|
Item |
English Language Problematic |
Quantonics' Quantum
Remediation
©Quantonics, Inc., 2001-2008
|
|
'machine' |
"...it is ridiculous and shameful that men should be
machines; and ridiculous and shameful that their philosophy should
describe them so." Will Durant, The Story of Philosophy,
2nd ed., 1933, p. 501.
Classical machines are mechanical. By that we mean machines
are formal assemblies of objects. Formal assembly of machines
follows a set of scientific rules and laws called 'mechanics.'
Formal assembly of machines is usually called manufacture
and manufacturing. Manufacturing is classically valuable due
some concepts like reproduction, mass production, Total
Quality Control, mass customization, etc. Manufacturing
depends upon a deeper concept of component identity and assembly
identity. Ideally each of N parts which make up an assembly are
Quality Controlled so that they are identical to one another
for any given type of part. Similarly, any assembly follows an
assembly process and it too is Quality Controlled, with
a goal that every finished assembly has a ~six sigma probability
of being 'correct' and as identical as possible to every other
assembly produced.
As you may choose to see classical manufacturing models itself
after classical logic, mathematics and science.
When we talk about classical science, post modern science,
quantum matrix mechanics, quantum wave mechanics, and any objective,
symbolic mathematics which attend those sciences — we are
essentially talking about radically formal machines.
As a result, scientists and mathematicians tend to see Nature
as a classical machine! They tend to use formal mechanical models
to mimic Nature.
In Quantonics, we k-now
that Nature is n¤t mechanical, n¤r is S-he a machine
n¤r machines. So, in Quantonics, we only use 'machine,'
'formal,' 'mechanism,' 'manufacturing,' etc., in classical contexts.
In Quantonics we use emerscent
in place of machine. We use emerq
in place of form, and emerqant in place of formal. We use emerscenture
in place of manufacture. And we use emerscitecture
in place of architecture. Holistically, we k-now that all emerscents
are quantons.
Page top index.
|
|
'magnitude' |
Issues: Classical reality modeling assumes that reality
is objective and quantitative. Whenever it wishes, classical
reality modeling assumes that it may convert qualitative-subjective
aspects of reality into quantitative-objective magnitudes. Examples
we offer show how adherents of classicism attempt to convert:
qualitative morality into quantitative truth; qualitative emotions
into magnitudes on a numbered scale; qualitative sensations into
numbered quantities on some measuring device; quantum qualitative
time into a unitemporal quantitative measurable independent variable;
etc. See: independent,
measure, number,
object, quality,
quantity, subject,
truth.
Classical scalar magnitude measurement we refer impenitently,
incorrigibly, "scalarbation."
Page top index.
|
|
'measure' |
: Measure
In Quantonics, we call classical measurement, unashamedly,
"scalarbation."
: Mæasuræ As of
June, 2006 we choose to coopt classical 'measure,' and 'monitor,'
with quantum 'omnitor.' QELRed: from: measure,
measures, measuring, measurings, measurement, measurements, etc.
to:
¤mniht¤r,
¤mniht¤rs, ¤mniht¤ring, ¤mniht¤rings,
¤mniht¤rmænt,
¤mniht¤rmænts,
etc.
This change accompanies a change in 'monitor'
below. It involves a subtle change in our QELR main page rules table.
Issues: Classical illusions/delusions of a spatially
extensible, numerically countable, numerically measurable, static,
objectively independent, homogeneous reality. See analytic,
determinate,
number, homogeneous,
independent,
objective, predictable,
state-ic, etc.
Classical 'measurement' assumes and presumes (presuppositionally)
reality is analytic. Given those assumptions and presumptions
classical measurement thus suffers countless notional delusions
that reality is, in general:
- stoppable (stable, lisr, spatial 'positions' entail and obtain,
e.g., <x,y,z,t>; zero momentum as a classical notion 'exists')
- independent (AKA "excluded-middle," objects in
classical reality are; classical mathematics' 'independence
axiom')
- inanimate (except for unitemporal motion)
- rational (measurements of state-ic
(see Aristotle's
apple) reality 'exist;' "what happens next" may
be 'predicted' from "initial conditions;")
- 'sensible' state-ic observation
is unilateral and possible
- suppositional (which carries immense classical baggage and
derivatives including: 1-1 correspondence, induction,
cause-effect, determinism, prediction, etc.)
- proof-provable-valid-veritable (which carries immense classical
baggage and derivatives including: dichotomous oppositivity,
objective negation, contradiction, falsifiability, and provisional
scientific 'law' based upon those delusions)
- etc.
Classicists assume that any classical measurement is valid
and repeatable (i.e., scalarbative). Classicists assume that
any classical measurement is manufacturable, i.e., any 'scientist'
anywhere can reproduce a valid measurement (i.e., as scalarbative)
taken by any other 'scientists' any other where. Clearly, this
notion of measurability, by itself, is bogus for countless pragmatic
and lisrability
comsiderations — without even pondering problematics of
experimental comtextual n¤nsimilarities and absences of
ideal classical duplication of environments and human mindsets.
Feynman suggested another approach, though he was thing-king
classically when he made his recommendation.
We shall bend his view just slightly to achieve our intended
results here. Allow that quantum reality is semper flux
quantum pr¤cessings. In Quantonics we call them quantons.
Quantons are emerscents.
Quantons are emerscitectural,
emerscenturable
and emersible.
Leap out of your SOM box and into a n¤vel quantum realm
where quantons coobsfect
quantons and that is what we call
"quantum
¤mniht¤rmænt."
There is n¤ surprise here. We just described what birds
do when they fly, what babies do when they initially experience
their environment, what you do when you walk down a street...read
a book...type an email...kiss your loved ones...drink a glass
of wine...scan your surroundings..run...swim...drive your cycle-bimmer...talk
on a phone...eat...and so on, what planets do when they orbit
their sun(s), what galaxies do when they move through their superclusters,
etc.
Surprise is in accepting a n¤vel
quantum enlightenment that when we want to do quantum
¤mniht¤rmænt
using
a quantum pr¤cess
that humans create, we can n¤
longer do that classically, analytically, formally, mechanically,
and so on...
What is this quantum pr¤cess we are speaking about?
An example is a real quantum computer, n¤t a quasi-quantum
computer made with classically and innately
formal 'parts.' What do we call it? In general, "quanton."
In Quantonics we have our own word for it: evaluon.
Evaluons do quantum
¤mniht¤rmæntings
of
real quantum pr¤cessings.
Evaluons ride Platt Holden's "Edge of Now" (EoN).
Perhaps we should upgrade that phrase to "quantum edgings
of nowings." QEoNs. QÆoNs.
Page top index.
|
|
'metaphor' |
Quantonics ch¤¤ses t¤ c¤¤pt
classical 'metaphor' amd
remerq all
quantum comtextual ¤ccurrences with 'metaph¤r.'
We choose to describe 'metaphor' as meta- (change) phor (carrier/bearer).
Classical change is analytic, mechanical, objective, EEMD,
monocontextual, unitemporal, independent motion. Classical carry
and bear imply a force-support interaction. Neither of these
classical characterizations of metaphor adequately describes
quantum reality.
In Quantonics' versi¤n ¤f quantum reality changæ issi
ensehmble
st¤chastic, n¤nmechanical, qualitative, EIMA,
¤mnic¤mtextual, heter¤temp¤ral, abs¤lute c¤mpenetrating/c¤herent
flux. Quantum interrelati¤nships aræ
b¤rne.
See Quanton
Primer on metaphor.
Page top index.
|
|
'minus' |
In classical contexts use 'minus.'
In quantum comtexts use 'mihnus,'
and 'mihnusings.' (i.e.,
'mihnus,' amd visualize 'ih'
as square root of minus 1 times h-bar; 'ih'
issi ¤ne of Quantonics' most powerful tells of
'noncontradictory,'
'nonfalsifiable,' quantum subjective negati¤n)
Classical 'minus' presumes and assumes putatively that negation
and subtraction are classically objective.
Quantum 'mihnus' is a
Quantonics heuristic hermeneutic remediation of classical 'minus.'
It adheres a quantum meme that quantum negation
is subjective due quantum reality's EIMA,
anihmatæ, intrinsically
recursive, plural
present participle, pr¤cessings.
Examples:
| Classical: |
1 minus 1 = zero; A - A = 0; etc. |
|
(classical 'reality' is EEMD,
inanimate and uni-context 'free') |
| Quantum: |
quantum_1xl mihnus quantum_1ym zer¤;
amd |
|
quantum_Arj mihnus quantum_Askzer¤;
etc. |
|
(quantum reality issi anihmatæ
EIMA comtextually
heter¤gene¤us
(i.e., e.g., <x,y> amd <r,s>) amd c¤mplementary;
n¤te h¤w intrinsic
quantum recursi¤n ¤ccurs ¤ver l amd m, amd
j amd k; als¤ p¤nder h¤w these aræ
n¤t classical mathematics given that r,s, x,y comtexts
aræ heter¤gene¤us, anihmatæ,
EIMA comtexts amd j, k, l, amd m aræ quantons which we
aræ using here as quantum n¤mbærs.) |
See negate. See
subtraction.
Page top index.
|
|
'model' |
: Model
:
M¤dæl, m¤dal
Quantonics ch¤¤ses t¤ c¤¤pt
classical 'model' amd
remerq all
quantum comtextual ¤ccurrences with 'm¤del.'
Altærnatihvæly,
amd præfærably, wæ shahll usæ quantum 'm¤dal.'
Quantons aræ m¤dals. They
aræ quantum ænsehmble
pr¤babilihty ihnterrelati¤nships.
Where classical 'models' are manufactured, new, and objectively
static, quantum 'm¤dæls, m¤dals' are emerscentured,
n¤vel, and quantum
stindyanic.
See ænsehmble. See ænsehmble pr¤babilihty
ihnterrelati¤nships.
See ihncludæd~mihddle
comma~no~spacings.
Page top index.
|
|
'moment' |
Quantonics ch¤¤ses t¤ c¤¤pt
classical 'moment' amd
remerq all
quantum comtextual ¤ccurrences with 'm¤hment.'
In classical contexts we shall use 'moment.' In Quantonics/quantum
comtexts we shall use 'm¤hment.'
Classicists view a 'moment' as a classically stoppable and
independent 'time.' Moments in classical reality are ideally
objective:
lisr, state-ic,
and stable. For example, t0, t1, t2,...tn
are static and stable 'moments' of classically measurable,
OGC, unitemporality:
t.
Students of Quantonics view any m¤hment
as Bergsonian durational,
islandic, paratehmp¤ral, pragmatehmp¤ral, pr¤bability
distributed, quantum umcærtain,
amd quantum c¤mplementary to other b¤th l¤cal
amd n¤nl¤cal m¤hments
amd m¤hmentings.
See instant,
time.
Page top index.
|
|
'monitor'
'monitored'
'monitoring'
'monitorings'
'monitors'
Synonyms:
- observe
- govern
- control
- teach
- etc.
|
: Monitor, monitored, monitoring, monitors. Classical
semantics are usually: a lizard, control based upon classical
assessment of classical data, government (usually a social state
semantic), education, etc.
Classical 'monitor' assumes reality is dialectic,
analytic, and formally measurable. State-ic measurements
can be made upon a reality which holds still.
Classical 'monitoring' is 'running on automatic' scalarbation.
Another way to look at 'running on automatic,' is how current
academia teaches our children. Our children are taught to 'scalarbate'
classical notions dialectically, a kind of institutional ritual.
Recall y-our multiplication tables. Institutional, social, mechanical
ritual. Did a teacher ever do an H5W on multiplication tables?
Probably not. They were taught with ritual too! Engrained academic
'running on automatic' scalarbative legacy. What is another infamous
academic legacy which has been ritualized? Consensus. Common
sense. Communist, totalitarian socialist sense. No individualism
allowed! All mores must be ritualized by all students to run
on socially acceptable automatic. "Break a 'rule,' get in
trouble." Academic rote stupidity! Sheer idiocy! Dimbaughlbianism!
Academic 'how-to' drive quality out. "Driving aretê
out of life by academic socialized anti-individual rituals of
rote tote." Doug - 7Nov2007.
SOMites 'measure'
reality.
Formal computers running formal languages and formally compiled,
manufactured, and reproduced formal executables classically monitor
their state-ic inputs and generate their scalarbative classically
formal outputs. Formal processes
have no means of monitoring emergent novelty. Why? They have
no inherent means of recapitulative adaptation. Worse, said means
of adaptation may not be programmed formally. Why? Reality
is not a formal mechanism.
See duration,
simultaneity,
etc.
: M¤niht¤r,
moniht¤red, m¤niht¤ring, m¤niht¤rings,
moniht¤rs. As of
June, 2006 we choose to coopt classical 'measure,'
and 'monitor,' with quantum 'omnitor.' QELRed: from:
Monitor, monitors, monitoring, monitorings, etc. to:
Ømnihtør, ømnihtørs,
ømnihtøring, ømnihtørings, etc. This
changæ acc¤mpanies
a changæ ihn
'¤mniht¤r' ab¤ve.
Iht ihnv¤lves
a subqtle changæ
ihn ¤ur QELR main pagæ
rules table.
Quantum ømnihtør
assumæs ræhlihty
issi anihmatæ, c¤mplæmæntary,
REIMAR,
ænsehmble,
æmærscing, æmærscænturing, parthæn¤fluxihc
pr¤cæssings.
Quantum ømnihtørings
aræ
æmærqant, n¤n formal,
abs¤lutæly anihmatæ,
adaptihvæ,
gravihdati¤nal,
quantum ræhl
pr¤cæssings.
MoQites ømniht¤r reality.
For fun, let's imagine our following graphic as animate, say
like an inch worm crawling on a tree branch. Let's also assume
that our graphic represents a quantum real qubit.
Given that, is there any way we can classically measure our
qubit state-ically
and retain any semblance of reality? Classical 'monitoring' requires
discrete sample and hold of our qubit, right? Do we stop said
qubit to 'measure' it? Can we sample it 'one' 'time?' How many
'times' would we have to 'measure' our qubit to acquire an ensemble
which is representative of our qubit's quantum reality? Can we
do that? But is not our ensemble state-ic? But our qubit is absolutely
fluxing, changing!
See our 1st quarter 2005 QELRs
of duration,
relativity, and
simultaneity.
Page top index.
|
|
'monism' |
Quantonics ch¤¤ses t¤ c¤¤pt
classical 'monism' amd
remerq all
quantum comtextual ¤ccurrences with 'm¤nism.'
In classical contexts we shall use 'monism.' In Quantonics/quantum
comtexts we shall use 'm¤nism.'
Where classical 'monism' is homogeneous, lisr,
and a unilogically whole continuum of analytically differentiable
and integrable objects, quantum 'm¤nism' is (via quantum
c¤mpenetrati¤n) b¤th h¤m¤gene¤us
amd heter¤gene¤us,
b¤th lisr amd
n¤nlisr, amd
a paral¤gically plural multiplicity ¤f quantons.
See Doug's recent 2007 omniscussion
re: "Monism
is Deceit."
See Pirsig's and
Bergson's Perspectives ¤f b¤th M¤nism
and Pluralism.
Page top index.
|
|
'moral' |
Quantonics ch¤¤ses t¤ c¤¤pt
classical 'moral' amd
remerq all
quantum comtextual ¤ccurrences with 'm¤ral.'
In classical contexts we shall use 'moral.' In Quantonics/quantum
comtexts we shall use 'm¤ral.'
Classical morality may be assessed dialectically. A human
or a human act is either absolutely moral, or absolutely amoral/immoral.
This is source of classicists' great power over other humans.
It is dialectically ESQ.
ESQ in quantum reality is intrinsically not moral. Dialectic
in quantum reality is, in a sense, not moral in quantum reality.
Why? Because of what classicists must assume in order for their
reality to be a dialectic (Boolean) reality.
Quantum reality is not what classicists assume! For exemplars,
see "What is wrong
with SOM's logic."
Page top index.
|
|
'moral' cont'd. |
Where classical, dialectical reality
is:
- analytic
- adheres classical bistable alpha-omega
ontology
- adheres single event cause-effect determinism
- absolutely dialectically assessable truth, ethics, and morality,
- dichonic:
- absolutely stable/state-ic
- lisr,
- homogeneous,
- unilogical:
- immutable,
- an infinitely divisible
homogeneity,
- quantitative,
- manufacturable:
- transformation of 'existing' stuff to make 'new' stuff,
- information-rearrangement of 'existing' data,
- etc.
|
|
'moral' cont'd. |
Quantum quantonic, paral¤gical, c¤mplementary
reality is:
- st¤chastic
- abs¤lute changæ,
relentless alterati¤n ¤f all quantons: including
l¤cal assessments
¤f truth, ethics, amd m¤rality,
- quantonic,
- abs¤lutely
Planck-rate-driven flux/changæ/phase-ic
- BAAM(n¤nlisr,lisr)
- BAAM(heter¤gene¤us,h¤m¤gene¤us)
- islandic-paral¤gical, inc¤mmensurable, comtrafactual,
n¤ndistributive, n¤nc¤mmutative, n¤nfact¤rizable,
- abs¤lutely emersible,
- c¤hesively indivisible,
- qualitative,
- emerscenturable:
- emergence ¤f is¤fluxing quantons t¤
create n¤vel
quantons,
- etc.
|
|
'moral' cont'd. |
Where assessment of classical 'morality' depends upon invalid
human dialectic assumptions and concomitant human bivalent "one
size fits all, we are qualified to decide for you, and if you
do not agree with our doctrine we shall eliminate you" judgments,
quantum reality is, by c¤mparis¤n, intrinsically
m¤ral. Abs¤lute quantum flux imp¤ses dynamic
Planck-rate-driven ¤nt¤l¤gical pr¤cesses
¤n all realities' comstituents. All comstituents, i.e.,
quantons, endlessly make quantum-¤nt¤l¤gical
ch¤ice-chance-changæ
event assessments which are always amd intrinsically, really,
m¤ral. Why? Th¤se assessments are always m¤mentarily
in fav¤r ¤f what l¤cally appears
t¤ be better. We say "appears" all¤wing
that quantum realities' m¤ral assessments ackn¤wledge
n¤nl¤cal quantum affects imperceptible t¤
l¤cal assessments.
Page top index.
|
|
'motion' |
Quantonics ch¤¤ses
t¤ c¤¤pt a classical interpretation of 'motion'
and remerq
all quantum comtextual ¤ccurrences with 'm¤ti¤n.'
In classical contexts we shall use 'motion.' In Quantonics/quantum
comtexts we shall use 'm¤ti¤n.'
Classicists assume objects' motions are stoppable: classical
objects may possess "zero momentum." This is quite
transparently a classical illusion, a SOMitically induced classical
self-delusion. Doug - 9Se02006.
In classical reality motion is OGC,
OGT y=f(t). Classical 't' which symbolically represents classical
'time' is a "one
time fits all" unitemporality. In classical reality objects
and their state-ic properties move independently
as functions of classical uni-time. Time is treated as an objectively
independent mathematical variable based upon classicism's "Axiom
of Independence."
In quantum reality m¤ti¤n is absolute
quantum flux. All quantons are in absolute atemporal (i.e., n¤n-classically
temporal) quantum m¤ti¤n/flux each with its own
quantum variable/tentative persistence.
Abs¤lute
quantum m¤ti¤n is quantized, anihmatæ,
heter¤gene¤us, umcærtain, flux~durational,
everywhere-included-middle-ass¤ciative via stochastically~islandic
quantum pr¤bability omnistributi¤nings, where centers
of all islands aræ quantum flux attract¤rs and each
flux attractor's flux attenuati¤n interrelationship (each
attractor may have many
interrelationships) adheres ¤ne of various classes
of pr¤bability omnistributi¤ns. As an example,
viewing electr¤ns as quantons, each electr¤n in
each of an atom's classical 'energy shells' adheres a pr¤bability
omnistributi¤n c¤rresp¤nding shell class.
Doug has shown, quite beautifully, how absolute motion of
quantum reality may be measured. To see this, read color updates
to Doug's review of Itzhak Bentov's The
Wild Pendulum. Start with pink and read through green
updates. Doug - 26Feb2008.
See animacy.
See Bergson on Duration
(analogy here is that quantum~motion is Bergsonian durational;
Doug).
Page top index.
|
|
'multiplication' |
Quantonics ch¤¤ses
t¤ c¤¤pt a classical interpretation of 'multiplication'
and remerq
all quantum comtextual ¤ccurrences with 'multiplicati¤n.'
In classical contexts we shall use 'multiplication.'
In Quantonics/quantum comtexts we shall use 'multiplicati¤n.'
Classical multiplication assumes reality is stable and objects
in reality are independent. Classical multiplication further
assumes reality is inanimate/stoppable, excluded-middle, analytic,
etc.
Quantum multiplicati¤n assumes reality is anihmatæ and quantons in reality
have quantum c¤mplementary, included-middle, unstoppable
interrelationships.
For application, and descriptions of relative importances
of these terms, see our 7Jun2002 Möbius
3-Primæ Fermion.
See addition,
differentiation,
division, integration,
multiplication, prime,
recursion,
square, square
root, and subtraction.
Page top index.
|
|
©Quantonics, Inc., 2001-2009 |