Aside:

I.e., PovRay is object-oriented at a scripting level; it takes a tad more effort to write scripts, but it is really good experience for you to learn how, plus PovRay is freeware and available for both Win$Tel and MAC; we show $ in that one case because acquisition costs are low but far exceeded by installation, operation, usability, compatibility, productivity, maintenance, down time, ubiquitous covert channel (lack of immunity to formal software viruses, worms, prions, phages, bacteria, fungi, even symbionts (a huge threat to formal systems when applied maliciously), etc.), and retirement-recycling costs.

End aside.

Aside:

Quantum reality is energy, energy of abs¤lutely anihmatæ EIMA quantum flux.

How can we energize our double-wrapped Möbius loops? Try this graphic for a starter.

We use arrows to show direction (omnirection) of flux in an unrendered quantum Möbius.

Remember a strange quantum-classical dilemma (omnilemma): classical energy is proportional to amplitude-area, but quantum energy is proportional to flux rate (irrelevant to waveform amplitude).

So quantum energy doesn't care how big those quasi-circle's Möbius diameters (omniameters) are, only how fast those arrows are whizzing by, and whether their emerqancy is Mobius and thus 1/2 spin, wobbling, fermionic. When those rates are (when quantum energy is) so high that they are exceedingly above our shasbs (standard human accoutrement-assisted sensory bandwidths), they appear substantially, materially objective to our senses. We call it "decoherent" quantum reality. It is posentropic reality.

J. C. Maxwell thought posentropic reality was all there is to reality and thought posentropy only had one gradient

Long parenthetical:

(positive; this is n¤n intuitive; think about it for awhile; increasing posentropy is supposedly increasing classical 'disorder;' any decrease in posentropy is an increase in classical 'order'; of course by observation biological systems are all quantum both-all-while-and-many

quantons(negative_gradient_posentropy,positive_gradient_posentropy),
analogously,
quantons(cellular_emergence,cellular_apoptosis).

Read Prigogine and Stenger's Order Out of Chaos — note that Ilya Prigogine transitioned mid 2^nd quarter 2003; he contributed enormously to n¤vel and innovative sciences and Earth's societies)

End long parenthetical.

and thus our universe would eventually suffer an ultimate and final Maxwellian heat death. Wrong!!! Classical scientists refer this 'law' as "J. C. Maxwell's 2nd 'law' of thermodynamics." You may intuit this classically as:

Countless Earth-folk still buy into this fundamentalist Babel.

Looking at end of our garden hose we can see, perhaps, one circle with arrows all pointing in same loop direction (chiralty matters), even though in this example we know there are two entangled rotationally n¤n symmetric loops.

Begin Aside on Chiralty:

Chiralty is an issue in quantum~reality from core evolutionary creation through formation of basal fermionic and bosonic quanta which make up our quantum~actuality we 'live' in. Usually Doug just shows you one chiralty of that core quantum~reality~loop. There are others, and Doug uses following graphic to show you just one other quantum~antinomial chiralty~loop:

This quantum~reality loop's
two antinomial rotations:
clockwise and counterclockwise.

---

If we show those loops hypermentionally (omnimentionally), their unlimited variations would provide unlimited antinomialityings. Imagine them rotated around their axes (ordinals). Imagine them rotated about their abscissae.

Ordinals and abscissae may be precess~antinomially rotated, too! Hologral reality can express,
in dynamic~living evolution, any and all you may choose to imagine.
Classical reality's ineptness cowers in its comparative state-ic-, dead-dialectical incompetence.

I'll say it again, "Dialectic is bogus!"

All of those manifest antinomia are quantum~complementary~antinomial all other rotational~antinomia:
very quantum~hologra[[il][lex][m][ph][view]]ic.

Quantons(antinomia,antinomia).

Nominally, Doug always shows top loop antinomial. Linguistically, it is referred "left handed."

Notice how, assuming nonactuality is left and actuality is right, evolution (OEDC) still comes from nonactuality and emerges into actuality, while devolution still comes from actuality and immerses back into its source nonactuality.

Key meme here is rotation of reality's loop is clockwise at top and antinomially ccw at bottom.

Rotations of reality's loopings are n¤t commutative implying omniffering actualities emerge...depending...

Fascinating, eh?

Compare Nutrasweet and Sugar...their chiralties are antinomial!

Explaining that involves many novel memes.

Doug's reality looping graphic applies to qycloids too!

Later...

Doug - 30Dec2014.

Nonactuality		Actuality

At issue from that core perspective of reality is, "Are we in one chiralty? Are we in two chiralties? Are we in multiple chiralties?"

To offer at least a partial explanation, we have to begin our own evolutionary process of, "What do we mean by chiralty?" Following Peirce, we say, "That query begs an unlimited list of potential hypotheses." Too, Doug would add, "Each of those hypotheses begs an unlimited list of additional queries."

Goodness and quality of that coquecigruesical situation manifests in our ability, our qua, to heretically choose subsets of hypotheses and queries which are better.

One hypothesis Doug makes, based on his multi decade efforts developing his own quantum~philosophy, is that chiralty is very likely a kind of quantum~antinomialism, not classical opposition, rather quantum~antinomialism. If we adopt that as a candidate answer, we can offer a Value phasementing that antinomialism is hyper chiralty. That permits us to fathom chiralty more deeply coinside quantum memes of antinomialism. (Fathom potentia of arguing chiralty hyper antinomialism. Are those two omniffering (antinomial) rqcs?)

Given that, it becomes simpler to illustrate chiralty in language and (holo~)graphics.

Linguistically we describe chiralty in terms of quantum~spin. You saw spin memes above in Doug's brief on string theory. They tend to spin multirectionally in a global quantum~relativity landscape. They tend to spin locally in some kind of proximal antinomialism: fluxoids in any fermion are not classically opposite, they are quantum~antinomial one another, for example. That example is rather simply portrayed in our Schrödinger hydrogen atom graphic, and in our string theory fermion graphics.

Classically we have described linguistically chiralty as handedness, either left or right. But that view is naïve, and worse, in general, bogus. Spin isn't an ideal, binary alternative denial (BAD) classical either-or opposition. Spin is a quantum~complementary~antinomialism of two or more multi spin quantum~interrelationshipings. Let's show that graphically using quantons:

• quanton(,)
• quanton(,)
• etc.

Observe at least two quantum~complementary~antinomial patterns above:

• left to right vis-à-vis right to left antinomialism of spin in each quanton, and
• antinomialism of quantons.

Quantumly, in any fermion, when viewed as a Mobius strip, left~handed spin issi ihn right~handed spin and right~handed spin issi ihn left~handed spin. Spin 720 comtains two middle~including fluxoids of left~handed spin and right~handed spin.

This profound middle~inclusion of two antinomials represents mostly what we mean when we say "quantum~complementarity."

"What is profound about that, Doug?" All classical logics assume Aristotelian middle~exclusion. That assumption, adopted by any thingker, is self~disabling in any sense of he~r being capable, having qua, of describing quantum~coquecigrues of natural reality.

It may be obvious to you that our antinomial denigration of classical logic carries other quantum~ramifications too. Classical logics' dialectical dependence on equivalence relations breaks down. Why? Quantum~antinomials, for example, do not classically commute!

Doug - 30Dec2014.

Doug - 6Jan2015 - Repair Doug's typo 'The tend,' to "They tend."

End Aside on Chiralty.

End aside.