Quantonics' 3D Fuzzon by Doug Renselle ©Quantonics, Inc., 2004-2007

Quantonics' 3D IsoFuzzon A Fuzzon as a quanton is quanton(isofuzzon,fuzzon). As you can see our gold actual fuzzon has quantum fuzzon lines which are con(m)tiguous. Our isofuzzon has blue-dotted quantum isofuzzon isolines. See an exemplar discussion of fuzzons used to describe QCD quark ontologies. (~Large page.) by Doug Renselle ©Quantonics, Inc., 2004-2007

In a simile of how a human is created from sperm and egg haploids Quantonics' version of quantum reality shows us a n¤vel m¤daling with fuzzons and isofuzzons as n¤n~objectively omniploidal and isoomniploidal. So quantum reality quantons(isofuzzon_isoomniploids,fuzzon_omniploids). Soon we shall be showing you graphical examples of recognizable actualities. Here's one, though crude, which will assist: Bobby Knight IU B-Ball-Team playing B-ball and Knight imposing his dogma Quantum Coherent IU B-Ball-Team playing B-ball absent outside direction Key to grasping essence here is to see fuzzons as quantum interrelationship attractors (simpler, better), and n¤t to see objects as classical material aggregations of classical objective properties (more complex, worse): Quantum interrelationship(ing)s, n¤t Classical 'properties.' Crux for philosophers, metaphysicists, theoreticians, scientists, technicians, and lay practitioners is a simpler quantum memeo of interrelationship taxonomy (similar DNA, and IBM-Sony-Toshiba's CCP, any fuzzon can represent this) vis-à-vis an incredibly complex and Babelian classical notion of 'property taxonomy' ('no' 'object' can represent 'that'). Classicists convert abs¤lutæ quantum flux~changæ into 'absolute' 'stopped' states and thus generate unlimited static Babel! How can we say that? Simply, there are more potential 'stopped' classical 'objects' and 'properties' than there are animate quantum interrelationshipings. Obviation of that statement is wholly apparent when one fathoms how all of reality has to be classically 'stopped,' and then that all classical objects and time are classically, infinitely 'divisible.' Every classical moment requires unlimited classical objective properties to fully describe itself! How do classicists avoid their own Babel? They claim that classical objects and their properties are 'scientifically' immutable! They have ESQ tumescent and measurable Dialectical 'Intelligence' Quotients! J Doug - 17Oct2006. What kinds, from a classical conspective, of classical objects' apparent static properties quantum reality can create is unlimited. (a list of: "a 'particle' or 'property' for each state-ic ("stopped") interrelationship combination") What kinds, from a quantum perspective, of abs¤lutæly anihmatæ fuzzon~based quantonic interrelationshipings quantum reality uses are limited. (a list of interrelationshipings, and oversimply, these are relatively 'just~only' quantum~likelihood~omnistributionings all n¤n 'identical' yet quantum~wave~functionally~similar - Doug - 17Oct2006). We are in a process of applying those taxonomic comparisons to high energy particle physics now. As Henri Louis Bergson hinted, "Flux is simple, state is complex." Erwin, wave~equation, Schrödinger intuited this. His classical matrix state-mechanical antagonists did 'not.' Doug - 1Oct2004.

Figure 1 - 2D Quantum Lihnæ
(That little right hash is our embedded ©.)

Figure 1 - phase-ihc ræpræsæntati¤n ¤f a quantum lihnæ (wh¤se p¤ihnts, quantum~frahctahlly, aræ fuzz¤ns!).

Say, like this:

Figure 1a - One 2D Quantum Lihnæ's Actual Bending Fuzzon QLO

And, like this:

Figure 1b - One 2D Quantum Lihnæ's N¤nactual Bending Fuzzon QLO

Figure 2 - 2D QLO

Figure 2 - phase-ihc ræpræsæntati¤n ¤f a QLO.
(Yæs, wæ nææd t¤ rændær this art using fuzz¤ns! Latær... J)

Figure 2 a - F¤ur peaqlos ¤n Their Way t¤ a Fermi¤n.

---

A spin 1 boson has 360° rotational symmetry. See our recent, new 2007 Quantonics' boson:

A spin 1/2 fermion has 720° rotational asymmetry. See our recent, new 2007 Quantonics' fermion:

Our use of symmetry here finds its comtext in actuality.

You may recall DMD's queries re symmetry and asymmetry in our August, 2006 TQS News. When we ihncludæ quantum~n¤nactuality, ihn a quanton(n¤nactuality,actuality) our symmetry c¤mplæmæntati¤n looks like quanton(symmetry,asymmetry). When we 'ignore' n¤nactuality ihn a quanton(actuality,actuality) our actual symmetry c¤mplæmæntati¤n looks like quanton(symmetry,asymmetry), say quanton(bosons'_apparent_actual_symmetry,fermions'_actual_asymmetry).

To oversymplify: n¤nactual isosymmetry issi pure, and actual symmetry issi impure.

Another way to look at this: There issi n¤ 'spin' ihn n¤nactuality.
There are n¤ measurables ihn n¤nactuality.
That issi what makes n¤nactuality "pure."

Figure 3a - Peaqlo ihn Human Sæns¤ry Bamdwihdth at HSB Cæntær Fræquæncy

Apparently Value-Decoupled but really Quantum~Entangled Bandwidths

Figure 3b - Peaqlo ihn At¤mihc Sæns¤ry Bamdwihdth at ASB Cæntær Fræquæncy

Apparently Value-Decoupled but really Quantum~Entangled Bandwidths

Figure 3c - Peaqlo ihn 'Higgs B¤s¤n' Sæns¤ry Bamdwihdth at HBSB Cæntær Fræquæncy

Notes:

Note 1 - Quantum coherence:

Classically, objective coherence implies dialectical, usually biformal at least bi-comparative, similarity, functional similarity, pairing of similars and opposites, logical often predicable and Boolean grouping, reasonable arrangement, ordered correlation, 1-1 correspondence, marching together, consistent commonality, consonance, etc.

Classically, subjective coherence implies a conventional heterogeneous polyformal probability distribution for every variable. Classical probability distributions are a posteriori, which begs inductive causal predication; see Margenau.

Quantonically, quantum coherence implies a quantum attraction ensemble of all interrelationships for a given attractor. We are speaking of an ensemble of interrelationships which cohere via their attractor's coobsfective interrelationships with other attractors in agency of quantum evolution and change, e.g., a quantum~adaptihvæ~netw¤rk, AKA a quantum~h¤l¤gram. For a simple quantum m¤daling example of this elegant quantum process, see our recent (2004) fermionta. Each interrelationship is what we innovatively refer peaqlo. A peaqlo is a partially emerqant animate EIMA quantum likelihood omnistribution. Fuzzonic peaqlos EIMA hætær¤tæhmp¤rahlly c¤¤bsfect and n¤n synchronously and up to Planck rate OEDCycle quantum~relatively to other peaqlos. It (they) can change~emerge~evolve autonomously while tentatively adhering its attractor's coherence. See our simple graphics on this page just above. Quantum likelihood omnistributions are a priori, plus, which begs quantum selectable, choosable affectation; see Margenau. Our use of plus begs memeos of quantons(pastings,nowings,futurings).

Quantonics' fuzzons give us an incredibly powerful quantum coherence m¤daling t¤¤l. Fuzzon's represent animate, EIMA 'nodal' quantum coherence autonomies in a sense of Mae-wan Ho's quanton(coherence,autonomy), and her own description of quantum coherence. Notice how our Quantonics fuzzons, Mae-wan Hoesque style, eliminate classical conflict! Notice how our Quantonics' fuzzons show how quantum~probability and ~likelihood are hermeneutic!

In Quantonics' version of quantum reality and our fledgling attempts at quantum m¤daling of it, we envision animate, EIMA memes, memeos, and memeotics as quantum m¤daling t¤¤ls. Our quantum libraries and memeory palaces are quantum memetic — relentlessly QTM æv¤lving — each text's auth¤hr ræcursihvely uhpdating iht amd uhpgrading iht while quantum ihncludæd~mihddle æværywhere~ass¤ciating wihth æværy ¤thær just as though they aræ ahctinihc~fuzz¤nihc næurons ihn a burgæ¤ning bibli¤thecal brain.

Wæ ænvisagæ quantum mæmæs amd their acc¤utræmænts as quantum t¤¤ls.

Our fuzz¤ns aræ quantum~ræcursihve amd thus mæmætihc amd mæmæ¤tihc capablæ.

Each fuzz¤n issi a p¤tæntiahlly umlimihted quantum ihnterrelati¤nship attrahct¤r ænsehmble (QIAE) of quantum lihkælih¤¤d ¤mnistrihbuti¤n (QLO) hærmænæutihcs. This Quantonics-innate fuzzon capability to represent QIAE QLOs we call "quantum c¤herænce." It essentially says that fuzzons are animate, EIMA quantum likelihood omnistributions (QLOs) of hermeneutic potentia. An easy fuzzon metaphor is any energy well attractor in any quantum SON.

Doug - 23Oct2004.

Note 2 -