Qabala.

Let's look at two qwfal QCS™ clauses:

both
~{10 ~{100}~ ~200~: inclination from ~{10 to 100}~.
and
~{100}~ ~200~ ~1}~: declination from ~{100 to 1}~.

We may semiotically_q hermeneut_q both patterns_q overlapping_q on ~200~.

Raysh represents cosmic emerqancyings: ~200~.

As our link shows, all Raysh appear to be measurable.
Thus all Raysh arera quantum~assessable.

If all Raysh arera quantum~assessable, any assessment_q may be used to re form, re emerq said evolveing_q Raysh qwf~pattern of Value_q. Since Raysh is cosmic, Doug's surmise may be impractical. But realize how Qof too is cosmic. Doug senses Qof can shape~sema shift Raysh regardless. Another way to say~write this is, "QR metabolically_q evolves_q all."

Relate terms inclination and declination to quantum cuneiform.

Roman Imposition of Dialectic

Doug - 1Sep2017.

4 Yod~Hay~Yod
(10.5.10)
[Yehy:

...""Hail divine existence, living existence,;"
"Hail divine existence, living existence,...]
~{~{10 ~5~ ~10}~}~ ~{~{iso1000}~}~

. . .

In Qabala this means two existenceings, both alive.

In general any one existence is antinomial_q any other, even evolutionarily_q itself from moment to moment.

One may be living, other may be dying.

One may believe, other deny.

And so on...

. . .

Suares spends much time and narrative on this schema in his Cipher of Genesis.

You may fathom its deeply metaphysical usage in Gen I:3 word 3.

Doug - 1Sep2017.

5 Mem~Lammed~finalKhaf
(40.30.500)
[Melakh:

..."a king of;"
a king of...]
Romans are ridiculing_c YhShWh.

Now (strategically, two millennia later) wæ arera cowithihn_q timeings_q for paying it back... timeings_q for a little of our own ridiculeing_q and cajoleing_q.

Doug - 1Sep2017.

6 Hay~Yod~Hay~Waw~Dallet~Yod~finalMem
(5.10.5.6.4.10.600)
[Ha'Yehodim:

..."the Jews,";"
the Jews,"...]
~{5 ~{10 ~5}~ ~{6 ~4~ ~10}~ ~600}~ ~{~{iso1000}~}~

7 Vav~Yod~Khaf~Hay~Waw
(6.10.20.5.6)
[Ve'Yekhaho:

..."and with their hands;"
and their hands...]
~{6 ~10.20.5~ ~6}~ ~{~{iso1000}~}~

8 Ayn~Lammed
((70.30))
[Aal:

..."relentlessly;"
relentlessly...]
Doug could not fathom a better idiom for this role and situation.

Doug - 1Sep2017.

9 Hay~Lammed~Hhayt~Yod
(5.30.8.10)
[Ha'Lahhi:

..."struck his face.;"
struck his face....]
Clearly it isn't apparent that idiom agrees with this schema's gematria.

Vulgately Doug interprets, "Living existential_c metabolismings attempting to reify_c spirit_q."

Doug - 1Sep2017.

©Quantonics, Inc., 2017-2033

And they came to witness YhShWh's demise, dialectically believing it as his eschaton
unto YhShWh,
desiderate Romans' imposition of dialectic and prevent fecund qwf~cavitationings of ~Qof.100's~ qwf~cavitational existential_q ~Yod.10~ to...
...archetypal_q ~Aleph.1's~ Shyt~metabolic_q evolutionary_q desiderational_q reshapeings_q of ~Raysh.200~

"Hail divine existence, living existence,
a king of
the Jews,"

and their hands
relentlessly
struck his face.

. . .

Voltaire: "Composition of a tragedy requires testicles."

Doug just re watched Tadpole last evening...

Doug - 1Sep2017.

index

©Quantonics, Inc., 2017-2033

Retranslation of John_c XIX:4 assa Magdalene_q XIX:4

We see Pilate politically PC-masturbating here...literal bunk...

Doug - 1Sep2017.

Magdalene XIX Letter~Text Spelled Out
Gematria
Pronunciation
(some guesses)
An Internet Literal
(some altered by Doug)
Doug's Suaresian Qabalic Translation
Comcision

1 Vav~Yod~Sheen~Vayt
(6.10.300.2.10.600)
[Ve'Yeshevim:

..."And entered;"
And entered...]
~{6 ~{10 ~300.2~ ~10}~ ~600}~ ~{~{iso1000}~}~

. . .

"Fecund existential qwf~cavitationings of cosmic metabolismings of soma cowithihn cosmic biosphereings."

Keep in mind that 'enter' and 'leave' are antinomials_q. Which to say and write depends upon local and global roles_q and situations_q.

Doug - 23Aug2017.

2 Pay~Yod~Lammed~Tayt~Waw~Sammekh
(80.10.30.9.6.60)
[Pilatos:

..."Pilate;"
Pilate...]
~80.10.30.9~ ~{6 60}~ ~{~{iso1000}~}~

3 Vav~Yod~Tsadde~Aleph
(6.10.90.1)
[Ve'Yetsa:

..."and therefore went forth;"
and therefore went forth...]
~6~ ~{10 ~90~ ~1}~ ~{~{iso1000}~}~

Pilate, like Peter, is an strict adherent of dialectic (e.g., his three times dialectical denial of Yeshooaa). So Doug's retranslation of this schema omniffers one he does for YhShWh.

Doug - 21Aug2017.

4 Hay~Hhayt~Waw~Tsadde~Hay
(5.8.6.90.5)
[Ha'Hhotsah:

..."again;"
again,...]
~{5 ~8.6.90~ ~5}~ ~{~{iso1000}~}~

. . .

Esoterically, "Two antinomial lives of fecund spiritual structurationings."

Since "two lives" recurse, we may infer "...again..."

Unsure if that makes sense to you...

Doug - 1Sep2017.

5 Vav~Yod~Aleph~Mem~Raysh
(6.10.1.40.200)
[Ve'Yamer:

..."and saying;"
nd saying...]
~6~ ~{10 1}~ ~40.200~ ~{~{iso1000}~}~

6 Aleph~Lammed~Yod~Hay~finalMem
(1.30.10.5.600)
[Elihem:

..."unto them,;"
unto them,...]
~{1 ~30~ ~10}~ ~5.600~ ~{~{iso1000}~}~

7 Hay~Noun~Hay
(5.50.5)
[Hanah:

...""Behold_c;"
"Behold_c...]
~{5 ~{50}~ ~5}~ ~{~{iso1000}~}~

. . .

"Two antinomial_q divine_q life_q principleings_q."

Fathom Yehy just above, previous verse.

. . .

In this situation, in idiom, it means exoterically, "Behold_c!" Or very simply, "Objectively_c observe_c." LOL

Romanesque mechanical stux sux blares its ugly tone and tenor.

In Latin tenere means to hold: to sustain stux sux. LOL

Is that hold permanent? Tentative?

What do classicists mean by tentative when they worship state?

. . .

More deeply_q Hanah means divine_q livings_q arera always both livings_q and dyings_q. All about reality_q issi metabolic_q! All about reality_q evolves_q. Both life and death arera cowithihn_q both life and death.

~Livings~ and ~dyings~ nissin ~livings~ and ~dyings~: Noun!

Noun: ~{~{50}~}~: divine_q existential_q principleings_q of livings_q assa sempiternal quantons(livings_q,dyings_q),
sempiternal quantons(resurrection,apoptosis),...

However, Romans' Behold issi dialectical, very unquantum.

Doug - 1Sep2017.

8 Aleph~Waw~Tsadde~Yod~Aleph~Noun~Waw
(1.6.90.10.1.50.6)
[Autsiono:

..."the indicted I show;"
the indicted I show...]
~{1 ~{6 ~90~ ~{10}~ ~1}~ ~50~ ~6}~ ~{~{iso1000}~}~

. . .

"Antinomial_q ~Aleph.1s~ qwf~cavitating ~{fecund_q structurationings_q overlapping_q and cowithihn_q existenceings_q borne of fecund_q}~ life_q principleings_q."

It may be useful here to fathom ~Auts~ assa ~Aleph.1~ cowithihn_q existential_q structurationings_q. "Fecund ~Aleph.1~ ihn ~Tsadde~."

Compare to ~Aut~.

Doug! "What about ~Yaeno~? Closest Doug can find is torture.

If those memes work, we might have, "Torturing ~Alephic~ fecundity [proliferation] cowithihn_q all (YhShWh's) existential structures."

Doug - 1Sep2017.

9 Lammed~Phay~Noun~Yod~Khaf~finalMem
(30.80.50.10.20.600)
[Leefneykhem:

..."before you.;"
before you [before_q your song_q being_q sung_q...]....]
Proemial Nascence

Leefney Ha Sheray, Havayah Yeleed.

"Before the [y~¤ur] song_q being_q sung_q."

Song of Songs

Shyar Ha Shyarim Esher Le'Shalomoh.

"Qwfings (songs) of my qwfal~ings (singings) witness_q (omnitor) my peace_q."

Nature_q, with Iht's assistance, sings_q our_q songs_q...sempiternally...

Doug - 9Jul2017.

10 Lammed~Vayt~Ayn~Vayt~Waw~Raysh
(30.2.70.2.6.200)
[La'Va'Aavor:

..."to the intent you may wish,;"
to the intent_q you may wish_q ihn metabolic_q divine_q qwf~cavitationings of autodidactic_q enlightenmentings_q, that YhShWh might fecundate_q and proliferate_q endless omniversal emerqancyings_q,...]
~30~ ~{~{2 ~70~ ~2}~}~ ~6.200~ ~{~{iso1000}~}~

To Doug this issi an omniscriptioning of one life's hermaphroditic_q, stochastic_q variegated trajectories.

Individual_q heretical_q chanceings_q, chooseings_q, and changeings_q.

Adjust situation_q and role_q of this schema...

Doug - 7Feb2107, 21Feb2017, 25,30Jun2017.

11 Thav~Dallet~Ayn~Waw
(400.4.70.6)
[Tha'Daao:

..."and know;"
and know...]
~{400 4}~ ~70.6~ ~{~{iso1000}~}~

. . .

Compare Tao and Daao.

For latter two thirds of Doug's life he has tended to pronounce Tao assa Dao.

Strange!

Tao often means 'the way.' "To know the way."

Qua means 'the way,' 'a way.' ~Qua~qua~ means 'in whatever way.'

Latter begs "...embrace indeterminationings_q, embrace quantum~uncertaintyings."

The way, however, tends to beg classical determination, predication, strict determinism.

Definite articles are BAD words in QR.

Doug - 20Ap42017.

12 Kaf~Yod
((20.10))
[Ki:

..."that;"
that...]

13 Lammed~Aleph
((30.1))
[Lo:

..."not;"
not...]

14 Mem~Tsadde~Aleph~Tav~Yod
(40.90.1.400.10)
[Metsati:

..."do I find;"
do I find...]
~{40 ~90~ ~{1 ~400}~ ~10}~ ~{~{iso1000}~}~

15 Vayt~Waw
((2.6))
[Vo:

..."in him;"
in him...]

16 Ayn~Waw~finalNoun
(70.6.700)
[Aaoon:

..."any crime.;"
any crime."...]
~{70 ~6~ ~700}~ ~{~{iso1000}~}~

. . .

Recall how Simon (Peter), spelled out issi ~Sheen~Yod~Mem~Ayn~Waw~finalNoun~.

"Existential name of crime."

We see directly Pilate's obscene political masturbation. Ugh!

Some call it CYAing, CYBing.

But...all part of that strategic three millennial prophecy...

Doug - 1Sep2017.

©Quantonics, Inc., 2017-2033

And entered
Pilate
and therefore went forth
again,
and saying
unto them,

"Behold_c
the indicted I show
before you, [...before_q your song_q being_q sung_q...]
to the intent_q you may wish_q ihn metabolic_q divine_q qwf~cavitationings of autodidactic_q enlightenmentings_q,...
...that YhShWh might fecundate_q and proliferate_q endless omniversal emerqancyings_q,
and know
that
not
do I find
in him
any crime."

Doug - 1Sep2017.

index

©Quantonics, Inc., 2017-2033

Retranslation of John_c XIX:5 assa Magdalene_q XIX:5

Doug - 1Sep2017.

Magdalene XIX Letter~Text Spelled Out
Gematria
Pronunciation
(some guesses)
An Internet Literal
(some altered by Doug)
Doug's Suaresian Qabalic Translation
Comcision

1 Vav~Yod~Tsadde~Aleph
(6.10.90.1)
[Ve'Yetsa:

..."And therefore went forth;"
And therefore went forth...]
~6~ ~{10 ~90~ ~1}~ ~{~{iso1000}~}~

Pilate, like Peter, is an strict adherent of dialectic (e.g., Peter's three times dialectical denial of Yeshooaa). So Doug's retranslation of this schema omniffers one he does for YhShWh.

Doug - 21Aug2017.

2 Yod~Sheen~Waw~Ayn
(10.300.6.70)
[Yeshooaa:

..."YhShWh;"
YhShWh...]

3 Hay~Hhayt~Waw~Tsadde~Hay
(5.8.6.90.5)
[Ha'Hhotsah:

..."again;"
again,...]
~{5 ~8.6.90~ ~5}~ ~{~{iso1000}~}~

. . .

Esoterically, "Two antinomial lives of fecund spiritual structurationings."

Since "two lives" recurse, we may infer "...again..."

Unsure if that makes sense to you...

Doug - 1Sep2017.

4 Noun~Seen~Aleph
(50.300.1.6)
[Nassoo:

..."they took him in;"
they took him wearing...]

5 Kaf~Tav~Raysh
(20.400.200)
[Keter:

..."a crown;"
a crown...]
~{20 ~400~ ~200}~ ~{~{iso1000}~}~

. . .

YhShWh Hates Being Called Christ

Why? Like this:

Be keen to grasp all three of those Aut are about:
both comtainmentings (~20~ ~?~ ~200~)
and resistanceings (~?~ ~400~ ~?~).

Can you imagine how a king's crown (of dialectic, of state-ic stux sux resistance and comtainment) would stultify all of his enlightened fluxodynamic character and integrity?

Do you understand how YhShWh hated self being referred a "king?" Being called a "christ?"
Actually name of crime (Simon) Peter called him "the Christ."

To Doug that is a bigger betrayal than YhShWh's apparent crucifixion. Voltaire... comes to mind...

To offer that some comtext: Peter was martyred by 'the king loving Roman chruch.'

Can you imagine 'the chruch' being so ignorant and hylic to think it could crucify ~Bere~Shyt~?

Wearing any crown, to YhShWh is like forsaking Qabala, Autiot, Gematria, Gnosis, Sepher Yetsira, and Sefirot!

YhShWh simply will not do that. If he did he could be accepting dialectic as his language and belief system.

No way!!!

Doug - 1Sep2017.

YhShWh Hates Being Called Christ

6 Hay~Qof~Waw~Tsadde~Yod~finalMem
(5.100.6.90.10.600)
[Ha'Qootsim:

..."of thorny dialectic;"
of thorny dialectic from any existential_q structurationings_q,...]
~5~ ~{100 ~{6 ~90~ ~10}~ ~600}~ ~{~{iso1000}~}~

. . .

Ignoring ~Hay~ wæ sææ only one standing wayve_q ihn this script: ~90~.

Rest of wayves_q represent_q QCS™ qwf~cavs:

both
~{100 ~{6 ~90~ ~10}~: declination from ~{100 to 10}~.
and
~{6 ~90~ ~10}~ ~600}~: exaltation from ~{6 to 600}~.

We may semiotically_q hermeneut_q both patterns_q overlapping_q on ~90~.

Tsadde represents existential structuration: ~90~.

As our link shows, all Tsadde appear to be measurable.
Thus all Tsadde arera quantum~assessable.

If all Tsadde arera quantum~assessable, any assessment_q may be used to re form, re emerq said evolveing_q Tsadde qwf~pattern of Value_q.

What wæ sææ here, role_q and situationally_q, is an explicit_q of Qof's hatred of any thorny dialectic from any qwf's wayve_q patterns_q of Value_q.

~{100 ~{6 ~90~ ~10}~: issi fecundly_q, qwf~cavitationally (metabolically) mutateing_q some existential_q ~Tsadde~.

as a result

~{6 ~90~ ~10}~ ~600}~: issi fecundly_q exalting_q (due removal of dialectic) said existential_q ~Tsadde~ ihnto and cowithihn_q cosmic biosphereings of isoenergyings.

Putting a thorny crown on YhShWh is an attempt to re forge his being, from spiritual into concrete Roman dialectic.

It's like calling him a christ, a kristos, a messiah, etc. Such behavior is to remake YhShWh into a phony Roman king.

To YhShWh 'Roman Kingship' represents Satan, the beast, the creature of Revelation. We have mentioned this many times prior.

Recall this is Peter's method forgery too, though Suares offers an apology on Peter's behalf. Similar an apology for Judas. Said forgery is part of a three millennial strategic plan to skirt all dialectic.

What an abomination. (n¤t the strategic skirting, rather those forging YhShWh's role and situation, abstractly, using dialectic)

Doug - 1Sep2017.

7 Vav~Mem~Ayn~Yod~Lammed
(6.40.70.10.30)
[Ve'Me'Aail:

..."and up above;"
and up above...]

8 Hay~Aleph~Raysh~Ghimel~Mem~finalNoun
(5.1.200.3.40.700)
[Ha'Argemon:

..."the array;"
the array, of living_q vital impetusings cosmically comtaining biospheric organic_q movementings_q cosmically quantizing life_q principleings_q,...]

9 Ayn~Lammed~Yod~Waw
(70.30.10.6)
[Aalio:

..."one fecund existential metabolic light;"
one_q fecund_q existential_q metabolic_q light_q, ~Aleph.1~'s light_q,...]
Doug takes this as QED light_q of YhShWh's ~Aleph.1~.

We may choose to associate purple and heliotrope (assa light of sun, son).

Doug - 26Aug2017, 1Sep2017.

10 Vav~Yod~Aleph~Mem~Raysh
(6.10.1.40.200)
[Ve'Yamer:

..."and saying;"
and saying...]
~6~ ~{10 1}~ ~40.200~ ~{~{iso1000}~}~

11 Aleph~Lammed
((1.30))
[Al:

..."to them;"
to them...]

12 Phay~Yod~Lammed~Tayt~Raysh~Sammekh
(80.10.30.9.200.60)
[Philatrass:

..."Pilate said;"
Pilate said,...]

13 Hay~Noun~Hay
(5.50.5)
[Hanah:

...""Behold_c;"
"Behold_c...]
~{5 ~{50}~ ~5}~ ~{~{iso1000}~}~

. . .

"Two antinomial_q divine_q life_q principleings_q."

Fathom Yehy just above, previous verse.

. . .

In this situation, in idiom, it means exoterically, "Behold_c!" Or very simply, "Objectively_c observe_c." LOL

Romanesque mechanical stux sux blares its ugly tone and tenor.

In Latin tenere means to hold: to sustain stux sux. LOL

Is that hold permanent? Tentative?

What do classicists mean by tentative when they worship state?

. . .

More deeply_q Hanah means divine_q livings_q arera always both livings_q and dyings_q. All about reality_q issi metabolic_q! All about reality_q evolves_q. Both life and death arera cowithihn_q both life and death.

~Livings~ and ~dyings~ nissin ~livings~ and ~dyings~: Noun!

Noun: ~{~{50}~}~: divine_q existential_q principleings_q of livings_q assa sempiternal quantons(livings_q,dyings_q),
sempiternal quantons(resurrection,apoptosis),...

However, Romans' Behold issi dialectical, very unquantum.

Doug - 1Sep2017.

14 Hay~Ghimel~Vayt~Raysh
(5.3.2.200)
[Ha'Gever:

..."the male man.;"
the male man."...]
~5.3~ ~{2 200}~ ~{~{iso1000}~}~

. . .

Do you see how berating, how deprecating this word Gever is, to refer ~Aleph~Sheen~Waw~Ayn~
assa
|~Hay~Ghimel~Vayt.2~Raysh.200~|!

Even biologically we know that no man is a pure man. All men arera haploidally hermaphroditic: quantons(X,Y).

Can you imagine YhShWh being somatically exalted into comtainment? Perhaps that is what crucifixion is expected to accomplish?

A dialectician's mafia dream to plant YhShWh in classical formal mechanical Roman concrete...

"Oh, but Doug, it is a digital world."

From mouths of lemmings...

Doug - 1Sep2017.

©Quantonics, Inc., 2017-2033

And therefore went forth
YhShWh
again,
they took him wearing
a crown
of thorny dialectic from any existential_q structurationings_q,
and up above
the array, of living_q vital impetusings cosmically comtaining biospheric organic_q movementings_q cosmically quantizing life_q principleings_q,
one_q fecund_q existential_q metabolic_q light_q, ~Aleph.1~'s light_q,
and saying
to them
Pilate said,

"Behold_c
the male man."

Doug - 1Sep2017.

index

©Quantonics, Inc., 2017-2033

Retranslation of John_c XIX:6 assa Magdalene_q XIX:6

From first 10 verses of Chapter XIX, this is last of those 10 verses to use ~Qof~.

This verse moves us into a n¤væl pneumatic realm_q.
Our reading uncovers a meme of radical antinomialism_q and what it means for what we refer life.

. . .

Classically we live_c once and die_c once. According classical myth 'jesus' lived_c once and died once_c. Giggles...

'Da chruch' has pushed this crap into y~¤ur minds for centuries, about 16 centuries.

Suares exposes this Aristotelian, Thomas Aquinas hylic idea thus:

"It may well be that the greatest error of the Christian dogma is the assertion that the
Holy Ghost engendered an infant [YhShWh] only once, and at a certain date."
Suares' Trilogy, p. 208 of 549 total pages, Shambhala 1985 paperback.
Doug's brackets.

This is a most damaging error by 'the chruch' against itself and explains much of current
'chruch's' unstoppable regression...its persistent throes of dying leading to its 'dead-death.'

Recall how Revelation roughly equates: error, the beast, evil, the creature, the devil, dialectic, and satan.
Revelation shows us that we must destroy dialectic
[study carefully all ~Qof~ occurrences there]
to exit, exodus our "genetically defective" self imposed hell_c.

Let's get detail, down and dirty!

YhShWh self declares: "I am before Abraham." How could he have been born on a specific date?

YhShWh self declares: "I am ~Aleph.1~" How could anyone crucify ~Aleph.1~?

YhShWh self declares (Doug is paraphrasing here): "I am hologral flux:"
qwfal~middle~inclusion:
quantons(us,YhShWh),
quantons(YhShWh,God),
quantons(us,God) refer Mag XIV:11-17.

"Therefore God is in you."

See Doug's Last Supper Farewell Discourse for those references from The NIV Study Bible.

In Doug's retranslation of Magdaleneq those references aren't that obvious.
Sustain awarenessings that all three of those quantons distill to "Ben Adam."
Most people translate Ben Adam as "son of man."
However in Suaresian Autiot translation Ben Adam means "Evolution of Aleph in Blood."

. . .

Reread Doug's midrash from Magdalene_q XVIII:26:

So Peter is a liar, a multiplicate prolific liar. He lied again and called YhShWh 'the christ.'
See Magdalene VI:69, word 8.
YhShWh said (Mark VIII:33) to Peter then, "Get away from me [dialectical] Satan!"
See also Matthew XVI:16,20, Mark VIII:29,33 and Luke IX:20-21.

This liar is Pater of c a t h o l i c i s m? And we find that it lies too, prolifically.
Note: To lie_c requires one's adherence_c to dialectic's OSFA analytic_c, genetically defective, sociopathic_c principles_c.

Recall Gnosis regarding stux: "Principle_c rules_c something not itself," and "Monism_c is deceit."
See G. R. S. Mead.
Qabala shows us: "Adhere metabolic_q memes_q of flux_q."
Both QC and AI must adhere_q Qabala!!! Doug - 11Aug2017.
Follow Carlo Suares.

See Doug's remediations of truth_cq, logic_cq, judgment, etc.

. . .

One symptom of dialectic is 'a few ruling many.' Some refer this 'democracy.' Really it is hegemony.
Read Alexis de Tocqueville.

Gnostic individuals rule themselves, but they must embrace quantum memes to do~due that and avoid social conflict.

Doug has two referrals for you on what he sees as potential approaches to solving this social, societal, sociopathic problem:

Mae~wan Ho's rainbow and the worm re: coherent autonomy,
and
Dana Zohar's Quantum Society, and Quantum Self.

Both Mae~wan and Dana, in Doug's opine, emphasize a kind of gnosis_q without saying so explicitly.

Doug - 2Sep2017.

Magdalene XIX Letter~Text Spelled Out
Gematria
Pronunciation
(some guesses)
An Internet Literal
(some altered by Doug)
Doug's Suaresian Qabalic Translation
Comcision

1 Vav~Raysh~Aleph~Sheen~Yod
(6.200.1.300.10)
[Ve'Reshi:

..."And therefore when chiefs;"
And therefore when chiefs of largeness,...]
~6~ ~{200 ~{1 ~300}~ ~10}~ ~{~{iso1000}~}~

2 Hay~Kaf~Hay~Noun~Yod~finalMem
(5.20.5.50.10.600)
[Ha'Kohenim:

..."the priests,;"
the priests, some of those grailing_q prevaricating ascensionings_q of life_q and life's_q principleings_q ihnto existenceings_q priestly cosmic biosphereings,...]
~{5 ~20~ ~{5}~ ~50}~ ~10.600~ ~{~{iso1000}~}~

3 Vav~Hay~Mem~Sheen~Raysh~Hhayt~Yod~finalMem
(6.5.40.300.200.8.10.600)
[Ve'Ha'Me:

..."they cried out;"
in cowithihnitnessings_q exaltationings_q they cried out from their lives_q and biosphereings lifted_q spiritually_q ihnto cosmic biosphereings...]
~{6 ~5~ ~{40 ~{300 200}~ ~8.10~ ~600}~}~ ~{~{iso1000}~}~

. . .

Two stand alone ~qwfal~patterns~ are apparent:

~5~: Hay, life,
and
~8.10~ ~Hhi, spirit in existenceings.

Three cavitationing ~qwfal~patterns~ are apparent:

That ~{6 600}~: exaltation of cowithihnitnessings (proliferationings_q) ihnto cosmic biosphereings offers a really neat overall situation.

That ~{40 600}~: exaltation_q of biosphereings of ~{Shera}~ ~Hhi~ ihnto cosmic biosphereings.

That ~{300 200}~: cosmic~metabolic_q emerqancyings_q

. . .

~Ve'Hem~ in idiom is 'they.'

~Sherahh~ in idiom is 'cry.'

So VeHem'Sharahhim in idiom is, "they cried out."

BTW 'im' is masculine plural. Compare 'ot,' and 'iot' as feminine plural.

Doug - 2Sep2017.

4 Kaf~Raysh~Aleph~Waw~Tav~finalMem
(20.200.1.6.400.600)
[Kareotam:

...""Behold;"
"Behold...]
~{20 200}~ ~1~ ~{6 ~400~ ~600}~ ~{~{iso1000}~}~

. . .

Doug emboldened ~qwfs~ of comtainmentings and resistanceings.

What appears to be contained and resisted?

~1~ and ~6~.

What does it mean to be held?

Doug - 2Sep2017.

5 Aleph~Tav~Waw
(1.400.6)
[Ato:

..."we must, thoroughly;"
we must, thoroughly, fecundly...]

6 Tsadde~Ayn~Qof~Waw
(90.70.100.6)
[Tsaa'Qoo:

..."destroy him (your belief in dialectic destroys him);"
dialectic fecundly destroying structures of light assa Aleph (y~¤ur belief in dialectic destroys ~Aleph.1~, destroys YhShWh...]
~90.70.100.6~

This is very interesting to Doug.

YhShWh often is referred Light.

Too YhShWh has self~declared, "I am before Abraham," which implies YhShWh emersces perpetually via Gen I:1's "Bere Shyt." Also see Mag VIII:58 words 12-15 for YhShWh's explicit phasement.

Doug has shown how his quanton(,) comma~nospace allegorizes:

middle~inclusion
flux~fux~flux
copulation
fecundity
etc.

Doug has made inferences that we can show us assa:

quantons(us,Elohim)

In that special case Doug's comma~nospace can be:

son
Light
YhShWh
~Aleph.1~
messenger
etc.

Is Doug's comma~nospace a strategic WoW or what?

XX8XX or what?

Doug - 1Sep2017.

7 Lammed~Aleph~Mem~Raysh
(30.1.40.200)
[Le'Amer:

..."saying,;"
saying_q,...]

8 Hay~Ayn~Lammed~Vayt
(5.70.30.2)
[Ha'Aalev:

...""Crucify,;"
"Crucify,...]
Literally in Qabala's Autiot this means, "Living light of metabolic soma."

So a 'kill' notion must be implicit somewhere in Ha'Aalev's idiom. I don't see it.

Some 'Eele[?] sema mean to mute, to shut up.

That's closer.

It may be that Doug should sometimes be thinking Ee in place of Aa.

I think Jews just want him to shut up...stop messing with their status quo...

Webster's 'crucify' has a portion assa 'Tsolev.'

Doug senses Tsolev is destruction of structures.

By comparison Aalev is about destruction of light, aka YhShWh, aka ~Aleph.1~.

Doug simply cannot fathom, let alone imagine how Jews would want to shut up Gen I:1's ~Bere~Shyt~.

But the apparently do deny him as "son of God."

They are apparently calling YhShWh a liar, and using bogus dialectic to do so!

Sounds a little like today''s sociopathic socialists_c.

Doug - 2Sep2017.

9 Hay~Ayn~Lammed~Vayt
(5.70.30.2)
[Ha'Aalev:

..."crucify!";"
crucify!"...]

10 Aleph~Tav~Waw
(1.400.6)
[Ato:

..."We must, thoroughly;"
We must, thoroughly, fecundly...]

11 Vav~Yod~Aleph~Mem~Raysh
(6.10.1.40.200)
[Ve'Yamer:

..."and saying;"
nd saying...]
~6~ ~{10 1}~ ~40.200~ ~{~{iso1000}~}~

12 Aleph~Lammed~Yod~Hay~finalMem
(1.30.10.5.600)
[Elihem:

..."unto them,;"
unto them,...]
~{1 ~30~ ~10}~ ~5.600~ ~{~{iso1000}~}~

13 Pay~Yod~Lammed~Tayt~Waw~Sammekh
(80.10.30.9.6.60)
[Pilatos:

..."Pilate;"
Pilate...]
~80.10.30.9~ ~{6 60}~ ~{~{iso1000}~}~

14 Qof~Hhayt~Waw
(100.8.6)
[Qohho:

...""Take him unto yourselves, receive pure holy spirit;"
"Take him unto yourselves, receive pure_q holy_q spirit_q, free_q of dialectic's illusions and delusions...]
Recall Doug's earlier remarks on Qohho: this schema exhibits complementary_q antinomialism_q sensitive_q to situation_q and role_q. Qohho issi radically quantum comtext sensitive.

It exhibits quantons(take,receive), etc.

That antinomialism_q is a tell_q of destruction of dialectic's abstractions!

Don't blow by that last sentence...

If this is correct, and Doug worries about that, this puts Pilate in a much omniffering light.

Doug sees Pilate as a pure dialectician, similar Peter, and many others.

Of course it may be that YhShWh was successful in changeing Pilate's own beliefs. That would really make one incredible story!!! It, at least in Doug's opine, doesn't fit the mythos.

Doug - 26Aug2017, 2Sep2017.

15 Aleph~Tav~Waw
(1.400.6)
[Ato:

..."fecundly, thoroughly;"
fecundly, thoroughly...]

16 Aleph~Thav~finalMem
(1.400.600)
[Athem:

..."thoroughly to them,;"
thoroughly to them,...]

17 Vav~Hay~Tsadde~Lammed~Yod~Vayt~Hay~Waw
(6.5.90.30.10.2.5.6)
[Ve'Ha'Tsaleevaho:

..."and so crucify him;"
and so crucify him...]
~{6 ~{5 ~90.30.10.2~ ~5}~ ~6}~ ~{~{iso1000}~}~

. . .

Again we see nested qwf~cavitational palindromicityings_q of ~Hay_q~ and ~Waw_q~ exhibiting "two lives_q" complementary_q~antinomialismings_q of ~life_q~ and ~fecundity_q~.

~{Life_q...Life_q}~
antinomially assa
~{living_q...dying_q}~
...
nested cowithihn_q
...
~{Fecundity_q...Fecundity_q}~
antinomially assa
~{virile_q...impotent_q}~

That should remind you of Atta expressed explicitly in terms of life_q and fecundationings_q.

quantons(living,dying)
and
quantons(virilityings,impotencyings)

Those quantons provide_q partial_q situations_q for our linguistic_q role_q infix_q:

~90.30.10.2~

~Tsadde~Lammed~Yod~Vayt~: Tsaleev: in idiom crucifixion.

18 Kaf~Yod
((20.10))
[Ki:

..."since;"
since...]

19 Aleph~Noun~Yod
(1.50.10)
[Ani:

..."I;"
I...]

20 Lammed~Aleph
((30.1))
[Lo:

..."do not;"
do not...]

21 Mem~Tsadde~Aleph~Tav~Yod
(40.90.1.400.10)
[Metsati:

..."find;"
find...]
~{40 ~90~ ~{1 ~400}~ ~10}~ ~{~{iso1000}~}~

22 Vayt~Waw
((2.6))
[Vo:

..."in him;"
in him...]

23 Ayn~Waw~finalNoun
(70.6.700)
[Aaoon:

..."any crime.;"
any crime."...]
~{70 ~6~ ~700}~ ~{~{iso1000}~}~

. . .

Recall how Simon (Peter), spelled out issi ~Sheen~Yod~Mem~Ayn~Waw~finalNoun~.

"Existential name of crime."

We see directly Pilate's obscene political masturbation. Ugh!

Some call it CYAing, CYBing.

But...all part of that strategic three millennial prophecy...

Doug - 1Sep2017.

©Quantonics, Inc., 2017-2033

And therefore when chiefs of largeness,
the priests, some of those grailing_q prevaricating ascensionings_q of life_q and life's_q principleings_q ihnto existenceings_q priestly cosmic biosphereings,
in cowithihnitnessings_q exaltationings_q they cried out from their lives_q and biosphereings lifted_q spiritually_q ihnto cosmic biosphereings,

"Behold
we must, thoroughly, fecundly
use dialectic fecundly destroying structures of light assa Aleph (y~¤ur belief in dialectic destroys ~Aleph.1~, destroys YhShWh
saying_q,

"Crucify,
crucify!"

We must, thoroughly, fecundly,
and saying
unto them,
Pilate,

"Take him unto yourselves, receive pure_q holy_q spirit_q, free_q of dialectic's illusions and delusions
fecundly, thoroughly
thoroughly to them,
and so crucify him [yourselves]
since
I
do not
find
in him
any crime."

. . .

Why?

If you do not sense forgery in this text...but where? Only in idiom?

Bottom line: Who tried to kill YhShWh?
If wæ can trust_cq those words, it is obvious dialectical Pharisaic~Sadducean Jews wanted YhShWh crucified!
But they, for some reason, wanted Romans to do it. Why? Fear? "Do not be afraid."

If reality_q issi really_q metabolically_q~evolutionarily_q uncertain_q, how can wæ trust_cq any assertion?
Doesn't our judgment_cq have to rest on guessing_q...stochastics_q?

Our omniscussion actually is about The System Problem, Yæs?
That issi, no doubt, unambiguously, in the text!

Why?

Doug - 2Sep2017.

index

©Quantonics, Inc., 2017-2033

Retranslation of John_c XIX:7 assa Magdalene_q XIX:7

Doug - 2Sep2017.

Magdalene XIX Letter~Text Spelled Out
Gematria
Pronunciation
(some guesses)
An Internet Literal
(some altered by Doug)
Doug's Suaresian Qabalic Translation
Comcision

1 Vav~Yod~Ayn~Noun~Waw
(6.10.70.50.6)
[Ve'Yaano:

..."They answered;"
They answered...]
~{6 ~10.70.50~ ~6}~ ~{~{iso1000}~}~

In this case we might view 'answer' assa a quantum~assessment of some query.

In Song of Songs I:1 we find Her self measurement of her peace assa quantum~assessment assa witnessing her peace assa qwf of qwf~ings: Song of Songings. Song assa qwf measureing Songings assa qwfings garnering a signature which represents her peace.

Keep in mind that signature_q issi metabolic_q. Keep in mind that peace_q issi metabolic_q. So wæ should add participle~plural to both.

Her peace_q, like metabolic_q reality_q issi evolveings_q cowithihn_q reality_q.

In this case wæ sub answer_q for peace_q.

How, autsimilar Doug on con(m)sciousness, would you omniscribe gradience_q of Her peace?

Compare gradience_q of preference_q in assessing con(m)scious_q chooseings_q.

Issi peace_q a symptom of con(m)sciousness_q?

Issi any answer_q a symptom of con(m)sciousness_q?

Compare belief_q, thought_q, and answer_q. Arera all answers_q ephemeral_q, always? Arera all memes_q ephemeral_q , always?

Why? Do metabolisms_q ever have mechanical absolutely_c stable_c state_c?

Is all in reality metabolic? Are all fermions metabolic? How do we know? They wobble.

Are all spin 1 bosons metabolic? How do we know? They modulate fermions transmutatively_q: i.e., QED.

How do we make vocal sounds? Voice metabolismings_q. Sound issi phononic and transmutatively transmitted via repeated quantons(scin,quan) modulationings of (predominately) air (fermionic) molecules. Creation of sound via our vocal cords issi very similar in that phonons arera emitted by those cords being vibrated then cavitationally~tuned~muscular~selectively under stimulus of air from our lungs.

We see air fermions vibrating cord muscular fermions garnering cavitational emission of phonons from our vocal cords.

Doug - 29May2017.

2 Aleph~Tav~Waw
(1.400.6)
[Ato:

..."Pilate, thoroughly, fecundly,;"
Pilate, thoroughly, fecundly,...]

3 Hay~Yod~Hay~Waw~Dallet~Yod~finalMem
(5.10.5.6.4.10.600)
[Ha'Yehodim:

..."[did] the Jews;"
[did] the Jews...]
~{5 ~{10 ~5}~ ~{6 ~4~ ~10}~ ~600}~ ~{~{iso1000}~}~

4 Hay~Noun~Hay
(5.50.5)
[Hanah:

...""Behold_c;"
"Behold_c...]
~{5 ~{50}~ ~5}~ ~{~{iso1000}~}~

. . .

"Two antinomial_q divine_q life_q principleings_q."

Fathom Yehy just above, previous verse.

. . .

In this situation, in idiom, it means exoterically, "Behold_c!" Or very simply, "Objectively_c observe_c." LOL

Romanesque mechanical stux sux blares its ugly tone and tenor.

In Latin tenere means to hold: to sustain stux sux. LOL

Is that hold permanent? Tentative?

What do classicists mean by tentative when they worship state?

. . .

More deeply_q Hanah means divine_q livings_q arera always both livings_q and dyings_q. All about reality_q issi metabolic_q! All about reality_q evolves_q. Both life and death arera cowithihn_q both life and death.

~Livings~ and ~dyings~ nissin ~livings~ and ~dyings~: Noun!

Noun: ~{~{50}~}~: divine_q existential_q principleings_q of livings_q assa sempiternal quantons(livings_q,dyings_q),
sempiternal quantons(resurrection,apoptosis),...

However, Romans' Behold issi dialectical, very unquantum.

Doug - 1Sep2017.

5 Yod~Sheen
((10.300))
[Yesh:

..."some;"
some...]

6 Lammed~Noun~Waw
(30.50.6)
[Lano:

..."for us we have a;"
for us we have a...]

7 Thav~Waw~Raysh~Hay
(400.6.200.5)
[Torah:

..."law;"
law...]

8 Vav~Lammed~Phay~Yod
(6.30.80.10)
[Ve'Laphi:

..."and by;"
and by...]

9 Tav~Waw~Raysh~Tav~Noun~Waw
(400.6.200.400.50.6)
[Toratano:

..."that law;"
that law...]

10 Mem~Sheen~Phay~Tayt
(40.300.80.9)
[Me'Shephat:

..."judgment;"
judgment...]

11 Mem~Waw~Tav
(40.6.400)
[Mawt:

..."to die;"
to die...]

12 Lammed~Waw
((30.6))
[Loo:

..."unto all;"
unto (in the opinion: social judgment) all...]

13 Kaf~Yod
((20.10))
[Ki:

..."because;"
because...]

14 Mem~Tav~Aleph~Mem~Raysh
(40.400.1.40.200)
[Met'Amer:

..."of his deadly words;"
of his deadly words...]
~{~{40 400}~ ~1~ ~40}~ ~200~ ~{~{iso1000}~}~

15 Lammed~Aleph~Mem~Raysh
(30.1.40.200)
[Le'Amer:

..."saying,;"
saying_q,...]

16 Bayt~finalNoun
((2.700))
[Ben:

..."he is son of;"
he issi son assa somatic_q evolution_q...]
Gender bias issi, for Doug, inappropriate here.

What is purely masculine about ~2~?

~700~?

To Doug, over simply, only appropriate gender significance occurs in ~6~ and ~60~. Too we may argue that column 9 [9.90.900] has a predominate feminine bias due female wisdom Doug refers as "reproductive qua."

Energy wise compare male (6) and female (60, 9, 90, 900). There isn't any race, from any ~get~go~.

That is Doug's
way of looking at it,
n¤t the
way of looking at it.

Males emulate god in their X,Y hermaphrodicity.

Females emulate god in their reproductive qua for creation of new life.

Doug - 2Sep2017.

17 Hay~Aleph~Lammed~Hay~Yod~finalMem
(5.1.30.5.10.600)
[Ha'Elohim:

..."of God;"
of G¤d...]
~{5 ~{1 ~30~ ~5}~ ~10}~ ~600~ ~{~{iso1000}~}~

. . .

Let's parse this emphasizing Qabala, The Game of Life:

~{Living ~{Aleph.1 ~30~ ~living}~ ~Aleph.10}~

Is that a Wow! or what?

Qabala: Ehieh: Aleph.1~living~Aleph.10~living!!!

...and, it's existentially metabolized!!!

Doug - 2Sep2017.

18 Hay~Waw~Aleph
(5.6.1)
[Hoa:

..."as life in Aleph;"
assa life_q cowithihn_q ~Aleph.1~...]

©Quantonics, Inc., 2017-2033

They answered
Pilate, thoroughly, fecundly,
[did] the Jews,

"Behold_c
some of us,
for us, we have a
law,
and by
that law
[calls for a] judgment
to die
unto (in the opinion: social judgment) all
because
of his deadly words

saying_q,
he issi son assa somatic_q evolution_q
of G¤d
assa life_q cowithihn_q ~Aleph.1~.

. . .

"...his deadly words..." simply do[es] not make sense, unless all of these Pharisaic and Sadducean Jews were hylic retards!

Again, The System Problem.

Sociopathy steps in here too adjunct TSP.

Nothing appears to have changed.
Yet some today are saying, Using reality to know, "Nothing I see means anything anymore..."

Doug - 2Sep2017.

index

©Quantonics, Inc., 2017-2033

Retranslation of John_c XIX:8 assa Magdalene_q XIX:8

Doug - 2Sep2017.

Magdalene XIX Letter~Text Spelled Out
Gematria
Pronunciation
(some guesses)
An Internet Literal
(some altered by Doug)
Doug's Suaresian Qabalic Translation
Comcision

1 Kaf~Sheen~Mem~Ayn
(20.300.40.70)
[Kashemaa:

..."When therefore heard;"
When therefore heard...]

2 Pay~Yod~Lammed~Tayt~Waw~Sammekh
(80.10.30.9.6.60)
[Pilatos:

..."Pilate;"
Pilate...]
~80.10.30.9~ ~{6 60}~ ~{~{iso1000}~}~

3 Aleph~Tav
((1.400))
[At:

..."thoroughly;"
thoroughly...]

4 Hay~Dallet~Vayt~Raysh
(5.4.2.200)
[Ha'Davor:

..."words saying;"
words saying...]
~5.4~ ~{2 200}~ ~{~{iso1000}~}~

5 Hay~Zayn~Hay
(5.7.5)
[Ha'Zah:

..."life's unlimited divine potentia;"
life's unlimited divine potentia...]
~{~{5 ~7~ ~5}~}~ ~{~{iso1000}~}~

6 Vav~Yod~Yod~Raysh~Aleph
(6.10.10.200.1)
[Ve'Ye'Yeter:

..."and Pilate was deeply afraid;"
and Pilate was deeply afraid...]

7 Yod~Tav~Raysh
(10.400.200)
[Yeter:

..."furthermore;"
furthermore...]

8 Mem~Aleph~Dallet
(40.1.4)
[Meod:

..."even more.;"
even more....]

©Quantonics, Inc., 2017-2033

When therefore heard
Pilate
thoroughly
words saying
life's unlimited divine potentia
and Pilate was deeply afraid
furthermore
even more.

Doug - 2Sep2017.

index

©Quantonics, Inc., 2017-2033

Retranslation of John_c XIX:9 assa Magdalene_q XIX:9

Doug - 2Sep2017.

Magdalene XIX Letter~Text Spelled Out
Gematria
Pronunciation
(some guesses)
An Internet Literal
(some altered by Doug)
Doug's Suaresian Qabalic Translation
Comcision

1 Vav~Yod~Sheen~Vayt
(6.10.300.2.10.600)
[Ve'Yeshevim:

..."And entered;"
And entered...]
~{6 ~{10 ~300.2~ ~10}~ ~600}~ ~{~{iso1000}~}~

. . .

"Fecund existential qwf~cavitationings of cosmic metabolismings of soma cowithihn cosmic biosphereings."

Keep in mind that 'enter' and 'leave' are antinomials_q. Which to say and write depends upon local and global roles_q and situations_q.

Doug - 23Aug2017.

2 Vav~Yod~Vayt~Aleph
(6.10.2.1)
[Ve'Yevae:

..."and then came;"
and then came fecundly_q with permeable existenceings_q at home cowithihn_q vital~impetus...]
~6~ ~{10 ~2~ ~1}~ ~{~{iso1000}~}~

3 Aleph~Tav
((1.400))
[At:

..."thoroughly;"
thoroughly...]

4 Bayt~Yod~Tav
(2.10.400)
[Bayt:

..."home;"
home...]

5 Hay~Mem~Sheen~Phay~Tayt
(5.40.300.80.9)
[Ha'Me'Shephat:

..."of judgment via Praetorium;"
of judgment via Praetorium...]
Indicted by Jews, Judged and Murdered by Romans

Here we can begin to fathom how Jews indicted YhShWh, but Romans judged and executed him!!!

Very big deal!!!

"Praetorium: The official residence of a Roman governor. The palace of Pilate of Jerusalem to which YhShWh was taken after his capture was so designated."

Quote taken from New Analytic KJ Bible, Dickson, Chicago, 1929.

Indicted by Jews, Judged and Murdered by Romans

Primal Roman proto Chruch Dialectic Fubar

Read Baigent, Leigh, and Lincoln's Holy~Blood, Holy Grail.

Doug - 12Aug2017.

. . .

Note that Dickson issi plausibly Dihhson.

If so, it fluxodynamically_q means, "Existential_q gatewayveings_q of spiritually_q focused_q cosmic~metabolic_q fecundationings_q of cosmic life_q principleings_q."

Just a reminder, Doug's use of 'e' omnistinguishes objective (dead, stuck, mechanical) sema of (for example) gatewayv vis-a-vis ostensed reason_q (understanding) of gatewayve.

Doug - 12Aug2017.

6 Vav~Yod~Aleph~Mem~Raysh
(6.10.1.40.200)
[Ve'Yamer:

..."and saying;"
and saying...]
~6~ ~{10 1}~ ~40.200~ ~{~{iso1000}~}~

7 Aleph~Tav
((1.400))
[At:

..."thoroughly unto;"
thoroughly unto...]

8 Yod~Sheen~Waw~Ayn
(10.300.6.70)
[Yeshooaa:

..."YhShWh,;"
YhShWh,...]

9 Aleph~Yod
((1.10))
[Aee:

...""You are;"
"You are...]

10 Mem~Zayn~Hay
(40.7.5)
[Me'Zah:

..."when?";"
when?"...]

11 Aleph~Thav~Hay
(1.400.5)
[Athah:

..."however;"
however...]

12 Vav~Yod~Sheen~Waw~Ayn
(6.10.300.6.70)
[Ve'Yeshooaa:

..."YhShWh;"
YhShWh...]
~{6 ~10.300~ ~6}~ ~70~ ~{~{iso1000}~}~

13 Lammed~Aleph
((30.1))
[Lo:

..."did not;"
did not...]

14 Ayn~Noun~Hay
(70.50.5)
[Aanah:

..."answer;"
answer...]
~70~ ~{50 5}~ ~{~{iso1000}~}~

15 Aleph~Tav~Waw
(1.400.6)
[Ato:

..."thoroughly and;"
thoroughly and...]

16 Mem~Aleph~Waw~Mem~Hay
(40.1.6.40.5)
[Me'Oomah:

..."alone.;"
alone....]
~{~{40 ~1.6~ ~40}~}~ ~5~ ~{~{iso1000}~}~

©Quantonics, Inc., 2017-2033

And entered
and then came fecundly_q with permeable existenceings_q at home cowithihn_q vital~impetus
thoroughly
home
of judgment via Praetorium
and saying
thoroughly unto
YhShWh,

"You are
when?"

however
YhShWh
did not
answer
thoroughly and
alone.

. . .

What would YhShWh have answered to Pilate's, "You are when?"

"I am Bere~Shyt, I am before all, before Abraham."

Now saddle yourself with this enthymemetic burden:

HotMeme™
"...before has n¤ classically
analytic meaning in a perpetually metabolic_q reality, a quantum reality."™
HotMeme™

"Therefore I am always with you!"

See Doug's ~Aleph.1~ assa ~Shyt~.

See Gen I:1 Barashyt.

. . .

All of this brings Doug back to linguistic para phenomena and personal experience.

I first started a paper route when I was 10. Round trip it was about a three mile walk with around 100 clients.
(12.5 cents per client per week, duh..., but that was a fourth of my Mother's wage which she and I were living on...
she made $50 per week full time and I made $50 per month part time. A living wage in those days was $40 per week.)

Do you have personal experience(s) with para phenomena in any vestigial sense?

Sometimes on Doug's route he could sense a vestige, just to his left apparently about 5-10 feet away.
It moved with me and seemed to just be 'being with me.' All of that Doug fathoms now: quanton(Iht,Doug).

But somehow after each vestige experience I remembered thoughts I didn't know I had, nor had I experienced prior.
I emerqed cowithihn_q self_q mental green shoots subsequently proximate those occurrences.

One of them which I could n¤t explain then was antinomialism of YhShWh per se.
~Aleph.1~ omniscribed in Qabala's Autiot does that complementary~antinomialism.
AReRA issi Doug's linguistic acronymic script for that ~do~due~ antinomialism_q (quanton(~Erts~AR~,~Nirioo~RA~)).
Latter I learned from Suares, may he rest in peace_q.

Not to be forgotten: Thank you Mrs. Bengston for opening_q my eyes, my ears, my being_q!
You are central, pivotal my hologral_q labyrinth_q.

Doug - 2Sep2017.

index

©Quantonics, Inc., 2017-2033

Retranslation of John_c XIX:10 assa Magdalene_q XIX:10

Doug - 3Sep2017.

Magdalene XIX Letter~Text Spelled Out
Gematria
Pronunciation
(some guesses)
An Internet Literal
(some altered by Doug)
Doug's Suaresian Qabalic Translation
Comcision

1 Vav~Yod~Aleph~Mem~Raysh
(6.10.1.40.200)
[Ve'Yamer:

..."And saying;"
And saying...]
~6~ ~{10 1}~ ~40.200~ ~{~{iso1000}~}~

2 Aleph~Lammed~Yod~Waw
(1.30.10.6)
[Elio:

..."unto him;"
unto him...]
~{1 ~30~ ~10}~ ~6~ ~{~{iso1000}~}~

3 Pay~Yod~Lammed~Tayt~Waw~Sammekh
(80.10.30.9.6.60)
[Pilatos:

..."Pilate,;"
Pilat,e...]
~80.10.30.9~ ~{6 60}~ ~{~{iso1000}~}~

4 Hay~Aleph~Lammed~Yod
(5.1.30.10)
[Ha'Ali:

...""Unto me;"
"Unto me...]
~5~ ~{1 ~30~ ~10}~ ~{~{iso1000}~}~

5 Lammed~Aleph
((30.1))
[Lo:

..."do you not;"
do you not...]

6 Tav~Dallet~Bayt~Raysh
(400.4.2.200)
[Ta'Dabor:

..."speak?";"
speak?"...]
~{400 4}~ ~{2 200}~ ~{~{iso1000}~}~

~{precipitous resistanceings}~ ~{exalted comtainmentings}~ ~{~{iso1000}~}~

Looks like refusal to Doug...silence is golden...

...silent running...strategic quiet...

Permit other to metabolically extinguish self...

. . .

Ta'Dabor roughly is "refuse to speak."

Words 5 and 6 together appear as a double negative when when 'refuse' is included in said idiomatc translation.

Doug - 3Sep2017.

7 Hay~Lammed~Aleph
(5.30.1)
[Ha'Lo:

...""Do not;"
"Do not...]

8 Tav~Dallet~Ayn
(400.4.70)
[Ta'Daa:

..."you know;"
you know...]

9 Kaf~Yod
((20.10))
[Ki:

..."that;"
that...]

10 Yod~Dallet~Yod
(10.4.10)
[Yadi:

..."in my hands;"
in my hands...]
~{10 ~4~ ~10}~ ~{~{iso1000}~}~

11 Raysh~Vayt
((200.2))
[Rav:

..."possess;"
possess...]

12 Lammed~Yod
((30.10))
[Li:

..."I;"
I...]

13 Lammed~Sheen~Lammed~Hhayt~finalKhaf
(30.300.30.8.500)
[La'Shelahhakh:

..."much power;"
much power...]

14 Vav~Raysh~Vayt
(6.200.2)
[Ve'Rav:

..."and authority;"
and authority...]

15 Lammed~Yod
((30.10))
[Li:

..."you;"
you...]

16 Lammed~Tsadde~Lammed~Vayt~finalKhaf
(30.90.30.2.500)
[La'Tselevakh:

..."to crucify.";"
to crucify."...]
~{30 ~90~ ~30}~ ~2.500~ ~{~{iso1000}~}~

. . .

Try doing complementary~antinomialism on ~90~.

Ask self, "What is ~2.500~?

Doug - 3Sep2017.

©Quantonics, Inc., 2017-2033

And saying
unto him
Pilate,

"Unto me
do you not
speak?"

"Do not
you know
that
in my hands
possess
I
much power
and authority
you
to crucify."

. . .

Little do they fathom they (Pilate and his Pharisaic Sadducean dialectical friends) are extinguishing selves.

Opine.

Doug - 3Sep2017.

index

Doug Renselle
Quantonics, Inc.
Suite 18 #368 1950 East Greyhound Pass
Carmel, INdiana 46033-7730
USA
1-317-THOUGHT

©Quantonics, Inc., 2017-2039- Rev. 19Aug2019 PDR - Created: 1Sep2017 PDR
(19Aug2019 rev - Add Qootsim anchor to Magdalene XIX:2 word 4.)

Arches

©Quantonics, Inc., 2017-2033
Retranslation of John_c XIX:1 assa Magdalene_q XIX:1 Any Fake Spins? This chapter is interesting. Pilate appears intimidated by YhShWh's proclamation, "I am before Abraham." Pilate may be asking self, "What if YhShWh's claim holds?" Genesis I:1 validates YhShWh's claim commencing: "BereShyt Bara Elohim..." Therein lies one ancient answer to YhShWh's proclamation. Suares shows us that YhShWh claims 'he' issi ~Aleph.1~. Suares shows us in Cipher of Genesis that Bar means "Son of Aleph." Son of ~Aleph.[1 of ~Aleph.1000]~. Iff anyone believes that they are all children of ~Aleph.1~. "Doug what happens after that?" Over simply, Ben Adam happens assa, "Vital metabolic_q evolution_q of us_q via ~Aleph.1~ quantized cowithihn_q all of us_q, cowithihn_q our_q blood_q." HotMeme™ "Beware any fake dialectical idiom which spins otherwise..."™ HotMeme™ "The first divine was the first rogue to meet the first fool." Voltaire. Try this, "The first divine was the first rogue to dialectically spin and fake the first fool." Any Fake Spins? Doug - 1Sep2017.
		Magdalene XIX Letter~Text Spelled Out	Gematria	Pronunciation (some guesses)	An Internet Literal (some altered by Doug)	Doug's Suaresian Qabalic Translation	Comcision
	1	Aleph~Zayn	((1.7))	[Az:	..."Then;"	Then...]
	2	Yod~Qof~Hhayt	(10.100.8)	[Yaqahh:	..."shall take;"	shall take and attempt to protect spiritings_q from dialectic...]	~{10 100}~ ~8~ ~{~{iso1000}~}~
	3	Pay~Yod~Lammed~Tayt~Waw~Sammekh	(80.10.30.9.6.60)	[Pilatos:	..."Pilate;"	Pilate...]	~80.10.30.9~ ~{6 60}~ ~{~{iso1000}~}~
	4	Aleph~Tav	((1.400))	[At:	..."thoroughly;"	thoroughly...]
	5	Yod~Sheen~Waw~Ayn	(10.300.6.70)	[Yeshooaa:	..."YhShWh;"	YhShWh...]
	6	Vav~Yod~Yod~Sammekh~Raysh	(6.10.10.60.200)	[Ve'Yeyeessar:	..."punish;"	punish via interrelative_q struggle...]	~{6 ~{~{10 10}~}~ ~60}~ ~200~ ~{~{iso1000}~} . . . "Qwf~cavitationing masculine fecundationings being divinely projected_q ihnto feminine fecundationings cowithihn_q cosmic emerqancyings." Best allegory Doug can offer for that is, "sexual intercourse comceiving_q sperm and egg cowithihn_q a womb." Of course, role_q and situationally_q that does n¤t fit here, at least n¤t apparently. Webster's says this means punish. Perhaps this is etymologically a source of "fuck you?" LOL Keep in mind a key quantum meme of Qabala: complementary_q~antinomialism_q. In this role_q and situation_q: quanton(punishment,reproduction) quanton(hard~work,joy~of~newborn) quanton(sexual~pleasure,laborious~struggle~of~birth) Complementary_q~antinomialism_q really does make sense_q. Too, what Doug just showed you applies ubiquitously in Qabala. For example: quanton(problem,solution): "Problems arera cowithihn_q solutions and solutions arera cowithihn_q problems." problems nissin solutions love nissin hate good nissin evil etc. None of those pairs is dialectically lisr. There is no 'opposition.' Is tiger opposite you? 'Splain. Is tiger in you and you in tiger? Read Thomas Gospel, Scholars' Translation. Doug - 1Sep2017.
	7	Aleph~Tav~Waw	(1.400.6)	[Ato:	..."fecundly, thoroughly;"	fecundly, thoroughly...]
	8	Bayt~Sheen~Waw~Tayt~Yod~finalMem	(2.300.6.9.10.600)	[Ba'Shotim:	..."using whips.;"	using whips....]	~2.300~ ~{6 ~9.10~ ~600}~ ~{~{iso1000}~}~
©Quantonics, Inc., 2017-2033

©Quantonics, Inc., 2017-2033
Retranslation of John_c XIX:2 assa Magdalene_q XIX:2 In verses two through six we see five more uses of ~Qof.100~. These occurrences of cosmic vital~impetusings destroying dialectic are important translation_q mutatives_q of semantic_q Value_q. They omnistinguish Doug's translation_q radically from traditional_c, so called, 'consecrated' canon_c. One meme which interests Doug is how most of word spellings_q using ~Qof~ are, so far, omnique. Doug - 1Sep2017.
		Magdalene XIX Letter~Text Spelled Out	Gematria	Pronunciation (some guesses)	An Internet Literal (some altered by Doug)	Doug's Suaresian Qabalic Translation	Comcision
	1	Vav~Aleph~Noun~Sheen~Yod	(6.1.50.300.10)	[Ve'Anashi:	..."And soldiers;"	And soldiers...]	~6~ ~{1 ~50.300~ ~10}~ ~{~{iso1000}~}~
	2	Hay~Tsadde~Vayt~Aleph	(5.90.2.1)	[Ha'Tsavae:	..."of the standing army;"	of the standing army...]
	3	Sheen~Raysh~Ghimel~Waw	(300.200.3.6)	[Sherago:	..."platted;"	platted...]	~{~{300 200}~ ~3}~ ~6~ ~{~{iso1000}~}~
	4	Khaf~Tayt~Raysh	(20.9.200)	[Keter:	..."a crown;"	a crown...]	~{20 ~9~ ~200}~ ~{~{iso1000}~}~
	5	Qof~Waw~Tsadde~Yod~finalMem	(100.6.90.10.600)	[Qootsim:	..."of thorny dialectic;"	of thorny dialectic from any existential_q structurationings_q...]	~{100 ~{6 ~90~ ~10}~ ~600}~ ~{~{iso1000}~}~ . . . Wæ sææ only one standing wayve_q ihn this script: ~90~. Rest of wayves_q represent_q QCS™ qwf~cavs: both ~{100 ~{6 ~90~ ~10}~: declination from ~{100 to 10}~. and ~{6 ~90~ ~10}~ ~600}~: exaltation from ~{6 to 600}~. We may semiotically_q hermeneut_q both patterns_q overlapping_q on ~90~. Tsadde represents existential structuration: ~90~. As our link shows, all Tsadde appear to be measurable. Thus all Tsadde arera quantum~assessable. If all Tsadde arera quantum~assessable, any assessment_q may be used to re form, re emerq said evolveing_q Tsadde qwf~pattern of Value_q. What wæ sææ here, role_q and situationally_q, is an explicit_q of Qof's hatred of any thorny dialectic from any qwf's wayve_q patterns_q of Value_q. ~{100 ~{6 ~90~ ~10}~: issi fecundly_q, qwf~cavitationally (metabolically) mutateing_q some existential_q ~Tsadde~. as a result ~{6 ~90~ ~10}~ ~600}~: issi fecundly_q exalting_q (due removal of dialectic) said existential_q ~Tsadde~ ihnto and cowithihn_q cosmic biosphereings of isoenergyings. Putting a thorny crown on YhShWh is an attempt to re forge his being, from spiritual into concrete Roman dialectic. It's like calling him a christ, a kristos, a messiah, etc. Such behavior is to remake YhShWh into a phony Roman king. To YhShWh 'Roman Kingship' represents Satan, the beast, the creature of Revelation. We have mentioned this many times prior. Recall this is Peter's method forgery too, though Suares offers an apology on Peter's behalf. Similar an apology for Judas. Said forgery is part of a three millennial strategic plan to skirt all dialectic. What an abomination. Doug - 1Sep2017.
	6	Vav~Yod~Sheen~Yod~Mem~Waw	(6.10.300.10.40.6)	[Ve'Yeshimo:	..."and put it;"	and put it...]	~{6 ~{~{10 ~300~ ~10}~}~ ~40~ ~6}~ ~{~{iso1000}~}~
	7	Ayn~Lammed	((70.30))	[Aal:	..."upon;"	upon...]
	8	Raysh~Aleph~Sheen~Waw	(2.1.300.6)	[Rosho:	..."his head;"	his head...]
	9	Vav~Yod~Lammed~Bayt~Yod~Sheen~Hay~Waw	(6.10.30.2.10.300.5.6)	[Ve'Yelvishaho:	..."with a purple;"	with a purple...]	~{6 ~{10 ~{30 ~2~ ~10}~ ~300}~ ~5~ ~6}~ ~{~{iso1000}~}~
	10	Mem~Ayn~Waw~Lammed	(40.70.6.30)	[Me'Aaol:	..."garment;"	garment...]
	11	Aleph~Raysh~Ghimel~Mem~finalNoun	(1.200.3.40.700)	[Argemon:	..."array;"	array....]
©Quantonics, Inc., 2017-2033

©Quantonics, Inc., 2017-2033
Retranslation of John_c XIX:3 assa Magdalene_q XIX:3 Word 3 of this verse is important, perhaps so important it may be beyond qua of some to fathom. Spend some time with Comcision there. To Doug, it unfolds a much better story. A story not unlike one wæ arera experienceing k~n¤w~ings at MIII's beginning[s]. Doug - 1Sep2017.
		Magdalene XIX Letter~Text Spelled Out	Gematria	Pronunciation (some guesses)	An Internet Literal (some altered by Doug)	Doug's Suaresian Qabalic Translation	Comcision
	1	Vav~Yod~Ghimel~Sheen~Waw	(6.10.3.300.6)	[Ve'Yegesho:	..."And they came;"	And they came to witness YhShWh's demise, dialectically believing it as his eschaton...]	~{6 ~10~ ~{3 300}~ ~6}~ ~{~{iso1000}~}~ . . . "Fecund qwf~cavitationings of all existenceings_q qwf~cavitationally exalted from ogranic movementings ihnto cosmic~metabolismings." Column three represents all archetypal_q organic_q existential_q and cosmic metabolismings_q of actuality_q cowithihn_q ~{~{isofluxings}~}~. Ihn this schema wæ sææ metabolic_q exaltation_q of all qwfal standing_q wayve_q existenceings_q cowithihn_q perpetual_q fecundationings_q. If this ~10~ swf (standing_q wayve_q function_q of existenceings_q) is about YhShWh, then we find him metabolically_q coming to an end of his Bayt life_q trajectory_q cowithihn_q a prolific_q reality_q. Bayt happens to all! Thence Veyn too recurs. In this case, strategically_q, Bayt's happening is intentionally_q premature: by YhShWh's and Judas' complicit Last Supper accord. Doug - 1Sep2017.
	2	Aleph~Lammed~Yod~Waw	(1.30.10.6)	[Alio:	..."unto YhShWh;"	unto YhShWh,...]	~{1 ~30~ ~10}~ ~6~
	3	Vav~Yod~Qof~Raysh~Aleph~Waw	(6.10.100.200.1.6)	[Veiqrao:	..."desiderate Romans' imposition of dialectic;"	desiderate Romans' imposition of dialectic and prevent fecund qwf~cavitationings of ~Qof.100's~ qwf~cavitational existential_q ~Yod.10~ to archetypal_q ~Aleph.1's~ Shyt~metabolic_q evolutionary_q desiderational_q reshapeings_q of ~Raysh.200~...]	~{6 ~{10 ~{100}~ ~200~ ~1}~ ~6}~ ~{~{iso1000}~}~ . . . Roman Imposition of Dialectic This word we have encountered prior. In Mag IV:40 word 4, and in Rev VII:10 word 1. In latter, Doug used desiderate as idiom. But we may, as an act of heresy, choose to view_q desiderate assa desire_q to eliminate dialectic. A base meme we must obtain here is: those who are about to 'kill' YhShWh love dialectic. Antinomially, YhShWh hates dialectic. One way our Veiqrao's Gematraic QCS™ script may be parsed issi: "Fecund_q qwf~cavitationings of ~Qof.100's~ qwf~cavitational existential_q ~Yod.10~ to archetypal_q ~Aleph.1's~ Shyt~metabolic_q evolutionary_q desiderational_q reshapeings_q of ~Raysh.200~. " Romans and Jews imposition of dialectic upon YhShWh, from YhShWh's antinomial_q complementarospective, is about as strategic as possible, since it, long term (approximately three millennia), solves what Doug refers, The System Problem. But how does their imposition of dialectic strategically help us remove dialectic from our lives? Doug responds, their imposition of dialectic garners a multi millennial strategic exposure to it, and we metabolically_q evolve_q learning_q gradually becomeing aware that wæ must stop using dialectic. If we couch liaison nature metabolically_q evolveing_q us_q out of dialectic, that is a much omniffering story which requires much Peircean hypothetical guessing_q and plausible_q expectationings_q. So alternatively... ...Doug believes perhaps Neo sapiens arera imminent. Seven brain lobes, one corpus callosum, etc. Recall Jean Auel's Clan of the Cave Bear and its sequels. Neandertal and Cro Magnon being evolutionarily_q, metabolically_q replaced by Homo sapiens. Now its our turn. Doug surmises two brain lobes have much to do with Pirsig's meme of a "genetic defect in human reason." Thus memetically "two lobes" has much to do with The System Problem. Neocon elites shall soon be playing male protagonist roles autsimilar Pontius Pilate. Pilate was a politician and elevated his political survival above a just assessment of YhShWh. YhShWh counted on this Pilatean dialectical-immaturity. . . . Assa BTW FYE: Dialect issi Neev in Autiot. Doug wants to make dialect into dialectic: Neevteekh: Noun.Yod.Vayt.Tav.Yod.finalKhaf. Using Doug's spelling: Nivtikh: \|50.10.2.400.10.500\|. Realize how finalKhaf.500 issi an n¤n~columnar exaltation of Khaf.20. It is apropos to think_q of Khaf here in dialectical abstraction to satisfy a concrete_c semantic_c of Nivtikh. If we allow linguistic_c kin and ken of Khaf and finalKhaf, then Doug can write that we concretely have two comtainments (Vayt, and finalKhaf) and one resistance (Tav) in Nivtikh, making it very dialectical, very classical. . . . Following Doug's premier exemplar from previous verse's Qootsim: We see only one standing wayve ~200~: Raysh: cosmic comtainmentings, aka cosmic~emerqancyings. It is good here to remind selves there are two classes of detending fluxes in Autiot's QR: column 2 of Autiot (con(m)tainers) and column 4 (resistanceings) of Autiot. Both beg ESQ vav SQ vav DQ issues beyond scope of this comcision. Those categories roughly correspond \|Mawt~HaMawt\| vav ~Yod~ vav ~{~{Iht.iso.1000}~}~ in Qabala. Let's look at two qwfal QCS™ clauses: both ~{10 ~{100}~ ~200~: inclination from ~{10 to 100}~. and ~{100}~ ~200~ ~1}~: declination from ~{100 to 1}~. We may semiotically_q hermeneut_q both patterns_q overlapping_q on ~200~. Raysh represents cosmic emerqancyings: ~200~. As our link shows, all Raysh appear to be measurable. Thus all Raysh arera quantum~assessable. If all Raysh arera quantum~assessable, any assessment_q may be used to re form, re emerq said evolveing_q Raysh qwf~pattern of Value_q. Since Raysh is cosmic, Doug's surmise may be impractical. But realize how Qof too is cosmic. Doug senses Qof can shape~sema shift Raysh regardless. Another way to say~write this is, "QR metabolically_q evolves_q all." Relate terms inclination and declination to quantum cuneiform. Roman Imposition of Dialectic Doug - 1Sep2017.
	4	Yod~Hay~Yod	(10.5.10)	[Yehy:	...""Hail divine existence, living existence,;"	"Hail divine existence, living existence,...]	~{~{10 ~5~ ~10}~}~ ~{~{iso1000}~}~ . . . In Qabala this means two existenceings, both alive. In general any one existence is antinomial_q any other, even evolutionarily_q itself from moment to moment. One may be living, other may be dying. One may believe, other deny. And so on... . . . Suares spends much time and narrative on this schema in his Cipher of Genesis. You may fathom its deeply metaphysical usage in Gen I:3 word 3. Doug - 1Sep2017.
	5	Mem~Lammed~finalKhaf	(40.30.500)	[Melakh:	..."a king of;"	a king of...]	Romans are ridiculing_c YhShWh. Now (strategically, two millennia later) wæ arera cowithihn_q timeings_q for paying it back... timeings_q for a little of our own ridiculeing_q and cajoleing_q. Doug - 1Sep2017.
	6	Hay~Yod~Hay~Waw~Dallet~Yod~finalMem	(5.10.5.6.4.10.600)	[Ha'Yehodim:	..."the Jews,";"	the Jews,"...]	~{5 ~{10 ~5}~ ~{6 ~4~ ~10}~ ~600}~ ~{~{iso1000}~}~
	7	Vav~Yod~Khaf~Hay~Waw	(6.10.20.5.6)	[Ve'Yekhaho:	..."and with their hands;"	and their hands...]	~{6 ~10.20.5~ ~6}~ ~{~{iso1000}~}~
	8	Ayn~Lammed	((70.30))	[Aal:	..."relentlessly;"	relentlessly...]	Doug could not fathom a better idiom for this role and situation. Doug - 1Sep2017.
	9	Hay~Lammed~Hhayt~Yod	(5.30.8.10)	[Ha'Lahhi:	..."struck his face.;"	struck his face....]	Clearly it isn't apparent that idiom agrees with this schema's gematria. Vulgately Doug interprets, "Living existential_c metabolismings attempting to reify_c spirit_q." Doug - 1Sep2017.
©Quantonics, Inc., 2017-2033

©Quantonics, Inc., 2017-2033
Retranslation of John_c XIX:4 assa Magdalene_q XIX:4 We see Pilate politically PC-masturbating here...literal bunk... Doug - 1Sep2017.
		Magdalene XIX Letter~Text Spelled Out	Gematria	Pronunciation (some guesses)	An Internet Literal (some altered by Doug)	Doug's Suaresian Qabalic Translation	Comcision
	1	Vav~Yod~Sheen~Vayt	(6.10.300.2.10.600)	[Ve'Yeshevim:	..."And entered;"	And entered...]	~{6 ~{10 ~300.2~ ~10}~ ~600}~ ~{~{iso1000}~}~ . . . "Fecund existential qwf~cavitationings of cosmic metabolismings of soma cowithihn cosmic biosphereings." Keep in mind that 'enter' and 'leave' are antinomials_q. Which to say and write depends upon local and global roles_q and situations_q. Doug - 23Aug2017.
	2	Pay~Yod~Lammed~Tayt~Waw~Sammekh	(80.10.30.9.6.60)	[Pilatos:	..."Pilate;"	Pilate...]	~80.10.30.9~ ~{6 60}~ ~{~{iso1000}~}~
	3	Vav~Yod~Tsadde~Aleph	(6.10.90.1)	[Ve'Yetsa:	..."and therefore went forth;"	and therefore went forth...]	~6~ ~{10 ~90~ ~1}~ ~{~{iso1000}~}~ Pilate, like Peter, is an strict adherent of dialectic (e.g., his three times dialectical denial of Yeshooaa). So Doug's retranslation of this schema omniffers one he does for YhShWh. Doug - 21Aug2017.
	4	Hay~Hhayt~Waw~Tsadde~Hay	(5.8.6.90.5)	[Ha'Hhotsah:	..."again;"	again,...]	~{5 ~8.6.90~ ~5}~ ~{~{iso1000}~}~ . . . Esoterically, "Two antinomial lives of fecund spiritual structurationings." Since "two lives" recurse, we may infer "...again..." Unsure if that makes sense to you... Doug - 1Sep2017.
	5	Vav~Yod~Aleph~Mem~Raysh	(6.10.1.40.200)	[Ve'Yamer:	..."and saying;"	nd saying...]	~6~ ~{10 1}~ ~40.200~ ~{~{iso1000}~}~
	6	Aleph~Lammed~Yod~Hay~finalMem	(1.30.10.5.600)	[Elihem:	..."unto them,;"	unto them,...]	~{1 ~30~ ~10}~ ~5.600~ ~{~{iso1000}~}~
	7	Hay~Noun~Hay	(5.50.5)	[Hanah:	...""Behold_c;"	"Behold_c...]	~{5 ~{50}~ ~5}~ ~{~{iso1000}~}~ . . . "Two antinomial_q divine_q life_q principleings_q." Fathom Yehy just above, previous verse. . . . In this situation, in idiom, it means exoterically, "Behold_c!" Or very simply, "Objectively_c observe_c." LOL Romanesque mechanical stux sux blares its ugly tone and tenor. In Latin tenere means to hold: to sustain stux sux. LOL Is that hold permanent? Tentative? What do classicists mean by tentative when they worship state? . . . More deeply_q Hanah means divine_q livings_q arera always both livings_q and dyings_q. All about reality_q issi metabolic_q! All about reality_q evolves_q. Both life and death arera cowithihn_q both life and death. ~Livings~ and ~dyings~ nissin ~livings~ and ~dyings~: Noun! Noun: ~{~{50}~}~: divine_q existential_q principleings_q of livings_q assa sempiternal quantons(livings_q,dyings_q), sempiternal quantons(resurrection,apoptosis),... However, Romans' Behold issi dialectical, very unquantum. Doug - 1Sep2017.
	8	Aleph~Waw~Tsadde~Yod~Aleph~Noun~Waw	(1.6.90.10.1.50.6)	[Autsiono:	..."the indicted I show;"	the indicted I show...]	~{1 ~{6 ~90~ ~{10}~ ~1}~ ~50~ ~6}~ ~{~{iso1000}~}~ . . . "Antinomial_q ~Aleph.1s~ qwf~cavitating ~{fecund_q structurationings_q overlapping_q and cowithihn_q existenceings_q borne of fecund_q}~ life_q principleings_q." It may be useful here to fathom ~Auts~ assa ~Aleph.1~ cowithihn_q existential_q structurationings_q. "Fecund ~Aleph.1~ ihn ~Tsadde~." Compare to ~Aut~. Doug! "What about ~Yaeno~? Closest Doug can find is torture. If those memes work, we might have, "Torturing ~Alephic~ fecundity [proliferation] cowithihn_q all (YhShWh's) existential structures." Doug - 1Sep2017.
	9	Lammed~Phay~Noun~Yod~Khaf~finalMem	(30.80.50.10.20.600)	[Leefneykhem:	..."before you.;"	before you [before_q your song_q being_q sung_q...]....]	Proemial Nascence Leefney Ha Sheray, Havayah Yeleed. "Before the [y~¤ur] song_q being_q sung_q." Song of Songs Shyar Ha Shyarim Esher Le'Shalomoh. "Qwfings (songs) of my qwfal~ings (singings) witness_q (omnitor) my peace_q." Nature_q, with Iht's assistance, sings_q our_q songs_q...sempiternally... Doug - 9Jul2017.
	10	Lammed~Vayt~Ayn~Vayt~Waw~Raysh	(30.2.70.2.6.200)	[La'Va'Aavor:	..."to the intent you may wish,;"	to the intent_q you may wish_q ihn metabolic_q divine_q qwf~cavitationings of autodidactic_q enlightenmentings_q, that YhShWh might fecundate_q and proliferate_q endless omniversal emerqancyings_q,...]	~30~ ~{~{2 ~70~ ~2}~}~ ~6.200~ ~{~{iso1000}~}~ To Doug this issi an omniscriptioning of one life's hermaphroditic_q, stochastic_q variegated trajectories. Individual_q heretical_q chanceings_q, chooseings_q, and changeings_q. Adjust situation_q and role_q of this schema... Doug - 7Feb2107, 21Feb2017, 25,30Jun2017.
	11	Thav~Dallet~Ayn~Waw	(400.4.70.6)	[Tha'Daao:	..."and know;"	and know...]	~{400 4}~ ~70.6~ ~{~{iso1000}~}~ . . . Compare Tao and Daao. For latter two thirds of Doug's life he has tended to pronounce Tao assa Dao. Strange! Tao often means 'the way.' "To know the way." Qua means 'the way,' 'a way.' ~Qua~qua~ means 'in whatever way.' Latter begs "...embrace indeterminationings_q, embrace quantum~uncertaintyings." The way, however, tends to beg classical determination, predication, strict determinism. Definite articles are BAD words in QR. Doug - 20Ap42017.
	12	Kaf~Yod	((20.10))	[Ki:	..."that;"	that...]
	13	Lammed~Aleph	((30.1))	[Lo:	..."not;"	not...]
	14	Mem~Tsadde~Aleph~Tav~Yod	(40.90.1.400.10)	[Metsati:	..."do I find;"	do I find...]	~{40 ~90~ ~{1 ~400}~ ~10}~ ~{~{iso1000}~}~
	15	Vayt~Waw	((2.6))	[Vo:	..."in him;"	in him...]
	16	Ayn~Waw~finalNoun	(70.6.700)	[Aaoon:	..."any crime.;"	any crime."...]	~{70 ~6~ ~700}~ ~{~{iso1000}~}~ . . . Recall how Simon (Peter), spelled out issi ~Sheen~Yod~Mem~Ayn~Waw~finalNoun~. "Existential name of crime." We see directly Pilate's obscene political masturbation. Ugh! Some call it CYAing, CYBing. But...all part of that strategic three millennial prophecy... Doug - 1Sep2017.
©Quantonics, Inc., 2017-2033

©Quantonics, Inc., 2017-2033
Retranslation of John_c XIX:5 assa Magdalene_q XIX:5 Doug - 1Sep2017.
		Magdalene XIX Letter~Text Spelled Out	Gematria	Pronunciation (some guesses)	An Internet Literal (some altered by Doug)	Doug's Suaresian Qabalic Translation	Comcision
	1	Vav~Yod~Tsadde~Aleph	(6.10.90.1)	[Ve'Yetsa:	..."And therefore went forth;"	And therefore went forth...]	~6~ ~{10 ~90~ ~1}~ ~{~{iso1000}~}~ Pilate, like Peter, is an strict adherent of dialectic (e.g., Peter's three times dialectical denial of Yeshooaa). So Doug's retranslation of this schema omniffers one he does for YhShWh. Doug - 21Aug2017.
	2	Yod~Sheen~Waw~Ayn	(10.300.6.70)	[Yeshooaa:	..."YhShWh;"	YhShWh...]
	3	Hay~Hhayt~Waw~Tsadde~Hay	(5.8.6.90.5)	[Ha'Hhotsah:	..."again;"	again,...]	~{5 ~8.6.90~ ~5}~ ~{~{iso1000}~}~ . . . Esoterically, "Two antinomial lives of fecund spiritual structurationings." Since "two lives" recurse, we may infer "...again..." Unsure if that makes sense to you... Doug - 1Sep2017.
	4	Noun~Seen~Aleph	(50.300.1.6)	[Nassoo:	..."they took him in;"	they took him wearing...]
	5	Kaf~Tav~Raysh	(20.400.200)	[Keter:	..."a crown;"	a crown...]	~{20 ~400~ ~200}~ ~{~{iso1000}~}~ . . . YhShWh Hates Being Called Christ Why? Like this: Be keen to grasp all three of those Aut are about: both comtainmentings (~20~ ~?~ ~200~) and resistanceings (~?~ ~400~ ~?~). Can you imagine how a king's crown (of dialectic, of state-ic stux sux resistance and comtainment) would stultify all of his enlightened fluxodynamic character and integrity? Do you understand how YhShWh hated self being referred a "king?" Being called a "christ?" Actually name of crime (Simon) Peter called him "the Christ." *To Doug that* is a bigger betrayal than YhShWh's apparent crucifixion. Voltaire... comes to mind...** To offer that some comtext: Peter was martyred by 'the king loving Roman chruch.' Can you imagine 'the chruch' being so ignorant and hylic to think it could crucify ~Bere~Shyt~? Wearing any crown, to YhShWh is like forsaking Qabala, Autiot, Gematria, Gnosis, Sepher Yetsira, and Sefirot! YhShWh simply will not do that. If he did he could be accepting dialectic as his language and belief system. No way!!! Doug - 1Sep2017. YhShWh Hates Being Called Christ
	6	Hay~Qof~Waw~Tsadde~Yod~finalMem	(5.100.6.90.10.600)	[Ha'Qootsim:	..."of thorny dialectic;"	of thorny dialectic from any existential_q structurationings_q,...]	~5~ ~{100 ~{6 ~90~ ~10}~ ~600}~ ~{~{iso1000}~}~ . . . Ignoring ~Hay~ wæ sææ only one standing wayve_q ihn this script: ~90~. Rest of wayves_q represent_q QCS™ qwf~cavs: both ~{100 ~{6 ~90~ ~10}~: declination from ~{100 to 10}~. and ~{6 ~90~ ~10}~ ~600}~: exaltation from ~{6 to 600}~. We may semiotically_q hermeneut_q both patterns_q overlapping_q on ~90~. Tsadde represents existential structuration: ~90~. As our link shows, all Tsadde appear to be measurable. Thus all Tsadde arera quantum~assessable. If all Tsadde arera quantum~assessable, any assessment_q may be used to re form, re emerq said evolveing_q Tsadde qwf~pattern of Value_q. What wæ sææ here, role_q and situationally_q, is an explicit_q of Qof's hatred of any thorny dialectic from any qwf's wayve_q patterns_q of Value_q. ~{100 ~{6 ~90~ ~10}~: issi fecundly_q, qwf~cavitationally (metabolically) mutateing_q some existential_q ~Tsadde~. as a result ~{6 ~90~ ~10}~ ~600}~: issi fecundly_q exalting_q (due removal of dialectic) said existential_q ~Tsadde~ ihnto and cowithihn_q cosmic biosphereings of isoenergyings. Putting a thorny crown on YhShWh is an attempt to re forge his being, from spiritual into concrete Roman dialectic. It's like calling him a christ, a kristos, a messiah, etc. Such behavior is to remake YhShWh into a phony Roman king. To YhShWh 'Roman Kingship' represents Satan, the beast, the creature of Revelation. We have mentioned this many times prior. Recall this is Peter's method forgery too, though Suares offers an apology on Peter's behalf. Similar an apology for Judas. Said forgery is part of a three millennial strategic plan to skirt all dialectic. What an abomination. (n¤t the strategic skirting, rather those forging YhShWh's role and situation, abstractly, using dialectic) Doug - 1Sep2017.
	7	Vav~Mem~Ayn~Yod~Lammed	(6.40.70.10.30)	[Ve'Me'Aail:	..."and up above;"	and up above...]
	8	Hay~Aleph~Raysh~Ghimel~Mem~finalNoun	(5.1.200.3.40.700)	[Ha'Argemon:	..."the array;"	the array, of living_q vital impetusings cosmically comtaining biospheric organic_q movementings_q cosmically quantizing life_q principleings_q,...]
	9	Ayn~Lammed~Yod~Waw	(70.30.10.6)	[Aalio:	..."one fecund existential metabolic light;"	one_q fecund_q existential_q metabolic_q light_q, ~Aleph.1~'s light_q,...]	Doug takes this as QED light_q of YhShWh's ~Aleph.1~. We may choose to associate purple and heliotrope (assa light of sun, son). Doug - 26Aug2017, 1Sep2017.
	10	Vav~Yod~Aleph~Mem~Raysh	(6.10.1.40.200)	[Ve'Yamer:	..."and saying;"	and saying...]	~6~ ~{10 1}~ ~40.200~ ~{~{iso1000}~}~
	11	Aleph~Lammed	((1.30))	[Al:	..."to them;"	to them...]
	12	Phay~Yod~Lammed~Tayt~Raysh~Sammekh	(80.10.30.9.200.60)	[Philatrass:	..."Pilate said;"	Pilate said,...]
	13	Hay~Noun~Hay	(5.50.5)	[Hanah:	...""Behold_c;"	"Behold_c...]	~{5 ~{50}~ ~5}~ ~{~{iso1000}~}~ . . . "Two antinomial_q divine_q life_q principleings_q." Fathom Yehy just above, previous verse. . . . In this situation, in idiom, it means exoterically, "Behold_c!" Or very simply, "Objectively_c observe_c." LOL Romanesque mechanical stux sux blares its ugly tone and tenor. In Latin tenere means to hold: to sustain stux sux. LOL Is that hold permanent? Tentative? What do classicists mean by tentative when they worship state? . . . More deeply_q Hanah means divine_q livings_q arera always both livings_q and dyings_q. All about reality_q issi metabolic_q! All about reality_q evolves_q. Both life and death arera cowithihn_q both life and death. ~Livings~ and ~dyings~ nissin ~livings~ and ~dyings~: Noun! Noun: ~{~{50}~}~: divine_q existential_q principleings_q of livings_q assa sempiternal quantons(livings_q,dyings_q), sempiternal quantons(resurrection,apoptosis),... However, Romans' Behold issi dialectical, very unquantum. Doug - 1Sep2017.
	14	Hay~Ghimel~Vayt~Raysh	(5.3.2.200)	[Ha'Gever:	..."the male man.;"	the male man."...]	~5.3~ ~{2 200}~ ~{~{iso1000}~}~ . . . Do you see how berating, how deprecating this word Gever is, to refer ~Aleph~Sheen~Waw~Ayn~ assa \|~Hay~Ghimel~Vayt.2~Raysh.200~\|! Even biologically we know that no man is a pure man. All men arera haploidally hermaphroditic: quantons(X,Y). Can you imagine YhShWh being somatically exalted into comtainment? Perhaps that is what crucifixion is expected to accomplish? A dialectician's mafia dream to plant YhShWh in classical formal mechanical Roman concrete... "Oh, but Doug, it is a digital world." From mouths of lemmings... Doug - 1Sep2017.
©Quantonics, Inc., 2017-2033

©Quantonics, Inc., 2017-2033
Retranslation of John_c XIX:6 assa Magdalene_q XIX:6 From first 10 verses of Chapter XIX, this is last of those 10 verses to use ~Qof~. This verse moves us into a n¤væl pneumatic realm_q. Our reading uncovers a meme of radical antinomialism_q and what it means for what we refer life. . . . Classically we live_c once and die_c once. According classical myth 'jesus' lived_c once and died once_c. Giggles... 'Da chruch' has pushed this crap into y~¤ur minds for centuries, about 16 centuries. Suares exposes this Aristotelian, Thomas Aquinas hylic idea thus: "It may well be that the greatest error of the Christian dogma is the assertion that the Holy Ghost engendered an infant [YhShWh] only once, and at a certain date." Suares' Trilogy, p. 208 of 549 total pages, Shambhala 1985 paperback. Doug's brackets. This is a most damaging error by 'the chruch' against itself and explains much of current 'chruch's' unstoppable regression...its persistent throes of dying leading to its 'dead-death.' Recall how Revelation roughly equates: error, the beast, evil, the creature, the devil, dialectic, and satan. Revelation shows us that we must destroy dialectic [study carefully all ~Qof~ occurrences there] to exit, exodus our "genetically defective" self imposed hell_c. Let's get detail, down and dirty! YhShWh self declares: "I am before Abraham." How could he have been born on a specific date? YhShWh self declares: "I am ~Aleph.1~" How could anyone crucify ~Aleph.1~? YhShWh self declares (Doug is paraphrasing here): "I am hologral flux:" qwfal~middle~inclusion: quantons(us,YhShWh), quantons(YhShWh,God), quantons(us,God) refer Mag XIV:11-17. "Therefore God is in you." See Doug's Last Supper Farewell Discourse for those references from The NIV Study Bible. In Doug's retranslation of Magdaleneq those references aren't that obvious. Sustain awarenessings that all three of those quantons distill to "Ben Adam." Most people translate Ben Adam as "son of man." However in Suaresian Autiot translation Ben Adam means "Evolution of Aleph in Blood." . . . Reread Doug's midrash from Magdalene_q XVIII:26: So Peter is a liar, a multiplicate prolific liar. He lied again and called YhShWh 'the christ.' See Magdalene VI:69, word 8. YhShWh said (Mark VIII:33) to Peter then, "Get away from me [dialectical] Satan!" See also Matthew XVI:16,20, Mark VIII:29,33 and Luke IX:20-21. This liar is Pater of c a t h o l i c i s m? And we find that it lies too, prolifically. Note: To lie_c requires one's adherence_c to dialectic's OSFA analytic_c, genetically defective, sociopathic_c principles_c. Recall Gnosis regarding stux: "Principle_c rules_c something not itself," and "Monism_c is deceit." See G. R. S. Mead. Qabala shows us: "Adhere metabolic_q memes_q of flux_q." Both QC and AI must adhere_q Qabala!!! Doug - 11Aug2017. Follow Carlo Suares. See Doug's remediations of truth_cq, logic_cq, judgment, etc. . . . One symptom of dialectic is 'a few ruling many.' Some refer this 'democracy.' Really it is hegemony. Read Alexis de Tocqueville. Gnostic individuals rule themselves, but they must embrace quantum memes to do~due that and avoid social conflict. Doug has two referrals for you on what he sees as potential approaches to solving this social, societal, sociopathic problem: Mae~wan Ho's rainbow and the worm re: coherent autonomy, and Dana Zohar's Quantum Society, and Quantum Self. Both Mae~wan and Dana, in Doug's opine, emphasize a kind of gnosis_q without saying so explicitly. Doug - 2Sep2017.
		Magdalene XIX Letter~Text Spelled Out	Gematria	Pronunciation (some guesses)	An Internet Literal (some altered by Doug)	Doug's Suaresian Qabalic Translation	Comcision
	1	Vav~Raysh~Aleph~Sheen~Yod	(6.200.1.300.10)	[Ve'Reshi:	..."And therefore when chiefs;"	And therefore when chiefs of largeness,...]	~6~ ~{200 ~{1 ~300}~ ~10}~ ~{~{iso1000}~}~
	2	Hay~Kaf~Hay~Noun~Yod~finalMem	(5.20.5.50.10.600)	[Ha'Kohenim:	..."the priests,;"	the priests, some of those grailing_q prevaricating ascensionings_q of life_q and life's_q principleings_q ihnto existenceings_q priestly cosmic biosphereings,...]	~{5 ~20~ ~{5}~ ~50}~ ~10.600~ ~{~{iso1000}~}~
	3	Vav~Hay~Mem~Sheen~Raysh~Hhayt~Yod~finalMem	(6.5.40.300.200.8.10.600)	[Ve'Ha'Me:	..."they cried out;"	in cowithihnitnessings_q exaltationings_q they cried out from their lives_q and biosphereings lifted_q spiritually_q ihnto cosmic biosphereings...]	~{6 ~5~ ~{40 ~{300 200}~ ~8.10~ ~600}~}~ ~{~{iso1000}~}~ . . . Two stand alone ~qwfal~patterns~ are apparent: ~5~: Hay, life, and ~8.10~ ~Hhi, spirit in existenceings. Three cavitationing ~qwfal~patterns~ are apparent: That ~{6 600}~: exaltation of cowithihnitnessings (proliferationings_q) ihnto cosmic biosphereings offers a really neat overall situation. That ~{40 600}~: exaltation_q of biosphereings of ~{Shera}~ ~Hhi~ ihnto cosmic biosphereings. That ~{300 200}~: cosmic~metabolic_q emerqancyings_q . . . ~Ve'Hem~ in idiom is 'they.' ~Sherahh~ in idiom is 'cry.' So VeHem'Sharahhim in idiom is, "they cried out." BTW 'im' is masculine plural. Compare 'ot,' and 'iot' as feminine plural. Doug - 2Sep2017.
	4	Kaf~Raysh~Aleph~Waw~Tav~finalMem	(20.200.1.6.400.600)	[Kareotam:	...""Behold;"	"Behold...]	~{20 200}~ ~1~ ~{6 ~400~ ~600}~ ~{~{iso1000}~}~ . . . Doug emboldened ~qwfs~ of comtainmentings and resistanceings. What appears to be contained and resisted? ~1~ and ~6~. What does it mean to be held? Doug - 2Sep2017.
	5	Aleph~Tav~Waw	(1.400.6)	[Ato:	..."we must, thoroughly;"	we must, thoroughly, fecundly...]
	6	Tsadde~Ayn~Qof~Waw	(90.70.100.6)	[Tsaa'Qoo:	..."destroy him (your belief in dialectic destroys him);"	dialectic fecundly destroying structures of light assa Aleph (y~¤ur belief in dialectic destroys ~Aleph.1~, destroys YhShWh...]	~90.70.100.6~ This is very interesting to Doug. YhShWh often is referred Light. Too YhShWh has self~declared, "I am before Abraham," which implies YhShWh emersces perpetually via Gen I:1's "Bere Shyt." Also see Mag VIII:58 words 12-15 for YhShWh's explicit phasement. Doug has shown how his quanton(,) comma~nospace allegorizes: middle~inclusion flux~fux~flux copulation fecundity etc. Doug has made inferences that we can show us assa: quantons(us,Elohim) In that special case Doug's comma~nospace can be: son Light YhShWh ~Aleph.1~ messenger etc. Is Doug's comma~nospace a strategic WoW or what? XX8XX or what? Doug - 1Sep2017.
	7	Lammed~Aleph~Mem~Raysh	(30.1.40.200)	[Le'Amer:	..."saying,;"	saying_q,...]
	8	Hay~Ayn~Lammed~Vayt	(5.70.30.2)	[Ha'Aalev:	...""Crucify,;"	"Crucify,...]	Literally in Qabala's Autiot this means, "Living light of metabolic soma." So a 'kill' notion must be implicit somewhere in Ha'Aalev's idiom. I don't see it. Some 'Eele[?] sema mean to mute, to shut up. That's closer. It may be that Doug should sometimes be thinking Ee in place of Aa. I think Jews just want him to shut up...stop messing with their status quo... Webster's 'crucify' has a portion assa 'Tsolev.' Doug senses Tsolev is destruction of structures. By comparison Aalev is about destruction of light, aka YhShWh, aka ~Aleph.1~. Doug simply cannot fathom, let alone imagine how Jews would want to shut up Gen I:1's ~Bere~Shyt~. But the apparently do deny him as "son of God." They are apparently calling YhShWh a liar, and using bogus dialectic to do so! Sounds a little like today''s sociopathic socialists_c. Doug - 2Sep2017.
	9	Hay~Ayn~Lammed~Vayt	(5.70.30.2)	[Ha'Aalev:	..."crucify!";"	crucify!"...]
	10	Aleph~Tav~Waw	(1.400.6)	[Ato:	..."We must, thoroughly;"	We must, thoroughly, fecundly...]
	11	Vav~Yod~Aleph~Mem~Raysh	(6.10.1.40.200)	[Ve'Yamer:	..."and saying;"	nd saying...]	~6~ ~{10 1}~ ~40.200~ ~{~{iso1000}~}~
	12	Aleph~Lammed~Yod~Hay~finalMem	(1.30.10.5.600)	[Elihem:	..."unto them,;"	unto them,...]	~{1 ~30~ ~10}~ ~5.600~ ~{~{iso1000}~}~
	13	Pay~Yod~Lammed~Tayt~Waw~Sammekh	(80.10.30.9.6.60)	[Pilatos:	..."Pilate;"	Pilate...]	~80.10.30.9~ ~{6 60}~ ~{~{iso1000}~}~
	14	Qof~Hhayt~Waw	(100.8.6)	[Qohho:	...""Take him unto yourselves, receive pure holy spirit;"	"Take him unto yourselves, receive pure_q holy_q spirit_q, free_q of dialectic's illusions and delusions...]	Recall Doug's earlier remarks on Qohho: this schema exhibits complementary_q antinomialism_q sensitive_q to situation_q and role_q. Qohho issi radically quantum comtext sensitive. It exhibits quantons(take,receive), etc. That antinomialism_q is a tell_q of destruction of dialectic's abstractions! Don't blow by that last sentence... If this is correct, and Doug worries about that, this puts Pilate in a much omniffering light. Doug sees Pilate as a pure dialectician, similar Peter, and many others. Of course it may be that YhShWh was successful in changeing Pilate's own beliefs. That would really make one incredible story!!! It, at least in Doug's opine, doesn't fit the mythos. Doug - 26Aug2017, 2Sep2017.
	15	Aleph~Tav~Waw	(1.400.6)	[Ato:	..."fecundly, thoroughly;"	fecundly, thoroughly...]
	16	Aleph~Thav~finalMem	(1.400.600)	[Athem:	..."thoroughly to them,;"	thoroughly to them,...]
	17	Vav~Hay~Tsadde~Lammed~Yod~Vayt~Hay~Waw	(6.5.90.30.10.2.5.6)	[Ve'Ha'Tsaleevaho:	..."and so crucify him;"	and so crucify him...]	~{6 ~{5 ~90.30.10.2~ ~5}~ ~6}~ ~{~{iso1000}~}~ . . . Again we see nested qwf~cavitational palindromicityings_q of ~Hay_q~ and ~Waw_q~ exhibiting "two lives_q" complementary_q~antinomialismings_q of ~life_q~ and ~fecundity_q~. ~{Life_q...Life_q}~ antinomially assa ~{living_q...dying_q}~ ... nested cowithihn_q ... ~{Fecundity_q...Fecundity_q}~ antinomially assa ~{virile_q...impotent_q}~ That should remind you of Atta expressed explicitly in terms of life_q and fecundationings_q. quantons(living,dying) and quantons(virilityings,impotencyings) Those quantons provide_q partial_q situations_q for our linguistic_q role_q infix_q: ~90.30.10.2~ ~Tsadde~Lammed~Yod~Vayt~: Tsaleev: in idiom crucifixion.
	18	Kaf~Yod	((20.10))	[Ki:	..."since;"	since...]
	19	Aleph~Noun~Yod	(1.50.10)	[Ani:	..."I;"	I...]
	20	Lammed~Aleph	((30.1))	[Lo:	..."do not;"	do not...]
	21	Mem~Tsadde~Aleph~Tav~Yod	(40.90.1.400.10)	[Metsati:	..."find;"	find...]	~{40 ~90~ ~{1 ~400}~ ~10}~ ~{~{iso1000}~}~
	22	Vayt~Waw	((2.6))	[Vo:	..."in him;"	in him...]
	23	Ayn~Waw~finalNoun	(70.6.700)	[Aaoon:	..."any crime.;"	any crime."...]	~{70 ~6~ ~700}~ ~{~{iso1000}~}~ . . . Recall how Simon (Peter), spelled out issi ~Sheen~Yod~Mem~Ayn~Waw~finalNoun~. "Existential name of crime." We see directly Pilate's obscene political masturbation. Ugh! Some call it CYAing, CYBing. But...all part of that strategic three millennial prophecy... Doug - 1Sep2017.
©Quantonics, Inc., 2017-2033

©Quantonics, Inc., 2017-2033
Retranslation of John_c XIX:7 assa Magdalene_q XIX:7 Doug - 2Sep2017.
		Magdalene XIX Letter~Text Spelled Out	Gematria	Pronunciation (some guesses)	An Internet Literal (some altered by Doug)	Doug's Suaresian Qabalic Translation	Comcision
	1	Vav~Yod~Ayn~Noun~Waw	(6.10.70.50.6)	[Ve'Yaano:	..."They answered;"	They answered...]	~{6 ~10.70.50~ ~6}~ ~{~{iso1000}~}~ In this case we might view 'answer' assa a quantum~assessment of some query. In Song of Songs I:1 we find Her self measurement of her peace assa quantum~assessment assa witnessing her peace assa qwf of qwf~ings: Song of Songings. Song assa qwf measureing Songings assa qwfings garnering a signature which represents her peace. Keep in mind that signature_q issi metabolic_q. Keep in mind that peace_q issi metabolic_q. So wæ should add participle~plural to both. Her peace_q, like metabolic_q reality_q issi evolveings_q cowithihn_q reality_q. In this case wæ sub answer_q for peace_q. How, autsimilar Doug on con(m)sciousness, would you omniscribe gradience_q of Her peace? Compare gradience_q of preference_q in assessing con(m)scious_q chooseings_q. Issi peace_q a symptom of con(m)sciousness_q? Issi any answer_q a symptom of con(m)sciousness_q? Compare belief_q, thought_q, and answer_q. Arera all answers_q ephemeral_q, always? Arera all memes_q ephemeral_q , always? Why? Do metabolisms_q ever have mechanical absolutely_c stable_c state_c? Is all in reality metabolic? Are all fermions metabolic? How do we know? They wobble. Are all spin 1 bosons metabolic? How do we know? They modulate fermions transmutatively_q: i.e., QED. How do we make vocal sounds? Voice metabolismings_q. Sound issi phononic and transmutatively transmitted via repeated quantons(scin,quan) modulationings of (predominately) air (fermionic) molecules. Creation of sound via our vocal cords issi very similar in that phonons arera emitted by those cords being vibrated then cavitationally~tuned~muscular~selectively under stimulus of air from our lungs. We see air fermions vibrating cord muscular fermions garnering cavitational emission of phonons from our vocal cords. Doug - 29May2017.
	2	Aleph~Tav~Waw	(1.400.6)	[Ato:	..."Pilate, thoroughly, fecundly,;"	Pilate, thoroughly, fecundly,...]
	3	Hay~Yod~Hay~Waw~Dallet~Yod~finalMem	(5.10.5.6.4.10.600)	[Ha'Yehodim:	..."[did] the Jews;"	[did] the Jews...]	~{5 ~{10 ~5}~ ~{6 ~4~ ~10}~ ~600}~ ~{~{iso1000}~}~
	4	Hay~Noun~Hay	(5.50.5)	[Hanah:	...""Behold_c;"	"Behold_c...]	~{5 ~{50}~ ~5}~ ~{~{iso1000}~}~ . . . "Two antinomial_q divine_q life_q principleings_q." Fathom Yehy just above, previous verse. . . . In this situation, in idiom, it means exoterically, "Behold_c!" Or very simply, "Objectively_c observe_c." LOL Romanesque mechanical stux sux blares its ugly tone and tenor. In Latin tenere means to hold: to sustain stux sux. LOL Is that hold permanent? Tentative? What do classicists mean by tentative when they worship state? . . . More deeply_q Hanah means divine_q livings_q arera always both livings_q and dyings_q. All about reality_q issi metabolic_q! All about reality_q evolves_q. Both life and death arera cowithihn_q both life and death. ~Livings~ and ~dyings~ nissin ~livings~ and ~dyings~: Noun! Noun: ~{~{50}~}~: divine_q existential_q principleings_q of livings_q assa sempiternal quantons(livings_q,dyings_q), sempiternal quantons(resurrection,apoptosis),... However, Romans' Behold issi dialectical, very unquantum. Doug - 1Sep2017.
	5	Yod~Sheen	((10.300))	[Yesh:	..."some;"	some...]
	6	Lammed~Noun~Waw	(30.50.6)	[Lano:	..."for us we have a;"	for us we have a...]
	7	Thav~Waw~Raysh~Hay	(400.6.200.5)	[Torah:	..."law;"	law...]
	8	Vav~Lammed~Phay~Yod	(6.30.80.10)	[Ve'Laphi:	..."and by;"	and by...]
	9	Tav~Waw~Raysh~Tav~Noun~Waw	(400.6.200.400.50.6)	[Toratano:	..."that law;"	that law...]
	10	Mem~Sheen~Phay~Tayt	(40.300.80.9)	[Me'Shephat:	..."judgment;"	judgment...]
	11	Mem~Waw~Tav	(40.6.400)	[Mawt:	..."to die;"	to die...]
	12	Lammed~Waw	((30.6))	[Loo:	..."unto all;"	unto (in the opinion: social judgment) all...]
	13	Kaf~Yod	((20.10))	[Ki:	..."because;"	because...]
	14	Mem~Tav~Aleph~Mem~Raysh	(40.400.1.40.200)	[Met'Amer:	..."of his deadly words;"	of his deadly words...]	~{~{40 400}~ ~1~ ~40}~ ~200~ ~{~{iso1000}~}~
	15	Lammed~Aleph~Mem~Raysh	(30.1.40.200)	[Le'Amer:	..."saying,;"	saying_q,...]
	16	Bayt~finalNoun	((2.700))	[Ben:	..."he is son of;"	he issi son assa somatic_q evolution_q...]	Gender bias issi, for Doug, inappropriate here. What is purely masculine about ~2~? ~700~? To Doug, over simply, only appropriate gender significance occurs in ~6~ and ~60~. Too we may argue that column 9 [9.90.900] has a predominate feminine bias due female wisdom Doug refers as "reproductive qua." Energy wise compare male (6) and female (60, 9, 90, 900). There isn't any race, from any ~get~go~. That is Doug's way of looking at it, n¤t the way of looking at it. Males emulate god in their X,Y hermaphrodicity. Females emulate god in their reproductive qua for creation of new life. Doug - 2Sep2017.
	17	Hay~Aleph~Lammed~Hay~Yod~finalMem	(5.1.30.5.10.600)	[Ha'Elohim:	..."of God;"	of G¤d...]	~{5 ~{1 ~30~ ~5}~ ~10}~ ~600~ ~{~{iso1000}~}~ . . . Let's parse this emphasizing Qabala, The Game of Life: ~{Living ~{Aleph.1 ~30~ ~living}~ ~Aleph.10}~ Is that a Wow! or what? Qabala: Ehieh: Aleph.1~living~Aleph.10~living!!! ...and, it's existentially metabolized!!! Doug - 2Sep2017.
	18	Hay~Waw~Aleph	(5.6.1)	[Hoa:	..."as life in Aleph;"	assa life_q cowithihn_q ~Aleph.1~...]
©Quantonics, Inc., 2017-2033

©Quantonics, Inc., 2017-2033
Retranslation of John_c XIX:8 assa Magdalene_q XIX:8 Doug - 2Sep2017.
		Magdalene XIX Letter~Text Spelled Out	Gematria	Pronunciation (some guesses)	An Internet Literal (some altered by Doug)	Doug's Suaresian Qabalic Translation	Comcision
	1	Kaf~Sheen~Mem~Ayn	(20.300.40.70)	[Kashemaa:	..."When therefore heard;"	When therefore heard...]
	2	Pay~Yod~Lammed~Tayt~Waw~Sammekh	(80.10.30.9.6.60)	[Pilatos:	..."Pilate;"	Pilate...]	~80.10.30.9~ ~{6 60}~ ~{~{iso1000}~}~
	3	Aleph~Tav	((1.400))	[At:	..."thoroughly;"	thoroughly...]
	4	Hay~Dallet~Vayt~Raysh	(5.4.2.200)	[Ha'Davor:	..."words saying;"	words saying...]	~5.4~ ~{2 200}~ ~{~{iso1000}~}~
	5	Hay~Zayn~Hay	(5.7.5)	[Ha'Zah:	..."life's unlimited divine potentia;"	life's unlimited divine potentia...]	~{~{5 ~7~ ~5}~}~ ~{~{iso1000}~}~
	6	Vav~Yod~Yod~Raysh~Aleph	(6.10.10.200.1)	[Ve'Ye'Yeter:	..."and Pilate was deeply afraid;"	and Pilate was deeply afraid...]
	7	Yod~Tav~Raysh	(10.400.200)	[Yeter:	..."furthermore;"	furthermore...]
	8	Mem~Aleph~Dallet	(40.1.4)	[Meod:	..."even more.;"	even more....]
©Quantonics, Inc., 2017-2033

©Quantonics, Inc., 2017-2033
Retranslation of John_c XIX:9 assa Magdalene_q XIX:9 Doug - 2Sep2017.
		Magdalene XIX Letter~Text Spelled Out	Gematria	Pronunciation (some guesses)	An Internet Literal (some altered by Doug)	Doug's Suaresian Qabalic Translation	Comcision
	1	Vav~Yod~Sheen~Vayt	(6.10.300.2.10.600)	[Ve'Yeshevim:	..."And entered;"	And entered...]	~{6 ~{10 ~300.2~ ~10}~ ~600}~ ~{~{iso1000}~}~ . . . "Fecund existential qwf~cavitationings of cosmic metabolismings of soma cowithihn cosmic biosphereings." Keep in mind that 'enter' and 'leave' are antinomials_q. Which to say and write depends upon local and global roles_q and situations_q. Doug - 23Aug2017.
	2	Vav~Yod~Vayt~Aleph	(6.10.2.1)	[Ve'Yevae:	..."and then came;"	and then came fecundly_q with permeable existenceings_q at home cowithihn_q vital~impetus...]	~6~ ~{10 ~2~ ~1}~ ~{~{iso1000}~}~
	3	Aleph~Tav	((1.400))	[At:	..."thoroughly;"	thoroughly...]
	4	Bayt~Yod~Tav	(2.10.400)	[Bayt:	..."home;"	home...]
	5	Hay~Mem~Sheen~Phay~Tayt	(5.40.300.80.9)	[Ha'Me'Shephat:	..."of judgment via Praetorium;"	of judgment via Praetorium...]	Indicted by Jews, Judged and Murdered by Romans Here we can begin to fathom how Jews indicted YhShWh, but Romans judged and executed him!!! Very big deal!!! "Praetorium: The official residence of a Roman governor. The palace of Pilate of Jerusalem to which YhShWh was taken after his capture was so designated." Quote taken from New Analytic KJ Bible, Dickson, Chicago, 1929. Indicted by Jews, Judged and Murdered by Romans Primal Roman proto Chruch Dialectic Fubar Read Baigent, Leigh, and Lincoln's Holy~Blood, Holy Grail. Doug - 12Aug2017. . . . Note that Dickson issi plausibly Dihhson. If so, it fluxodynamically_q means, "Existential_q gatewayveings_q of spiritually_q focused_q cosmic~metabolic_q fecundationings_q of cosmic life_q principleings_q." Just a reminder, Doug's use of 'e' omnistinguishes objective (dead, stuck, mechanical) sema of (for example) gatewayv vis-a-vis ostensed reason_q (understanding) of gatewayve. Doug - 12Aug2017.
	6	Vav~Yod~Aleph~Mem~Raysh	(6.10.1.40.200)	[Ve'Yamer:	..."and saying;"	and saying...]	~6~ ~{10 1}~ ~40.200~ ~{~{iso1000}~}~
	7	Aleph~Tav	((1.400))	[At:	..."thoroughly unto;"	thoroughly unto...]
	8	Yod~Sheen~Waw~Ayn	(10.300.6.70)	[Yeshooaa:	..."YhShWh,;"	YhShWh,...]
	9	Aleph~Yod	((1.10))	[Aee:	...""You are;"	"You are...]
	10	Mem~Zayn~Hay	(40.7.5)	[Me'Zah:	..."when?";"	when?"...]
	11	Aleph~Thav~Hay	(1.400.5)	[Athah:	..."however;"	however...]
	12	Vav~Yod~Sheen~Waw~Ayn	(6.10.300.6.70)	[Ve'Yeshooaa:	..."YhShWh;"	YhShWh...]	~{6 ~10.300~ ~6}~ ~70~ ~{~{iso1000}~}~
	13	Lammed~Aleph	((30.1))	[Lo:	..."did not;"	did not...]
	14	Ayn~Noun~Hay	(70.50.5)	[Aanah:	..."answer;"	answer...]	~70~ ~{50 5}~ ~{~{iso1000}~}~
	15	Aleph~Tav~Waw	(1.400.6)	[Ato:	..."thoroughly and;"	thoroughly and...]
	16	Mem~Aleph~Waw~Mem~Hay	(40.1.6.40.5)	[Me'Oomah:	..."alone.;"	alone....]	~{~{40 ~1.6~ ~40}~}~ ~5~ ~{~{iso1000}~}~
©Quantonics, Inc., 2017-2033

©Quantonics, Inc., 2017-2033
Retranslation of John_c XIX:10 assa Magdalene_q XIX:10 Doug - 3Sep2017.
		Magdalene XIX Letter~Text Spelled Out	Gematria	Pronunciation (some guesses)	An Internet Literal (some altered by Doug)	Doug's Suaresian Qabalic Translation	Comcision
	1	Vav~Yod~Aleph~Mem~Raysh	(6.10.1.40.200)	[Ve'Yamer:	..."And saying;"	And saying...]	~6~ ~{10 1}~ ~40.200~ ~{~{iso1000}~}~
	2	Aleph~Lammed~Yod~Waw	(1.30.10.6)	[Elio:	..."unto him;"	unto him...]	~{1 ~30~ ~10}~ ~6~ ~{~{iso1000}~}~
	3	Pay~Yod~Lammed~Tayt~Waw~Sammekh	(80.10.30.9.6.60)	[Pilatos:	..."Pilate,;"	Pilat,e...]	~80.10.30.9~ ~{6 60}~ ~{~{iso1000}~}~
	4	Hay~Aleph~Lammed~Yod	(5.1.30.10)	[Ha'Ali:	...""Unto me;"	"Unto me...]	~5~ ~{1 ~30~ ~10}~ ~{~{iso1000}~}~
	5	Lammed~Aleph	((30.1))	[Lo:	..."do you not;"	do you not...]
	6	Tav~Dallet~Bayt~Raysh	(400.4.2.200)	[Ta'Dabor:	..."speak?";"	speak?"...]	~{400 4}~ ~{2 200}~ ~{~{iso1000}~}~ ~{precipitous resistanceings}~ ~{exalted comtainmentings}~ ~{~{iso1000}~}~ Looks like refusal to Doug...silence is golden... ...silent running...strategic quiet... Permit other to metabolically extinguish self... . . . Ta'Dabor roughly is "refuse to speak." Words 5 and 6 together appear as a double negative when when 'refuse' is included in said idiomatc translation. Doug - 3Sep2017.
	7	Hay~Lammed~Aleph	(5.30.1)	[Ha'Lo:	...""Do not;"	"Do not...]
	8	Tav~Dallet~Ayn	(400.4.70)	[Ta'Daa:	..."you know;"	you know...]
	9	Kaf~Yod	((20.10))	[Ki:	..."that;"	that...]
	10	Yod~Dallet~Yod	(10.4.10)	[Yadi:	..."in my hands;"	in my hands...]	~{10 ~4~ ~10}~ ~{~{iso1000}~}~
	11	Raysh~Vayt	((200.2))	[Rav:	..."possess;"	possess...]
	12	Lammed~Yod	((30.10))	[Li:	..."I;"	I...]
	13	Lammed~Sheen~Lammed~Hhayt~finalKhaf	(30.300.30.8.500)	[La'Shelahhakh:	..."much power;"	much power...]
	14	Vav~Raysh~Vayt	(6.200.2)	[Ve'Rav:	..."and authority;"	and authority...]
	15	Lammed~Yod	((30.10))	[Li:	..."you;"	you...]
	16	Lammed~Tsadde~Lammed~Vayt~finalKhaf	(30.90.30.2.500)	[La'Tselevakh:	..."to crucify.";"	to crucify."...]	~{30 ~90~ ~30}~ ~2.500~ ~{~{iso1000}~}~ . . . Try doing complementary~antinomialism on ~90~. Ask self, "What is ~2.500~? Doug - 3Sep2017.
©Quantonics, Inc., 2017-2033