|
'object'
Etymology:
Object
n. before 1398 object tangible thing; borrowed from Old
French object, and directly from Medieval Latin Objectum
thing put before: (the mind or sight), neuter of Latin objectus,
past participle of obicere to present, oppose, cast in
the way of (ob. against + -icere. combining form
of to throw).
The meaning of a thing aimed at, purpose, goal, is first recorded
probably before 1425.—v. Probably about 1400 obiecten;
borrowed from Old French objecter, objeter, and
directly from Latin objectare to cite as grounds for disapproval,
frequentative form of obicere to oppose.
From Barnhart, Dictionary of Etymology.
Synonyms - classical:
- logic:
- material
- substantial
- above subject
- stable
- immutable
- unchanging - nonevolutionary
- independent
- excluded-middle
- negation
- value:
- dislike
- dissent
- opposition
- intention
- deprecation
- hindrance
- unbelief
- refute
- deny
Synonyms - quantum:
- illusion
- delusion
- oxymora
- quantum complement of subjæct
- ~sobject
|
: Object, etc.
Classically 'object' is above and before subject.
'Object' as may be seen from etymology to left, is a pure
dialectical 'form.'
See our QELP of object.
:
Objæct, etc.
Pirsig's MoQ inverts
classicism's O over S hierarchy. See our SOM
sVo animation.
Quantum reality, and nature's own manifestations show us memeotically
and hermeneutically that ontological process emphasizes qualitative
subjectivity (AKA "Valuation") and belies any classical
quantitative objectivity (AKA "scalarbation").
Pirsig's MoQ shows us how, what classicists call either
Subject or Object (i.e., dichon(S, O) and EOOO(S,
O)), is actually both Subject and Object (i.e., quanton(S,O)
and BAWAM(S,O)).
In Quantonics, classical objects are illusions, self delusions.
In Quantonics, objects do not exist, rather quantons exist. Quantons
are quantum complements of what classicists refer: both
objective and subjective. We use our quantonic script to illustrate
like this quanton(subjective_apparency,objective_apparency).
Quantonics ch¤¤ses t¤ c¤¤pt
classical 'object' amd
remerq all
quantum comtextual occurrences with 'quanton.'
See our QELP
object. See SOM
Issues. See SOM limitations.
See SOM Reality Loop.
See What is Wrong with
SOM Logic?
Page top index.
|
|
'occur'
Etymology - Classical: occur
Etymology - Quantum
Synonyms - Classical
- happen
- y=f(t) cartesian lisr
stoppable event
- arise
- transpire
- befall
- mental occasion as occurrence
- change as state
- change of constancy
- "movement by immobility"
- "movement as motion of non evolvables"
- etc.
Synonyms - Quantum
- happenings
- processings
- change as process
- change as Planck rate variability
- stindyanic evolutionings
- change as waves...flux
- change as omnitorable stochasticings
- metaentropa and metacohera as quantum~holographic metamorphing
of zeroentropic th~oughts
and posentropic emerscents (as actualizing, emerscenturing
quantum~th~¤ughts)
- etc.
|
It has taken Doug nearly ten years to build enough personal,
individual, quantum~gn¤stic qua,
enough personal, individual, quantum~gn¤stic quantum~wisdom, to take on this
QELR of 'occur.'
"Doug, why has it taken so long?"
Recall Doug's earlier omniscriptions of John
von Neumann's attempts to describe "quantum~special~events."
Recall Pirsig's almost normative, "Quality is an event."
Recall how it took Doug, from Quantonics' beginnings in about
1995 until about 2003, to fully accept Bohm's, Talbot's, Pietsch's,
and Pribram's memes of reality as holographic.
Then, only recently, Doug has been able to put quantum~probability (more generally,
stochastics)
in a quantum~enthymemetic
schema of supporting quantum~stochastics in terms of quantum~events
as quantum~pr¤cæssings. Doug's full acceptance of
that enthymeme didn't happen until Doug omniscovered ancients'
quantum~gn¤stic memes of "redemption as quantum~pr¤cæss."
See Doug''s extensive omniscussion on Commutativity
and Enthymemetics at our CeodE
2002 EPR table.
Doug didn't have a problem of describing classical 'events'
and all their apparently unbounded problematics! We list many
of those problematics under our QELR link to 'event,' above.
Doug had a problem of describing, generally what historically
has been labeled, 'quantum~event' as quantum~pr¤cæss.
What our goal has been, ever since we made this 'occur' entry
in our QELR quantum~vis-à-vis~classical lexicon, is to
ethically and skillfully (i.e., n¤n dialectically) describe
what we intend when we say "quantum~ævænt,"
and "quantum~occurrence." Doug feels con(m)fident he
is ready to do that now, CeodE14Dec2008.
Allow us to make a penultimate observation. Occurrence and
event are quasi duals of one another, so whatever we describe
for 'event' will likely apply to 'occur,' and vice versa.
: occur, occurred, occurrence, occurs, etc.
Classically, an 'occurrence' is a state change, a change of
state. Trouble is that classical change is an event which
is zero latency. 'Zero latency' is classical dialectical 'science' and 'philosophy'
disabling quantum~reality, turning off Planck's frequency, disabling
Planck's reality clock.
Why? Classicists have made some terrible assumptions about
how change is adequately 'described' 'simply' as 'change of state.'
Stoppability is presumed! State permits ideal scalarbation (measurement
of that which is stopped: state-ic).
Classicists deny real, natural, evolutionary process as a
means of describing occurrences.
Take a look at these graphics:
HotMeme™ "Classical Time is a Monism. Monism is Deceit."™
HotMeme™
Doug - 8Jan2009.
|
Ideal Classical
Fundamentalist Science Modeled as a Monotemporal 'Process' Pluralism
of Ideal 'States,' and Ideal 'Events.' |
View classical 'events' here as classical 'occurrences.'
|
View classical stoppability 'events' AKA 'point
occurrences' here as zero latency.
|
 |
Zeno's Stoppability
Modeled as Alterations of:
- Stop...
- Unlimited Acceleration
- Stop...
- Unlimited Acceleration
- etc.
|
Ideal Classical
Fundamentalist Science and Religion Mapping of Quantum Flux onto
Ideal 'States.'
A Digital Reality.
A Dialectical Reality!
|
Bottom line, based upon those graphics and Doug's omniscriptions
of those graphics, classical dialectic and analytic notions of
'occur' and 'occurrence' are simply bogus. Why? Reality isn't
static. Reality
is relentless, forever changing, adapting and evolving quantum
flux.
:
¤ccur, ¤ccurred,
¤ccurræncæ, ¤ccurs, etc.
Quantum~occurrencings are quantum~stochastic quantum~processings.
That sentence puts extraordinary limitationings on what we
can call an "occurrence," and an "event."
We say that like this, "Quantum~occurrences have Value."
To say that more absolutely in terms of:
- quantum~comsistency as always fluxing , and
- quantum~completeness as fluxes all,
...we say,
"Quantum~¤ccurræncæs
aræ ihn Valuæ amd Valuæ
issi ihn Quantum~¤ccurræncæs."
Doug, what does that mean?
Value is re cognizable. Latter means we need a growing, evolvable
holographic network of patterns which we may compare with omnique
value impinging upon a given hologram.
An
omnique value may not be re cognizable, if it is impinging first
time ever on said hologram. If omnique value recurs, it then
becomes a recognizable recurrencing.
Holograms adiabatically cognize omnique value, and adiabatically
recognize recurrent valuings.
So we must quantumly omnistinguish omnique value occurrences
and similar valuings' recurrencings.
In a familiar quantum~environment recurrencings predominate.
In an unfamiliar quantum~environment, initially, occurrencings
predominate and gradually decline as they evolve into recurrencings.
All recurrencings are similar prior recurrencings, but they
are never 'identical'
to prior recurrencings. An implication is that all holograms
must adapt and coadapt to relentless quantum~evolution
of pattern valuings in their environmentings.
We can summarize what we have so far in a...
Quantonics' Holographic
HotMeme™ "Our quantum~stage hologramings' Quality depends
upon their qua to be relentlessly doing cognizings, recognizings,
and adaptively omniscriminatings their
quantons(holographings_complementings_otheringsj,holographings_complementings_selfingsk)."™
Quantonics' Holographic HotMeme™.
Let's establish a Quantonics' QELR approach for variations
of occur and recur using these proprietary linguistics:
- Cognition: Occur, occur, Occurrence, occurrence -
Ohccur, ¤ccur,
Ohccurræncæ, ¤ccurræncæ
- Recognition: Recur, recur, Recurrence, recurrence
-
Ræcur, ræcur, Ræcurræncæ,
ræcurræncæ
- Omniscrimination: Adapt, adapt, Coadapt, coadapt -
Adahpt, adahpt, C¤adahpt,
c¤adahpt
Now, ponder those manifest linguisms in terms of their cognizability
(omnique quantum~flux pattern valuings), n¤n cognizability
(classical notions of 'state'), recognizability (recurring, QTP,
and QVP quantum~flux pattern valuings), n¤n recognizability
(quantum~flux pattern valuings which have become extinct) in
any hologram:
- knowable,
- unknowable,
- known, and
- unknown.
We may make an inference, however conjectural...however heuristic,
that holograms offer quantum~means of a metameme of knowability
via cognition and recognition of occurrences and recurrences
of quantum~wave, quantum~flux, stochasticings of adiabatic and
ostensibly adiabatic valuings.
Ostensibly adiabatic valuings have both QTPings
and QVPings.
Best Example Aside:
Doug's best example of everyday quantum occurrences are QED photon~electron
scintillation
which permits our bodies' zær¤æntr¤pic~thinkqing quantum~stages and
our p¤sentr¤pic~pragmahcting
soma to both see and be seen by all other zeroentropic
and posentropic quantum~reality. See cohera
and entropa.
We should use our quantonics script here to show full Poisson~Bracketings of
expected compound quantum~both~andings:
mind~body issi quanton(quanton(mind_thinking_hologra,mind_brain_hologra),quanton(soma_coherent_hologra,soma_posentropic_hologra)).
What we attempt to script there is:
- quantum~stage~brain~mind as both~and quanton(coherent_bosonic_zeroentropic,decoherent_fermionic_posentropic),
- both~and quanton(n¤nphysical_bosonic_hologra,physical_fermionic_hologra),
and
- actual~physical~soma~body as both~and quanton(coherent_bosonic_zeroentropic,decoherent_fermionic_posentropic)
- both~and quanton(n¤nphysical_bosonic_hologra,physical_fermionic_hologra).
Our minds are both bosonic and fermionic hologra,
and our bodies are both bosonic and fermionic hologra
all ihn Pirsigean
n¤ncontradicting quantum~superposition
among one another.
Notice how a subset of quantum~wordings relentlessly keep
attracting one another:
- hologra, mind, quantum~stage, body, soma, n¤nphysical
(n¤nactual), physical (actual)
- cohera
- entropa
- boson, coherent zeroentropy, thinkqing
- fermion, decoherent posentropy, pragmahcting
Long ago (CeodE
1997), in Psychology Today, Dr. Larry Dossey and Jill
Neimark, editor for PT described two
sisters coexisting in a single body. See p. 6, then bottom
of p. 8, and all of p. 9. Classically that is "absurd."
Quantumly we now can view it as a reality, n¤n absurd,
and genuinely quantum real. Classicism is dead. Classicism sucks.
Stux sux! Flux is crux!
Doug - 24Dec2008.
End Best Example Aside.
Doug - 14Dec2008.
Page top index.
|
|
'of'
Etymology: of
|
Quantonics ch¤¤ses t¤ c¤¤pt
classical 'of' amd remerq all quantum
comtextual occurrences with '¤f.'
In classical contexts we may recognize 'of' as an objective
dichon, assuming a classical, conventional comma-space 'wall'
may be represented as a biformal copulum (e.g., |or|, |and|,
|plus|, etc.):
of(object_1_of_preposition, object_2_of_preposition),
e.g.,
of(her|or|him), and
by c¤mparis¤n, in quantum comtexts, we rec¤gnize
'¤f' as a c¤mplementary quanton wh¤se included-middle
denies SOM's biformal wall:
¤f(quanton,quanton),
e.g.,
¤f(us,them).
Our c¤mments here apply t¤ all classical c¤mp¤und
prep¤siti¤ns. Th¤ugh we have n¤t
c¤¤pted all th¤se classical terms, yet.
E.g., at, both, by, either, for, from, in, to, with, etc.
Page top index.
|
|
'open'
Etymology: open
See Barnhart, Dictionary of Etymology.
Synonyms - classical:
Synonyms - quantum:
- n¤nconservative
- perpetual emergence; cyclic emergence~demergence, etc.
- etc.
|
: Open, opening, openings, opens, etc.
Classically reality is closed, not open. Classical physicists
can stoppably assess total mass of our universe. A closed universe
cann¤t evolve, since evolution requires openness as a
key enabler of emergent change.
:
Opæn, ¤pæns,
¤pæning, ¤pænings, etc.
Quantum reality is open due its relentless, perpetual evolution.
A good example of this is what happens when we draw a circle.
Classically a circle is closed. Quantumly a circle's closure
is an apparition. Why? Earth is rotating. Earth is 'orbiting'
(polycycloidally) Sol. Sol is 'orbiting' (polycycloidally) Milky-Way,
and so on...
As a result, when you draw a circle its real quantum~complement's
starting 'point' and ending 'point' are at least hundreds of
miles apart. Classicists say what Doug just wrote is "absurd,"
since they believe reality is closed and stopped,
at least stoppable. But all
those motions listed in previous paragraph do n¤t convenitently
stop when one of us draws a circle. Quantum reality is open!
See our quantum 'pi.'
Doug - 1Apr2008.
See close.
Page top index.
|
|
'order'
Etymology: order
- Classical - From Barnhardt's Dictionary of Etymology:
"order n. Probably before 1200 ordre
rank, class, sequence, arrangement; borrowed from Old French
ordre, orde, from ordene, learned borrowing
from Latin ordinem (nominative ordo row, rank,
series, arrangement.
—v. Probably about 1200 orden arrange, ordain;
from the noun.
—orderly adj. before 1577, formed from English order
+ -ly, but earlier found as an adverb (about 1477).
—n. 1800, military attendant who carries out orders;
from the adjective, perhaps by influence of French ordonnance
orderly."
- Quantum - Probably from Quantonics, c. 1996-2006, quantum
poly[qua]trotomies
of cohera
and entropa
as incrementally improving mixtures of quantum flux in emerqancies
of Value as interrelationshipings of quantum~flux called "phasicityings."
Synonyms:
- Classical - preexisting immutable structure, perfect immutable
form, Platonic ideal hierarchy, arrangement, marching mechanically
together in ideal unitemporal Sieg Heil fascist formal catholic
synchrony, etc.
- Quantum - Value as fluxing, dynamic, pragmatic novel emergence
which is better, emerscitecture,
emerscenture,
etc. Evolution of a quantum order, Nature, etc.
|
: Order, orders, ordering, orderings, etc.
Hints: classical 'order' is, for examples -
| ideal, |
objective, |
conceptual, |
| rational, |
sensible, |
lucid, |
| formal, |
mechanistic, |
reasonable, |
| normal, |
axiomatic, |
independent, |
| conventional, |
ratiocinational, |
methodic, |
| state-ic, |
unitemporal, |
unicontextual |
| definite, etc. |
|
|
:
Ohrdær,
¤rdærs, ¤hrdæring,
¤hrdærings, etc.
Quantum '¤rder' ¤beys n¤ne ¤f
th¤se classically 'objective' edicts. Hints: quantum
'¤rder' is, for examples -
| perceptual, |
quantonic, |
comceptual, |
| s¤phist, |
Valuable, |
(para)phen¤menal, |
| emerqant, |
st¤chastic, |
describable, |
| paran¤rmal, |
islandic, |
c¤¤bsfective, |
| hermeneutic, |
qubital1, |
m¤dal, |
| phasic/pragmatic2, |
¤mnitemp¤ral, |
omnicomtextual |
| uncertain,
etc. |
|
|
1(I.e., phasic quantum 'numbers' have unlimited qu-bit
Values, thus, qu-bits are omnivalent;
see qubit, qubital)
2(Quantum reality issi
abs¤lute flux; we may n¤t use classical 'state'
t¤ describe quantum flux; we may use 'phase,' 'phasic,'
amd 'phasicity' t¤
describe quantum flux; syn¤nyms ¤f quantum flux
are 'acti¤n,' amd 'pragma.')
Page top index.
|