Classical assess: stability independence excluded-middle EOOOness H5Wness lisrability causation certainty EEMDivity observation : Phase

Paul Pietsch, in his Shufflebrain 'defines' phase for us, like this:

"Phase, remember, specifies the location of amplitude." Our italicization of 'the.'

We hope, now, that after eight years of Quantonics, our students can irreverently nail what that 'definition's' quantum~problematics are. Let's make a list:

• First we should QELR his sentence to experience some clues as to its problems, however, we can just examine his words and grasp some QIC~simplicities:
  • classical specificity stops more general quantum reality,
  • the is a classically definite article (vis-à-vis a, an, any, and more general quantum uses of present participle plurals which imply quantum memeos of likelihood~omnistributioning~quantum~ensemblings),
  • location stops quantum reality, and
  • amplitude is a scalar measurement which stops quantum reality.
• Pietsch's 'specifies' classically implies analytic fixation as a notion which can be viewed tautologously as: axiomatic, canonic, legalistic,..., essentially 'forever true.'
• Regarding Pietsch's use of 'the,' see our coined thelogos.
• Pietsch's 'specifies' requires an classical operation of reifying a qualitative, subjective quantum reality into a quantitative, objective classical nonreality. See our QELRs of object and subject.

Quantum assess: animacy c¤mplementarity included-middlings BAWAMings H5Wings lisrings affectati¤nings umcærtainty EIMAivityings c¤¤bsfection : Phase, phased, phases, phasihcihty, phasings...

In Quantonics, in general, we shall coopt classical 'phase' with more quantum 'phase.' Even more generally, we shall use present participle adjectival 'phasicityings.'

Paul Pietsch, in his Shufflebrain 'defines' phase for us, like this:

"Phase, remember, specifies the location of amplitude." Our italicization of 'the.'

Here's our QELR of it, raw:

Phase, ræmæmbær, spæcihfies the l¤cati¤n ¤f amplihtudæ.

Tr¤ublæ issi, f¤r what wæ aræ attæmpting t¤ sh¤w hæræ, that QELR c¤uld bæ bættær. H¤w Doug? H¤w can iht bæ bættær, quantum~bættær?

Recall that quantum~æssæncæ requires omniffering quantum~voicings: quantum reality is both a plural (massively heterogeneous), and a present participlings reality. Notice that we did n¤t say 'the' reality, we said 'a' reality. To use a pragmatic analogy here, it is n¤t a Pietschean classical "phase code(d)" reality, rather quantum ræhlihty issi many phasings~ænc¤dings ræhlihtyings. T¤¤, quantum~phase~ænc¤dings aræ quantum ihnterrelati¤nshipings: quantons!

So our quantum quintessential QELR of Pietsch's 'definition' might be:

"Phasings, ræmæmbær, aræ quantum~m¤nit¤rings ¤f QLOings ¤f

Our motivation for quantum phasicity in preference to classical staticity distills to latter's insistence on classical reality's classical notions of 'stoppability,' including:

• Aristotelian-Newtonian 'state,'
• classical 'stoppability,'
• classical 'movement by immobilities,'
• Feynmanian 'reference frame,'
• physicists' 'zero momentum,'
• 'logics'' analyticity,
• etc.

Classically, for phase and similar to frequency, we cannot (i.e., it is 'wr¤ng' to assume, classically, that we can) make measurements (scalarbate) at a 'point.' However, phase, like frequency, is quantum~unstoppable and thus ~animately~stochastic. Classicists deludedly assume that phase and frequency are not only transverse 2D state-icities, but that phase and frequency will classically, certainly hold still while classicists measure them.

Classically 'phase' is state-ic 'di' fference twixt two 'stopped' scalar angle 'measurements.'

Quantons aræ quantum phasihc. Their quanta aræ chumks ¤f anihmatæ enærgy. They have n¤ classihcal 'statæ.' They aræ n¤t classihcahlly st¤ppable! They aræ quantum phasihc. They have quantum phasihcihty amd quantum phasihcihtyings.

Quantum phasihcihtyings linguistihcahlly ihnure many quantum mæmæs, ihncluding:

• abs¤lutæ anihmacy,
• æværywhere-ihncludæd-mihddle-ass¤ciatihvihty (EIMA),
• mahssihvely prægmahllel quantum ænsehmble ihnterrelati¤nshipings, (sææ fuzzon)
• quantum (p¤tæntiahlly-æntanglæable) heterogæne¤us ihslandihcihty,
• quantum reality is quantum holographic, therefore all is quantonic interrelationshipings phasicityings' encodings,
• quantum uncertainty manifests across all scales of quantum reality (i.e., since we cannot classically, stoppably measure, thus scalarbate phase at a point, we are ignorant, "quantum uncertain," of its phase: incipience of natural quantum uncertainty). O'gadon, ask yourself how this interrelates Einstein's need to 'transform' his Special Relativity into his more General Relativity... If you need help read Zukav's Dancing Wu Li Masters.
• quantons as REIMAR (¤ftæn læast enærgy) ¤mnihfferæncing phasihcihtyings,
• etc.

Fr¤m any quantum~h¤l¤graphic~pærspæctihvæ, quantons aræ phasihcihtyings! That issi quintæssæntiahlly expressing quantum~h¤l¤graphic~ræhlihty as phasihcihtyings!

Page top index.