|
'valid' |
In classical contexts, 'valid' usually means 'true.'
Classical synonyms include: verity, veracious, fact, verifiable,
positive, certain, unambiguous, real, provable, authentic, genuine,
right, correct, etc.
All those classical notions depend upon classical notions
of reality as Aristotelian/Newtonian objective, lisr,
and delusionally:
- stable, and
- independent. (See Bergson's Creative Evolution Topic 39.)
Quantum reality denies, in general, those classical notions
of validity.
All Pirsigean latched reality, what we in Quantonics call
"actuality," is tentative
due quantum reality's mandate of abs¤lute
flux/changæ.
We remediate (see QELR)
classical 'valid' to quantum 'valihd.'
In quantum comtexts 'valihd'
means, simply, better.
Quantum reality's latched actualities (AKA Pirsigean SQ
SPoVs) persist tentatively
until a valihd, better replacement
emerges.
Here our use of better chaperones quantum reality's
mandate of abs¤lute flux/changæ
via quantum memes
amd metaphors of pragmatism/actionism/Planck_rate_fluxism.
Page top index.
|
|
'value'
Etymology:
Synonyms - classical
- quantity,
- materialism
- analysis, synthesis,
- state,
- orthodox order,
- principles, axioms, laws, truth, validity, proof, etc.,
- semper fi,
- etc.
Synonyms - quantum
- quality,
- interrelationshipings,
- creatio ex nihilo aperio,
- emergence,
- heterodox omniversity,
- flux as essence,
- semper fluxio,
- etc.
|
: Value, valued, values, etc.
Classical value is quantity.
Classical value is determinate.
Classical value is certainty, absolute certainty.
Classical value is a thing
(Bergson, Matter and Memory, about 15th paragraph of chapter
IV,1896 is first ed. fifth ed. in 1908,) Implications include:
value is scalar, stoppable, concrete, analytic, etc. So basic
classical measurables like time, space, mass, temperature, heart
rate, blood pressure, etc., are scalars, classical things, classical
'objects.'
: Value, valued, values, valuing, valuings, etc.
Quantum Value issi Quality issi absolutely animate EIMA quantum~reality.
Quantum Value issi radically stochastic given reality is absolutely
animate (instable) and uncertain at all scales of reality.
Quantum Value issi uncertainty.
Quantum Value issi process,
absolute and durable flux~isoflux
stochastic Value process (See Bergson, Ibid.). Easy
inferences are that quantum~Value is durationally unstoppable,
quantum~complementary, changing absolutely both near to~
and far from~equilibrium via quantized gradience of transemerqant
scintillation of all quanta at up to Planck rates. We see clearly
that quantum~omnitorables like timings, spacings, massings, temperaturings,
etc., are durational quantum~processings, quantons. Doug - 4Jun2011.
Doug - 19Mar2006. Updates in red text 4Jun2011 - Doug.
Students and readers, please read Pirsig's
1974 Zen and the Art of Motorcycle Maintenance, 1991 Lila,
and 1995 SODV
paper. In Pirsig's opus, you may read his simple description
of Value in every day life: paraphrased, "Sit on a hot stove
and experience value. Quickly get off of hot stove and experience
Value." Clearly Pirsig is showing us how [Vv]alueings are
empirically quantum~relative. Quantum~relativityings are ubiquitously
evident and apparent. Doug accomplishes a kind of graphical rendition
of what Pirsig writes about in this quantum~cuneiform (basic
strokes for quantum folks) graphic:
Doug will offer more omniscriptionings
in weeks ahead, since this is so systemically and strategically
relevant quantum~cuneiform, equilibrium, chaos (see chance as a metaphor), gradience, etc.
"Doug, Why is quantum~relativity,
as you write, 'radical?' " Easiest, however n¤t only,
way to answer is, "Quantum~reality, per Doug's New Quantum
Philosophy, is radically comtext sensitive." Two Higher quantum~cuneiform
strokes in our graphic are in a hyper comtext relative
lower two strokes. Autsimilarly two lower strokes are hypo
comtext relative Higher strokes. Higher is in lower, and lower
is in Higher: quantum~complementarity of [Vv]alue. Even
though they complement one another we still assess lower and
Higher relatively. An easy way to see this is using a sinusoid:
In our general sinusoid quantum we see that relatively, "up is in down
and down is in up:" a quantum BAWAM general complementation. Too, we see [Hh]igher
is in [Ll]ower and [Ll]ower is in [Hh]igher, again generic middle~included
quantum complementation. Relativity of [Vv]alue is like this
everywherings and everywhenings we look in quantum~reality.
Doug - 21Jan2012.
Page top index.
|
|
|
'velocity' |
: Velocity, etc.
Classical velocity integrates, so ideally classical velocity
can be zero, since a platform can ideally return to its 'starting
locus.'
A car which we drive in an ideal classical circle, which returns
to its starting location, has accumulated 'zero velocity.'
Ponder classical acceleration.
Ponder classical time. Define it. (No! It's not dx/x!)
Ponder classical distance. Define it.
Classically, m, l, t and thus g are undefinable 'primitives.'
We 'model' them by imposing some classical convention
like 3D and 1T on them. But why not 3D and 3T? Why not ND and
NT? Classicists will say, funda
mentally, "simplicity.
We always use Ockham's
razor, whenever we can. We always place a brick
wall twixt us and reality whenever we can."
What is time? What is distance-space (spatial extensity)?
Is velocity really dx/dt? Is it really <px/pt,py/pt,pz/pt>.
Why are all those n-tuple's partial 'times' 'identical?'
Hmmm...
See time.
:
Vel¤cihty,
vel¤cihties, vel¤cihtyings, etc.
Ihn quantum ræhlihty
classical
velocity of 'zero'
issi ihmp¤ssible!
N¤
'platform'
(quantumly,
platæmærq)
'or' 'particle'
ævær
ræturns t¤ ihts ¤riginal
'starting locus.'
Ihn quantum ræhlihty ¤nly spææd
'exists.'
Quantum spææd
issings
quantum lihkælih¤¤d ¤mnistrihbuti¤nings.
See QLOs, peaqlos, ensemble
attractors, circle,
positive, quantum
pi, etc.
See Quantum Essence.
Page top index.
|