|
'quality' |
: Quality, qualities, etc.
:
Qualihty,
qualihties, qualihtyings,
etc.
Quantum ræhlihty issi gænærahlly
qualihtatihvæ.
Classical reality is quantitative.
Quantum: qualihty.
Quantum~quality is non classically measurable. Classicists
measure and scalarbate objects quantitatively at ideal Newtonian
'points' and ideal DesCartesian 'loci.' Classical objects like
points, lines,
and circles do not
'exist' in quantum reality.
Quantum quality is processes
animately, durationally
monitoring animate
quantum reality.
Quantum~quality is (see comments
on classical design in last bullet):
- waves, wavicity,
flux, absolute change,
absolute change impetus
- phase, phasicity,
phase~encodings, holographic phase~encodings
- we represent waves and wave phases as ensemble~quantum~likelihood~omnistributioning
(EQLOs)
- fuzzonic (this is one way of representing quantum reality,
not the way):
- quanton(n¤nl¤cal,l¤cal): fuzzonic locus is ambiguous:
spatially arbitrary, since interrelationshipings (AKA phasicityings)
are non classically spatial
- evolutionary (by way of comparison classical reality via
its Babelian canons, rules, laws, axioms is innately, by orthodox
intentional dogmatic classical design, incapable of evolution;
as we can see lucidly, vividly, eidetically...classical reality
is a bogus reality, classically-designed reality is a
deign to feign...hocus bogus)
Quantum quality (reality) is not: logical, objective, measurable,
propertyesque, stoppable, stable, dissociative, excluded-middle,
independent, axiomatic negatable (negative), contradictory,
falsifiable, true, and so on...
See subjectiv,
subjective, logic, quantitative,
coquecigrues,
judge, Bases
of Judgment, classically real,
etc.
Page top index.
|
| |
'quanta'
'quantal'
'quantum'
Synonyms - classical:
- material increment
- objective granularity
- measurable
synthetic change gradient
- quantity
- substantial portion
- concrete metricity
- absolute stasis
- absolute quantifiability
- a means to scalarbation
- etc.
Synonyms - quantum:
- enabler of all emergent, evolutionary, real
 isobeing, isounbecoming,
becoming, being, unbecoming, isobecoming quantum ontologies;
see our Generation III Reality
Loop. Study fuzzons to TBCSUD
quarks and quark to nucleon
ontologies. We are at essence of real (n¤t religious
and classical, but quantum) creation here! Somethings Gotta
Give! Quantum Nicholson~and~Keaton with Keanu Reeves messing
with their macroscopic quantum uncertainties.
 Doug.
- chunky flux (any size of energy chunk as multiples of Planck's
least energy flux packet: N·i·h);
refer Johann
Jakob Balmer's energy (flux) ladder and the Balmer
formula
- flux packet (~QLO
dispersion; see our fuzzon)
- wave energy packet
(multiples of N·i·h)
- least energy flux hunk (i·h)
- Planck's least energy flux packet (i·h)
- monitorable
(quanta are durational
quantum processes,
n¤t objective, state-ic
'particles')
- quanta are subjective change, i.e., Quality, as absolute:
- light
- etc.
See our Planck
quanton.
Etymology - classical:
"quantum, quanta n. 1619, Latin quantum, neuter
of quantus how great: quantity; meaning in physics smallest
amount of energy, apparently granular, about 1910; quantum
jump 1955; quantum leap 1970." some minor Doug
editing for contemporaneity. See Barnhart. Quantum tsunami
1995 - Doug and Quantonics re: ubiquitously imminent Millennium
III changes of culture, philosophy, especially soft, nano, nono,
and bionon 'sciences.' See Doug's coquecigrues.
Etymology - quantum:
- See quantum synonyms just above.
- This is Doug's own etymology for Quantonics
version of quantum and quanta.
- Quantonics' version of quanta emerged
during years starting in about 1991 and progressing until now,
CeodE 2009.
- We juxtapose classical quanta and Quantonics
quanta:
- classical quanta are scalar vav Qtx
quanta are flux processings
- classical quantum atoms are objects
vav Qtx quantum atoms are adiabatic perpetual ensemblings of
quark and nucleonic flux processings
- classical 'science' defines reality
as static, independent objective 'interactions,' vav Quantonics
describes reality as dynamic, middle~including quanton interrelationshipings.
- classical 'science' builds real objects
from quantum-objects, vav Quantonics emersces evolutionary quanton ensembles from ensemblings
of quanta and all evolves perpetually at all scales of reality.
- classical 'science' defines nodes (energy
wells) in a hologram as 'objective,' vav Quantonics describes
energy wellings in a hologram as evolving fuzzons whose comstituents are quantal ensemblings
evolving coherently~autonomously.
- this list of comparisons may be extended
indefinitely... Doug - 31Oct2009.
|
: Quanta, quantum, etc.
Classical quanta are state-ic, stoppable,
material, objective, substantial, quantitative
'particles' of
matter.
Classical 'scientists' (we believe) wrongly claim that reality
is a material perpetuity of objective, yet mechanically Newtonian-interactive-event-alterable
state. They refute quantum reality's absolute flux, emergent
change, and animacy ("Do
you see this egg?"). Classical change is static propertyesque
cinematographic frames. Bergson calls classical change "movement
by immobilities." Period of nonprocess-state-icity, nonprocess
zero latency event,
period of nonprocess-state-icity, nonprocess zero latency event,
period of of nonprocess-state-icity, nonprocess zero latency
event, and so on... Stuff of Zeno's
first paradox!!!
: Quanta, quantal, quantum, quantumings, quantumist,
quantumly, etc.
Quanta represents plural of quantum, vulgately quantums.
Key HotMemes™ are:
- quanta are adiabatic, their processings are lossless:
i.e., 100% efficient,
- quanta are unstoppable, their motions are perpetual, and
- viewed classically quantal 'motions' are uncertain
and 'discontinuous.'
Quantum (singular) quanta (plural) are absolutely fluxing
wave energy packets.
Reality's basic
quanta are genuine perpetual
motion flux packets: including photons,
electrons, neutrons,
protons, etc. All
of animate, unstoppable, REIMAR
quantum reality emerges from endless variations of subjective,
qualitative change
among these basic quanta.
We probably should
QELR quanta to quala...
However, just like that other word, 'science,'
we sense that quantum is just part of our linguistic history.
And quanta can be animate EIMA can't they? But we just have to
keep reminding ourselves that all quanta are really qualitative
and subjective in their essence
and quintessence.
Quanta as absolute flux explain total failure of classical
thinking! How? Proponents of a classical reality made a bunch
of invalid assumptions. Formalization and mechanization of invalid
classical assumptions (suppositions)
started with Parmenides, Plato,
and Aristotle, mostly
using an invalid
Attic dialectic to do their classical 'reasoning.' Quantum
thinking changes all that, enormously, and offers countless n¤vel
and better ways of looking
at reality. How do we know they are better? Classical
ways either do not work period or offer very crude even mendacious
assessments of reality. Why? Classicists adhere a SOM
Box notion of y=f(t). All objects, when they change 'state,'
must do so by classical edict y=f(t) continuously. Such dogma
of continuous change, especially an assumption of unitemporal
change, rules out all entropies except J. C. Maxwellian 2nd
'Law' of Thermodynamics posentropies. (Please keep on your quantum~stage
that all quantum numbers are pr¤cesses: quantum~zer¤
is pr¤cess,
quantum~¤ne is pr¤cess, and so on...)
But, dear reader, quanta leap!1 And they leap in
 /2 increments. Increments that fast are essentially
and quintessentially adiabatic. Classicists insist on y=f(t),
classically durational,
heat-energy loss. Quanta adiabatically leap which means zer¤
latency leaping without heat~energy loss! Latter is a
description of quantum zer¤entropy.
1More carefully we should say, "Dear
reader, quanta, from a classical conspective 'discontinuously'
leap."
Quantum memeos
of reality repair nearly all invalid classical notions of 'reality.'
"Doug give us some examples!"
OK, here
is a list (classical problems inexplicable using classical 'mechanics'):
- perpetual motion (classicists deny perpetual motion due their
belief that reality is only J. C. Maxwellian posentropic, and
that posentropy
has a single, unitemporal gradient: positive); Read Prigogene
and Stengers' Order Out of Chaos. Read Erwin Schrödinger
and Mae-wan Ho on negentropy. Modern quantum science admits that
zeroentropy 'exists.' See Quantonics' cohera
and entropa.
- heat radiation (classicists invalidly assumed heat radiation
was y=f(t); similarly they assumed electrons' 'particle-object'
orbits should decay classically as y=f(t); all classical
phenomena had to be objective, predicable, causal, determinate,
1-1 correspondent y=f(t) radically-mechanical phenomena; just
and only classical arrogance, ineptness, and hylic-psychic
intellectual bogosity) see Dirac's
tourmaline gedankenment
- ultraviolet catastrophe (similar above)
- nuclear radiation (similar above)
- spontaneous electron (and other exotic 'particle') emission
and absorption, plus creation and discreation ontologies which
simply cannot be explained classically
- scintillation
as 'particulate' (photons as objects, particulate; see bottom
note at Deutsch)
- particles as ideal 'point
objects' (real flux quanta have macroscopic 'spatially'
arbitrary quantum likelihood omnistributions which included~middle
compenetrate and coinside
other real flux quanta)
- tunneling
- breaks a classical Newtonian
assumption of impenetrability of material reality
A most glaring everyday exemplar of quantum~reality's emerqant
c¤mpænætrating~pr¤cæssings which
illustrate intra~penetrating middle~inclusion is a nitrogen atom
in an ammonia molecule. Said atom bi-tetrahedrally "very
high rate flux" adiabatically~superposes complementary vertices
whose bases are a triangle emerqed
by three hydrogen atoms. See artwork at our Mobius
3 Prime Fermion web page. 12Dec2007 - Doug.
- all 'supers:'
- conductivity
- liquidity
- solidity
- positioning
- etc.
- absence of continuous orbital decay of electrons; see heat
radiation above
- nuclear spectra
- separability
- localability (see lisr)
- isolability
- reducibility
- electron pair exclusion (Pauli 'principle'); more generally
quantum~pair exclusion...
- middle~inclusion
- quantum logic as "absurd"
(see coquecigrues link in column just left)
- subjectivity of quantum reality as "absurd"
- sophism of quantum reality
as "absurd"
- action without reaction ('effectless cause;' violates Newton's 'laws')
- reaction without action ('effect without cause,' usually,
classically, referred as phenomena)
- negentropy (free energy; gainful action)
- zeroentropy (ideal adiabaticity; lossless action)
- mixentropy (our best example here is a human brain; QTMs)
- action at a distance (e.g., quantum entanglement)
- space-like action (AKA 'correlation')
- space-like signaling
- zero latency signaling
- unlimited bandwidth signaling
- photon as a holographic qubit of quasi~unlimited 'information'
- photons as optical qubits of visible and n¤nvisible
'picturings' of reality
- photons as qubital øptihcal
ømnihtørs
- quantum
coherence
- invalidity of "probability 1" (classical thing-king
claims this is a valid notion; were it true it would invalidate
quantum~uncertainty)
- invalidity of "probability 0" (classical thing-king
claims this is a valid notion; were it true it would invalidate
quantum~uncertainty)
- this list is nearly endless...
We'll do a lot more here later, but this gives essence and
urgency of Quantonics' efforts and need for wider adoption of
quantum think-king modes. See QTMs.
Bottom line here: quanta are n¤t classically
mechanical and to treat them as such is to remain in SOM's
box. 'Quantum Mechanics,' like 'Quantum Logic' is an oxymoron.
Quanta are about a quantum n¤nMechanics of reality!!!
Study David Bohm
and his theories about reality as holographic.
Doug - 11Jun2005.
Page top index.
|