These Graphics Derive from a Much Older Opus Called,
"Absoluteness as Uncertainty Relationships
Between Consistency and Completeness"

See Original

For a practical exemplar of what this page is attempting to exegetize, see Bobby Knight's imposition,
as a monism, of his own chaos on a B-ball Team's natural equilibria.

Fathom how a coherent team (local~global), when instructed to fix a problem,
suddenly and monistically focuses on said problem and QVP-lose their coherence!
Never thought about that, right?
It's happening globally CeodE 2012 within Finance, Economics, and Politics as Doug writes this...
Ponder how MSM does this to earth's societies by getting them to focus on something
which prevents societies' own coherence in getting rid of Keynesianism!

Doug - 10Sep2012.

Here we use standard probability equations to produce curves shown.

Our approach follows a line of classical reasoning like this:

Assume stochastics

  • that no two physical (i.e., actual) coherent quantum comtexts' chaos~equilibria interrelationshipings are evolutionarily comsistent out of a group of 'n' energy~wellings in 't' total possible energy~wellings, and
  • that no two physical (i.e., actual) decoherent quantum comtexts' chaos~equilibria interrelationshipings are evolutionarily comsistent out of a group of 'n' energy~wellings in 't' total possible energy~wellings

is, S(n,t)=t!/((t-n)! * tn).

Then we assume stochastics

  • that two or more physical quantum comtexts are more equilibrial and less chaotic out of a group of 'n' coherent energy~wellings, and
  • that two or more physical quantum comtexts are more chaotic and less equilibrial out of a group of 'n' decoherent energy~wellings

is, P(n,t) = 1 - S(n,t).

We approximated our calculation of S(n,t) using (1-n/(2*d))n-1

Classical Problematics (need wingdings font for our fickle quantum fingers :):

Analyticity (determinism, induction, cause-effect, homogeneous time or independent variable as change, axiom of independence (a strict derivation of Aristotle's 3rd syllogistic 'law,' claiming excluded-middle 'independence' of classical objects), et al.) -

  • As you can see in our graphs above and our classical equations, a classical assumption of monism as continuous and unitemporal (from a purely classical-ideal "reality is stoppable" view...atemporal) analyticity is inherent. Our classical equation is continuous.

  • But is reality analytic? ! Reality is quantal, as graph just above illustrates. Here is an exemplar:

  • Do our continuous, analytic stochastic graphs of our probability~plausibility~likelihood functions for classical equilibria and chaos depict quantal reality? N¤! However, we benefit from making these classical comparisons, since they show us chaoequil interrelationshipings vary with coherent~decoherent quantum~comtextings. If this makes you thinkq of PBings(cohera,decohera) and PBings(equilibria,chaos), Doug has achieved a partial quantum~affectation. Also, these two graphics illustrate a great quantum tell: quantum~reality is complementary. Complementarity appears ubiquitous and perpetual in all quantum~reality at all scales of quantum~reality. Chaos complements equilibrium and vice versa. Coherence complements decoherence and vice versa. Latter is an essential of quantum~evolutionary~creation processings as exhibited in both QED and QCD, and other omnisciplines like Bohm's Hologramic~Quantum~Theory, Bergson's Creation Philosophy, Quantonics, Qabala, and its associated cosmic energy language: Autiot, etc. Doug - 10Sep2012.

Localability, isolability/individuicity, separability, and reducibility (lisr) -

  • A classical assumption of lisr is inherent in classical reasoning.
  • Each classical context is lisr.
  • Each classical context adheres Aristotelian syllogisms, especially objective, excluded-middles among all classical contexts.
  • But is reality lisr? N¤! Reality is quantum c¤hesive.
  • Do our continuous, analytic graphs of our probability functions for classical equilibria and chaos depict quantum c¤hesive reality? Yæs, partially! They show quanton(chaos,equilibrium) as quantum~complementary and thus, to some extent, quantum~coherent due an Quantonics assumption of quantum~middle~inclusion. Ditto quanton(coherence,decoherence). Trouble is, those analytic graphs do it using classical maths' canonic Aristotelian sillygisms!

Ideal mathematical integer constancy -

  • A classical assumption that an ideal logical/physical constant, one (1), exists.
  • A classical assumption that ideal logical/physical manipulations of one (1) exist:
    • 1/1 iso 1
    • 1*1 iso 1
    • 1+1 iso 2 (inference of induction and counting)
    • 1-1 iso 0 (inherent definition of zero)
    • 1 = 1 iso classical ideal identity
    • d1/dt = 0 (1st derivative of a 'constant' is zero; assumes homogeneous time)
    • (1-1)/(1-1) iso undefined (Isn't this amazing?)
  • But does reality generate or manifest physical integer constants? N¤! All quantum n¤mbærs are umcærtain! N¤ tw¤ quantum n¤mbærs are identical! Too, they are perpetually and ubiquitously evolving. In general it is n¤t p¤ssible f¤r tw¤ quantum n¤mbærs t¤ be physically and thus l¤gically identical.
  • Do our continuous, analytic graphs of our probability functions for classical equilibria and chaos depict quantum n¤mbær umcærtainty? ! (I.e., classical use of '1-P.') Quantum~n¤mbærs are dynamic, evolving processings. For example, see Doug's Quantum~Hamiltonian.
  • See Doug's list of Suggested Requirements for A New Quantum~Mathematics.

So, reader, you can see how classical concepts, especially classical mathematical sillygistic concepts, impede any real and natural understanding of quantum~reality. N¤ mathematician ever shows '1' as a quantum umcærtain comcept. (Using n¤vel memes presented here we can d¤ that.)

F¤r ¤ur purp¤ses here, let's assume that ¤ur least values f¤r equilibria and chaos in ¤ur n¤nclassical, quantum~reality are individual quanta. Our curves d¤ n¤t sh¤w that; h¤wever, we can imagine their classical zero asymptotes as reality's minimum Planck quantum, i.e., quantum_2•quantum_•h.

Thank you f¤r reading,


To contact Quantonics write to or call:

Doug Renselle
Quantonics, Inc.
Suite 18 #368 1950 East Greyhound Pass
Carmel, INdiana 46033-7730

©Quantonics, Inc., 2012-2022 — Rev. 10Sep2012  PDR — Created 10Sep2012  PDR