Using Quantum Uncertainty
Applying Quantum Uncertainty
"Doug, give us a real, quantum~genuine example
of how to use and apply macroscopic quantum~uncertainty!"
To do what you ask we must use a quantum~meme of
something classicists call 'hierarchy.'
Let's exemplify that meme first so we can use it to do what you
Is truth above true? Is true above fact?
Most of us intuitively may conclude philosophical truth is above
what is scientifically true.
Doug wants that to be so, but many would omnisagree.
But how do philosophers and scientists choose truths
and their trueness?
They claim valid tools of thought which help them come to some
That is classical essence of agreement based in opinion.
We have a problem now, a big problem.
All philosophy, science, indeed all 'law' depends, bottom line,
on social opinion.
Thus Doug's end result, our answer to your query,
has to be a
HotMeme "Common social opinion is never a metameme of
To make that very simple, anyone who tells you
that they know truth and what is true, in terms of 'common sense,'
is retarded at best.
For countless affectors, quantum~uncertainty at
all scales of reality is sovereign all social opinion including:
philosophic, scientific, and legal.
Doug - 20Dec2008.
An Example of PB[PB[Pessimism,Optimism],PB[Worse,Better]]
in Reality are Quantum Uncertain
In Quantonics We Use PBs to Assess Interrelationshipings'
Poisson Brackets are commutation
Classically if A x B = B x A, we can say "A commutes
B, and B commutes A." In other words, order of multiplication
But reality isn't like that! Reality is n¤t
classical. Rather reality is quantum~uncertain. Order of interrelationshipings
In quantum reality, generally, A does n¤t commute
B and vice versa.
Example? Your view of self and someone else's view
of you uncertainly omniffer.
Your view of other and other's view of self uncertainly omniffer.
This is a clear manifestation that quantum~reality,
a holographic reality, is radically
and that sensitivity for any PBing evolves everywherings and everywhenings.
We can use PBs to show that:
Here's an example of a way to assess and manage
This table is borrowed from our April,
2007 TQS News.
Our natural, dialectical tendency is to treat pessimism,
optimism, better, and worse as ideal either-or classical absolutes.
When we do that, we commit immense Errors
we must avoid ideal dialectical Errors in judgment using
Quantum~Likelihood~Omnistribution~stochastics (QLOs: each
of which may be viewed as an 'evolving PB'):
In that graphic Doug is showing a more genericq
Poisson~Bracketing as PB(Absolute_Uncertainty,Absolute_Truth).
- One may pessimistically believe that a task is 'impossible'
to accomplish when it may actually be 'possible.'
- One may be pessimistic about another person's capabilities
without realizing that person may actually be whom you actually
need for a task. Observe how some people dredge pessimism based
upon color, creed, culture, etc.
- One may believe that humans are 'causing' global warming
and climate change when, indeed, nature is affecting change in
ways beyond human qua.
- Pessimism rests unassured.
- One may easily be optimistic about accomplishing a task which
is 'impossible.' However, claiming a reality that said task is
'impossible' will be viewed as 'pessimistic.'
- One may be optimistic about a person's abilities to perform
a task based upon their success doing another unrelated class
of effort. Upon placing that person in a novel problem space,
said individual falters from lack of specific problem~handling
- One may believe that climate has been apparently stable for
a 100 years that it will continue to be stable for another 100
years, and perhaps even longer, when reality's norm is that actually
climate changes naturally and unpredictably.
- Optimism rests unassured.
- Caution may save one from disaster.
- Uncertainty at all scales of reality begs one to think using
probability, plausibility, and likelihood.
- Understanding Paul Pietsch's phasement, "Indeterminacy
is the principal feature of intelligence."
- Dread staunches over exuberance.
- Why do you monitor your children while they are waiting for
their school bus?
- An ounce of prevention is worth a pound of cure.
- If I swing without a net I may die.
- If I kill my neighbor, I may start a clan war which will
last for centuries.
- A war that destroys one's own people and treasure is a lost
- Confidence may permit one to succeed.
- Just as in poker, stochastics should guide any optimist's
choosings, chancings, and changings.
- In formal models of reality determinism often works.
- Hope raises expectations.
- It's good for your kids to go out and meet the world and
experience all: both good and evil.
- I could worry about everything and never get anything done.
98% of what I worry about never happens, and the 2% which does
happen I am incapable of anticipating which those are. (Doug
ran a very successful business based upon this, but same business
now, 20+ years later would fail, for countless reasons due absolute
change of business ephemera. In early Millennium III what works
changes almost daily, with even higher surety monthly. State
of art c. 2007 is wMBU Doug's acronym for wave~Management
- Don't worry. Be happy.
- If I love my neighbor s~he will love me.
It shows readers that those absolutes can only exist in an ideal
In quantum~reality truth is stochastic and uncertainty is stochastic
so we may represent them using QLOs.
QLOs (Quantum~Likelihood~Omnistributionings) are quantonic
complementaryq~antinomialq pairwise qwf~interrelationshipings of
Specific antinomials in our graphic are bogus dialectical
absolutec truthc and absolutec
'c' subscripts for 'classical.'
Big red inchworm is a evolvingq PBing QLO
of ensemble stochastics of Pastings,Nowings,Futurings.
Astutes please re cognize epigenomic quantum~subjunctive
aspects of quantons(Futurings,quantons(Nowings,Pastings)).
You may wish to revisit Doug's very popular What
is Wrong with Probability as Value?
Name of that web page is a takeoff on title of Einstein, Podolsky,
and Rosen's EPR paper
from about 1934-1935.
Too, weigh your pondering of QLOs as cuneiformicq
Doug - 25Feb2015, 2,19Mar2015.
Poisson~Bracketings show us, generally, that quantum~complementarity
is ubiquitous: all
things (fluxings) are
Shakespeare offered us perhaps dialectics' most supreme
exemplar in his:
"To be or not to be, that is the question."
We see his enormous Error
in judgment via his implicit:
Either to be or not to be.
A Pirsigean platypus!
Rather Shakespeare might have asked, while allowing
animate EIMA quantum~subjective~negation:
Fathom this approach compared to Valentinus' gnostic
Thence to Doug's (mimicking, following Chaldeans)
holographically mixed in all things (fluxings)...to greater
and lesser extents...essence of quantum~partiality.
Our two PB exemplars, so far, show us that optimism
quantum~complements pessimism, and 'to be' complements 'not to
...quanton(optimism,pessimism) and quanton(to_be,not_to_be):
As movement issi ihn rest,
so too pessimism issi ihn optimism
and 'to be' issi ihn 'not to be.'
This is perhaps our most powerful quantum~tell of how
we must use PBings to do quantum~assessments of quantum~realityings.
For another 'worse~better' example see our 'religion-science'
For Doug's original intuitive use of PBs to describe
anthropological interrelationshipings as quantum~uncertainties
You may use this technique as part of your quantum~indagation and
quantiques on any pair of noun and adjective (and other plausible
linguistic) comparatives like this:
For those of you in business, this is a great way to
do what Doug coined as wMBU.
A great example of business application of wMBU
is whether to move from your current home or virtual digs to an
office building or separate facility.
PBing for Doug is a kind of quantum~due~diligence of
any problem space.
If you were about to sell your business, perhaps buy
an existing business, PBings are essential tools of quantum~due~diligence.
Doug has a small business exemplar on moving which
he will offer here, soon...
Bottom line is that dialectic no longer works for general
business decision-making. Classical MBO is clearly dead. Time
to move on, folks!
Nearly all (occurring,
actual) problems today are multiparametric.
What does that tell us?
Many parameters (ephemera) imply ensembles
of holograilic interrelating evolvables.
See Henri Louis Bergson's omniscription
of our Quantum Stage's processings actually
doing a kind of quantum~evolving due diligence, which we use as
a wMBU tool.
Ensembles imply statistics. Statistics imply probabilityngs, plausibilityings,
PPLings imply quantum~waves (wavefunctions)
If your current counsel offers classical, dialectical
either-or decision-making, it's time to move on...to Millennium
Beth just recently managed a due diligence effort on
sale of a small business (<$50 million) to a larger firm (>$1
Unfortunately larger firm had already decided to make
said purchase, and they used classical dialectic to decide.
Doug's view is that dialectic may be problematic in
that specific case, since PBings of market parameters and buy-sell
parametrics were apparently n¤t done.
If you are assessing buy-sell, use PBings to do your
own buy-sell due diligence assessment.
Doug also recommends that if you are anticipating selling
your own business during next five years you should start having
full annual accounting audits done. That simplifies actual due
diligence at sale time, and more than pays for itself. Also consider
showing your accountants how they can do PBings on select business
problems in your business. You will be able to see, vividly, on
a single page, a better view of what your decision options are
given a large parameter space.
Doug will use this web page as a work space to refine
memes and memeos
regarding better ways we can assess and manage uncertainty
in our lives and businesses.
For example, please note natural quantum~recursion
in our approach. Too, note how PB issi a quanton.
As a test of your personal abilities to emersce a similar
table, do this exercise:
vis-à-vis quantum reality,
better vis-à-vis worse.
Quantonics' approach to implementing PBs is to view
each bullet item as a QLO (perhaps of QLOs) which interrelates
other bullets somewhat like this:
We took our table of text bullets and scrunched it
so that our QLO Value Ensemble could roughly superpose it.
Suddenly our Quantum Uncertainty Value Semiotic
grabs some additional semantic, does it not?
You want MOOOORRE...?
Try tying those green Xs into quantum waves!
Doug has found a way of assessing two authors' approaches
to solving dissimilar problems by Poisson~Bracket placing their
words in each others' mouths.
See Bailey on
natural homosexuality vis-à-vis Monastersky on climate
For a Bergsonian analogue of using and applying quantum
uncertainty, see our c. 2000 quanton graphic of his Bergsonian
Try to imagine a Quantonics approach to a classico-Quantum
m¤dal using QLOs to represent cell and bullet level interrelationshipings.
Each color above shows interrelationshipings of ensemble
QLO pairs from four peaqlo triple ensembles.
We can interrelate any ensemble with any ensemble.
If we interrelate an ensemble with itself we might
see a cylinder of self~reference, self~recursion.
We can enthymemetically
interrelate any partial~element of any ensemble with any partial~element
of any ensemble and with any ensemble.
Any interrelationship may be modaled as a wave~function
and as an ensemble of wave~functions. Our cylinder exemplar may
make that more apparent.
does one extract QLOs (QSOs
- Doug - 3Apr2009) from reality?
(Here is our major challenge. It is the key quantum~success~enabler
which requires huge effort to evolve. Doug perceives non~mechanical,
~formal, ~dialectical, etc., multidisciplinary business schools
playing key roles in development of this qua.)
We offer a 'Doug rendition' of first cut graphic and
second cut descriptive
approaches on that parenthetic:
Doug's tentative, here, is still too dialectical. Better
(as quantum~meliorism) should have a "CEP," a "CPE"
around stochastic 'attractors' which appear almost as 'ad occulos'
Clearly this needs a lot more work, but we offer it
as a kind of 'heads up' for those who may have chosen to pursue
cut descriptive effort on last few words in our development
parenthetic, "...key roles in development of this qua."
Our second cut effort gives us bases of ontological
of quantons as holographic nexi. We show how holographic nexi
on our quantum~stagings. Given those bases, we find that it is
physially extensible and full spectrum flux~scalable in actuality
among other actual quantons.
Our approach finds
its bases in nascent quantum H5W
Chautauquas among three quantum~awareness
memes: cognition (occurrence), re cognition (recurrence),
(evolutionary holographic adaptation).
Incipience of our quanton(unsaid,said), as wave~proemial
energy~wellings' PBings, sort of its 'first' holographic nexus
exhibits its infancy in quantons(occur,recur)
emersing energy~wellings on some quantum~stagings.
Subsequent growth and fledging of those nexi are as
quantons(recur,recur) and quantons(adapt,recur).
Can you see much of H¤wq and Whatq developing qua
Isn't it beautiful?
Doug sees this as quantum~beauty Almost As
Good as It Gets.
We're far from finishing though!
Whatings issi nextings? For a heads up, see quantum~selection,
and check our nearly decade old selection~ontology.
Doug - 15Dec2008
If we are worrying about wMBU we must
have means to represent all aspects of a business this way. Marketing
must worry about all customer QLOs which drive sales and satisfaction:
Each of those can be an ensemble of ensembles of QLOs.
Each of those is dynamic, changing, adapting, evolving
with dynamic customer-by-customer memes and memeos of what is
currently bettering and what expectational betterings may be and
All business disciplines have similar QLOs:
management, quality, accounting, legal, sales, emerscenturing,
G&A, security, facilities, purchasing, communications, IS,
publications, HR, payroll, PR, logistics (coquecigruesistics!),
Doug left out planning. It is historically a dialectical
cause-effect mechanical induction exercise which has no place
in a business run on wMBU memeos.
And all of those 'roll up' into a business QLO ensemble
of ensembles of ensembles...
wMBUed products evolve and adapt with
individual and societal expectationings for betterings.
Status quo and One Size Fits All predicting
ideal dialectical certainty via MBO is a failed business notion.
MBO is classically dead!
Doug - 15Aug2007.
Then, if we can emerse a classically state-ic model,
how could we move it closer to quantum?
Doug - 6May2007.
- Durability and all ilities...
To contact Quantonics write to or call:
Suite 18 #368 1950 East Greyhound Pass
Carmel, INdiana 46033-7730
©Quantonics, Inc., 2007-2028 Rev. 13Apr2015
PDR Created 6May2007 PDR
(25May2007 rev - Add QLO Value overlay
on top of our Pessimism~Optimism, Better~Worse matrix. Mooorre...?)
(17Jul2007 rev - Add web page 'subtitles.' Add link to quantum~using
and~applying Bergsonian Durational Uncertainty.)
(15Aug2007 rev - Add 'An Approach Example.')
(19Sep2007 rev - Add 'Four Peaqlos on Their Way to a Fermion'
link to QLO (peaqlo) GIF.)
(22Dec2007 rev - Add Shakespeare PB exemplar. Reset legacy red
(27Feb2008 rev - Add 'Ensemble Interrelationshipings' anchor to
QVI graphic. Repair spelling of mimicing to mimicking.)
(10Aug2008 rev - Add Nathan Bailey vav Richard Monastersky PB
on homosexuality vav climate change.)
(16-17Nov2008 rev - Add quanton(unsaid,said) graphic exhibiting
(15,20Dec2008 rev - Add second cut 'Second Cut Emerq Holographic
Nexi' on emerqancy of holographic nexi as PBings. Add 'Quantum~Awareness'
anchor. Add page top 'Uncertainty Sovereign.')
(15Jan2009 rev - Add 'omniscrimination' and 'wave~function' links
to our recent c. 2009 QELRs of 'discrimination' and 'wavefunction.')
(12Mar2009 rev - Add 'enthymemetically' link to Doug's treatise
on 'Commutativity and Enthymemetics.')
(3Apr2009 rev - Updates for Doug's latest QSO modaling breakthrough.
Update text at 'Quanton Unsaid Said' anchor location.)
(23Jan2012 - Add sprinkled commentary adjustments and several
links to more recent pages with relevant instruction.)
(11May2012 rev - Add a 'A Reservoir of Wave Functions' graphic
link to 'perhaps QLO of QLOs' exemplar graphic.)
(23,25Feb2015 rev - Add 'Quantum Assessment' anchor near page
top. Make page current. Reset legacy markups. Add 25Feb2015 Update
near page top.)
(2,19Mar2015 rev - Update Quantum~Assessment re complementary~antinomialism
of ephemera. Repair Int to In typo.)
(13Apr2015 rev - Make page current. Reset legacy markups.)