|
Paul Pietsch, Shufflebrain, p. 62. bæars a comtextual network~sorso~¤rganizing quantum~relatihve~phasæ~ænc¤ding f¤r an æntiræ scænæ." Fathom how h¤l¤grams violate Aristotle's sillygisms: h¤l¤gramings aræ b¤th~ahll~whilæ~amd~many (BAWAM) quantum~included~middlings! issi quantum~ænsehmblings ¤f peaqlo~sælæction~æv¤lving quantum~relatihve~phase~ænc¤ding~ihnterrelati¤nshipings which wæ cahll "quantons." Every fuzzon in any hologram is "quantum~complementary" every other fuzzon in said hologram." All fuzzons in any hologram 'co-exist' "...without contradiction." Pirsigean "absence of dialectical contradiction." Compare neurons. More simply, we can say a hologram is a quantum~SOON. Doug - 4Feb2006, 22Aug2012. It needs some omniscriptors we can use easily and at will. Let's try these: quantum~viewing, and quantum~world~view(ing)s, and quantum~EWings'~viewings, and quantum~fuzzonic~world~viewings, etc. Essence, quintessence of Bell's Inequalityings. we may coin a n¤væl semanticq: quantum~holoviewing! cohereingq, coinsidingq many quantum~sema in a single 'expression.' "Doug believes, with some reservation, that we may now fathom viewq as a hyper memeq of grail, gram, and graph." A Doug HotMeme ranging from the proportions of a geometric point up to the magnitude of the entire universe." 'magnitude' hints at classical quantitative scalarbation. We must also worry about absence of, especially plural~, present participle except for 'ranging.' We effaced a footnote on that sentence which refers to Bohm's holographic theory of the universe. Physics and Perception, and The Enfolding-Unfolding Universe and Consciousness, and Super Implicate Order Dialogue (with Renée Weber). |
|
Quantonics' version of quantum reality shows us a n¤vel m¤daling with fuzzons and isofuzzons as n¤n~objectively omniploidal and isoomniploidal.
n¤t to see objects as classical material aggregations of classical objective properties (more complex, worse): Classical 'properties.' simpler quantum memeo of interrelationship taxonomy (similar DNA, and IBM-Sony-Toshiba's CCP, any fuzzon can represent this) vis-à-vis an incredibly complex and Babelian classical notion of 'property taxonomy' ('no' 'object' can represent 'that'). that all classical objects and time are classically, infinitely 'divisible.' (a list of: "a 'particle' or 'property' for each state-ic ("stopped") interrelationship combination") (a list of interrelationshipings, and oversimply, these are relatively 'just~only' quantum~likelihood~omnistributionings all n¤n 'identical' yet quantum~wave~functionally~similar - Doug - 17Oct2006). Erwin, wave~equation, Schrödinger intuited this. His classical matrix state-mechanical antagonists did 'not.' |
|
|
|
|
|
Notes:
Note 1 - Quantum coherence (Doug's descriptionings of 'quantum~coherence' here presume quantum~reality's underlying holographicity.):
Classically, objective coherence implies dialectical, usually biformal at least bi-comparative, similarity, functional similarity, pairing of similars and opposites, logical often predicable and Boolean grouping, reasonable arrangement, ordered correlation, 1-1 correspondence, marching together, consistent commonality, consonance, etc.
Classically, subjective coherence implies a conventional heterogeneous polyformal probability distribution for every variable. Classical probability distributions are a posteriori, which begs inductive causal predication; see Margenau.
Quantonically, quantum coherence implies a quantum attraction ensemble of all interrelationships for a given attractor. We are speaking of an ensemble of interrelationshipings which cohere via their attractor's scintillating coobsfective concupiscent~quantaldulative interrelationships with other attractors in agency of quantum evolution and change, e.g., a quantum~adaptihvæ~netw¤rk, AKA a quantum~h¤l¤gram. For a simple quantum m¤daling example of this elegant quantum process, see our recent (2004) fermionta. Each interrelationship is what we innovatively refer peaqlo. A peaqlo is a partially emerqant animate EIMA quantum likelihood omnistribution. Fuzzonic peaqlos EIMA hætær¤tæhmp¤rahlly c¤¤bsfect and n¤n synchronously and up to Planck rate OEDCycle quantum~relatively to other peaqlos. It (they) can change~emerge~evolve autonomously while tentatively adhering its attractor's coherence. See our simple graphics on this page just above. Quantum likelihood omnistributions are a priori, plus, which begs quantum selectable, choosable affectation; see Margenau. Our use of plus begs memeos of quantons(pastings,nowings,futurings).
Quantonics' fuzzons give us an incredibly powerful quantum coherence m¤daling t¤¤l. Fuzzon's represent animate, EIMA 'nodal,' i.e., energy~wellings' quantum coherence autonomies in a sense of Mae-wan Ho's quanton(coherence,autonomy), and her own description of quantum coherence. Notice how our Quantonics fuzzons, Mae-wan Hoesque style, eliminate classical conflict! Quantum~complementarity, scripted via quantons as a comma~nospace, omnitors quantum~interrelationshipings without classical-conflict, without classical-contradiction.
Notice how our Quantonics' fuzzons show how quantum~probability and ~likelihood are hermeneutic!
In Quantonics' version of quantum reality and our fledgling attempts at quantum m¤daling of it, we envision animate, EIMA memes, memeos, and memeotics as quantum m¤daling t¤¤ls. Our quantum libraries and memeory palaces are quantum memetic relentlessly QTM æv¤lving each text's auth¤hr ræcursihvely uhpdating iht amd uhpgrading iht while quantum ihncludæd~mihddle æværywhere~ass¤ciating wihth æværy ¤thær juhst as though they aræ ahctinihc~fuzz¤nihc næurons ihn a burgæ¤ning bibli¤thecal brain.
Wæ ænvisagæ quantum mæmæs amd their acc¤utræmænts as quantum t¤¤ls.
Our fuzz¤ns aræ quantum~ræcursihve amd thuhs mæmætihc amd mæmæ¤tihc capablæ.
Each fuzz¤n issi a p¤tæntiahlly umlimihted quantum ihnterrelati¤nship attrahct¤r ænsehmble (QIAE) of quantum lihkælih¤¤d ¤mnistrihbuti¤n (QLO) hærmænæutihcs. This Quantonics-innate fuzzon capability to represent QIAE QLOs we call "quantum c¤herænce." It essentially says that fuzzons are animate, EIMA quantum likelihood omnistributions (QLOs) of hermeneutic potentia. An easy fuzzon metaphor is any energy well attractor in any quantum SON.
Doug - 23Oct2004.