|
Item |
English Language Problematic |
Quantonics' Quantum
Remediation
©Quantonics, Inc., 2001-2009
|
|
'cancel'
Etymology:
Synonyms:
- Classical -
- counteract,
- destroy,
- nullify,
- obliterate,
- etc.
- Quantum -
- apparent absence,
- apparent darkness,
- apparent emptiness,
- shadow,
- etc.
|
: Cancel, cancels, canceled, cancellation, etc.
Classical cancellation carries formal, dialectical, analytic
inferences and implications of a null result. For example, A-A=0
classically 'cancels' A and leaves classical 'zero.' Classically
'zero' 'exists.' Classically and mathematically a 'null set'
'exists.' Classicism supports notions of emptiness, void, total-absolute
absence, etc.
:
Cancæl, cancæls,
cancæled, cancællati¤n, etc.
Quantum cancællation, since all ihn
quantum~reality issi flux, emerqs
only tentative phase~interrelationshipings.
Quantum~flux may n¤t in any way be permanently, n¤r
perpetually made empty, absent, null, etc.
Quantum cancællation happens when two 'similar' quantum~waves
tentatively maintain 'inverse' phase interrelationshipings, thus
affording an illusion of cancællation.
Quantum cancællation requires at least two p¤sihtihvæ
energies, eternally present and existing, in select
interrelationshipings to maintain an illusion of cancællation.
Since n¤ two quantum waves may perpetually remain ideally
identical (they may be tentatively c¤hærænt, tentatively c¤rrælatæd,
etc., however each of those terms have omnique quantum English
language remediations...also see quantum~coherence),
quantum~cancællation is itself a wave~function whose phase~interrelationshipings'
stochastics are minimal. That is why we say that all presences
and absences are always partial~presences and ~absences. See,
for example, partial
presence of gravity. Least partial
presences and absences are manifestations, similar Bell's Inequalities,
of Planck's least action portraying a minimum quantum~uncertainty
of quanton(qwfj,qwfk)
 Nih.
All quantum flux issi perpetually positive. That phasement
finds its bases in memeos
which permit us to call quantum~reality "radically~stochastic."
Quantumly, light is one class of flux which we can use to
observe quantum~flux cancellation directly. To do that we need
a means of detecting 'light' flux' range of spatial frequencies
(see wavelengths
re: holograms). How do we do that? QED
explains how we can see light and its phase~mixing (ranges of
quantum~flux partial~cancellation) phenomena. Without atoms whose
electron energy shells can scintillate
light flux, we cann¤t 'see' light. That explains why light
in a pure vacuum isn't apparent until it interrelates (a process of scintillation
explained by QED) with atoms in our eyes, and atoms of stellar
emerqs like planets, comets, and asteroids, etc.
Page top index.
|
|
'canon'
Etymology:
Synonyms:
|
: Canon
:
Can¤n
Classically 'canon' means strict, static (ESQ,
non-ESS) 'law' given by authority
- usually some classically catholic 'union' which self-assumes
omniscience: society, culture, religion, science, mathematics,
etc.
- sometimes only an individual who assumes classical omniscience:
Castro, Hitler, Bush, etc.
for those who 'need' it to use it. Those who do not 'need'
canon 'law' are told to "follow it or else," "you
are either for us or against us," "there is no middle
ground," "we will excommunicate you," and other
such 'authoritative' classical bilge.
Classical canon 'law,' when classically 'effective,' drives
out quantum individual free will and choice. It labels all nonadherents
'disloyal,' 'unpatriotic,' and even 'criminal.' Classical canons
defy and deny quantum
ræhlihty.
Quantumly 'canon'
d¤æs n¤t
'exist'
amd cann¤t
'exist.'
Ahll ræhlihty ihncluding quantum can¤ns aræ
stindyanihc ænsehmble
pr¤cæssings which aræ æmærging amd
æv¤lving mætab¤lihcahlly:
i.e., b¤th anab¤lihcahlly
amd catab¤lihcahlly.
(biologically, 'ana' is up and 'cata'
is down - Doug - 7Feb2007.)
P. A. M. Dirac says it like this speaking of a Poisson's
Bracket (P.B.) of position and momentum, "...canonical
coordinates and momenta are of less importance in quantum mechanics
than in classical mechanics; in fact, we may have a system in
quantum mechanics for which canonical coordinates and momenta
do not exist and we can still give a meaning to P.B.s. Such a
system would be without a classical analogue and we should not
be able to obtain its quantum [mechanical]
conditions by the [classical] method here described." P.
88, The Principles of Quantum Mechanics, 1958, OUP. Our
brackets. Readers should note that Einstein and his classical
mechanist buddies would say then, "By canonic 'law' such
systems do not exist!" Since, classically, such systems
are 'not' canonical, classical 'science' excommunicates them
from reality. Sound familiar? Classical 'science' excommunicates
quantum reality! J Doug - 7Feb2007.
In Quantonics those P.B. 'meanings'
include classically-n¤nmechanical quantum:
-
ihncludæd~mihddle,
-
ænsehmble
æværywhere~ass¤ciati¤n,
-
umcærtainty,
- Bell Inequalities,
- BAWAM,
-
b¤th~amd,
-
arbihtrary spathial pr¤babilihty
¤mnistrihbuti¤n,
(our
use of spathial here is our QELR of spatial, i.e.,
classical space-tial; classical space is cartesian; quantum~spacæ
is n¤n cartesian)
-
arbihtrary p¤lytehmp¤ral quantum~lihkælih¤¤d ¤mnistrihbuti¤nings,
(see
QLO)
-
c¤mmingling,
-
c¤mpænetrati¤n,
-
supærluminalihty,
-
supærp¤sihti¤n,
-
æntanglæmænt,
-
c¤mmunihcati¤n,
-
telep¤hrtati¤n,
-
gravihtati¤nal
librati¤n,
-
c¤hera,
(co~hæræ~a)
-
æntr¤pa,
-
vacuum flux (ihn
Quantonics wæ cahll this "is¤flux;"
classicists
deny its 'existence'),
- etc.
A major issue for consideration here is our Quantonics perspectives
of:
- classical mechanics,
- quantum mechanics, and
- quantum nonmechanics.
Dirac, as a mathematician, views reality as 'mechanical.'
As students of Quantonics, long after Dirac's transition from
Earth, we are k~now~ings (see a
iamai) quantum reality is nonmechanical. Our own brand
of quantum philosophy and quantum science are nonmechanical based
upon mentorship of greats like Heraclitus, Bergson, and Bohm.
All mechanical formulations of reality models are dialectical
and thus suspect on their face. All classical mathematical formulations
of reality models are dialectical and thus suspect on their face.
You will recall how this same issue played a large role in our
refutation of EPR.
Another major issue is how mathematics uses terms analyticity
and analogy. Mathematicians appear to view analogy as less mechanical
than analyticity. However, in an analog approach, physical reality
is usually a mathematician's laboratory and said mathematician
views physical reality as ideally objective which means ideally,
formally, mechanical. Dirac's efforts to find classical analogs
of quantum mechanics took him directly to where we commenced
our above quote and you can see his conclusion there.
Sææ a macr¤sc¤pihc P.B. at
Zeno's
first paradox; read all text under that paradox.
Sææ
a m¤re n¤nmæchanihcal pærspæctihvæ
¤f quantum ræhlihty at
Heraclitus.
Page top index.
|
|
'cause'
Etymology:
Synonyms:
|
Quantonics ch¤¤ses
t¤ c¤¤pt classical 'cause' (see singularity
bel¤w) amd remerq all quantum
comtextual ¤ccurrences with 'prec¤nditi¤ns.'
In classical contexts we shall use 'cause.' In Quantonics/quantum
comtexts we shall use 'prec¤nditi¤ns.'
We shall use single qu¤tes when referring these terms,
respectively, "¤ut ¤f con/comtexts."
Where classical reality is a unitary, analytical, quantitative,
stoppable, cause-effect reality — quantum reality is many
st¤chastic, qualitative, unstoppable, affects-¤utc¤mes
realities.
See our QQA on classical cause-effect.
See stop, end,
begin, event,
process.
Page top index.
|
|
'certain'
Etymology:
Synonyms:
|
Quantonics ch¤¤ses t¤
archive classical 'certain' and its derivatives as anachronistic
for Millennium III. We ch¤¤se t¤ delete
'certain' and its derivatives fr¤m ¤ur Quantonics-remediated
English language.
In classical contexts we shall use 'certain.' In Quantonics/quantum
comtexts we shall ¤nly use 'umcærtain,'
¤r 'quantum umcærtain.'
For a detail comparison of both classical and quantum certainty
juxtaposed classical and quantum uncertainty, see Doug's review
of Hume's
SRS.
Page top index.
|
|
'change'
Etymology:
Synonyms:
|
Before we offer our detail remediation of 'change,' allow
us to quote Will Durant's interpretation of Henri Louis Bergson's
notion of change:
"But it is our own fault if, by insisting on the application
of physical concepts in the field of thought, we end in
the impasse of determinism,
mechanism, and materialism.
The merest moment of reflection might have shown how inappropriate
the concepts of physics
are in the world of mind: we think as readily of a mile as of
half a mile, and one flash of thought can circumnavigate the
globe; our ideas elude every effort to picture them as material
particles moving in space, or as limited by space in their flight
and operation. Life escapes these solid concepts;
for life is a matter of time [heterogeneous quantum tihmings] rather than of space; it
is not position, it is change; it is not quantity so much
as quality; it is not a mere redistribution of matter and motion,
it is fluid and persistent creation." P. 495, The Story
of Philosophy, by Will Durant, 1926-7, and 1933. (Our bold,
links, and brackets - Doug - 8Oct2003.)
Let's make a bullet list of Durant's life emergence dichotomies
using Quantonics' remediation and subjective negation:
- tihmæ n¤t space,
- changæ n¤t position,
- qualihty n¤t quantity,
amd
- fluihd persihstent
cræation n¤t mere redistribution of matter and motion.
Durant's words, though we doubt he understood this,
aræ descrihbing quantum realihty amd
mind's life as a quantum
stage, quantum stagings. Wæ sææ quantum
c¤herence here,
quantum entanglement, quantum superp¤siti¤n, quantum
ihncluded-mihddle, quantum everywhere-ass¤ciativity, quantum
abs¤lute
anihmacy,
quantum ensehmble
heter¤geneity,
etc.
And this leads us to our Quantonics' remediation of classical
'change...'
Quantonics ch¤¤ses
t¤ c¤¤pt classical 'change' amd
remerq all
quantum comtextual ¤ccurrences with 'changæ.' Ditto
'changing,' and 'changing.'
In classical contexts we shall use 'change.' In Quantonics/quantum
comtexts we shall use 'changæ.'
Ditto 'changing,' and 'changing.'
Classicists view reality, other than unitemporal motion, as
inanimate, nonemergent, and unchanging. In Quantonics,
there is n¤ analogue of classical unchanging. Quantum
reality is abs¤lute flux, abs¤lute changæ.
Nearest analogue we offer is Quantum
Tentative Persistence and Quantum Variable Persistence. Simply,
any classical concept of unchanging reality is just a
naïve classical self-deception. (It is worth your while
to ponder how classicism's concept of 'unchanging' is
paradoxically and dyslexically averse its own J.
C. Maxwellian mandate for universal, spiralling,
and inevitable entropic
heat death. See similar commentary under uncertainty.
Finally, see entropy gradient annotations on our MoQ
II Reality Loop.)
CTMs describe
classical change as unitemporal motion of ideal classical objects.
Worse, CTMs describe time as a space rate of 'change.' Roughly,
classical time is  space/space. Classicists
view change as space-rate motion. Classical change is analytic,
spatially extensible, state-ic, except for Maxwell's 2nd 'law'
of thermodynamics - ideally temporally reversible,
stoppable, etc. Classical
change depends upon 'axioms of ideal objective independence,'
and 'ideal numeric
scalar magnitudinal measurability
of a presumed stable, immutable spatial extensity.'
QTMs describe
quantum changæ as quantal
¤mnifluxings of quantons. These ¤mnifluxings subsume
a meme ¤f paratehmp¤rality ("many times"
and Dirac's meme of a many times quantum wave function) as but
pragmatemp¤ral
ensehmble
emerscenturings aspects of quantum reality. Quantum changæ
is ensehmble quantum b¤th
paratehmp¤ralities and
n¤nparatehmp¤ralities.
An¤ther way of viewing quantum changæ's
ensehmble/heter¤gene¤us,
anihmatæ, everywhere-ass¤ciative
quantum umcærtainty/c¤mplementarity/c¤mplexity
is via hermeneutics of ensehmble
Bergsonian omni-duration-ings.
See our April, 2000 QQA on change.
See our recent (2002) Quantonic
Ensehmble Quantum Interrelationships.
See our Absoluteness
as Quantum Umcærtainty.
Page top index.
|
|
'choice'
Etymology:
Synonyms:
|
Quantonics ch¤¤ses
t¤ c¤¤pt classical 'choice' (see open)
amd remerq
all quantum comtextual ¤ccurrences with plural present-participle
'ch¤¤sings.'
In classical contexts we shall use 'choice.' In Quantonics/quantum
comtexts we shall use 'ch¤¤sings.'
Classicists view choice as a single, local, homogeneous causal event.
Choice is 1-1 correspondence of decision and effect.
To classicists, classical reality is a predicable, determinate,
y=f(t), 'choice as cause-effect' reality.
Th¤se ¤f us wh¤ adhere quantum real memes
k-n¤w
that all ch¤¤sings aræ
based up¤n memes ¤f ensehmble quantum prec¤nditi¤nings
affecting ensehmble quantum ¤utc¤mings.
We als¤ rec¤gnize that ¤ur ch¤¤sings
aræ inclusive ¤f a larger ensehmble
¤f ¤thers' ch¤¤sings, including Nature,
et al. As y¤u may intuit, real quantum ch¤¤sings
aræ endless emerging quantum pr¤cesses.
We say, "Quantum reality issi
ensemblings of ensehmble ch¤¤sings."
Quantons aræ
ch¤¤sings.
See select. See
our 'choice'
ontology. See our Ensehmble Quantum Umcærtainty.
See our Whatings
Happenings Nextings. See affectation.
Page top index.
|
|
'circle'
Etymology:
Synonyms:
|
Quantonics ch¤¤ses
t¤ c¤¤pt classical 'circle' amd
remerq all
quantum comtextual ¤ccurrences with 'cihrcle,'
'cihrcles' amd plural present-participle
'cihrclings.'
In classical contexts we shall use 'circle.' In Quantonics~quantum
comtexts we shall use 'cihrcle,'
'cihrcles,' and 'cihrclings.'
Classicists view 'circle' objectively. A circle is a classical
object. It is a composition of other ideal classical objects
called points. Both circle and points are ideal lisrable
objects. An example of what this means classically is that one
may remove one point from a circle and said circle is no longer
a circle.
Removal (essentially objective negation) of that one point
changes an ideal classical circle object into an ideal classical
line segment object.
What about that classical point we removed? What about its
circleness?
According to dialectical thought, CTMs,
a classical point is independent, stable, everywhere-excluded-middle-dissociative.
Said point is a general classical object. It can be used in a
line, a triangle, a circle. All points and classical objective
particles are identical to one another. They are wholly unaware
of their context, in fact do not even care about their context.
This is classical, dialectical, objective thingking!
No respectable classical point is aware of its previous circleness!
No classical point has context. All classical points are axiomatically
'free' of context. No respectable classical point has arbitrary
spatial distribution. No respectable classical point is animate,
except for mechanical motion.
In Quantonics' version of quantum reality n¤ classical
'circles' exist. Why? There are many issues involved, including:
For an example of some more quantum, n¤n classical 'circle'
issues see our quantum
pi.
As you may choose to see, classical circles are radically mechanical
delusions of SOM.
Why? Classical: stability,
independence,
stoppability, analyticity,
objectivity, immutability,
etc.
But for sake of analogy let's assume that we can talk
about a closed, and thus anti quantum, quanton called "cihrcle."
Can we objectively remove a quantonic p¤ihnt
from said cihrcle in such a way
that said cihrcle is n¤
longer a cihrcle, rather it
somehow changes into a quantum lihnæ? N¤! Why?
A superb answer is a biological one. If we remove one of your
kidneys, are you still you? Your own body's natural cellular
apoptosis is another great example. Every ~170 days most n¤n
bone cells in your body die (apoptosis; a kind of cellular self-euthanasia)
are (removed) reused and replaced (remerqed) by emergent new
cells.
S¤ as wæ aræ dæscrihbing thæm,
quantum y¤u~ness amd quantum cihrclæness
aræ n¤n
'objective.'
Rather quantons (e.g., y¤u amd cihrcle) aræ qualihtatihvæ amd subqjæctihvæ.
Ræm¤val ¤f a quantum p¤ihnt
fr¤m a quantum cihrcle læaves
an æmærgænt, rææmærqed quantonic
cihrcle avatar rææmb¤dihmænt.
Another excellent example is a hologram. Holograms manifest
what we call quantum EIMA. Say you have a hologram 10cm square.
Cut out a 1cm square piece of it. Display that 1cm hologram.
Whats happens? One obvious phenomenon occurs: our 1cm hologram
displays an excellent analogue of our 10cm hologram. Omnifferencings?
Attenuated EIMAs! Lower pixial resolution.
Another analogue of our hologram example is brain cells. We
can lose some brain cells and our quantum EIMA brains still retain
our memeories since all of our memeories are quantum EIMA!
A classical brain analogue is more like our classical 'circle'
above. If we cut out a small memory portion of a human
brain, classicists objectively assume that human's brain
will objectively lose selected memories. To a classicist a human's
memories are spatially and objectively allocated just like a
circle's classical points.
Hæræ issi a quantum
fuzz¤n
cihrcle b¤th
wihth
amd wihth¤ut
a mihssing quantum
p¤ihnt:
Quantum cihrcles
aræ lihkæ quantum
holograms!
Their fuzz¤n~p¤ihnts aræ æværywhere~ihncludæd~mihddle~ass¤ciatihve.
They ass¤ciatæ wihth ahll ¤thær
p¤ihnts ihn
their quantum cihrcle
¤f fuzz¤ns! Quantum cihrcles
aræ lihkæ
SONs!
Their fuzz¤ns aræ awaræ
amd
coobsfective
their
s¤rs¤ness.
Quantum fuzz¤ns ihn
quantum cihrcles aræ quantum
flux ihn Quantonic ihnterrelati¤nships wihth their
¤wn amd ¤thærs'
quantum flux!
Whæn wæ ræm¤ve
a fuzz¤n fr¤m a quantum cihrcle,
saihd fuzz¤n, duæ ihts ¤wn quantum~æntanglæmænt
wihth
that cihrcle,
f¤rævær rætains that
cihrclæness, rægardless
whether
iht issi ræm¤ved t¤
¤thær 'sihde'
¤f ¤ur galaxy ¤hr
any ¤mnihværse. Any
quantum p¤ihnt, ¤nce
'ræm¤ved' (pondær
classical
'remove'
vis-à-vis quantum ræm¤ve)
fr¤m ihts quantum cihrcle, issi awaræ ¤f ihts cihrclæness.
Als¤ sææ
lihnæ
f¤r
an anahlogue ¤f a quantum
mihssing p¤ihnt.
Page top index.
|
|
'class'
Etymology:
Synonyms:
|
We remediate classical 'class' with quantum 'clahss.'
<clauss>
Classical 'classes' are dialectical, lisr, objective, EEMD, dichonic, state-ic,
quantitative, categorical taxonomies. When SOMites thingk
'class' they thingk "social wall."
Quantum 'clahsses' aræ
rhet¤rical, quantonic, EIMA, c¤mplementary,
anihmatæ, emerscents. When M¤Qites think
'clahss' they
think "c¤¤perative,
respectful, ihnterrelati¤nship." Quantum hierarchy vis-à-vis classical hierarchy.
Page top index.
|
|
'close'
Etymology:
Synonyms:
|
Quantonics ch¤¤ses
t¤ c¤¤pt classical 'close' (see open
bel¤w) amd remerq all quantum
comtextual ¤ccurrences with 'cl¤se.'
In classical contexts we shall use 'close.' In Quantonics/quantum
comtexts we shall use 'cl¤se.'
Classical analytic reality adherents presume their reality
is 'closed.' Classicists' illusion of closure permits them to
make other objective assumptions that their reality:
- is wholly objective,
- is wholly formal, indeed, radically formal,
- ontology: conserves being,
- adheres Maxwell's second law of thermodynamics,
- degenerates into/via posentropy,
- can formally deny existence of any "subjective"
unthings outside it,
- is en-closed by one begin and one end,
- etc.
Classicists see reality as dichon(closed,
open), where 'open' is subjective and thus impossible.
Quantum reality adherents presume their realities are '¤pen.'
Or even better, '¤pening.' As a result quantum
adepts see quantum ¤penness and cl¤sedness as quantum umcærtainty
interrelati¤nships which we depict: quanton(¤pen,cl¤se),
or
quanton(¤pen cl¤se).
Any
- quanton(less_c¤mplete,m¤re_comsistent) is
- quanton(m¤re_cl¤sed,less_¤pen).
Similarly, any
- quanton(m¤re_c¤mplete,less_comsistent) is
- quanton(less_cl¤sed,m¤re_¤pen).
B¤tt¤m line, in quantum reality, we are always
umcærtain ¤f any quantons' stindyanic
sc¤pe ¤f included-middling c¤mpenetrati¤ns.
From this, reader, you may glimmer how reality might not animately
and freely emerge were we able to analytically stop and examine
it at will as classicists assume!
By c¤mparis¤n, quantum reality:
- is wh¤lly quantonic,
- is wh¤lly emerqant,
- ontology:
 emerses beesimmersesisobees
- adheres quantum trich¤t¤m¤us -entr¤py
(neg-, zer¤-, p¤s-),
- adheres quantum c¤-herence quatr¤t¤my
(is¤-, de-, c¤-, partial/mixed-),
- accepts p¤tential f¤r all p¤ssibilities,
- comtinu¤usly emerses many b¤th n¤vel
beginnings and n¤vel endings,
- etc.
Page top index.
|
|
'co-' |
Quantonics ch¤¤ses t¤ c¤¤pt
classical prefix 'co' amd
remerq all
quantum comtextual ¤ccurrences with quantum prefix 'c¤.'
In classical contexts we shall use 'co.' In Quantonics/quantum
comtexts we shall use 'c¤.'
Where classical 'co' implies a dichotomous either/or excluded-middle
objective homogeneous relationship, quantum 'c¤' implies
¤mniadic
b¤th/amd included-middle
c¤mplementary heter¤gene¤us
interrelati¤nships.
Page top index.
|
|
'coherent'
'coherence'
'cohesion'
Etymology:
Synonyms:
|
Quantonics
ch¤¤ses t¤ c¤¤pt
classical 'coherent' amd
remerq all
quantum comtextual ¤ccurrences with 'c¤herent.'
In classical contexts we shall use 'coherent.' In Quantonics/quantum
comtexts we shall use 'c¤herent.'
Where classical 'coherent' depends upon objective adherence
to substantial ideas and concepts, quantum 'c¤herence'
literally means 'co-here:' quantum h¤m¤gene¤us
c¤mmingling ¤f quantons in b¤th
a single l¤cus amd
many ¤ther l¤ci amd
n¤nl¤ci ¤ver heter¤gene¤us
times amd spaces (i.e.,
¤ver many quantum is¤c¤nes amd
their c¤mplements).
Classical 'cohesion' is functional. Classical cohesion's purpose
is to create classes of functionally cohesive groups. Ideal functionally
'cohesive' classes are logically excluded-middle localable, isolable,
separable, and reducible (lisr)
from one another. They are radically mechanical: formal
entities. Functionally cohesive groups clone members whose behaviors
are corrigible and abide group mores. Organization and management
of functionally cohesive groups is deemed "reasonable, logical,
and easier." Coherent classes tend to view their rules,
their axiom sets as 'the' rules. As a result, they tend to denigrate
others' rules. Dichotomized (i.e., dichonic,
bipolar) inter-class friction leads to fights and wars and attempts
to annihilate those who disagree.
Quantum 'c¤hesi¤n' is quantonic.
Quantum 'c¤hesi¤n' scales fr¤m smallest
t¤ largest real quantons.
Quantum 'c¤hesi¤n' is: quantonic interrelati¤nships
am¤ng actualized quantons amd n¤nactualized quantum
vacuum flux which is partially describable by, amd which we call
"is¤flux."
Quantum 'c¤hesive' quantons' middles are included amd mediated via quantum
vacuum (is¤)flux. Their included-middles preclude any
ideal classical lisrability.
All quantons are b¤th lisrable amd n¤nlisrable.
If ¤ne thinks ¤f quantons as islands, then ¤ne
may envisi¤n their islandicities ¤verlapping amd
c¤mmingling ¤ne an¤ther via b¤th
unseen Earth amd visible sea. Then imagine seas, within islands,
within seas... If ¤ne thinks ¤f quantons at¤mically,
¤ne may imagine wave-particle nucle¤ns amd electr¤ns
fluxing c¤hesively c¤within vacuum energy's (is¤)flux.
Quantumly photons in a laser beam c¤hæræ
as one photon. Many quantum photons lase to act as one massive,
n¤nl¤cal photon.
Classically photons in a laser beam are perceived as a lisr aggregation of
many photon 'objects' soldierly,
mechanically "marching together."
As you can see these two views of coherence are wholly unalike.
When Brian Josephson invented Josephson junctions he was thinking
quantumly.
When John Bardeen said wrongly "Josephson is all wet,"
Bardeen was thingking classically.
If we think quantumly, we are thinking
well. If we thingk classically, we are thingking ill.
See our Flash, 2001.
For quantum examples:
- BECs quantum
c¤here,
- Cooper pairs in quantum superc¤nduct¤rs c¤here,
- S¤lit¤nic energy in tsunamis partially c¤heres
water waves,
- Emergent systems c¤here, (life forms, planets, solar
systems, galaxies, etc.)
- Etc.
For classical examples:
- Mechanistic assemblies 'cohere' (cars, houses, puzzles, etc.)
- Organizations 'cohere' (religions, unions, corporations,
states, nations, etc.)
Add descripti¤n ¤f partial/mixed c¤herence
here.
See at this link
a very comprehensive description of what Quantonics means by
quantum coherence. Doug - 13Jun2005.
See decoherence.
(Nice description of quantum computing there.)
Page top index.
|
|
'collapse'
Etymology:
Synonyms:
|
Especially regarding von Neumann's classical concept of wave
function collapse upon classical measurement of said wave function.
Quantonics ch¤¤ses t¤ c¤¤pt
classical 'collapse' amd
remerq all
quantum comtextual ¤ccurrences with 'c¤llapse.'
See collapse.
Quantum wave functi¤ns d¤ n¤t 'collapse'
classically. They dec¤here quantumly. Quantum dec¤herence
d¤es n¤t pr¤cure ideal classical objective
state. Quantons are always b¤th anihmatæ
amd inanihmatæ,
amd are thus incapable
¤f ideal classical 'state,' or ideal classical 'collapse'
whose purpose is to achieve ideal classical 'state.'
S¤ when we say quantons c¤llapse, we mean they
dec¤here int¤ quanton(anihmatæ,inanihmatæ).
Page top index.
|
|
'complement'
Etymology:
Synonyms:
|
Quantonics ch¤¤ses t¤ c¤¤pt
classical 'complement' amd
remerq all
quantum comtextual ¤ccurrences with 'c¤mplement.'
In classical contexts we shall use 'complement.' In Quantonics/quantum
comtexts we shall use 'c¤mplement.'
Where classical 'complement' depends upon conjugate, objective
negation, quantum 'c¤mplement' assumes comjugate,
quantonic, included-middle, subjective negati¤n.
Historically, due to its classical interpretation, 'complement'
has caused philosophers, metaphysicians, and scientists much
chagrin. As an example, Niels Bohr intuited complementarity's
subjective nature but was forced by legacy classicism to say,
"...opposites are complementary..." Of course when
one makes that statement one imposes a classical schismatic dichotomy
on 'complement.' One thus forces classical 'complement' to be
an excluded-middle dichon.
Perhaps a most surprising aspect of quantum~complementarity
is how humans tend to see themselves as observers of 'objective'
reality, yet they do not view 'objective' reality as observers
of them. Niels Bohr was attempting to show classical scientists
how observation is actually some meme more like co-affectation.
That is why Doug coined both coobsfection and obsfect.
"How can that happen Doug?" Well if reality were
really 'objective,' it could 'not' happen by classical Aristotelian
syllogistic 'canon.'
Classical objects are canonically 'not' quantum~flux.
But quantum~reality is wholly quantum~flux. "What are
tells that quantum~reality is wholly flux, Doug?" There
are many, but a most apparent one is nature's holographic self-actualization.
David Bohm and Karl Pribram promoted this quantum meme early.
Our minds exhibit holographic qua which extends beyond our physical
bodies which is another tell of William James' and Boris Sidis'
reserve energy notions.
Simply, we are in flux and flux is in us. A huge and ubiquitous
examplar of this is gravity: "gravity is in us and we are
in gravity." But there are countless other fluxes about
which we can say confidently, "We are in it and it is in
us."
Given those remarks we can say, almost canonically, flux complements
flux.
That simple quantum~phasement
destroys all dialectical canon, period. You may argue otherwise,
but you are wr¤ng, forever living in dialectical Error!
In Quantonics, 'c¤mplement' is n¤ dichon! C¤mplement,
rather, is an included-middle quanton.
See: Two Kinds
of Complementarity.
Page top index.
|
|
'complete'
Etymology:
Synonyms:
|
Quantonics ch¤¤ses t¤ c¤¤pt
classical 'complete' amd
remerq all
quantum comtextual ¤ccurrences with 'c¤mplete.'
In classical contexts we shall use 'complete.' In Quantonics/quantum
comtexts we shall use 'c¤mplete.'
We shall use single qu¤tes when referring these terms,
respectively, "¤ut ¤f con/comtexts."
See: absolute.
Page top index.
|
|
'commutative'
'commutativity'
'commute'
'commutes'
Etymology:
Synonyms:
|
Note to readers:
To accomplish our remediation of 'commutative' we are using and
showing our recent Quantonics remediation of classical 'minus'
here in at least two quantum emerqants:
- mihnus ('h' in MT-Extra
font which is an h-bar), and
- mi
 nus (a GIF of an MT-Extra h-bar).
Our focus here is strictly on classical objective vis-à-vis
quantum quantonic notions of 'commutativity.'
Objective notions of 'commutativity' are usually 'mathematical'
which some scientists isomorph (using a noun here as a verb)
as classically 'physical;' i.e., "as it signifies [mechanically],
so it is [mechanically]."
Quantonic notions of 'commutativity' we call physial
(rather than 'physical').
To us physial evokes sensibilities of a more (closer
to a) real nature. To us 'physical' and 'physics'
abuse (using classical dialectic to I3
rape) our sensibilities with harsh mechanical notions of synthetic
artificiality. Those last two sentences find powerful analogies
in quanton
and dichon,
respectively. So here we are remediating dichonic commutativity
with quantonic c¤mmutativity.
Page top index.
|
|
'commutative' cont'd... |
In classical contexts we shall use 'commutative' and its various
classical forms.
In quantum comtexts we shall use 'c¤mmutative' amd
its various quantum emerqings.
Classicists often describe mathematical (i.e., mechanical)
commutativity using Poisson's bracket:
pq - qp = [p, q] = 0.
In other words, mechanical order of multiplication is arbitrary.
This should always hold as classically, tautologously, Aristotelian-syllogistically
'true.'
However, in quantum reality Poisson's bracket is n¤t
classically 'zero' tautologous.
Page top index.
|
|
'commutative' cont'd... |
Why? Quantum reality is, am¤ng ¤ther phen¤mena:
- abs¤lute flux (always canging amd canging all) — quantum reality, thus, imposes
many whenings on
all quantum comtexts,
- included-middle (pr¤bability-distributing, c¤-here-ing,
superp¤siti¤ning, "Bell Inequalitying,"
quantum-umcærtaintying,
etc.) — quantum reality, thus, imposes many animatæ, l¤cal
amd n¤nl¤cal pr¤cessings'
interrelati¤nships ¤n all quantum comtexts,
- ensemble-everywere b¤th
l¤cally amd n¤nl¤cally ass¤ciative
(partially: c¤herent, entangling, amd superluminally
c¤rrelating) — quantum reality, thus, imposes many
c¤¤bsfective
¤nt¤l¤gical
selective assessments
regarding "whatings
happenings nextings" on all quantum comtexts,
- etc.
See our Bell Theorem Study.
In quantum reality, Poisson's bracket must be shown more generally
as:
p•q minus q•p [p,q]quanton(p,q)i••N,
Page top index.
|
|
'commutative' cont'd... |
where
- '•' issi Quantonics' quantum multiplicati¤n,
- minus issi Quantonics' subtracti¤n,
- issi our
now famous Quantonics' equals sign,
- 'p,q' is our Quantonics comma-copulum absent classicism's
SOM 'wall' space, amd
- 'N' issi however many Planck h-bars we need to represent
any microscopic, mesoscopic, ¤r
macroscopic quantum umcærtainty
interrelati¤nship (in absence of N, one often sees a greater-than/equals
symbol to express a non-specific N; also, one may choose to view
N as a specific radius number based upon 2(r)
 h, where 'r'
is usually normalized classically to (one) '1,' and 'h' is Planck's
constant; we tend to view 'r' and its reciprocal Value depending
on whether we want to depict energy or radius as greater; smaller
'r' is analogous greater wave-n¤mbær/frequency/energy).
Too, all normally classical scalar magnitudes we represent
by Quantonic analogy via quantons as quantum n¤mbærs.
Finally our usage of i as quantum square root of minus ¤ne issi
intrinsically recursive and iteratively generative when viewed
as a quantum
square root.
Page top index.
|
|
'commutative' cont'd... |
In classical versions of quantum 'science,' quantum 'umcærtainty'
is always expressed in its classical uncertainty representation
as we show above.
However, in quantum reality, quantum c¤mmutativity
wears many other potential ensemble quantum-pr¤duct
interrelati¤nship guises which we may exemplify:
- quanton(p,q)p•q mihnus p•q (palindromic reversal,
2nd pair),
- quanton(p,q)p•q mihnus b•d (palindromic inversion,
2nd pair),
- quanton(p,q)p•q mihnus d•b (inversion & reversal),
- quanton(p,q)p•q mihnus p•b (partial inversion &
reversal),
- quanton(p,q)p•q mihnus d•p (partial inversion &
reversal),
- and so on...
When one becomes aware of quantum reality's omni-whatever
nature, one can see that EIMA
quantum umcærtainty (c¤mmutativity) interrelati¤nships
abound.
Also see, and take some timings to read surrounding text, our Boolean
Logic is Distributative.
Page top index.
|
|
'con' |
Quantonics ch¤¤ses t¤ c¤¤pt
classical 'con' amd
remerq all
quantum comtextual ¤ccurrences with 'com.' See Con.
In classical contexts we shall use 'con' prefixes. In Quantonics/quantum
comtexts we shall use 'com' prefixes, with some exceptions like
quantum included-middle, subjective c¤mplement.
We shall use single qu¤tes when referring these terms,
respectively, "¤ut ¤f con/comtexts."
Page top index.
|
|
'concrete'
Etymology:
Synonyms:
Classical -
- real,
- particular,
- objective,
- thing,
- material,
- stable,
- immutable,
- homogeneous,
- monistic,
- etc.
Quantum -
- abstract,
- complementary,
- sophist,
- heterogeneous,
- animate~fractal,
- nonactual,
- pluralistic,
- etc.
|
Quantonics ch¤¤ses t¤ c¤¤pt
classical 'concrete' amd
remerq all
quantum comtextual ¤ccurrences with 'comcrete.' See Con.
We shall use single qu¤tes when referring these terms,
respectively, "¤ut ¤f con/comtexts."
: Concrete, etc.
Classically 'concrete' means real,
actual, specific,
stable, material, objective, particulate, monistic, (w)holistic,
etc.
Classically 'concrete' means 'not' abstract, 'not' -plural,
-heterogeneous, -hermeneutic, -sophist,
etc.
Classically 'concrete' implies an absolutely stoppable,
hold-still logic of
EOOO opposition.
:
Comcrete,
etc.
Quantumly, comcrete ræfers amd dæscrihbæs quantum~ræhlness:
as anihmatæ, æv¤luti¤nary,
æmærscænt, æmærscænturable,
æmærscihtectable,
BAWAM, REIMAR
quanton(n¤nahctualihty,ahctualihty) amd
quanton(DQ,SQ)
quantum~wavæ
fumcti¤n(s)
AKA QLO(s).
Quantum comcrete must bæ abstrahct
since iht ræquiræs ahll n¤nahctualihty as quantum ahctualihty's ræhl
quantum~c¤mplæmænt.
See probability,
What is Wrong with Probability
as Value, etc.
Page top index.
|
|
|
'concur'
'concurrence'
'concurrent'
Etymology:
Synonyms:
|
Quantonics ch¤¤ses t¤ c¤¤pt
classical 'concur' amd
remerq all
quantum comtextual ¤ccurrences with 'comcur.' Similarly
'comcurrence' and 'comcurrent.'
In classical contexts two or more processes 'concur' objectively-independently
of one another.
Ihn quantum comtexts tw¤
¤r m¤re pr¤cesses
'comcur' BAWAM
EIMA c¤¤bsfecting
¤ne an¤ther.
Page top index.
|
|
|
'conflict'
Etymology:
Synonyms:
|
: Conflict
:
Comflihct
Classical conflict, e.g., war, is about what is dialectically 'right'
and 'wrong.' Classical conflict is about eliminating one's
enemies based on classical notions of opposition. This kind of
classical conflict is known as fascism. This kind of conflict
is called "politics." It distills, i.e., politics and
fascism, distill to hatred, a hatred which is against individuals
and societies! Think
ab¤ut
that, d¤ n¤t
thingk
about it!!!
Classical conflict is a dichon(win, lose). Notice how
democracy is constructed based on that same classical
notion of conflict: dichon(majority, minority).
Notice
thæræ
issi n¤ quantum ihncludæd-mihddle, n¤ quantum neutral gr¤umd
— only SOM's exclusive wall
— SOM's excluded-middle. Notice
how classical conflict is always an issue of society and
societal 'values.' Classical conflict always places
society above individuals. This conflict-based
version of society is ESQ,
non ESS, evil personified.
It also may be apparent to readers how classical conflicts
like war and oppression of 'infidels,' raise classical societies
above their own sacred notions of 'rule of law.' There is a huge
story here, waiting to be told.
In quantonics, we say it simply, "Static notions of rule
of law can be further distilled even as classicists do under
conditions of conflict: 'Rules is tules
for fules.'" Classical society reserves for itself an ultimate
right to ignore its own 'rule of law' whenever it benefits an
ultimate dichon(win, lose). "If 'rule of law' forces a loss
in a classical conflict, ignore it!" That's classical
conflict-politics folks! It's bilge. It's bull. It's rotten!
It stinks! It's fascism!
What is at root of these anti~quantum and ludicrous classical
notions? Dialectic!!!
Quantum comflihct
issi ab¤ut c¤smol¤gihcal,
nati¤nal, s¤cietal,
cultural,
and individual interrelationships
which aræ
adjusting, adapting, amd æv¤lving t¤ward
quantum c¤hesihve
bættærings. Quantum comflihct
issi ab¤ut mutual survihval
based upon quantum
memeos of judgment
wihth ræspæct: quanton(quanton(Hagana,havlagah),quanton(c¤¤pærati¤n,respæct)).
Ihn quantum ræhlihty, iht
issi ihmp¤ssible
for
ideal
- classical conflict based upon ideal
- classical opposition, i.e.,
- ideal classical negation,
- ideal classical falsifiability,
- ideal repeatable classical verifiability, and
- ideal classical proof, and thus
- ideal classical dialectical judgment
t¤ e[ist.
For additional and insightful coverage of this quantonic remediated
English language term see a recent article in The
Chronicle, 2Apr2004 issue, by Alan Wolfe, titled, 'A
Fascist Philosopher Helps Us Understand Contemporary Politics.'
Quantonics subscribes The Chronicle, otherwise we have
no affiliation.
Wolfe does not point out that both liberal and
conservative, both Democrat and Republican politics
are slaves of ancient and passe Greco-Roman dialectic. In our
view, that is crux of our world's problems at commencement of
Millennium III. We can make similar remarks regarding world religions
and world belief systems. Doug - 6Apr2004.
Page top index.
|
|
'consensus'
'consense'
Etymology:
Synonyms:
|
Quantonics ch¤¤ses t¤
c¤¤pt classical 'consensus' amd
remerq all
quantum comtextual ¤ccurrences with 'comsensus.'
In classical contexts we shall use 'consensus.' In Quantonics/quantum
comtexts we shall use 'comsensus.'
Classical consensus elicits semantics of Kuhnian
paradigm, social group-thingk,
CTMs, common
sense, common-ist sense, etc. Clifford Geertz in his Available Light
speaks of a classical view of a culture as essentially consensus.
Classically, consensus is group culture in support of group-thingk.
It is thingking by a culture for a culture. It is politically
correct radical socialism. Classical consensus places group above
individual. It is "one paradigmatic class of cultural rules
fits all members" of a culture. Classical consensus is a
closed cathedral, a church of reason, a detention center of group-thingk.
Vico says consensus is, "Uniform ideas originating among
entire peoples unknown to each other must have a common ground
of truth," and "Common sense is judgment
without reflection, shared by an entire class, an entire nation,
or the entire human race." Giambattista Vico (1688-1744),
Italian philosopher, historian. The New Science, bk. 1,
paragraphs 144 and 142 respectively (ed. 1744; tr. 1984). Quotes
added 25Aug2002 - Doug. See our Quantonics version of truth.
Thanks to The Columbia Dictionary
of Quotations, Columbia University Press. Copyright © 1993
by Columbia University Press. All rights reserved.
Thomas Digges, 16th century English Astronomer
said "Vulgi opinio Error."
Digges wrote that in his copy of Copernicus' De revolutionibus,
1543, cover book margin near page top.
Thanks to Peter Barker's 30Apr2004 Science book review
of The Book Nobody Read, by Owen Gingrich.
Translated, "Vulgi opinio Error," means "the
common opinion errs."
We agree with Digges.
Epicurus said, "I have never wished to cater to the crowd,
for what they know I do not approve, and what they approve I
do not know." Added 5Jul2006 - Doug.
Thanks to The Columbia Dictionary
of Quotations, Columbia University Press. Copyright © 1993
by Columbia University Press. All rights reserved. See 'Popularity,
Item 2.'
Classically, consensus is 'general
thought.' Some call it "common sense." It is 'cloned
thingking.' One thought system fits all 'thingking.' More seriously
and with large impact on culture and science is a conventional
semantic of social positive thought.
Consensus is what we call, in Quantonics, "running on
automatic." Classical consensus is scalarbation.
Several philosophers have said that general (socially positive)
thought is a precursor of abuse of power. If a society, organization,
union, science, philosophy, ruler, leader, etc., can get everyone
to think alike then in a very large sense that entity gains power.
Empirically we know this is so from experience. All societies
and rulers evolve toward conditions of absolute corruption and
power.
In our view quantum thinking individuals, who view themselves
as more highly evolved and evolving than societies and groups,
can (are capable and must shoulder this responsibility for their
and other pluralities' own good) take power away from these corruptible
entities.
Examples? Recently California and Gray Davis plus USA and
Georges (Herbert and Walker) Bush.
See Ernst Mach and Fritz Mauthner. Ref's from Casti's Gödel.
Quantum comsensus, Mae-wan Ho style (see page 153 ¤f
her, the Rainbow and the Worm) amd
Quantonics style, issi
b¤th gr¤up-think-king amd individual-think-king,
QTMs, extra¤rdinary sense, quantum sense, etc. Quantumly,
comsensus issi quantonic culture (i.e., quantum c¤hesi¤n, quantum
c¤herence) in supp¤rt
¤f individual-think (individual aut¤n¤my).
Quantum comsensus issi mass cust¤mizati¤n ¤f
individual pragmadigmatic
cultural values, member-by-member. Quantum comsensus issi an
¤pen bazaar, an arena ¤f free thinking individuals
wh¤ b¤th share amd d¤ n¤t
share memes.
See our judge,
our Bases of Judgment, and
our What is Wrong with
Probability as Value? (Added links 19Jul2004 - Doug)
Page top index.
|
|
'consequence'
Etymology:
Synonyms:
|
See: effect.
See before.
Notice this: 'con' sequence. Inference? 'Out' of sequence. Which
sequence. Only in a predicable, predictable, determinate, formal,
mechanical dialectical, analytic, unified,
whole monistic reality
could there be only one sequence. See OGC.
In quantum~reality there are n¤ classical 'sequences,'
so there are n¤ classical 'con' sequences as 'sequence's'
ideal classical 'opposites.'
Doug - 15Dec2007.
Page top index.
|
|
'consistent'
Etymology:
Synonyms:
|
Quantonics ch¤¤ses t¤ c¤¤pt
classical 'consistent' amd
remerq all
quantum comtextual ¤ccurrences with 'comsistent.'
In classical contexts we shall use 'consistent.' In Quantonics/quantum
comtexts we shall use 'comsistent.'
We shall use single qu¤tes when referring these terms,
respectively, "¤ut ¤f con/comtexts."
See: absolute.
Page top index.
|
|
'constant'
Etymology:
Synonyms:
|
Quantonics ch¤¤ses t¤ c¤¤pt
classical 'constant' amd
remerq all
quantum comtextual ¤ccurrences with 'comstant.'
In classical contexts we shall use 'constant.' In Quantonics/quantum
comtexts we shall use 'comstant.'
'Constant' is a classical term whose meaning depends upon
classically ideal constructs, especially staticity and inanimacy.
In quantum reality all comstructs are quantum umcærtain.
All quantum comstructs are in abs¤lute quantum flux, amd
thus intrinsically incapable ¤f certain, 'constant' interrelati¤nships.
This aspect ¤f quantum reality is what dr¤ve
us, in Quantonics, t¤ devel¤p Planck
quantum based quantum
number semi¤tics. Als¤ see a similar discussi¤n
at One is the Onliest.
See Problematic English
Term 'Constant.'
Page top index.
|
|
'continue'
'continua'
'continuity'
'continuous'
'continuum'
Etymology:
Synonyms:
|
Quantonics ch¤¤ses t¤ c¤¤pt
classical 'continue' amd
remerq all
quantum comtextual ¤ccurrences with 'comtinue.' Analogously,
'comtinua,' 'comtinuity,' 'comtinuous,' and 'comtinuum.'
In classical contexts we shall use 'continue.' In Quantonics/quantum
comtexts we shall use 'comtinue.' Analogously, 'comtinua,' 'comtinuity,'
'comtinuous,' and 'comtinuum.'
Classically reality may retain 'continuous' state. This is
analogous "semper fidelis," or "status quo is
the way to go."
Classically 'continua,' 'continuity,' and 'continuum' are
analytic determinants, pursuant an unchanging, persistent function,
strategy, and direction.
In quantum reality changæ
reigns, phase (n¤t classical state) is always tentative,
and changæ is always quantized,
e.g. n¤t continuous, rather, comtinuous.
We ch¤¤se n¤t to use classical 'discontinuous'
in place of n¤t continuous since it is an ideal
classical biformal opposite of 'not' continuous. Quantum reality
is c¤mplementary n¤t ideally biformal.
Page top index.
|
|
'contradict'
'contradiction'
'contradictory'
Etymology:
Synonyms:
|
TBD.
See Aristotle. (Classicism
depends upon an illusion/delusion of 'proof'
by contradiction. Contradiction as a concept
depends upon Aristotle's 'law' of excluded-middle or what we
today call "objective separability," AKA "objective
independence" of classical variables (See mathematics' axiom
of independence.). And classical contra |