|
- Equilibria and chaos are positive~energy~wave, and thus stochastic,
quantum~phenomena.
- Equilibria and chaos exhibit stindyanic
both movement and rest wave ontologies.
- Equilibria emerge from lower gradient quantum~scintillationings:
Rest. SQ. Tav.
- Equilibria emerq rest as relative lower change~energy
quiescence (lower energies of instabilityings:
see omnitor).
- Equilibria may rest at relatively higher and relatively
lower quiescent energies.
- Equilibria exhibit quantum~complementarityings of both
adiabaticity and n¤n adiabaticity: quantons(adiabaticityings,n¤nadiabaticityings).
- Equilibria as adiabatic rest (can) happen(s) quantum~atemporally. (I.e.,
zær¤~latæncy c¤~affæctation,
c¤rrælation, an(m)d ahction
at a distance: gl¤bal n¤n~l¤cality.)
- Equilibria as n¤n~adiabatic rest happens quantum~temporally.
(Many quantum~l¤cal timings: positive~wave~energyings'
st¤chastics thereof.) - Doug
3Jan2012.
- Chaos emerge from higher gradient scintillationings, i.e.,
radical~instability as : Movement.
DQ. Aleph. (Re~[Vv]aluings. A tentative movement toward FFE:
system evolution!)
- Chaos emerq movement as relative higher change~energy
systemic~perturbance (higher energies of instabilityings).
- Chaos may move to relatively higher and relatively
lower QTP energies.
- Chaos exhibit quantum~complementarityings of both
adiabaticity and n¤n adiabaticity: quantons(adiabaticityings,n¤nadiabaticityings).
- Chaos as adiabatic movement (can) happen(s) quantum~atemporally.
- Chaos as n¤n~adiabatic movement happens quantum~temporally.
- Movement issi ihn Rest and Rest
issi ihn Movement: quantons(movementings,restings)
nissin quantons(chaos,equilibria).
(Essence of "understanding the logos, the
account.")
- QTP higher gradience applies to both movement~to~higher~energy
(chao~analanche)
and movement~to~lower~energy changes (chao~avalanche).
- Durable lower gradience applies to both rest~at~higher~energy
(equil~analanche) and rest~at~lower~energy changes (equil~avalanche).
- Each chaoequil~scintillationing has myriad affectings (belies
classical cause-effect hylicity:
classical notions of 'cause-effect' are bogus).
- Each QED chaoequil~scintillationing
is (appears to be) adiabatic, that is, quantal
chaos is (appears to be) zeroentropic. Adiabaticity (zeroentropy)
nissin n¤n~adiabaticity (posentropy).
- Equilibria include lower gradience equil~analanchings and
equil~avalanchings.
- Chaos include higher gradience chao~analanchings and chao~avalanchings.
- Chaos onset desnouers itself among sentience (sentience
use is intentional: assume holographic~reality)
as high gradience
analanching of Cognitive
Overburden™.
- Equilibrium
onset desnouers itself among sentience (sentience use
is intentional) as accelerating emergence of n¤væl
re~cognitionings (re~[Vv]aluings).
- All chaoequil re~[Vv]aluings in quantum~reality are radically
comtext sensitive (i.e., hologra[[ph][m][il]]ic) and thus intrinsically quantum~relative. Relativity,
[Vv]alue relativity, is intrinsic in quantum~reality.
Doug - 21Jan2012.
- Quantum~chaos issi higher gradience
quantum~transmutation.
- Quantum~equilibrium issi lower gradience
quantum~transmutation.
- Measurement of gradience of chaos~analanche, and ~avalanche
and measurement of gradience of equilibrium~rest and movements
away from rest toward equilibrium~analanche and ~avalanche.
- An obvious approach here is to use phase~energy interrelationshipings
to assess evolutionary changings in equilibrium and chaos. To
Doug, there appears an implied requirement for classical stoppability
here...perhaps there are other phase approaches which are viable
under a core quantum essential that -- reality is perpetual change.
- To Doug, though, it isn't apparent H5W
to accomplish it. Big issues are: what interrelationshipings
(see important link just above)
do we use to assess phase~energyings?
I think (I am k~n¤w~ings)
this requires innovation.
- Another apparent approach is to perpetually monitor (being quantum~omniht¤rings)
real wave functions in real time and assess frequency changes
(especially gradiencings) real time.
Higher frequency is higher energy. Higher
gradiencings may be exhibiting changings to~from chaos and lower
gradiencings may be exhibiting changings to~from equilibria.
Changings in gradiencings (a kind of quantum~acceleration assessment)
become crucial aspects (crux) of our omnitorings' qua.
Ensembles , and their hologra[[ph][m][il]]ic networkings,
of these classes of changings require quantum~Value~assessmentings
for stochastic forecastings in any quantum~sense. Doug - 1Feb2012.
An issue of that approach is H5W do we choose to assess gradience
of wave energy changes and instabilityings. Doug believes 'real'
quantum~computing will simplify these monitoring issues.
- Self~other~referent~quantum~recursion appears to be required
along with means to assess omnivergence of radical~autsimilarity
which attends equilibrium at near quiescence. Ability to accomplish
this has value in other sciences than Finance, Economics, and
Politics, like volcanology, tsunamology, and plate~tectonics
wave~energyings.
- Clearly, Doug is narrating concerns of new (n¤væl)
philosophies and new (n¤væl) 'sciences'
here.
- Doug - 2Jan2012.
- Etc.
Doug - 28-29-30Dec2011, 1-2,7,21Jan2012, 1Feb2012.
|
|
