
'phase'
phased
phases
phasicity
phasings 
: Phase
Paul Pietsch, in his Shufflebrain 'defines' phase for
us, like this:
"Phase, remember, specifies
the location of amplitude." Our italicization of
'the.'
We hope, now, that after eight years of Quantonics, our students
can irreverently nail what that 'definition's' quantum~problematics
are. Let's make a list:
 First we should QELR
his sentence to experience some clues as to its problems, however,
we can just examine his words and grasp some QIC~simplicities:
 Pietsch's 'specifies'
classically implies analytic fixation as a notion which can be
viewed tautologously as: axiomatic, canonic,
legalistic,..., essentially
'forever true.'
 Regarding Pietsch's use of 'the,' see our coined thelogos.
 Pietsch's 'specifies'
requires an classical operation of reifying a qualitative,
subjective quantum
reality into a quantitative,
objective classical nonreality. See our QELRs of object
and subject.
:
Phase,
phased, phases,
phasihcihty, phasings...
In Quantonics, in general, we shall coopt classical 'phase'
with more quantum 'phasæ.'
Even more generally, we shall use present participle adjectival
'phasicityings.'
Quantum~phasæ, n¤r
any quanton, may be described as having classically objective
'physical properties.' Said properties are
 first, static, and due their staticity,
 second, formallyspecifiable.
Quantons, like phasæ, are
n¤n specifiable by
any formal, mechanical, objective 'property.' HotMeme™
"Only quantum~flux can describe
quantons!"™ HotMeme™.
Do n¤t assume you can scalarbate quantons like hylicpsychic
classicists propertyesquely scalarbate
objects.
Quantum~adaptive general~phasicityings
lingually QELR~coopt
scalarbative, classicalimmutable specificstaticity.
Paul Pietsch, in his Shufflebrain 'defines' [scalarbates]
phase, specificstatically,
for us, like this:
"Phase, remember, specifies
the location of amplitude." Our italicization of
'the.'
Here's our QELR of it, raw:
Phasæ,
ræmæmbær,
spæcihfies
the l¤cati¤n
¤f amplihtudæ.
Tr¤ublæ issi, f¤r what
wæ aræ attæmpting t¤ sh¤w
hæræ, that
QELR c¤uld bæ bættær. H¤w
D¤ug? H¤w can iht bæ
bættær, quantum~bættær?
Recall that quantum~æssæncæ
requires omniffering
quantum~voicings: quantum reality is both a plural
(massively heterogeneous), and a present participlings
reality. Notice that we did n¤t say 'the' reality, we
said 'a' reality. To use a pragmatic analogy here, it
is n¤t a Pietschean classical "phase code(d)"
reality,
rather
quantum ræhlihty
issi many phasings~ænc¤dings
ræhlihtyings.
T¤¤, quantum~phase~ænc¤dings
aræ quantum ihnterrelati¤nshipings: quantons!
So our quantum quintessential QELR of Pietsch's 'definition'
might be:
"Phasings,
ræmæmbær, aræ
quantum~flux~m¤nit¤rings
¤f QLOings
¤f
quantons(macr¤sc¤pihc_EQU_l¤cati¤nings,macr¤sc¤pihc_EQU_amplihtudings).
Our motivation for quantum~general phasicity
in preference to classicalspecific staticity distills
to latter's insistence on classical reality's classical notions
of 'stoppability,' including:
 AristotelianNewtonian 'state,'
 classical 'stoppability,'
 classical 'movement
by immobilities,'
 Feynmanian 'reference frame,'
 physicists' 'zero momentum,'
 'logics'' analyticity,
 'objects' as
having Platonic principledriven axiomatic, canonic, çatholiç
'properties,' as 'propertyesque,'
 etc.
Classically, for phase and similar to frequency, we cannot
(i.e., it is 'wr¤ng' to assume, classically, that we can)
make measurements (scalarbate)
at a 'point.' However,
phasæ, like frequency, is
quantum~unstoppable and thus ~animately~stochastic.
Classicists deludedly assume that phasæ
and frequency are not only transverse 2D stateicities, but that
phasæ and frequency will classically,
certainly hold still while classicists measure
them.
Classically 'phase' is stateic 'di' fference twixt two 'stopped'
scalar angle 'measurements.'
Quantons aræ quantum~phasihc. Their
quanta aræ
chumks ¤f anihmatæ
enærgy. They have
n¤ classihcal 'statæ.'
They aræ n¤t classihcahlly
st¤ppable! They aræ
quantum phasihc.
They have
quantum phasihcihty amd quantum phasihcihtyings.
Quantum phasihcihtyings linguistihcahlly ihnure
many quantum mæmæs, ihncluding:
 abs¤lutæ anihmacy,
 æværywhereihncludædmihddleass¤ciatihvihty (EIMA),
 mahssihvely
prægmahllel quantum ænsehmble ihnterrelati¤nshipings, (sææ fuzzon)
 quantum (p¤tæntiahllyæntanglæable)
heterogæne¤us ihslandihcihty,
 quantum reality is quantum holographic, therefore all is
quantonic interrelationshipings phasicityings' encodings,
 quantum uncertainty
manifests across all scales of quantum reality
(i.e., since we cannot classically, stoppably
measure, thus scalarbate phasæ
at a point, we are
ignorant, "quantum uncertain," of its phasæ:
incipience of natural quantum uncertainty). O'gadon,
ask yourself how this interrelates Einstein's need to 'transform'
his Special Relativity into his more General Relativity... If
you need help read Zukav's Dancing Wu Li Masters.
 quantons as REIMAR
(¤ftæn læast enærgy) ¤mnihfferæncing phasihcihtyings,
 etc.
Fr¤m any quantum~h¤l¤graphic~pærspæctihvæ,
quantons aræ phasihcihtyings!
That issi quintæssæntiahlly expressing quantum~h¤l¤graphic~ræhlihty as phasihcihtyings!
Page top index.
