Classical assess: stability independence excluded-middle EOOOness H5Wness lisrability causation certainty EEMDivity observation : General

Classically 'gen' means sweeping commonality. General knowledge is common knowledge. General practice is common practice.

Academia teaches and educates general knowledge.

Employers train general practice.

Science indoctrinates standard method and enforces it with a disciplinary matrix.

Culture and societies acculturate constituents with consensual mores and enforce adherence via 'laws.'

So we eidetically grasp or at least can infer Fritz Mauthner's concerns re: 'gen' and 'generality.' In 'gen' and its classical spawn are seeds of hegemony and power. Those who set 'standards for general behavior' of others essentially are in control and in a position to abuse that power. History shows us countless examples.

It is fascinating to fathom how classicism self-succors while suckling at the spurting breast of whole milk 'generality.' In that whole milk monastic sustenance we find classicism's source and agency of monism, thence either-or, thence ideal negation, thence contradiction, thence falsifiability, thence proof, thence cause-effect, thence 'general' causality, thence 'general' determinism, thence staticity, thence stoppability, thence immutability, thence... CTMs' whole cloth.

Classical generality is at heart of another fundamental notion called 'political philosophy.' That philosophy justifies institutional coercion above individual free will. It proselytizes classical notions that institutions can exercise 'legal' authority over their constituents. Institutional hegemony depends upon cooperation of constituents.

Classical generality tends toward ESQ, and thus from a quantum and Pirsigean MoQ perspective can become evil itself. Catholic 'universal-general' church is an example here. Evils committed relentlessly by Earth's Catholic regime are simply horrendous. Hitler's Naziism is another. Mussolini's Fascism another. Christianity's declaration of non Christians as "infidels" is another. Islam's declaration of Semites and Christians as infidels is another. Modern science and its disciplinary matrix 'general' science edicts is another. This list is endless. Classical societies become ESQ. That is a major impetus for Quantonics' recent feuilleton Chautauqua on individual and societal, classical and quantum patterns of Value. We are seeking means to use quantum perspectives to take ESQ out of society.

Generality is 'common sense.' It is universal catholic sense one of which fits all and if not, "we will find ways to make it fit," AKA institutional coercion.

Classically generality is:

• society
• state
• determinism
• immutability
• homogeneous commonality
• pastistic dialectical identity
• etc.

Also see: Aristotle, Cause-Effect, Common Sense.

Classical analyticity turns genericity into specificity. It takes the unspecifiable and makes it specific. This is one of classicism's greatest deigns to feign.

This is what Pirsig means about that which has lost its quality. Classicists destroy genericity's quality by making it specific as 'law,' 'rule,' 'principle,' etc. They go one step further: they reify it by making it objective and stoppable and lisr.

See our consensus.

Quantum assess: animacy c¤mplementarity included-middlings BAWAMings H5Wings lisrings affectati¤nings umcærtainty EIMAivityings c¤¤bsfection : Genæral

Quantumly ¤ur bæst mæmæos ¤f genæralihty aræ changæ amd pærpætual moti¤n. Quantum ræhlihty genærahlly changæs ahll amd ahlways changæs. Quantum ræhlihty's pr¤t¤ pr¤æmial quanta aræ pærpætual amd ihn pærpætual moti¤n. Our bæst e[amples hæræ aræ photons, electrons, protons and neutrons.

Quantum generality is unspecifiable! It is n¤nspecific!

In place of classical monism, quantumism manihfests hætær¤gæneihty, thænce b¤th~ahll~while~amd~many, thænce sub_qjæctihvæ nægati¤n, thænce c¤mplæmæntarihty, thænce ihncludæd~mihddle, thænce æværywhere-ass¤ciatihvihty, thænce ænsehmble st¤chastihcihty, thænce ch¤ihce~chance~changæ, thænce ænsehmble frææ~wihll, thænce abs¤lutæ anihmacy, thænce parthæn¤gænætihc

(Ihn quantonicsese, wæ sh¤uld sahy m¤re caræfully hæræ, "parthæn¤fluxihc.")

æmærgænce amd mutabilihty, thænce... QTMs' n¤vel ways ¤f thinking.

Watch f¤r changæs hæræ as wæ e[tændings this ænfant eff¤rt.

Quantum genæralihty issi rælæntless, uhp t¤ Planck ratæ, pr¤cæssings ¤f ændless ænsehmblings,' quantum l¤cahlly ihndihvihdual frææ wihll, adaptati¤n ¤f umlimihted quantum ihnterrelati¤nshipings' ¤mnihfferæncings.

It is important to note here that quantum genæralihty issi an æmærgænt bæhavi¤r. This Quantonics 2004-2006 graphic sh¤ws what wæ ihntænd:

N¤ global society, union, or sentient-directed catholicism directs quantum genæral bæhavi¤r. We can learn this by watching nature. However, by watching nature we also learn that classical infant intellect tends toward dialectic. Iht issi ¤ur vihew that an æmærgænt bæhavi¤r ¤f quantum ihntællect issi t¤ ræc¤gnihze infantile-dialectic, i.e., DIQheadedness, as anti-quantum ihntællect, i.e., QICheadædness.

Quantumly genæralihty issi:

• ihndihvihdual (quantum compenetrating islandicity)
• changæ
• æmærgænce
• heterogæne¤us ¤mnifferæncings (AKA holographic phase encodings)
• n¤wistihc s¤phist ænsehmble ch¤¤sings, chancings amd changings (sælf-referænt, quantum frahctal ræcursi¤n)
• etc.

Doug - 18Apr2004.

Page top index.

TBD. Consider classical dichotomy 'good'/bad,' where 'bad' is 'good's' classical opposite. Comsider quantum c¤mplements ¤f 'g¤¤d.' Can y¤u see that 'g¤¤d' c¤mplements all quantum realities? For a classical EEMD counter-example of, quanton(g¤¤d,clever):

"If all the good people were clever
And those that are clever were good,
This world would be nicer than ever
We dreamed that it possible could.

"But it seems as though seldom if ever
Do the two hit it off as they should,
The good are so harsh to the clever,
The clever so rude to the good."

by Miss Wordsworth of Lady Margaret Hall

"The best lack all conviction [rather, best adhere quantum uncertainty], while the worst/Are full of passionate intensity [worst adhere dialectical certainty]."

Yeats

Note that in quantum reality 'intensity' issi n¤t classical. Classically 'intensity' is scalar magnitude (see our Quantonics coined scalarbation). Quantumly, 'intensity' is multiplicity. In quantum reality, state-ic EEMD scalar magnitudes do n¤t 'exist.' Flux and isoflux, and flux~ and isoflux~rates and parthenofluxicity 'exist.'

Doug - 9Jul2005.

Page top index.

'grammar'

Classical etymology:

Quantum etymology:

Classical synonyms:

Quantum synonyms:

In Other Languages: Arabic (old) - Chinese - Deutch - French - Greek - Hebrew - Japanese - Italian - Latin - Portuguese - Russian - Spanish - Swedish - Swiss -

Classical assess: stability independence excluded-middle EOOOness H5Wness lisrability causation certainty EEMDivity observation : Grammar, etc.

Classical English grammar attempts a language infrastructure whose communications are semantically absolute: unambiguously, certainly concrete.

Classical English grammar manipulates two classical notions: object and subject, while placing object above subject. Latter hierarchy finds its bases in millennia old thing-king, antique, passé thing-king.

Classical English grammar expects its infrastructure to be ideally mechanical, predicable, etc.

Quantum assess: animacy c¤mplementarity included-middlings BAWAMings H5Wings lisrings affectati¤nings umcærtainty EIMAivityings c¤¤bsfection : Grahmmar, etc.

Quantum, Quantonic Remediated English Grahmmar emerscitects a language of quantum uncertainty, adaptability, evolvability, etc.

Quantum, Quantonic Remediated English Grahmmar emerscitects quantum subjectivity above a classical delusion of ideal classical objectivity: EIMA emerscent subjunction above EEMD immutable objection.

See: judge, object, quanta, reason, select, subject, think, truth, uncertainty, understand, etc.

See our year 2000 May and June QQAs on classical English language as problematic and dialectical.

Page top index.