Classical Fractals and Quantonic/Quantum Fractals
Classical Fractals:
Benoit Mandelbrot - Father of Classical Fractal Meme
- See Mandelbrot's Fractal Geometry of Nature
Classical Definition of 'Fractal,' Classical Fractals:
- are objective See our SOM Philosophy reality table (based upon Aristotelian ideal, concepts about 'matter/substance')
- quantitative
- formal predicate unilogical
- are dichonic
- are state-ic
- are radically formal (radically mechanistic; adhere classically mathematical mechanics)
- are radically final (suffer classically conditional haltability/stoppability)
- assume fractal objects are lisr
- i.e., they assume an Aristotelian objective excluded-middle based upon Aristotle's syllogistic 'laws:'
A classically 'equals' A
('law' of identity) A must be either A or not A
('law' of contradiction)
Polemicizes a classical either/or dichonic EOOO reality. See Henri Louis Bergson's cogent remarks on classical 'contradiction.' See in particular his, "...we shall never affirm a thing is not."A cannot be both A and not A
('law' of excluded-middle)
Denies quantum reality's quantonic BAAM coherence/compenetration/coinsidence.
Note: Dear reader, if you are new to Quantonics, it is important for you to know that Aristotle's syllogistic 'laws' both deny and outlaw quantum reality. In Quantonics we deny Aristotle's syllogistic 'laws.' If you spend some times with them you may arrive at our conclusion: Aristotle's syllogistic 'laws' are silly. See our Aristotle Connection.
- etc.
Classical Fractal Examples:
Classical Fractals as Classical Sophisms
Classical sophisms are self-referent and classically recursive. As we know from our other work regarding Buridan's Sophismata, then, classical fractals must be classical sophisms. Why? They are, when chaotic, classically inconsistent! Buridan and Hughes classically agree that all contextually inconsistent propositions are FALSE! Also, we know that classical fractals often manufacture many (often self-similar) incommensurable islands of many truths. To Buridan and Hughes these are sophisms and innately FALSE!
Saying sophisms "are FALSE" is equi-valent (analogous to) saying "quantum reality is FALSE!"
Classical Fractals as Manufacturers of Many Polylogical Truths (CR's "Chaos.")
Classical Non-generative Processes
Classical Generative/Manufacturing Processes
Classical Call-entrancy
Classical Re-entrancy
Classical Self-reference
Classical Recursion
Clocked Classical Recursion
Unclocked (Self) Classical Recursion (requires dedicated classical unit processors per sophism to emulate Planck rate quantum~monitoring essence; that's pretty much why any classical approach to real quantum computing shall fail; we can classically, n¤n real time scheduler-emulate, however; how would we use this? see our fuzzons to fermion onta we could use this approach to do endergonic exergonic switching; Doug - 15Sep2005)A Classical Equal Meme
There is no Classical 'Equal' (See discussion and our comments under Incommensurability as Contrafactual Definiteness.)
Quantonics - Parent ¤f Quantum Fractal Meme
Quantonics/Quantum Descripti¤n ¤f 'Fractal' Quantum Fractals:
- are quantonic See ¤ur MoQ Phil¤s¤phy reality table (based up¤n quantum comcepts ab¤ut latched (fermi¤nic, b¤s¤nic, et al.) amd unlatched (is¤tr¤pic, is¤nic, et al.) quantum flux). See our Quanton Primer.
- as quantonic are thus:
- qualitative
- quantum paral¤gical
- are phase-ic (quanton's are animate amd may c¤¤bsfect ¤ne an¤ther's quantal phases b¤th l¤cally amd n¤nl¤cally see ¤ur Planck quanton b¤th animate and inanimate semi¤tics). All¤w us an ¤pp¤rtunity here t¤ use ¤ur recent BAAM acr¤nym as a quanton t¤ extend ¤ur "b¤th l¤cally amd n¤nl¤cally" t¤ BAAM(l¤cally,n¤nl¤cally), which interpreted using QTMs gives, "b¤th-all n¤nl¤cally amd-many l¤cally." And even better, we may extend fr¤m b¤th l¤cality amd n¤nl¤cality t¤ b¤th lisr amd n¤nlisr in a similar way: BAAM(n¤nlisr,lisr). Latter is alm¤st a full Quantonic anal¤gue ¤f quantum reality. Use ¤f an even m¤re recent acr¤nym, BAWAM, m¤ves us cl¤ser t¤ a better, animate anal¤gue ¤f quantum reality.
- as phase-ic are thus:
- radically phase-ensehmble-st¤chastic (radically quantum n¤n-mechanistic; adhere Quantonics; see David Bohm's c¤mments ¤n quantum n¤n-mechanics)
- radically unst¤ppable (quantum flux c¤mpels abs¤lute change)
- assume quantonic fractals are BAWAM(n¤nlisr,lisr)
- i.e., they assume a single quantum paral¤gical included-middle s¤phism:
where A issi a quanton.
A issi BAWAM n¤t A
N¤te: Dear reader, if y¤u are new t¤ Quantonics, it is imp¤rtant f¤r y¤u t¤ kn¤w that Aristotle's syllogistic 'laws' b¤th deny amd ¤utlaw quantum reality. In Quantonics we deny Aristotle's syllogistic 'laws.' See ¤ur Aristotle C¤nnecti¤n.- etc.
Quantonics/Quantum Fractal Examples:
Quantum Fractals as Sophisms
Quantonics/Quantum Fractals as Emerscenture of Many Paralogical Truths (CR's "Chaos.")
Quantonics/Quantum Emergent Processes
Quantonics/Quantum Self-reference
Quantonics/Quantum Recursi¤n:
Synchr¤n¤us Planck Rate Quantum Recursi¤n Asynchr¤n¤us Planck Rate Quantum Recursi¤n Quatr¤t¤m¤us
Quantum C¤herency
Is¤c¤herent Planck Rate Quantum Recursi¤n C¤herent Planck Rate Quantum Recursi¤n Dec¤herent Planck Rate Quantum Recursi¤n Mixc¤herent Planck Rate Quantum Recursi¤n
Quatr¤t¤m¤us
Quantum Entr¤py
Negentr¤pic Planck Rate Quantum Recursi¤n Zeroentr¤pic Planck Rate Quantum Recursi¤n Posentr¤pic Planck Rate Quantum Recursi¤n Mixentr¤pic Planck Rate Quantum Recursi¤nn A Quantonics/Quantum Equal Meme
Fractal Nature - Fractal Reality - How?