Oxymora come in quantum ¤d¤rs (colors and flavors were used in QCD and Aristotle's classical excluded-middle disjoint 'categories' are abhorent here, in Quantonics...). We choose our first oxymoronic ¤d¤r as 'dialectical.'

Expect our ¤d¤rs to grow and oxymora within each ¤d¤r to evolve. Our philosophical bottom line here is that dichon(exactly, similar) is dialectically insoluble, whereas quanton(exactly,similar) is quantum~soluble, similar sophisms. Doug - 21Apr2006.

Dialectical Oxymora:

What is at issue with this ¤d¤r of oxymora is that we must omnistinguish dialectical and n¤ndialectical comtexts. From a narrower quantonics perspective we must omnistinguish dialectical contexts and quantum comtexts.

In dialectical contexts we may more generally avoid this ¤d¤r of oxymora by n¤t phrase-mixing (most recent red text updates 3Nov2007 - Doug):

• objects and subjects,
  • see detail examples below
• objective semantics and subjective semantics,
• quantity and quality,
• certainty and uncertainty,
• logic and rhetoric (usually sophism),
• state and phasicity,
• event and phasicity,
• immutability and change (see concrete and flux just below),
• opposite and complement,
  • opposite examples:
    • litotes is an oxymoron (compare Clifford Geertz' double 'negative' of relativism...):
      • - classically:
        
        We can deny an ideal opposite (i.e., litotes) of any notion; this classical rationale depends upon real stability and objective independence (both of which Henri Louis Bergson refers as classical delusions-illusions...).
        
      • - quantumly:
        
        Ideal classical opposites do not 'exist' in quantum reality; all negation is subjective and quantum~complementary.
        
• design and evolution,
• concrete and flux,
  • comparatives:
    • zero momentum is an oxymoron:
      • - classically:
        
        Reality is stoppable; reality is concrete; Plato's change is an illusion; we can ideally measure a stopped reality 'at will.'
        
      • - quantumly:
        
        Reality is absolute flux and thus unstoppable; change is real; we can monitor (omnitor) reality, but we can n¤t ever stoppably 'measure' reality.
        
        
• etc.

When we dialectically 'mix' oxymora in that fashion Doug calls it "Escherian linguistics." Recall how Escher used impolitic incorrectness showing three stairs up and one stair down, and three stairs down and one stair up, to violate more politically correct two stairs up and two stairs down. (Doug's use of specific numbers here is n¤t cardinal. There is a math 'rule' though...do you see it?) Actually this is an omniffering ¤d¤r of oxymora, right? What would you call it? One more soup question: Are oxymora quantum tells of ubiquitous quantum~optimism? Explain. Clue: "Many worlds (omniplex veritas), many truthings, many (unlimited) possibilities..." Doug - 2May2007.

In quantum comtexts we may more generally phrase~mix Quantum English Language Remediated (QELRed) terms and enrich our human capabilities for quantum~hermeneutic descriptionings, communicationings, and understandings of reality. Oxymora evaporate! Robert M. Pirsig's MoQ, you may recall, sutures SOM's subject-object schism. See Quantonics' quantum stage. That Pirsigean innovation is a dual of quantum reality's everywhere~associative heterogeneous included~middlings of potentially all quantum fluxings.

"Hey Doug, your list below shows us a list of quantum expositions of classical phrases which appear quantumly as dialectical oxymora. But do any quantum phrases appear normal in quantum~reality and oxymoronic in dialectical reality?" Yes, and I can give you one which is both genuine and well~used:

• Real good - You may have heard old-timers talking about grandma's chicken noodles and mashed potatoes as "real good." Classically 'reality' is dialectical (objective) while 'good' is wholly subjective. In quantum~reality all is flux AKA waves, and all waves are stochastic (requiring ensembles of probable, plausible, and likely 'data') thus requiring durational monitoring in order to assess what reality is doing. To classicists who routinely scalarbate (reify objective measurement) reality, our quantum monitoring approach is "subjective." Recall Robert M. Pirsig's Metaphysics of Quality...Quality is reality. Quality is good. Reality is good. Classicists claim that reality is objective and that goodness is a subspecies of objective truth. So SOMites believe reality is true, 'not' good. Doug - 25Oct2008.

Detail list of classical dialectical oxymora:

Academic reality - This one appears in The Chronicle's 15Aug2008 issue, page A5, in a quote of Jodi Magness at University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill: "...not grounded in academic reality." Nearly all 'academic reality' is purely dialectical. Dialectic is academe's basis of social-intellectual thought and reasoning. However, dialectic is demonstrably bogus when we test it with quantum~think_qing. In Pirsig's MoQ reality is Quality AKA Value and he showed us how academe ineptly denies any bridge twixt 'scientific' fact and real Value. That is dialectic's knife, SOM's knife cutting said bridge. Academe ineptly views reality as dialectical while rejecting qualitative reality as subjective. Academics who refer this intellectual 'pot shot chicanery' should read Henri Louis Bergson, William James, and Robert M. Pirsig. Reality isn't academically dialectical! Reality is flux (change) as quanta! Reality is flux as quantum~hermeneutic omniversity, n¤t academic dialectical 'di' versity! Academe currently (CeodE 2008) teaches pseudo science: dialectic. For an Daniel C. Dennett example... Doug alleges that Ms. Magness can speak eloquently on superiority of academic dialectic: 'academic reality.' See Doug's formidable Bases of Judgment. Doug - 16Aug2008.
Bad thing - 'Bad' is subjective negation while 'thing' is just about as ideal a notion of a classical object as one can imagine - Doug - 27,29Apr2007.
Blanket statement - This one arose on our way to dinner and a play last evening... Doug had made this statement, "Christians are liars." Other's spouse turned around and said, "Doug you just emitted a blanket statement." I was temporarily stunned by that response. It hadn't happened to me in nearly 11 years...like that. On Lila Squad during 1997 I was accused of "Stating absolute truth to counter another absolute truth." Doug's response way back then was, "I cann¤t state absolute truth, since my con(m)text isn't large enough, n¤r multiplicate enough to imbue me with such power." Of course today we can make it easier than that by saying, quantumly, "All statements are always enthymemetic." That's like saying, "All truths are partial," and "All logic is partial." "All judgment, all bases of judgment are partial." How? Based upon an assumption that all in quantum~reality evolves, so a statement too, evolves. N¤ statement, n¤ phasement can ever be taken as complete, blanket, final, absolute since its meaning cann¤t hold still: "Truth is an agent of its own change." Only classical dialecticians believe that truth is true forever and that some humans have qua to emit absolute truth. So now we are down to an issue of whether enthymemes are dialectically- vis-à-vis quantumly~true, whether enthymemes are dialectically- vis-à-vis quantumly~false. Quantumly all enthymemes are quantum~stochastically, quantum~holographically both locally true and locally false in some quantum~comtext. So in Doug's assumed comtext of McCain is a christian: McCain lies then christians are liars. Doug is assuming a quantum~logic of partial truthings which we call more correctly "coquecigrues." McCain lies abundantly: that is a dialectical-fact, an dialectically- and quantumly~indisputable fact. McCain is an episcopal christian. Therefore Doug can make a quantum~enthymeme that "Christians are liars," (which, since it is an enthymeme, is n¤t a 'blanket statement') since McCain is a christian and McCain lies. Doug possesses indisputable partial (enthymemetic) truth. And Doug says that is n¤t a 'blanket statement.' To any dialectician, partial truth is dialectically 'false.' Dialecticians adhere and abet dichon(false, true). Quantum~rhetoricians abide a qua of quanton(false,true). Compare dichon(wave, particle) and quanton(wave,particle). Hey Doug, "Are gnostics, then, according what you just wrote, liars?" Yæs! But it is apropos to qualify that with an observation that quantum~gnostics assume at least: monism is deceit, all is process (change n¤t state), and reality's middle is included (n¤t dialectically lisr). What is really amazing to Doug about all this is,... about two years ago, this same 'blanket-statement' person made a 'blanket observation' that, "Change is a principal feature of our universe." Change begs evolution, begs enthymemeticity! Doug - 21Sep2008.
Catholic excommunication -
Catholic heresy -
Cause-effect participles -
Classical truth - see Mitch's June, 2005 Question Three Latest Interim Response
C¤hærænt (quantum) 'state' (classical) - # Actually, this issi n¤t an oxymoron in any classical sense. Why? Quantum reality and classical reality are wholly omniffering com(n)texts! Quantum reality issi n¤t 'state'-ic! No detail below...
Concrete quality -
Correct use -
Define arete - We cann¤t define 'excellence' since it is real quantum change borne of adaptability to our perpetually evolving environs.
Define flux - We cann¤t define flux since it is durational, perpetual change itself. That is why quantum reality is uncertain.
Define quality - See 'define arete.'
Define wisdom - University of Chicago is running a 2008 grant program entitled Defining Wisdom - A Project of the University of Chicago. Paul Pietsch said it best, paraphrased, "Uncertainty is a principal feature of wisdom." Defining wisdom is a classical attempt to make it monistically, concretely 'certain.' Gn¤sis is wisdom itself which says classical "monism is deceit." All staff and clientele of UChic are hylic-psychic. One must achieve pneuma to 'understand' wisdom. What a deceitful waste of $2 million. A sheigmful deign to feign. See The Chronicle of Higher Education, 21Sep2007, page A33. Doug - 28Sep2007.
Efficient value - effective value, effectiveness of-for value, (Search for this pattern in transcript below, 5Oct2007: "PRAGER: No, effectiveness for your values, not shame. Effectiveness for your values." Hyper idiotic BS! Doug.) etc. - 'Efficient value' is how SOMwits stuff Value into SOM's Box. This is like saying we can analytically assess, measure, Value as quantitative. Recall Hume's Law? We may not scalarbate Value, folks. Saying "efficiency of-for value" is similar saying "define wisdom." Ditto "define ????." Value is affective. Value is n¤t classically 'effective.' Value is a priori Peircean~abductive. Value is n¤t a posteriori classically inductive, deductive. Value stochastically expects. Value does not 'root cause,' '1-1 correspondently' 'predict.' Doug - 6Oct2007. Reference: Chris Matthew's Hardball show 5Oct2007. See near end of show transcript (scroll down to Matthews), a radio talk show host's comments. Hope you saw his wife Kathleen on 4Oct2007 show. She is simply fabulous! Kathleen could step into Chris' shoes anytime! Doug.
Eigen value - (Classically this is a height, a hilt, of classical oxymoronicity. Science radically di stinguishes fact and value. Scientific reality is fact and 'truth,' no value added. No detail below.)
Ethical truth -
Exactly similar -
Financial wisdom - Material greed is anti-gnostic. Anti-wisdom. Wisdom is qualitative. Finance is quantitative. Doug - 22Apr2008.
Fluid mechanics -
Formally secure - See Doug's How to Make a System Ideally Insecure. Link added 21Apr2007 - Doug.
Gnostic 'christianity' - This is notably oxymoronic since 'christians' have been taught to hate gnosis as Roman 'Catholic' Irenæun 'heresy.' Roman 'Catholicism' is a purely dialectical genre. Gnosis belies dialectic as Error! Too, Essene Jesus called those, notably Peter, who called him 'a christ,' or 'Christ,'...Jesus called them (explicitly Peter) "Satan." Do research on Naassene and Essene Jesus' "father vis-à-vis Father," and "dead-father vis-à-vis living~Father." Doug - 22Apr2008. (References include Elaine Pagels' opus, e.g., her research exegesis, critical reviews, and descriptions of Johannine and Pauline gnosis, and Gaffney's Gnostic Secrets of the Naassenes. Also see Doug's Quantum Gnostic Religion vis-à-vis Classical Religion page.)
Good reason -
Good thing - 'Good' is subjective affirmation (though n¤t as problematic as subjective negation) while 'thing' is about an ideal a notion of a classical object as one can imagine - Doug - 27Apr2007.
Immutable uncertainty -
Impeccable logic - Dialectic is bogus, so how in hell can it be impeccable? Doug - 5Feb2007.
Kick morass - # This one is intended as quantum~humour, duh! You may have fun trying to QELR it, though...
Law of Included~Middle - Classicists believe that one may use formal 'axioms' to establish 'true' objective bases for their notions of 'law;' however, when one does that one creates a box, a closed domain of formal reason which canonically and universally excommunicates 'all' which is 'not' 'inside' said formal box of reason. Notice how included~middle allows all to informally, qualitatively associate, freely and without canonic walls, all. So, implicitly, included~middle denies any closed boxes of formal reason. Included~middle tears down classical notions of 'law' and 'legal boxes.' Can you fathom how formal and canonic 'law' depends upon either-or's excluded-middle and offers an explicit contradction of any quantum~memeo of included~middle? See OGC. Wolfram's website uses this phrase thus showing us, at least narratively, mathematics' objective oblivion to reality. Doug - 5Nov2007.
Learning Object - # Just found this one; it's academic thingk-king at its most 'intelligent' level of 'design;' learning evolves; objects dialectically are prohibited from evolution...Doug - 21Feb2007
Legal sanity - USA's legal system is "insane" due its formal bases of ideal dialectic 'decisions' given and adhered by presumed sovereign social 'opinion.' "Vulgi Opinio Error!" Thomas Digges, c. 15^th century. See Doug's QELR of 'law.' 22Apr2008 - Doug.
Measurable value - # Similar 'scientific value,' below. This one appeared in a 7September2007 issue of The Chronicle's Review section in a Point of View article by Harry R. Lewis titled 'A Core Curriculum for Tomorrow's Citizens.' It would appear that Lewis should read David A. Granger's October, 2006 (publish date) book juxtaposing both Dewey and Pirsig on educational value. Value isn't dead concrete stux quantitative measurables. Value is n¤t DIQheaded scalarbation. Value is living~evolving quantum flux. Value is unstoppable. It will n¤t conveniently hold still while one measures it. One may only ømnihtør (i.e., classically: monitor) quantum flux. One may only ømnihtør value...Doug - 12Sep2007.
Momentous location - # Classical physicists like Einstein and Feynman believe they can assess momentum and cartesian <x,y,z> 'locus' together, at one time, scalarbatively...
    Notice issues of macroscopic quantum~uncertainty here too: I.e., ·x  N·h. We are uncertain, however we harbor a modicum of comfihdæncæ
    that all omnitorable interrelationshipings' -product pairings will manifest macroscopic quantum~uncertaintyings. Doug - 19Jun2007.

Momentous state - # Classical physicists like Einstein and Feynman believe they can assess momentum and 'state' together, at one time, scalarbatively...
    Notice issues of macroscopic quantum~uncertainty here too: I.e., ·t  N·h. Fathom how classicists, here, assume time — as a spatial extensity
    proxy 'rate' — is stoppable, n¤n Bergsonian durational. Doug - 19Jun2007.

Moral principles - # A dialectical view of morality as logically canonical; a huge Error of EOOO classical 'judgment'
Moral truth -
No possibility - Consider both objective and subjective negation here. Simply, there is always 'a' possibility.
Objective cause - Quantum reality isn't objective. See affectation. See coobsfection.
Objective simplicity - Property taxonomy is infinitely complex. Simplicity as holographic flux phase~encodings is relatively trivial. See Flux versus state.
Particularized subject - One may not particularize any quality without turning it into quantity; to reify quality is to make an Error. This one is from David A Granger's discussion of John Dewey's views compared to Pirsig's views in Granger's October, 2006. John Dewey, Robert Pirsig and the Art of Living.
Political science - 'Ethical' 'science' is about 'provisional' 'truth'
Probability 'one' - Dynamic, included~middle, everywhere~associative, uncertain quantum~reality has n¤ classical 'notion' of a mathematically ideal, context-free, formal 'one.' Doug - 21Apr2007.
Probability 'zero' - Classically 'zero' is 'one' minus_c 'one.' See our pesky oxymoron - Probability 'one.' Doug - 21Apr2007.
Probable cause -
Quality control - Quality System specialists should rename this 'scalar measurement control:' it's all about quantity, it has naught to do with quality; real Quality may only be quantum~omnitored...Doug - 11Apr2007.
Quantify gravity - Gravity is a symptom emerging from dynamic flux interrelationshipings: gravity is a symptom of vastly ephemeral, many~quanton, both coherent ensemble and individual quantum~flux interrelationshipings. Gravity isn't classically 'constant.' Gravity isn't unitemporal! Gravity isn't unispatial! Gravity isn't classically 'objective.' Gravity isn't classically and naïvely 'local.' We may n¤t classically scalarbate gravity! Doug - 21Jan2008.
Quantum certainty - Rather quantum~uncertainty
Quantum geometry - This one should be obvious to O'gadons. What is geometry's founding axiom? "That equality may be assessed." What is quantum flux's founding axiom? "That quantum~phase~encodings are phylogenous."

"But Doug what does phylogenous mean?" Search on phylogeny, which is essentially genera of phyla. Technically phylogeny means evolutionary 'nonsynonymous di(omni)vergence.' That is a jargonized way of saying "quantum novelty emerges naturally, and up to Planck rate relentlessly." Too, "all quantum~emergence is n¤nsyn¤nym¤us, which emphasizes a servile and attendant mandate for evolving linguistics." Even simpler: "classical 'equality' simply cann¤t 'exist' in quantum reality. HotMeme™ "All quantum flux are phylogenous."™ HotMeme™. All quantum flux are evolutionarily unique, and borne of and on quantum~phylogeny. N¤ ideal, classical geometrical symmetry 'exists' in quantum reality. Doug - 17Feb2008; minor rev's - 6Mar2008.
Quantum logic - See coquecigrues.
Quantum mechanics - Rather quantum~n¤nmæchanics
Quantum objectivity - See object, subject.
Quantum particle - Rather quantum~wavicle
Quantum state - Rather quantum~phase
Quantum structure - Rather quantum~emerscitecture
Rhetorical polemic -
Sceptical principle[s] - Scepticism implies uncertainty. Principle implies certainty. From Doug's review of Hume's AToHN, Book I (Vol. I), Part IV, Section VII, p. 548 of 1789 White-Hart Mercer's Chapel Cheapside edition, reviewed by T. H. Greene. Doug - 13Aug2008.
Scientific value - All classical science finds its bases of reason in absolute truth provisionally based upon absence of any evidentiary factual contradiction otherwise. Classical science claims there is 'no bridge between fact and value.' Why? Fact is quantitative, objective. Value is qualitative, subjective. See judge, logic.
Sociology and psychology as 'social logic,' and 'mind logic.' Social patterns of value in their natural emerqancy are emergent quantum processings, thus in n¤ way classically logical. Ditto psychiatric patterns of mind value. Doug - 15Aug2008. See canon, fact, form, judge, law, logic, machine, reason, true, truth, What is Wrong with SOM's Logic?, etc.

Stable growth - Classical stability is objective 'state.' Growth as "evolution of actuality" issi quantum~subjective. Classicists deny evolution, therefore they must deny growth since growth cannot happen in any political 'state.' QuPo is about absolute political chance, choice, change. Keynesianism is about centrally-planned Marxist totalitarian state-us quo. Stability is Marxist retention of 'state' via Total Quantity Control AKA classical TQC. Quantumly, Quality (Value) may n¤t be classically-controlled as stable state. Doug - 23Nov2011.
Supernatural cause - Supernatural is subjective; cause is objective. So 'superstition,' classically, is an oxymoron. Notice how superstition bridges subjectivity and objectivity. Superstition bridges Value and fact. Quantum th~¤ught does just that: quanton(Value,fact). Quanton(¤ught,th). Quantum th~¤ught is subject-object oxymoronic when viewed classically: coquecigrues! See our QELR of thought. Doug - 13Aug2007.
Subject matter - Subject is qualitative, matter is objective, substantial, and dialectically quantitative. See other similar, re: David A. Granger on this page. Compare a cliché, "What's the matter?" Doug's quantum~answer, "Matter, and all philosophies whose bases are 'material.'"
'Wall of Uncertainty' - Just saw this manifest stupidity in Financial Time's 1May2007 edition special section of said title; a wall is a dialectical reductionist metaphor of SOM's knife and sidis of SOM's Box; uncertainty is a spatially arbitrary stochastic manifestation of holistic, inclusionary, wave flux; wall 'is' stux' certainty, uncertainty issi flux...Doug - 2May2007.
The interpretation (the anymeme, for that matter) - 'the' classically implies objective exclusivity of only 'one;' however 'interpretation' as Philip R. Wallace wrote, "...interpretation involves according primacy to subjectivity over objectivity." Doug's quote here is slightly paraphrased. See Wallace's Paradox Lost. Superb! Doug - 20Oct2007.
True essence - Essence is change. Unless we accept truth as change, 'true essence' is an oxymoron. Found this one on page 20 of David A. Granger's John Dewey, Robert Pirsig, and The Art of Living - Palgrave-MacMillan, 2006, hardbound.
Truth Values - Classical 'truth' is 'state.' Quantum 'Values' are about what may be and what may become. 'Value' is dynamic and fully capable of emergence, evolution, emerscenture, and relentless, unlimited change. So quantum Values bridge what is and what may become. Scientific 'state' is dead Value, stopped Value, measured Value (all oxymora, by-the~a-way) which science kills and pins to a cork board like a butterfly, a hummingbird... 'Science' isn't just dead, 'science' is death per son reified self-cloaking with a guise of socially approved, provincial and dogmatic, orthodox 'state' ic 'truth.' We found this first in an entirely embarrassing tome entitled Gnostic Philosophy. Real gn¤sis values dynamic, multiplicate, everywhere~nexiied quantum~emerscence! Read G. R. S. Mead's gn¤stic opus. Doug - 21Jun2008.
Wave-particle -
Etc.

Assess Classical assess: stability independence excluded-middle EOOOness H5Wness lisrability causation certainty EEMDivity observation and assess Quantum assess: animacy c¤mplementarity included-middlings BAWAMings H5Wings lisrings affectati¤nings umcærtainty EIMAivityings c¤¤bsfection for each dialectical oxymoron.

1. Catholic excommunication -
   
   

   Classical		Comments	Links	Quantum		Comments	Links
   Exactly	Similar	dichon(catholic, excommunication)	-	Exactly	Similar	quanton(catholic,excommunication)	-  coquecigrues
   Objective immutable EEMD comparison			-  -		Subjective animate EIMA comparison		-  -
   Quantitative scalar EEMD comparison			-  -		Qualitative animate EIMA comparison		-  -  -

   
   
   
2. Catholic heresy -
   
   

   Classical		Comments	Links	Quantum		Comments	Links
   Exactly	Similar	dichon(catholic, heresy)	-	Exactly	Similar	quanton(catholic,heresy)	-  coquecigrues
   Objective immutable EEMD comparison			-  -		Subjective animate EIMA comparison		-  -
   Quantitative scalar EEMD comparison			-  -		Qualitative animate EIMA comparison		-  -  -

   
   
   
3. Cause-effect participles -
   
   

   Classical		Comments	Links	Quantum		Comments	Links
   Exactly	Similar	dichon(cause-effect, participles)	-	Exactly	Similar	quanton(cause-effect,participles)	-  coquecigrues
   Objective immutable EEMD comparison			-  -		Subjective animate EIMA comparison		-  -
   Quantitative scalar EEMD comparison			-  -		Qualitative animate EIMA comparison		-  -  -

   
   
   
4. Concrete quality -
   
   

   Classical		Comments	Links	Quantum		Comments	Links
   Exactly	Similar	dichon(quality, concrete)	-	Exactly	Similar	quanton(quality,concrete)	-  coquecigrues
   Objective immutable EEMD comparison			-  -		Subjective animate EIMA comparison		-  -
   Quantitative scalar EEMD comparison			-  -		Qualitative animate EIMA comparison		-  -  -

   
   
   
5. Correct use -
   
   

   Classical		Comments	Links	Quantum		Comments	Links
   Exactly	Similar	dichon(correct, use)	-	Exactly	Similar	quanton(correct,use)	-  coquecigrues
   Objective immutable EEMD comparison			-  -		Subjective animate EIMA comparison		-  -
   Quantitative scalar EEMD comparison			-  -		Qualitative animate EIMA comparison		-  -  -

   
   
   
6. Exactly similar -
   
   

   Classical		Comments	Links	Quantum		Comments	Links
   Exactly	Similar	dichon(exactly, similar)	- A SOM Primer	Exactly	Similar	quanton(exactly,similar)	- A Quanton Primer
   Objective immutable EEMD 'exact' comparison	Subjective state-ic EEMD 'similar' comparison	To SOMwits objective vis-à-vis subjective is "nonsense," and "oxymoronic."	- identity - equality	Objective 'exactness' is quantumly n¤ncomceptual	Subjective animate EIMA similar comparison	'Exactly' is impossible in quantum reality. We need to quantumize 'exactly,' by calling it "approximately," and possibly "uncertainly."	- similar - uncertain
   Quantitative scalar EEMD 'exact' comparison	Qualitative 'similarity' has to be quantitatively reified to be "reasonable"	A dichon(quantity, quality) is "absurd" to any classical mind. Classicists turn quality into quantity by stopping and scalar-measuring it.	- quantity - reason	Quantity as 'exact' 'scalar stoppability' is quantumly n¤ncomceptual	Qualitative animate EIMA similar comparison	A quanton(approximately,similar) (is) has hermeneutic(ally) semantic in quantum reality. Our quantum stages quantonically compare ( i.e., vis-à-vis ) qualitative animate everywhere associative included~middle interrelationshipings as quantons.	- quality - stop - quantum stage

   
   
   
7. Ethical truth -
   
   

   Classical		Comments	Links	Quantum		Comments	Links
   Exactly	Similar	dichon(ethical, truth)	-	Exactly	Similar	quanton(ethical,truth)	-  ethic -  truth
   Objective immutable EEMD comparison			-  -		Subjective animate EIMA comparison		-  -
   Quantitative scalar EEMD comparison			-  -		Qualitative animate EIMA comparison		-  -  -

   
   
   
8. Fluid mechanics -
   
   

   Classical		Comments	Links	Quantum		Comments	Links
   Exactly	Similar	dichon(fluid, mechanics)	-	Exactly	Similar	quanton(fluid,mechanics)	-  form -  flux
   Objective immutable EEMD comparison			-  -		Subjective animate EIMA comparison		-  -
   Quantitative scalar EEMD comparison			-  -		Qualitative animate EIMA comparison		-  -  -

   
   
   
9. Formally secure -
   
   

   Classical		Comments	Links	Quantum		Comments	Links
   Exactly	Similar	dichon(formal, secure)	-	Exactly	Similar	quanton(formal,secure)	-  form -  secure
   Objective immutable EEMD comparison			-  -		Subjective animate EIMA comparison		-  -
   Quantitative scalar EEMD comparison			-  -		Qualitative animate EIMA comparison		-  -  -

   
   
   
10. Good reason -
    
    

    Classical		Comments	Links	Quantum		Comments	Links
    Exactly	Similar	dichon(good, reason)	-	Exactly	Similar	quanton(good,reason)	-  good -  reason
    Objective immutable EEMD comparison			-  -		Subjective animate EIMA comparison		-  -
    Quantitative scalar EEMD comparison			-  -		Qualitative animate EIMA comparison		-  -  -

    
    
    
11. Immutable uncertainty -
    
    

    Classical		Comments	Links	Quantum		Comments	Links
    Exactly	Similar	dichon(immutable, uncertainty)	-	Exactly	Similar	quanton(immutable,uncertainty)	-  duration -  uncertainty
    Objective immutable EEMD comparison			-  -		Subjective animate EIMA comparison		-  -
    Quantitative scalar EEMD comparison			-  -		Qualitative animate EIMA comparison		-  -  -

    
    
    
12. Legal sanity -
    
    

    Classical		Comments	Links	Quantum		Comments	Links
    Exactly	Similar	dichon(legal, sanity)	-	Exactly	Similar	quanton(legal,sanity)	-  fact -  law
    Objective immutable EEMD comparison			-  -		Subjective animate EIMA comparison		-  -
    Quantitative scalar EEMD comparison			-  -		Qualitative animate EIMA comparison		-  -  -

    
    
    
13. Moral principles -
    
    

    Classical		Comments	Links	Quantum		Comments	Links
    Exactly	Similar	dichon(moral, principles)	-  judge	Exactly	Similar	quanton(moral,principles)	-  moral -  principle -  truth
    Objective immutable EEMD comparison		View morality and principles as classical objects which 'possess' analytic 'properties.' Recall Henri Louis Bergson's two greatest classical illusions: That [classical] reality is stable, and that objects in [classical] reality are independent of one another.	-  object -  canon -  law		Subjective animate EIMA comparison	View morality and principles as quantum waves. Quantum waves are quantum likelihood omnistributionings. In quantum reality, morality and principles thus like all else are quantum~stochastic.	-  subject  -  stochastic
    Quantitative scalar EEMD comparison			-  -		Qualitative animate EIMA comparison		-  -  -

    
    
    Moral truth -
    
    

    Classical		Comments	Links	Quantum		Comments	Links
    Exactly	Similar	dichon(moral, truth)	-	Exactly	Similar	quanton(moral,truth)	-  moral -  truth
    Objective immutable EEMD comparison			-  -		Subjective animate EIMA comparison		-  -
    Quantitative scalar EEMD comparison			-  -		Qualitative animate EIMA comparison		-  -  -

    
    
    
14. Objective cause -
    
    

    Classical		Comments	Links	Quantum		Comments	Links
    Exactly	Similar	dichon(objective, cause)	-	Exactly	Similar	quanton(objective,cause)	-  cause -  object
    Objective immutable EEMD comparison			-  -		Subjective animate EIMA comparison		-  -
    Quantitative scalar EEMD comparison			-  -		Qualitative animate EIMA comparison		-  -  -

    
    
    
15. Probable cause -
    
    

    Classical		Comments	Links	Quantum		Comments	Links
    Exactly	Similar	dichon(probable, cause)	-	Exactly	Similar	quanton(probable,cause)	-  cause -  probability -  What is Wrong with Probability as Value?
    Objective immutable EEMD comparison			-  -		Subjective animate EIMA comparison		-  -
    Quantitative scalar EEMD comparison			-  -		Qualitative animate EIMA comparison		-  -  -

    
    
    
16. Quantum logic -
    
    

    Classical		Comments	Links	Quantum		Comments	Links
    Exactly	Similar	dichon(quantum, logic)	-	Exactly	Similar	quanton(quantum,logic)	-  coquecigrues -  logic -  quanta
    Objective immutable EEMD comparison			-  -		Subjective animate EIMA comparison		-  -
    Quantitative scalar EEMD comparison			-  -		Qualitative animate EIMA comparison		-  -  -

    
    
    
17. Rhetorical polemic -
    
    

    Classical		Comments	Links	Quantum		Comments	Links
    Exactly	Similar	dichon(rhetoric, polemic)	-	Exactly	Similar	quanton(rhetoric,polemic)	-  dialectic
    Objective immutable EEMD comparison			-  -		Subjective animate EIMA comparison		-  -
    Quantitative scalar EEMD comparison			-  -		Qualitative animate EIMA comparison		-  -  -

    
    
    
18. Scientific value -
    
    

    Classical		Comments	Links	Quantum		Comments	Links
    Exactly	Similar	dichon(scientific, value)	-	Exactly	Similar	quanton(scientific,value)	-  science -  value
    Objective immutable EEMD comparison			-  -		Subjective animate EIMA comparison		-  -
    Quantitative scalar EEMD comparison			-  -		Qualitative animate EIMA comparison		-  -  -

    
    
    
19. Etc.