If you're stuck in a browser frame - click here to view this same page in Quantonics!
Accord?It has been over a year since Doug
has posted here.
Gore is a laughing stock. McCain't is a laughing stock.
Envirnomental 'scientists' are all laughing stocks.
Like all 'good' socialists persistent
envirnomentalists have renamed 'global warming' to 'climate change.'
Socialists are, in Doug's opinion,
committing evolutionary suicide now on a grand scale.
"Why do you make that claim
Simply, change is normal. Change
Change is quantum. Change is
uncertain due quantum~real wave~stochastics. A quantized reality is radically~instable
via its perpetual transmutative cycles of both
chaos and equilibrium borne of
quantized~scintillation in all reality.
We have a similar issue in Keynesian-Marxist
thought. Of course they are socialists. (Read Hayek's Road
Keynesians and socialists attempt
their own utopian 'radical stability.' See Hyman
Minsky. Doug - 13Jan2012.
Economic systems are like weather
systems: they perpetually evolve, perpetually change, and
that evolutionary change is normal.
But socialists like central planning
and central control. It is their kind of objective classical
Instead of letting nature have
her way and adapting to nature's absolute change mandate, they
want to, via central planning, control her.
They want to, for purposes of
controlled 'natural-stability,' be able to determine
limits on weather, financial systems, and human beings.
They want to control all financial markets. If you want
evidence of this try
trading in markets today. Odds are about 99% you will lose all
They want one global society, classically unified, Total Quality
determinately following their One
Size Fits All 'rules.'
(Those of you serious students
of Quantonics fathom how 'Quality Control' is an oxymoronic insanity.
What classical Keynesian-Marxist socialists really mean is 'Total
Quantity Control.' Doug - 4Dec2010.)
It is apparent to Doug that any
socialist notion of 'natural-stability,' even OSFA 'social-stability,'
too, are oxymorons.
This sounds really evil and bad.
But it is, longer term, good. Why? Attempts to abort-alter natural
in weather, society, and financial systems induces an eventual
inevitability of self-extinction of those doing so.
Nature is allowing socialists
Their mandate of 'no competition,' guarantees their demise.
Nature will "off them." Nature competes whether socialists
'approve' and naye.
This notion is simple:
we cann¤t fight change. It is natural. Instead we must
learn to adapt to change.
A very anti socialist theme emerges here. To adapt we must compete.
Competition is nature's ultimate assessment method of natural
Competition is natural, and systems which embrace it have greater
likelihoods of survival.
Socialists want to deny competition and substitute classically
determinate central planning. This is a failed and failing strategy.
Socialists do not realize it yet but their anti competitive social-planning
mandates guarantee their self-extinction.
Our best example here is 'the'
European 'Union.' It is failing massively too.
Why? Horrible and inept central planning in Brussels, Belgium.
Ditto USA with Central Bank socially-planned central controls in
Washington DC and New York.
If you need more evidence of
what Doug is saying, look at our world's Keynesian financial systems.
They are collapsing, failing massively.
They fought change for nearly 100 years and now they are about
to become extinct.
Socially controlled weather and change will be, indeed are,
even more obvious and more rapidly apparent failures.
You should fathom how failing
financial systems are decidedly anthropogenic; however, weather
Make change adaptation a part
of who you are as an individual.
Dump classical socialism. Increase your chances of survival.
Doug - 4Dec2010.
Reasons Why ClimateChange is Natural!
Thanks to Drudge - 15Dec2009.
Gore, 'the' Pope, and Envirnomentalists are
all liars, charlatans, incompetents, ersatz twidlos!
Papa could use a tad of O'Gadon's O'Gn¤sis,
Keep it up, Matt. Martus Aritos!!!
Warming of Earth is a Hoax!
Thanks to Drudge - 12Nov2009.
"The GoreBull Warming is a Fuxup!"
Keep it up, Matt. Good Work!!!
on brink of major ice age, Pravda.Jupiter
scientists reject 'global warming' agenda
Most of Al Gore's Envirnomental
'Global Warming' Views are Bogus!
His views are all based upon
naïve local realism's classical dialectic.
Doug - 29Mar2008.Maunder
100 Years of Cooling!
of Global Cooling
Scientists say "No!"Challenge
"the envirnomentalist fool"
Shows Global Warmists'
actually preaches pseudo science!
believe AGW is 'nonscience.'
Thanks to Matt Drudge for finding this!
(AGW: Anthropogenic Global Warming.)
"By comparison, CO2 variations show little correlation
with our planet's climate on long, medium and
even short time scales...It
is global cooling,
not warming, that is the major
climate threat to the world,
"The school bully is, alas, right on climate change.
All such planning requires that those who would
undertake it hold information that they do not
have and to which they cannot realistically aspire."
"Because of the many factors
accurately predicting the outcome of
natural processes on the surface
of the earth is impossible."
Lars Larson on
Science Daily News: Global
UK-Documentary on Human-Caused
Global-Warming is Lies!
Hudson Institute refers two books which call Global
Warming Natural - Moderate.
Science-Daily on Global
Warming is Natural.
Warmists and Climate Changists as Empiricists.
That, folks, is what we have been telling and showing
you all along...
Doug - 7Nov2006
"It's too simplistic to say low CO2 was the only cause
of the glacial periods" on time scales of millions of years,
said Robert Giegengack, a geologist at the University of Pennsylvania
who studies past atmospheres. "The record violates that
He and other doubters say the planet is clearly warming today,
as it has repeatedly done, but insist that no one knows exactly
why. Other possible causes, they say, include changes in sea
currents, Sun cycles and cosmic rays that bombard the planet.
"More and more data," Jan Veizer, an expert on Phanerozoic
climates at the University of Ottawa, said, "point to the
Sun and stars as the dominant driver."
From a NYTimes article:
In Ancient Fossils, Seeds of a
New Debate on Warming
By WILLIAM J. BROAD
Published: November 7, 2006
Ocean surface temp's actually
cooling now, 2003-2005:
Science: Roger Pielke Sr. Research Group Weblog
Their weblog concludes, "The explanation of this
temporal change in the radiative imbalance of the
Earth's climate system is a challenge to the climate science community.
It does indicate that we know
less about natural- and human-climate forcings
and feedbacks than concluded in the IPCC Reports."
Notice our green bold of their use of present participle
Doug - 17Oct2006
9Jul2006 - Doug paraphrases Max Jammer's,
"If, however, all measurable properties (observables)
of a [climate] system are taken into
consideration objectifiability becomes impossible within the
framework of classical logic."
Jammer's parentheses. Our brackets and bold.
Climate systems are quantum systems
See Jammer's Philosophy of Quantum Mechanics,
Chapter 8 - 'Quantum Logic,' Section 5, page 394.
Readers should be aware
that >99.99% of climatologists and envirnomentalists
are "trained classically."
We simply cannot trust their "climate change"
and "global warming" admonitions.
They are using single parameter (CO2) cause
to make their assessments and 'predictions.'
Climate systems simply are n¤t 1-1 correspondent,
cause-effect, mechanical, formal, uni-parameter forcing, root
No real system is. To believe any system is a root
cause system is to illustrate one's own local
and naïve realism.
Doug - 9Jul2006
DEFRA has decided an "adaptation framework" is our,
probably better, way out.
Thanks to www.theregister.co.uk.
Thanks to www.theregister.co.uk.
See our Quantonics September,
2005 News for our best guess at what is current source of
Earth's 'global warming.'
Doug - 31Aug2005.
Unsure you have seen Discovery Channels' shows on mini ice
ages. They are quite spectacular!
Researchers have correlated these periods:
2200 b.c (quick failure of Nile; fall of then Egyptian empire)
0700 b.c. (global weather affects and ecofailures)
0800 a.d. (quick failure of South America's Mayan civilization)
2300 a.d. (possible quantum~fractal
'~repeat,' and what is happening now, i.e., apparent 'global
warming,' as a buildup to it)
What we see is quantum environmental changes which are quasi
cyclic (quantum wave~based, and thus intrinsically ensemble,
EIMA, emergent quantum likelihood omnistributionings' stochasticities).
One manifestation of these repetitious stochasticities is
changings from small weather quantum~islandic coherencies to
growing, larger and larger weather quantum~islandic coherencies.
Notice Weather Channel's satellite images. Patterns are growing
larger and larger.
Also notice an apparent global shift of seasons! Our summers
have become springlike and our falls are cool but summer like,
and winters are fall like. That pattern of change is manifest
where we live and has been for at least 15-20 years, since at
least blizzard of 1978 when envirnomentalists were predicting
'global cooling' and a 'snow blitz!' J
If that 1500 year cycle above is quantum~chaotic (and we suspect
it is), we are actually in a mini ice age cycle which quantum~expects,
stochastically, dramatic cooling sometime within next 300 years
with dramatic global drought affects which will last at least
100s of years.
If this is so, shouldn't we have an omniffering protocol than
Doug - 22Aug2005.
PS - try a www search on <1500 year mini ice
Then do it on Egypt, Nile, and Maya.
See New Scientist on Cosmic
Ray Warming of Planets
"...in the field of astronomy, we find that partly as
a result of chance disturbances from other galaxies and partly
as a result of the laws of motion under the gravitational forces
originating in the same galaxy, stars have a very complicated
and irregular distribution of velocities going in all sorts of
directions, etc., with the result that some systems of stars
are being disrupted, while new systems are formed."
in his paper,
The Qualitative Infinity of Nature,
from Lee Nichol's excellent 2003
The Essential David Bohm,
Text added 20Jul2005 - Doug.
"...At issue is whether cosmic rays, the high-energy
particles spat out by exploding stars elsewhere in the galaxy,
can affect the temperature [of planets]...
"...Some proponents of the theory argue that changes
in the number of cosmic rays reaching Earth can explain past
climate change as well as global warming today...."
"...'It makes you think maybe it's a waste implementing
the Kyoto Protocol and losing all those trillions of dollars,'
Quotes from New Scientist link above, dated 17Aug2004.
Kyoto Accord: A Postmortem!
is warming too!
See Earth's atmosphere
Magazine's September, 2002 Issue Cover Story:
And Our Quantonics' Commentary Here:
Notice how recent
sunspot activity correlates 'global warming' schedule. See
our graph below showing an, starting in
~1970 warming trend.
From The Register! See www.theregister.com.
Doug - 28Oct2004.
A New Ice Age
Global Warming Surprise!
Experiences Global Warming Too
Which Humans and Their Fossil Burning are Causing Mars' Global
Use Google on our top page to search for Mars
Experiences (Planet Surface) Global Warming Too!
Which Humans and Their Fossil Burning are Causing Pluto's Global
See Science News 7Sep2002, p. 148, 'Pluto and the Occult'
See Sowell's "Global
We are actually in an "Ice Age"
See James J. Besemer's September, 2001 "Global Warming,
The Big Picture"
See our new graphics
below showing how
looking at a single parameter, Earth's polar axis precession
Earth will experience global both warming and cooling
in a cycle which recurs each 26 thousand years.
(A subcycle of Besemer's larger cycles shown above.)
Doug - 26Apr2003
Please be aware that on Monday, July 23, 2001, "...in
Bonn, negotiators from 178 nations reached an accord that should
help transform the 1997 Kyoto Protocol on global warming into
a binding international treaty...They did it without the US."
From Science News, Vol. 160, July 28, 2001.
We find enormous humor in that quote!
But Doug, where is humor in that?
Negotiators (presumably including some envirnomental
'scientists') found accord among themselves
on global warming! Nothing is said about them finding any accord
with Nature on global warming.
1997's Kyoto Protocol claims that Earth's mean temperatures
will rise ~6o C in 120 years!
Friends, that classical prediction is hopelessly laughable.
That is more ludicrous than saying we will have a specific environmental
event on a specific date during latter half of our next full calendar
year. We have no deterministic means to do that! Nature offers
us no certainty about any specific future conditions or events!
Only classical thinkers will buy such silly arguments.
Nature, first of all, is quantum. As a result too, s-he is
thus self-referent, thus fractal,
thus both islandic and chaotic.
Furthermore, Nature is incredibly complex and even more
- always changes,
- changes all, and
- is always self-interdependent to greater or lesser degrees.
Human 'scientists' have no classical means at their disposal
to evaluate Nature's many parameters and their many interrelationships
all of which are changing from very slow rates to Planck's
frequency (~1043 times per unit spatial reference).
They simply cannot know what they claim to reach 'Kyoto Accord'
on. To say that they do know such is to claim their own omniscience.
We recognize from any such claim their own profound 'scientific'
ineptness. Demonstrate this apparent ineptness: please
recall that 'scientists,' in early 1970s, were predicting global
Notice too that these 'scientists' are using classical
cause and effect to reach their 'accord.' They say that human
behaviors on Earth (especially oxidation of fossil resources,
thus producing carbon dioxide) are 'causing' this global warming
they fear. Quantum reality simply is not a classically 'causal'
reality. Indeed quantum reality offers some apparent ensemble
persistence of innumerable changing preconditions, but it offers
no inductive human-perceived causes-effects predicting any global
temperature rise over a 100-120 year period! To think that
Earth's temperature will specifically rise ~6o C in
120 years is silly, laughable, in-credible.
Any 'scientist,' especially envirnomental 'scientists'
(should) know that humans are a tiny portion of Earth's total
life mass. Humans' total life mass (assuming ~6 billion humans)
contribute less than 1 part in 2000 to Earth's total life mass!
We are insignificant by that measure! Yes, though, we do agree
that humans have greater proportionate affects on Earth's environment.
But we claim that humans' affects on Earth are wholly insignificant
when we look at Nature's affects on Earth. Consider: large
volcanic eruptions, large earth quakes, tsunamis, asteroids, our
Solar system's orbit within our Milky Way, Milky Way's orbit within
its galactic cluster, etc. Consider Earth's history of Natural
violence and 'pollution.'
Specifically, how can any classicist look at Earth's global
temperature history and conclude that human finite intellect could
know what Earth's environment will do in 100 years? Their naïve
arrogance is funny!
Footnote: (Doug - 19Mar2002)
Here is a graph which shows Earth mean temperatures in Degrees
Centigrade from 1866 to 1996:
Data from NASA, Hansen, Wilson as compiled in CRC 82nd
You may draw your own conclusions from this graph.
Our conclusions follow...
Envirnomental 'scientists' were telling us in
late 1960s and during 1970s that Earth was going to
have a "Snow Blitz," and experience "Global Winter!"
You may recall PBS, CBS, NBC, and other
media specials on this subject.
Envirnomental 'scientists' associated with 'A
Kyoto Accord' claim an increase in Earth's global
temperatures over next 120 years of 6oC! If we take
endpoints of 1975 (13.95oC)
and 1996 (14.36), average increase per year is 0.013oC!
If we classically, linearly
extrapolate those last 31 years, in 120 years that means a total
of 1.59oC, not 6oC. But looking at our graph,
we can see that Earth's temperatures are not
linearly extrapolable. They are obviously not classically deterministic!
Consider how mean peak temperatures are flat from 1866
to about 1926. Also consider how
mean minimums for those same years (1884:13.35, 1904:13.51, 1917:13.58)
increase at an
average of 0.0072oC. (And prior to 1850, for ~500 years
Earth was in an "ice age" of relatively
minor proportions, but still offered localized temperatures ~10oC
below where they are now. Some
experts claim we are only nearing a chaotic ending of a much longer
ice age. It is also interesting to note
that for Earth's last quarter million years temperatures have
been ~constant compared to prior eras which
apparently offered immense ~50oC peak-peak fluctuations.
30Jul2002 - Doug.)
We are wholly unqualified to make a prediction similar
to that which envirnomental 'scientists'
made for 'A Kyoto Accord,' however, we would say it is more probable
that we will see another cooling
trend commencing within years 2012-2052, than it is to see what
'scientists' predict in 'A Kyoto Accord.'
What do we know for sure? Future temperatures will
change, both dramatically and undramatically;
however, always quantum uncertainly!
Doug - 19Mar2002.
A Pictorial Sequence of
Earth's polar precession and how it affects
both global warming and cooling
over a 26 thousand year cycle
(All artwork below by Doug, using PovRay freeware. We will provide
all four precession PovRay codes required to generate bitmaps
(we use PhotoShop to convert/export bitmaps to GIFs) shared below,
no cost to you. Just acknowledge Doug's work and copyright. Requests
on a ~limited-time basis.)
Figure 1 - Earth's Polar Precession as It Appears Now,
Early in Millennium III
Readers please be aware that our GIF shows improper
scale. Earth is roughly 91 (winter; actual for Jan 4, 2004 is
91,400,177 - Skygazer's Almanac) to 94 (summer; actual for Jul
5, 2004 is 94,507, 582 - SGA) million miles from Sol and Sol is
about one million times Earth's physical volume. (Note that Earth's
sun orbit eccentricity varies.) What we are showing you here is
how important Earth's polar axis tilt and precession is for determining
Earth's weather trends.
Earth as shown in this perspective, assuming it is
mid-winter, is on viewer's left/west position.
If it is mid-spring, Earth is south/bottom CCW orbital position
in our GIF. Mid-summer is right/east and mid-autumn is top/north.
Here is a list of knowables about our polar axis precession
GIFs which are important for our pending discussions:
We are showing Earth in its four WNES annual positions
at four different locations in its 26,000 year polar axis precession
cycle. We are doing that so you may imagine seasonal weather change
affects now, then 6,500 years from now, 13,000 years from now
and 19,500 years from now.
||Meridians allow viewers to infer
Earth's polar axis orientation.
||West position of Earth is winter.
||South position of Earth is spring.
||East position of Earth is summer.
||North position of Earth is fall.
||Earth is closer to Sol, by about
three million miles in winter than it is in summer!
(now, early Millennium III) polar axis orientation is 23.5o
west wrt Earth's ecliptic.
||From top view, Earth rotates on
its polar axis CCW. Period of rotation is ~24 hours.
||From top view, Earth's ~elliptical
orbit around Sol is CCW. Period of orbit is ~365 days.
||From top view, Earth's polar axis
precession is CW. Period of precession is ~ 26,000 years!
||All periods Earth rotation,
Earth orbit, and Earth polar axis precession are quantum
||Earth's polar axis 'tilt' is a fairly
constant 23.5o and precesses clockwise W to N to E
(26,000 years from now Earth will probably be back at ~now's
Figure 1 configuration. It's actual location then is indeterminate
due Nature's implicit quantum uncertainty. As an example, Earth
may not be here then. Earth may be hit by an asteroid or black
hole and be destroyed or have its orbit and axial parameters changed,
etc. In any case, it will not be 'the' 'same' Earth. It will have
changed in perhaps unimaginable ways, due Nature's absolute
mandate for quantum r-evolutionary change. )
Because Earth is three million miles (3.3%; i.e., ~3.1/92.95) closer to Sol in winter, those
warming affects will be most dramatic in winter. Similarly relative
cooling affects should be ~relatively more dramatic in summer.
Notice that these ~relative warming/cooling affects are changing
sub-globally by hemisphere and hemisphere season too
Let's take a look at Earth's polar axis precession
as it will appear 6500 years from now, one quarter of its way
through a full 26,000 year cycle.
Figure 2 - Earth's Polar Precession as It Will Appear
6500 Years from Now
We can see in Figure 2 how Earth's polar axis has precessed
CW to north.
This view is quarterway through Earth's 26,000 year polar axis
Earth is ~actually in its north position, behind Sol in this perspective.
What will this do to Earth's weather 6500 years from
now? Springs should be much warmer in Earth's northern hemisphere.
Summers will probably be cooler than in previous 6500 years. Autumns
in Earth's southern hemisphere should be warmer. Winters should
be warmer over Earth's entire surface than previous 6500 years.
Generally, we see a global warming trend, but local
conditions will vary.
Compare affects of Earth's polar axis precession to
warming attributed to fossil fuel burning. In our view, latter
are relatively insignificant.
Figure 3 - Earth's Polar Precession as It Will Appear
13000 Years from Now
This view is halfway through Earth's 26,000 year polar
axis precession cycle. Earth is ~actually in its east position.
Based upon an assumption of single
parametric polar axis symmetry, spring and autumn weather affects
should be nearly identical to now.
Under a similar but ~inverse assumption, winter and
summer will be dramatically different from their counterparts
now. Winter should be much warmer in Earth's northern hemisphere.
Summer should be much cooler in northern hemisphere and most likely
warmer in southern hemisphere.
Figure 4 - Earth's Polar Precession as It Will Appear
19500 Years from Now
Using similar assumptions to those used under Figure
3, we can say that Earth's weather 19500 years from now will be
very similar to its weather 6500 years from now.
Hope you enjoyed our little Chautauqua on longer term
probable affects on Earth's weather.
Bottom line: in our view, we're due for over
20,000 years of global warming just based upon Earth's polar axis
precession. We also believe that this warming will dwarf any warming
due to Earth's life form behaviors.
Thank you for reading.
Doug - 26Apr2003
To contact Quantonics write to or call:
Suite 18 #368 1950 East Greyhound Pass
Carmel, INdiana 46033-7730
©Quantonics, Inc., 2001-2020
Rev. 13Jan2012 PDR Created 2Aug2001 PDR
(10Sep2001 rev - Correct missing 'year'
in 3rd para. from bottom.)
(29Nov2001 rev - Add top of page frame-breaker.)
(7Dec2001 rev - Add Mars Warming announcement.)
(19Mar2002 rev - Add Earth mean temp graph and comments. Add link
to our Aug2002QQA on cause/effect.)
(7Jun2002 rev - Add link to Sowell's editorial.)
(12Jun2002 rev - Add Bessemer's http://www.ocs.orst.edu/forum/BigPicture.htm
(30Jul2002 rev - Add ice age prior 1850 comments.)
(7Aug2002 rev - Add 'A New Ice Age' link to our July, 2002 TQS
(10Sep2002 rev - Add Pluto Warming headline.)
(19Sep2002 rev - Add link to September, 2002 Discover Magazine
Ice Age Cover Story.)
(26Apr2003 rev - Add polar axis precession affects on global warming
with GIFs and commentary.)
(27Apr2003 rev - Correct knowable # 12 axial precession from WSEN
to WNES. Add comments. Change wingding smileys to GIFs.)
(7Jul2003 rev - Repair "in than" dyslexic to "than
(16Dec2003 rev - Give closer estimates of Earth-Sun winter-summer
separations. Was 90 and 93. Reset legacy red text.)
(28May2004 rev - Add three recent links just under page title.)
(27Jul2004 rev - Repair typo.)
(17Aug2004 rev - Cosmic ray warming, New Scientist quotes.)
(28Oct2004 rev - Add sunspot correlation announcement.)
(30Apr2005 rev - Add page top link to 'Why We Cannot Fix Global
Warming." Change all occurrences of "environmental 'scientists'"
to "envirnomental 'scientists.'")
(20Jul2005 rev - Add Bohm page top quote.)
(22,31Aug2005 rev - Add page top 'mini ice age' info. Add page
top 'global warming source guess' link.)
(4Sep2005 rev - Update Earth mean temp. graph to show Earth magnetic
core shift affectings.)
(9Nov2005 rev - Add UK "adaptation framework" approach
(9Jul2006 rev - Add page top Jammer quote. Reset legacy red text.)
(17Oct2006 rev - Ocean surface temps actually cooling now.)
(7Nov2006 rev - Add quote from Broad's NYT article today.)
(14Feb2007 rev - Update page top Global Warming links.)
(17-18Mar2007 rev - Update page top links.)
(21Jun2007 rev - Move index page reports to this page.)
(4,13Jul2007 rev - Update page top with News residuals.)
(12Sep2007 rev - Update page top with News residuals.)
(5Oct2007 rev - Add 'Challenge to Scienc' link.)
(18-19Jan2008 rev - Update article links at page top. Slightly
(23Feb2008 rev - Maunder minimum update.)
(21Jun2008 rev - Move index page 'Kyoto' News here for archival
(11,23Feb2009 rev - Move kyoto link from index page to this page.
Add link to recent QELR of aware.)
(12Nov2009 rev - Add another beautiful denial of Anthropogenic
(15Dec2009 rev - 100 Reasons from Drudge.)
(4Dec2010 - Add a Doug summary at page top.)
(18Jul2011 rev - Add 'fractal' links to "How to do quantum~fractals.")
(13Jan2012 rev - Add commentary and links to page top summary,
focus on quantum aspects of nature.)