A crucial quote for students of quantonics:
"In a determinate system, where the calculations have
already occurred, we know which points along a curve connect
with independent dimensions. In our indeterminate system we never
know just which points will suddenly sprout new axes or discard
old ones. Indeterminacy is the principal feature of intelligence!"
By Paul Pietsch, p. 223, Shufflebrain, Houghton-Mifflin
Co., Boston, 1981.
Synonyms - classical:
- 'not' certain
- tertium non datur
- canonic violation
Synonyms - quantum:
- flux absolute
- Bell Inequal
- Bergsonian durational,
and see duration
- changes all, and always changes
Classically uncertainty is
an ideal opposite
If one is ideally
certain, then one
can be ideally uncertain.
Also classicism depends upon mechanical formality to be able
to ideally predict.
Classically, then, that which may not
be ideally predicted is uncertain.
Classically, that which is certain is always
certain, ideally. A good example here are 'scientific' 'laws.'
Classically certainty, and therefore uncertainty must not
change. (Yes! We
agree, this is not as-practiced, rather we show how ideal classical
thingking and method when rigorously applied would demand absence
of any change in uncertainty.)
For a detail comparison of both classical and quantum uncertainty
juxtaposed classical and quantum certainty, see Doug's review
See DIQ. See How
SOMites View &
umcærtainings, umcærtainty, etc.
Quantonics ch¤¤ses t¤ c¤¤pt
classical 'uncertainty' amd
quantum comtextual ¤ccurrences with 'umcærtainty.'
In classical contexts we shall use 'uncertainty.' In Quantonics/quantum
comtexts we shall use 'umcærtainty.'
Classically 'uncertain' means that a probability of an 'event' is neither zero
nor one (AKA neither False nor True), rather is some fuzzy value,
possibly varying in time, between one and zero (or False and
True). This is what we mean when, in Quantonics, we say that
"classical reality is a dichon, dichotomous, EOOO,
analytic, platypusean, centric, biformal, etc." Classicists
see reality as mechanically state-ic
and immutably stable, and when reality changes in an Aristotelian/Newtonian/Einsteinian
y=f(t) manner from a current state
to a new predicable state, they see that change as a manufactured/manufacturable/analytic
causal/determinate stoppable discrete 'event.'
Often classical 'uncertain' means undecidable in a sense that
an answer lies outside any known or knowable classical context.
Some logicians call this classical tertium non datur,
"Mu," meaning no third or other alternative
Perhaps most em-bare-assing is that classical 'state-ic events'
can achieve and maintain equilibrium, arbitrary 'state-ic' duration
(i.e., perpetual, immutable 'state'), zero thermalized energy
thermodynamic entropy gradients, thus decoherently and dyslexically
denying generality of Maxwell's 2nd 'law' of thermodynamics.
See similar comments under change.
Quantum reality denies virtually all those classicisms! Those
naïve classicisms simply do n¤t obtain from a quantum
perspective and understanding of reality.
Quantumly 'umcærtain' means that n¤ such concepts
as classical state and classical event æist in quantum reality. Quantum reality is always
all, so any notion of classical state is impossible (variable
ideal immutable classical 'state,' n¤).
Quantum ævæntings aræ
everywhere-associative pr¤cesses. This is why,
when he looked, John von Neumann could find no classically
causal, 1-1 correspondent
locus or loci for any quantum-mechanical special measurement
and Value aspects
of quantum~reality are major affectors of full spectrum (macro,
meso, micro) quantum~uncertainty, i.e., real quantum~stochastic
indetermination? Let's make a list which will start our quantum~stages
on a journey of quantum~understanding:
Comparatively we juxtapose Bergson's quantum opposing
list of dialectical delusions...which most classicists wors(e)ship:
- stability (AKA stoppability as a requisite for scalar measurement),
If we distill these quantum vav classical lists we may observe
that classical reality is radically stable by socially positive
axiomatic presumption (auto-herded hive drone delusion), and
quantum~reality is radically instable by empirical individual
self~other fractally~recursive observation (Bergson's "think being
directly," and Pirsig's "direct experience").
Quantum reality's genuine uncertainty is crux of, "A
New Philosophy is in town..." Doug offers quantum~uncertainty's
Doug - 14Apr2012.
Hermeneutically, then, we must view quantum umcærtainty
as Quantonic Ensehmble Quantum Interrelationship pr¤cessings!
A good quantum
stage exercise to play here is to think of your child's baseball
hitting a neighbor's window first as a classical event, then
as a quantum umcærtainty pr¤cess. Classically a
baseball is an inanimate, independent, immutable, substantial,
material object. Similarly, a pane of glass. But quantumly, a
baseball is an anihmatæ quantum
ensehmble similar to that shown
in our ensehmble quantum interrelationship
link just above. Ditto that pane of glass. Interrelationships
twixt those two quantum ensehmbles
(ball and glass) aræ an anihmatæ
quantum umcærtainty pr¤cess of countless ensehmble ævæntings!!!
See our Quantum
Uncertainty as Macroscopic.
See our Bergsonian
Duration as a Proxy for Macroscopic Uncertainty.
See QIC. See How
MoQites View &
Page top index.
: Understand, understanding, understands, etc.
(need symbol font to see this in Greek: catalabainw;
in Hebrew, phonetically understanding issi meaning_explained,
"mroovahn dahrahsh;" in languages pulldown, cA means
and qQ means quantum~Quantonic)
Classically understanding may be explained and defined
using objective analytic methods. For example, an observer and
some 'thing' which said observer is attempting to understand
from one another. Another example is that understanding may be
objectively, methodically analyzed
and defined by
In classical Western culture, understanding is contextual
and an assumption is made of OGC
and OGT. OGT becomes said culture's basis for institutionalized
and public | social dogma and their 'legal,' socially
positive, tragedy of commons sense disciplinary matrices.
Essentially, in this monotext, there is only one accepted understanding
of any observable. Society's agents may only have the understanding,
and not have just any understanding.
Classical understanding requires classical reason
which says that reality is classically logical,
a reality which: is ideally stable,
falsifiable, and thence
assessable as EOOO(false,
Classical understanding is rote and it depends upon
a state-ic know-ledge whose contents are stable and inanimate.
Classical understanding depends upon unchanging truth which allows
those who classically understand to run
on automatic, to self-assuredly, paradigmatically, dogmatically,
provincially, and parochially rest on laurels of accretive past
'scientific' achievements. (To highlight that last sentence's
classical depth of decoherence see Kuhn's
Structure of Scientific Revolutions.)
Take great care in your pondering of classical axioms of stability
and objective independence. Fathom objective independence regarding
classical semantics of interpretation, meaning, and association.
Objective independence demands an Aristotelian excluded-middle
which requires separation. Now, reconcile that with a
need for association in order to both interpret and understand.
We see a deeply flawed classical-lingual decoherence here asking
us to disassociatively associate in order to classically understand.
(Similar flaws of classically decoherent language arise in
pondering classical cause-effect as axiomatically independent,
and Maxwell's 2nd law of thermodynamics demanding
a positive entropy slope for an immutably objective classical
reality. Others include: ideal identity, zero, null, empty,
ideal unity, negation, etc.)
Mostly, that is...
Some classicists debate whether understanding is either
scientific or human. This debate centers predominately
on a classical notion that 'science' is objective and humans
Further, that objective thingking is real and subjective thought
is unreal. Classicists' debate on understanding assumes
that understanding follows a formal, mechanical, unitemporal
flow which can be captured in ideal objective | predicate language,
i.e., classical understanding is, like 'science' mechanical.
German Verstehen carries a much more qualitative, subjectiv(e) interpretation
Cantonese offers even more flexibility here, at least as an
apparency of ideogrammatic flexibility, especially qualitative
semiotic and hermeneutic perspectives. We show this in two of
possibly unlimited examples in our languages pull-down just left.
TS'UNG begs a kind of dogmatic adherence. Our own choice of LI'AI'CHIAO'HSIN
carries more quantum, qualitative, subjective, animate memeotics:
radiant patterns of energy (LI), affect~ion (AI), commingling
(CHIAO), nowistically getting better (HSIN).
Perhaps our easiest way of describing what we mean by quantum
understanding is what Tom Petzinger said about The New Pioneers,
"They become one with their tools." That is a colloquialism
for what we mean when we say, "being quantum coherent."
Quantum umdærstamding happæns
whæn wæ bæc¤mæ
2011q How to Find One's Inner.
Quantum umdærstamding issi an æmærgænt
nævær ænds. Onæ nævær
achieves a 'final' understanding,
rather ¤næ issi ahlways
ihn an æv¤luti¤nary
pr¤cæss ¤f bættær umdærstamding.
One never 'classically arrives' at 'final'
Quantum umdærstamding æmærqs
¤ur quantum stagings as a sælf-¤hrganihzing net. Wæ can scrihpt
Quantum umdærstamding issi l¤cahlly
amd ~n¤nsihmihlarly hærmænæutihc by quanton. Sææ ¤ur
CR and SOM table.
Page top index.
: Unify, unification, etc.
In classical dialectical terms 'unify' means to make several
and many 'one.' To make a
Mathematically 9 is a mechanical unification of 1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1.
As we have shown elsewhere those one's, by mathematical canon
are 'identical' to
Now what if government says it unifies 'people.' Does that
mean they are all 'equal,' 'identical,' etc., to 'one' another.
But that is bogus on its face, isn't it?
So is '9' bogus as a unification of nine '1s.'
Classically, 'catholic' means universal: a unified belief
system where all members are bonded by a single set of canonic
dogma which all swear to uphold (though few adhere). We call
that a OSFA belief system. A monism! Chaldæan gnostics
prior our current era, called monism "deceit." Why?
No single system can fit all people. If it did, we would all
speak only one language. We would all share a single 'government,'
and a single 'religion.' Chaldæans were saying that
is bologna. Bogus. Intellectual and spiritual garbage.
We agree with Chaldæan gnosis
and find 'catholicism' and all contrived monisms bogus!
Many sizes fit all: languages, beliefs, local guidelines,
cultures, ethics, morals, laws, etc. Many, not 'one.'
Doug suggests a video, a superb video for each of you to watch...you
may garner a sense of what those Chaldæans are trying to
tell us. See V for Vendetta. Excellent! Buenoissimo! Value for V. V for Sophia.
V for Quality. Lower case 'v' for and .
Classicists unify via consensual (often via propaganda) EEMD interactions between
objective properties and thoughts. Doug - 27Jan2012.
: Unify, unification, unifies, unifying, unifyings,
unifications, unificationing, unificationings, etc.
is nothing like classical unification.
Quantum unification says, "There are n¤ classical
ones in quantum~reality!"
"But Doug, What takes place of classical 'unify' in quantum~reality?"
Lots of memeos in quantum~reality find relevance in quantum~wholeness.
To make it simpler, without delving deeply in quantum detail,
allow Doug to refer, again and for at least our tenth referral,
to Mae-wan Ho on quantum~unification:
See and read Mae-wan
Ho Coherence with Autonomy.
What we need to know here to make quantum~coherence
a quantum~metaphor of classical 'unity,' is to realize that quantum~unity
as coherence is nominally always partial.
"What does that mean Doug?"
It means that all features of any quantum~system need not
cohere simultaneously. View quantum~coherence as dynamic, r~evolution[aryings],
always emerscing genuine quantum~novelty, always phasistically
mutatively growing and diminishing in OEDCycles:
metabolic, anabolic, catabolic SON
cycles of sorso
coobsfective awarenessings and livings~dyings. 5Aug2008 - Doug.
Quantumists unify via hologramic EIMA
quantonic interrelationshipings among quantum~hologram islandic
EWings. Doug -
Page top index.
Synonyms - classical:
Synonyms - quantum:
: Unique, etc.
One of a kind. Sui generis.
Classical oneness here is objective, static, lisr, concrete,
comparisons of oneness tend toward logical bivalency (trueness
of uniqueness; validity of uniqueness assessments) and 1-1 correspondence
(classically perfect, objective correspondence, AKA 'identity,'
would deny, refute, and invalidate any uniqueness), etc.
¤mnihquæly, ¤mnihquæness, ¤mnihquænessings,
Quantum uniqueness is very special. Mae-wan Ho described it
like this: a both-and of both coherence (EIMA~othernessings)
and autonomy (selfnessings).
Quantonics shows quantum uniqueness like this: quanton(aliai_generis,suai_generis).
Here, we are using a Quantonics' approach of ai in
place of i for plural present participlings. Doug - 2Jul2006.
Any unique quanton is both~while its quantum~unique
selfings and~all of its complementings. A unique quanton
is its interrelationshipings of both selfings and otherings:
suai and aliai. Quanton(aliai,suai).
See our Quantonics What are
Page top index.