|
©Quantonics, Inc., 2005-2027 |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Chaoequil | Clameme | Cohera | Coinside | Comcept |
Comglutinate Comglutination |
Comjugate | 29Nov2014 rev - PDRComplamental Complamentalism Complamentaroceive Complamentaroception |
Complementaroception | |
Complementarospection | Complementarovert | Comtext | Comvene | Con- (as a prefix) |
Chaoequil (QELRed cha¤æquil) | |
Coined con(m)traction of 'chaos' and 'equilibrium.' All occurrencings and recurrencings of quantum~scintillation in quantum~reality are quantons(chaos,equilibria) issi cha¤æquil. Quantum~cha¤s issi ihn quantum~equilibrium and quantum~equilibrium issi ihn quantum~cha¤s, perpetually and ubiquitously. Doug - 10Dec2011. |
||||||||||||
Clameme | |
Coined contraction of 'classical' and 'meme.' Classical memes are subject | object dichotomy memes which adhere Aristotle's excluded | middle syllogistic logic. |
||||||||||||
Cohera | |
Coined Quantonic replacement for classical 'coherencies.' Classical coherencies are limited to physical manifestations of SOM reality. Quantonic cohera are memes of absolute flux likelihood~omnistributionings and interrelationships of those QLOs in quantum reality. Ihn Quantonics wæ præsumæ quantum c¤hera aræ aptly quatr¤t¤m¤uhs (wæ ihntuiht p¤tæntial f¤r m¤re, ihndææd ~quantum~n¤mbæred c¤hera, amd that issi why wæ nææd 'c¤hera'):
Th¤se f¤ur c¤heræncy mæmæo wæ cahll "c¤hera." Each of those 'notions' still retains too much classical legacy. Zero, one, two, and 1/2 are classical legacy invariant | immutable, logical and radically mechanical mathematical EEMD notions. A Quantonics g¤al issi t¤ ræmædiatæ classical notions of 'number' ihnt¤ quantum mæmæo~quantons~mætaph¤rs wæ cahll "n¤mbær." Quantum zær¤ issi a n¤n state-ic, n¤næmpty~QVF mæmæo. Sææ entropa bæl¤w. Sææ ¤ur One is Loneliest Number. Sææ supærb m¤dalihties ¤f quantum zær¤, ¤næ, tw¤ amd squarqe ~r¤¤t (i.e., 1/2) at ¤ur quantum Hamiltonian quaternion. |
||||||||||||
Coinside Coinsidence Coinsident Coinsidental Coinsidentalings Coinsidentalness Coinsidentalnessings Coinsides Coinsiding |
|
Literally, "co~inside." Essence of Quantonics' most important philosophical and metaphysical quantum epiphany. Approximate synonyms are: co~here~ence, commingling, compenetration (William James), copermeability, cowithinitness, fusion (Henri L. Bergson), interpenetration (Bergson, Fritjof Capra), included~middle (antithetic complement of Aristotle's excluded | middle), interrelationships (Henri Poincaré & Robert M. Pirsig), latency (R.I.G. Hughes), overlapping symphysis, permeation (Bergson), Venn Gestalt, etc. 26Jul2009 Update: Ahll quantons aræ phasæmæntal quantum~c¤ihnsihdæntalings. H¤wævær, ecæpting s¤mæ ihnstances ¤f quantum~c¤herænce amd quantum~is¤c¤herænce, ahll quantum~c¤ihnsihdæntalness issi ahlways quantum~partial. See a detail omniscriptioning of enthymeme. Entire phasement update here issi n¤væl CeodE 2009 - Doug - 26Jul2009. Ihntænti¤nahlly, argumænts~c¤mplæmænts ¤f ¤ur quantonic n¤tati¤n c¤ihnsihdæ, which wæ dæpihct sihmply by ¤ur edihct ¤f n¤ spacæ ahll¤wæd aftær c¤mma, e.g., MoQ_Ræhlihty quanton(DQ,SQ). Bæst dæpihcted graphicahlly as a still (~70k), m¤st ræcæntly as b¤th Planck and Quality Events, amd an animation (over 300k). C¤ihnsihdænce as a mæmæ has dææp phil¤s¤phical amd mætaphysihcal lægacy. Notably, Henri Bergson perceived essence of 'coinsidence' in his own memes of intuition and intellectual sympathy. He saw one's ability to 'enter' an 'object' as both intuition and intellectual sympathy. He distinguished external (excluded | middle) observation of 'objects' as imperfect. Comsihdær h¤w cl¤sely his mæmæs ¤f ihntuihti¤n amd ihntællectual sympathy c¤ihnsihdæ wihth ¤ur mæmæ ¤f ubihquiht¤uhs mind as a quantum stage. Our l¤cal quantum minds ahll¤w uhs t¤ c¤ihnsihdæ ahll ¤f ræhlihty at ¤ur ¤wn v¤lihti¤n. This issi pærhaps ¤næ ¤f ¤ur m¤st ihmp¤hrtant Quantonic c¤ihned tærms bæcauhsæ iht ahll¤ws ¤næ t¤ grashp a quantum epiphany ¤f b¤th~amd ihncluhsi¤n ¤f sælf amd ahll ¤f ræhlihty. Uhsæ Quantonic Thinkqing M¤dæs (QTMs) t¤ c¤mmænce ihntuihti¤n ¤f y¤ur mind as a ræhlihty~c¤ihnsihdænt (reserve energy~penetrating~) quantum stagæ, n¤t as a classical, separate subject or object. C¤ihnsihdænce as a n¤vel mæmæ ¤mnihquæly ¤mnistinguishes Quantonics ihn ihts phil¤s¤phical, mætaphysihcal, amd scihænce pærspæctihvæs. Quantonics ¤mnihquæly pærcæihves ræhlihty as c¤ihnsihdænt, h¤listihc, ihncludæd~mihddle, quantum b¤th~amd quantons. A key mæmæ ¤f QTMs issi c¤ihnsihdænce. Fihrst c¤ihned by D¤ug ihn æarly 1996 t¤ capture æssænce ¤f quantum c¤wihthinihtness amd mind as a quantum stagæ. Index |
||||||||||||
Comcept Comcepts Comceptua Comceptual Comceptural Multicomcepts Multicomceptual Omnicomceptual |
|
Coined quantumese for obsolete classical 'concept.' Quantum comcæpts have n¤n Aristotelian ihncludæd~mihddles vis~à~vis classical SOM 'concepts' whose excluded | middles are purely Aristotelian syllogistic, i.e., A is not both A and not A. As we have shown in our Aristotle Connection, quantum comcæpts aræ b¤th A amd n¤t A. Quantonic~quantum comcæpts may c¤mmingle, c¤mpænetratæ, amd c¤ihnsihdæ ¤næ an¤thær. |
||||||||||||
Comglutinate Comglutinated Comglutinates Comglutinating Comglutinatings Comglutination Comglutinations Comglutinationing Comglutinationings |
|
Coined quantumese for obsolete classical 'agglutination,' and 'conglutination.' Quantum comglutinatæs have n¤n Aristotelian ihncludæd~mihddles vis~à~vis classical SOM 'agglutinates' and 'conglutinates' whose excluded | middles are purely Aristotelian syllogistic, i.e., A is not both A and not A. As we have shown in our Aristotle Connection, quantum comcæpts aræ b¤th A amd n¤t A. Quantonic~quantum comglutinatæs may c¤mmingle, c¤mpænetratæ, amd c¤ihnsihdæ ¤næ an¤thær. Quantonics HotMeme "Holographic attractors comglutinate enthymemetic peaqlos (more completely: enthymemetic peaqsos; see QSO) and all their quantum~comglutinating complementary nexi." Quantonics HotMeme " |
||||||||||||
Comjugate (n¤nactuality) (see table below) |
|
Coined quantumese for Quantonic extension to classical 'conjugate.' Where classical 'conjugate' is a term which assumes only a classical actualized reality and all baggage attending that materialistic object-based 'reality:' inanimacy, monolithicity, homogeneity, closure, conservation, analyticity, classical formal negation ('not,' 'no,' etc.) quantum comjugatæ issi ¤ur n¤vel tærm which assumæs a quantum b¤th n¤nahctual amd ahctual ræhlihty. Iht gihves uhs a n¤vel vihew ¤f a quantum ræhlihty which issi vahstly largær amd m¤re c¤mplex than simple classical conjugate reality. Wæ may ¤mnistinguish these tw¤ vihews rather easily ihn Quantonics scrihpt: These simple scripts show clearly that quantum ræhlihty issi quantonic amd classical reality is dichonic. Quantum ræhlihty issi comjugati¤nal. Classical reality is conjugational. Our Quantonics scrihpts bæg uhs t¤ umdærstamd that whæn wæ stamd ihn quantum ræhlihty, wæ muhst takæ a largær vihew amd uhsæ n¤vel m¤dæs ¤f thinkq~king (QTMs) t¤ fath¤m this græhter amd gramdær amd m¤re Valuablæ ræhlihty. When we take our reference as actuality, and stand in actuality, and declare that is whole reality, then we are declaring ourselves "classicists." In doing so, and in order for our classical thing-king 'methods' to work, we must concomitantly deny quantum n¤nahctualihty. We must deny any 'reality' outside of our classically real and closed 'actuality.' Our classical methods then, are limited to only dealing with 'things' in actuality and classical 'interactions' among those classical 'things.' When we thingk this way quantum reality Hydes he~rself from us (See Heraclitus' "Nature likes to hide."). We cannot see he~r due our CTMs and their attendant (Pink Floyd~esque brick wall) blinders. 22Aug2012 - Doug. But whæn wæ takæ amd makæ a quantum læap ¤f faihth whæn wæ viscerahlly ch¤¤se t¤ stamd ihn b¤th n¤nahctualihty amd ahctualihty, then further ræc¤gnihzæ that quantum n¤nahctualihty amd quantum ahctualihty anihmatæly, ihncludæd~mihddle c¤mmingle (EIMA) ¤næ an¤thær then quantum ræhlihty ¤pæns he~r d¤¤rs f¤r uhs amd wælc¤mæs uhs ihnsihde. S¤, ræhdær, y¤u may fath¤m h¤w wæ nææd n¤vel tærms t¤ help uhs ¤mniscrihbæ quantum comjugati¤nal ihnterrelati¤nships am¤ng quantum n¤nahctualihty(ies) amd quantum ahctualihty(ies). Doug - 1Nov2002. Quantum comjugatæ assumæs a quantum b¤th n¤nahctual amd ahctual ræhlihty which c¤mmingles via Plahnck ratæ anihmacy. Anihmatæ quantum ræhlihty issi an abs¤lutæ flux~basæd 'ræhlihty:' c¤hesihve amd plurahl, heterogæne¤uhs, ¤pæn, quantum st¤chastihc, quantum c¤mplæmæntarihty ('n¤t,' 'n¤,' etc.), absænt any multihværsal 'comservati¤n' (¤nly comtextuahlly l¤cal apparæncy), amd s¤ ¤n... Classical 'conjugate' only applies, as a classical dichon, t¤ ¤ur quantum ræhlihty's ahctual c¤mplement. Classical 'conjugate' denies quantum ræhlihty's c¤mplæmæntarihty amd any eistænce ¤f ihts n¤nahctual c¤mplæmænt. Classical conjugates are dichons(actuality, actuality) or more specifically dichons(dyad_1, dyad_2). An important example here is classical square root (esp. as used to manipulate probability amplitudes), e.g., dichon(minus, plus). Classical square roots of, e.g., probability amplitudes are dichotomously either plus or minus. Our n¤vel tærm comjugatæ assumæs quantum ræhlihty. Ihn fahct, iht dæclaræs quantum n¤nahctualihty amd quantum ahctualihty as quantum c¤mplæmæntary comjugatæs ¤f ¤næ an¤thær. Quantum comjugatæs aræ quantons(n¤nahctualihty,ahctualihty), amd m¤re spæcihfihcahlly quantons(¤mniad1q,¤mniad2q) lattær assuming ubihquiht¤uhs c¤mmingling ¤f n¤nahctualihty wihth ahll quantum ¤mniads (i.e., quantons). We slightly alter and retain our old classical 'conjugate' friend to describe c¤mplæmæntary quantum ihnterrelati¤nships ihn ahctualihty lihkæ this: An quantum anahlogue ¤f ¤ur classical square root example above tells us that quantum squarqe r¤¤ts ¤f, e.g., pr¤babilihty amplihtudæs aræ quantonicahlly b¤th~while pluhs amd~mihnuhs, i.e., quanton(mihnuhs,pluhs). S¤ whæn wæ vihew ¤ur quantonic anihmatæd Plahnck quanton, wæ may vihew ihts is¤¤mniræcti¤nal n¤nahctual d¤tted blue is¤flux c¤mplæmænt as pr¤babilihty amplihtudæ (i.e., quantum squarqe r¤¤t), amd wæ may vihew ¤ur ahctualihzæd black~grææn 'unidirectional' c¤mplæmænt as pr¤babilihty amplihtudæ squarqed. What issi m¤st fascihnating ¤f ahll hæræ, issi h¤w this n¤nahctual quantum squarqe r¤¤t anihmatæly~ihncludæd~mihddle b¤th~while c¤affæcts amd c¤mmingles ahctualihty. By comparison actuality's classical square root is always a dichon(minus, plus); either plus or minus. Consider how Irving Stein in his The Concept of Object as the Foundation of Physics offers a unidimensional, Buridan's Ass isobidirectional (Stein calls it "nonpreferential,") random walk analogue of our quantonic squarqe r¤¤t. Using Stein's language we can say that ¤ur quantonic squarqe r¤¤t issi "n¤npræfæræntial." Omnihstihlled, ihn quantum n¤nahctualihty, squarqe r¤¤ts aræ n¤npræfæræntial! Imagine how dramatically this should alter physicists' everyday uses of usually classical mathematics in their usual classical thing-king about quantum reality (See Doug's CeodE 2012 Suggested Requirements for a Quantum Mathematics.). Note that Stein classically views his Schrödinger quantum object as excluded | middle either nonpreferential nonspace or preferential space. His model does not permit nonspace | nonactuality and space | actuality to animately commingle one another. This is a major ontological problematic for Stein's quantum model, which wæ bælihævæ ¤ur m¤dalings appr¤ach mihtigatæs signihfihcantly. When we use 'conjugate,' then we must di-stinguish whether we assume our context is classical ¤hr ¤ur comtext issi quantum . Conjugate is dichonic in context and quantonic ihn comtext. Using our space-character-copulum means classical n¤~spacæ~charahcter~c¤pulum mæans quantum text modes we can then say conjugate(a, b) is in context and conjugate(a,b) is ihn a spæcihfihc, classically shrouded, quantum l¤cal comtext. T¤ eæmplihfy h¤w b¤th quantum comjugatæ ræhlihty amd ihts m¤re classical conjugate actuality c¤mpænetratæ amd c¤mmingle ¤næ an¤thær ihn comtext, ahll¤w uhs t¤ uhsæ b¤th text amd c¤l¤r t¤ sh¤w their c¤mmingling c¤mpænetrati¤n. Læt's uhsæ ahctualihty's wavæ~partihcle c¤mplæmænt t¤ dæpihct ¤ur c¤njugate mæmæ¤tihc. Læt's uhsæ ræhlihty's n¤nahctual~ahctual c¤mplæmænt t¤ dæpihct ¤ur comjugatæ mæmæ¤tihc. Wæ'll uhsæ ¤ur stamdard quanton mæmæ¤tihc t¤ c¤mmingle~c¤mpænetratæ b¤th as a comtextual ihntuæmæ ¤f quantum ræhlihty. Læt's uhsæ red f¤r ¤ur c¤njugate (comtextual, ahctualihty~ahctualihty) mæmæ¤tihcs, blue f¤r ¤ur comjugatæ (comtextual, n¤nahctualihty~ahctualihty mæmæ¤tihcs, amd grææn f¤r ¤ur c¤mp¤sihte quanton mæmæ¤tihcs, lihkæ this: comjugate(n¤nactuality,actuality) quanton(comjugate(n¤nactuality,c¤njugate(wave,particle))) Note that our first comma, left to right, is green. Also note that our three terminal parentheses are: red, blue then green from left to right. This color mixing represents quantum ræhlihty's comtextual c¤mmingling amd c¤mpænetrati¤n. Wæ sææ that quantum n¤nahctualihty (ahll umlatched is¤flux p¤ssibilihties) amd conjugate actuality (tentatively latched flux actualities) aræ c¤mplæmæntary comjugatæs ¤f ¤næ an¤thær. As wavæs~partihcles supærp¤sæ ihn quantum ahctualihty, n¤nahctualihties~ahctualihties supærp¤sæ ihn quantum ræhlihty! More recently, during 2002, we advanced our remediation of words like 'conjugate' to offer more flexibility. We now offer four interrelating Quantonics versions of 'conjugate' and its forms (emerqs):
Wæ aræ n¤t k~n¤w~ings h¤w t¤ ihnterpret ahll p¤ssible c¤mbihnati¤ns ¤f tærms hæræ (h¤wævær, wæ made an attæmpt bæl¤w, ihn ¤ur bullæt list ¤f 24q p¤ssibilihties). Thæræ appæar t¤ bæ many, f¤r eample: conjugate, c¤njugate, comjugatæ, pluhs dihchon amd quanton, pluhs ahctual amd n¤nahctual. A good specific example we talked about above and did not show in our four-item list, is conjugate(object_1,object_2). That is, classical objects viewed conjugally, however, wihth pærhaps ihntændæd quantum ihncludæd~mihddles (This is a simple exegesis for "Murphy," "Bell Inequalities," "quantum uncertainty," etc.). A big issue, at this stage of our discussion, is that classical reality is an apparition, and we do not want to retain that apparition long term. What wæ sh¤w hæræ issi m¤re ¤f a brihdge fr¤m classical thing-king t¤ quantum thinkq~king fr¤m thingk t¤ thinkq. Our ihntuihti¤ns sahy that wæ sh¤uld n¤t put eff¤rt ihnt¤ ¤mniscrihbing ahll th¤se hærmænæutihcs whæn m¤st ¤f thæm may bæ ihnvalihd l¤ng tærm. (You may find it a worthwhile and self~heuristic help to ponder them just to practice manipulating roughly a dozen classical~quantum mixed con(m)texts. F¤r uhs, quanton(n¤nahctualihty,ahctualihty) tælls ¤ur largær quantum st¤ry, curræntly, t¤ ¤ur satisfahcti¤n. We believe, at some futurings classical machinations shall be only artefacts of many pastings.) Doug - 20Jan2004. Here's a start using our quantum
m¤dalings; assumpti¤n hærmænæutihcs:
Here is our new graphic which shows our two thogons, i.e., quanton vis~à~vis dichon, above in a 2D quantum depiction (also see our analogous Millennium III Map of Quantonic Reality): We added classical 'square root' vis~à~vis quantum squarqe r¤¤t semiotics to our graphic above. Our classical 'square root' semiotic has a 'C' attached to it where our quantum square r¤¤t semiotic has a 'Q' attached to it. Consider: using our new graph alterations, we may view pedantically how classical 'square root' issi dichotomously 'either | or' (EOOO) amd quantum squarqe r¤¤t issi quantumly "b¤th~ahll~while~amd~many" (BAWAM). Classical square root and its 'inverse' manage classical transitions of probability amplitudes in actuality's isopreferential flux (isops). Quantum squarqe r¤¤ts managæ quantum transihti¤ns ¤f æmærgænce amd ihts ihnværse fr¤m amd t¤ n¤nahctualihties' is¤n¤npræfæræntial isoflux (isons). H¤w d¤æs ræhlihty acc¤mplish these stranger værsi¤ns ¤f 'squarqe r¤¤ts?' Wæ d¤ n¤t kn¤w. D¤ug. (Sææ ¤ur n¤vel Millænnium III Quantonics English Language Remediation (QELR) t¤ assist y¤ur ihnterpretati¤ns ¤f n¤vel tærms sh¤wn hæræ.) Wæ c¤ihned comjugatæ as a n¤vel tærm since classihcal Ænglish languagæ has n¤ mæans ¤f expræssing quantum c¤mplæmæntary ahctual~n¤nahctual comjugati¤n. |
||||||||||||
Complamental Complamentalism Complamentaroceive Complamentaroception |
|
Quantonics quantum~coining of classical 'fundamental,' and 'fundamentalism.' QELRed as c¤mplæmæntal. Note that 'complemental' in quantonics' quantum comtextings QELRs as c¤mplæmæntal too. Emphasis here is on 'mental' as emersced to 'mæntal' as quantonics' quantum~stagings. Complamentalists AKA c¤mplæmæntalists use QTMs to thinkq. By comparison fundumbmentalists use CTMs to thingk. Doug - 14Dec2011. |
||||||||||||
Complementaroception Complementaroceptionings Complementaroceptive Complementaroceptives Complementaroceive |
|
Quantonic quantumesque middle~inclusion of classical, analytic, dialectical terms proprioception, interoception, and exteroception. Classically proprioception is psycho-soma-centric, interoception is psycho-centric, and exteroception is psycho-soma-external. All of these terms describe loci of perceived stimuli. In Quantonics all three terms classically establish EOOO dichotomies:
Those three bullets cover three combinations of mind (psycho) and body (soma). Notice how classical thingking methods (CTMs) tend to leave spirit (pneuma) out of 'reasoning.' They (classicists) call it "middle-exclusion." Complementaroception cures said classical mechanics thus:
Does our quantonics script add pneuma? Yæs! Our comma~n¤space is a scripting quantique for middle~inclusion, thus ihncluding spirit and pneuma which we quantonic~quantum~philosophically refer as isoflux and QVF. Our omnique coinage here arises from our research review of Lee Nichol's 2003 The Essential David Bohm. Readers may observe that Doug's efforts here anticipated (retrospectively and retrochronically) Errol E. Harris' now 40+ year old comments on classical cybernetics' mechanical 'analogues' of 'conception,' vis-à-vis complementaroception. Doug - 28Jan2007. More simply, complementaroception is how quantum~stages' quantum~straddlings 'perceive.' Doug - 1Jul2006, 28Jan2007, 23Aug2007. |
||||||||||||
Complementarospection Complementarospectionings Complementarospective Complementarospectives Complementarospect |
|
In a sensory perspective, 'ception' is afflux where 'spection' is more like efflux. Crudely, looking 'out' is 'spection,' and looking 'in' is 'ception.' However, notice that 'introspection' asks us to outwardly look into ourselves. Notice comparatively how 'inspect' asks us to 'in' 'spect' outwardly an object which is 'external.' Is English language problematic? You bet! Classically 'spect' tends, usually, to imply visual efflux, efference. Classically, 'cept' tends, usually, to imply visual afflux, afference. Doug used to use an architectural acronym, APE. For Doug, it means Afference, Process, Efference. It is a more biological way of thingking about Input, Process, Output. Complementarospection is an individual perspicacity of both self and self's quantum~complement. For more detail, see Doug's efforts on quantum~gn¤stic revelation (in a sense of revealing nature's secrets). Doug - 23Aug2007. |
||||||||||||
Complementaroversion Complementaroversionings Complementaroversive Complementaroversives Complementarovert Complementarovertive |
|
Quantonic quantumesque middle~inclusion of classical, analytic, dialectical terms propriovert (coined for local purposes), introvert, and extrovert. Carl G. Jung had some very quantum memeos in his creative repertoire. Three of them fit Quantonics' Gestalt: conscious, subconscious, and unconscious. Allow Doug to compare them to Quantonics' relevant terms:
How do we compare quantum versions of complementaroception, complementarospection, and complementaroversion? First two are about stimuli. When we talk about a complementarovert we are speaking of sensations, feelings, and self's thoughts regarding them. Classically one is either an introvert or an extrovert. This is pure classical academic-hylic-psychic dialectical either-or garbage. People who believe in what academe has shoved into their minds (dialectic) may view self as either one or other. Doug is claiming that quantum~complementarovertive views of self realise that self may be partially introverted, partially extroverted and both~and EIMA hologramic mixturings of all of them: intro, extro, and mixturings of partialings of them. Humans are not mechanical as dialectic predicates (moronic causation)! Humans are quantum~beings. Reality is quantum and it creates quantum comstitua. Classical psychology and psychiatry simply do not grasp quantum~essence yet. Evolution will take care of that problem soon. Our suffix 'vert' has several semantics two of which are valued in Doug's coining of complementarovert: vert as 'green,' and vert as 'to turn.' Former etymology is noun-adjective Old French and is still used by Anglicans CeodE 2012 describing flag colors...as an example. Latter etymology is verb Latin and in this coining is primary. It begs both William James' and Charles Saunders Peirce's quantum~pragmatism. Their abductive pragmatism asks quantumists to turn from a classical monistic root-cause-effective dialectical predication of past as probability to see reality as a quantum~real affective hologramic expectation of futurings as ensemble EWings of quantum~likelihoodings. For humanity, at least, quantum~reality abducts reserve energy from quantum~n¤nactuality...Jung's "unconscious." See Doug's From~To efforts in QuPo. Regular students of Quantonics grasp how this vert's turning is a crucial faculty of QTMs. A quantum~complementarovert has at least partially found he~r inner, and thus understands the logos, the account...and so at least minimally understands quantum~reality, Autiot, Qabala, Grail, and Gn¤sis. Said complementarovert understands quantum~reality as hyper~redemption metana (comtraction of meta and ana) classical reality. See Doug's QELR of '[Vv]alue.' Now Doug can offer fuller exegesis of his earlier coined use of 'propriovert.' A quantum~propriovert finds one's own inner con(m)sciously, subcon(m)sciously, and uncon(m)sciously via both Sheen (diffuse) and Seen (focused) views of hyle, psyche, and pneuma. Doug - 5-6Nov2012. |
||||||||||||
Comtext Comtexts Comtextua Comtextual Comtextural Multicomtexts Multicomtextual Omnicomtextual |
|
Coined quantumese for obsolete classical 'context.' Quantum comtexts have n¤n Aristotelian ihncludæd~mihddles vis~à~vis classical SOM 'contexts' whose excluded | middles are purely Aristotelian syllogistic, i.e., A is not both A and not A. As we have shown in our Aristotle Connection, quantum comtexts aræ b¤th A amd n¤t A. Quantonic~quantum comtexts may c¤mmingle, c¤mpænetratæ, amd c¤ihnsihdæ thæmselves amd ¤næ an¤thær. Iht sh¤uld bæ abumdantly clæar t¤ studænts ¤f Quantonics that quantum comtexts aræ what wæ cahll ræhlihty. They aræ ahlways quantum ihslandihc, which mæans they aræ ahlways b¤th lisr amd n¤nlisr. Comtextuahlly wæ may dæscrihbæ thæm l¤cahlly. But whæn wæ ¤ffer that partihal quantum ¤mniscrihpti¤n iht issi ahlways wihth awaræness that ræhlihty's full quantum comtext issi b¤th m¤re amd less affæcting that 'l¤cal' comtext. Ræhlihty issi quantons(n¤nahctualihty,ahctualihty). Ræhlihty issi quantons(DQ,SQ). Any quanton issi quantons(n¤nahctualihty,ahctualihty), etc. Thuhs whæn wæ quantum explihcihtly ¤mniscrihbæ a quanton ihn ihts quantum comtext, wæ aræ ¤mniscrihbing ihts ænsehmble quantum ihnterrelati¤nships wihth ihts quantum c¤mplæmæntary ¤thær quantons ihn quantum ræhlihty. Further, amd this issi a m¤st ¤mnihffihcult ashpæct ¤f umdærstamding Quantonics' værsi¤n ¤f quantum ræhlihty, th¤se ihnterrelati¤nships thæmselves aræ quantons. This quantonics mæans amd m¤dalings ¤f thinkq-king sh¤ws uhs that: S¤ whæn wæ speak ¤f an "explihciht quantum comtext" wæ aræ speaking ¤f anihmatæ EIMA quantum ihnterrelati¤nships: quantons. |
||||||||||||
Comvene Comvened Comvening Comvenes |
|
Quantonic quantumesque analogue of classical convene. Where classical excluded | middle dichons convene, Quantonic quantons comvæne. Ihncludæd~mihddle quantons c¤mmingle, c¤mpænetratæ, amd c¤ihnsihdæ, i.e. whæn wæ gather thæm t¤gether they d¤ n¤t convene, rather they comvæne. Index Also see Con- |
||||||||||||
Con- | |
This is a classical SOMitic prefix. It is one of SOM's many biformal, objective linguistic knives. In its original Latin, linguistic intent was for 'con-' and 'com-' to have similar semantics; however, it has n¤t evolved that way in English. Some do n¤t , and many uses of 'con-' as a prefix today carry an objective and divisive (binary join, excluded | middle join, Sheffer stroke, etc.) tenor. Our intent is to say that, in general, we see 'con-' as a linguistic tool of SOM to retain its objective hegemony on Western culture. We want to deny that biformal, schismatic, dichotomous hegemony by substituting 'com-' for 'con-.' This substitution offers an initially n¤nhabihtual lingual exercise for Quantonics students who want to extract themselves from SOM's logical prison. Exegesis: Quantum ræhlihty has n¤ SOM objects, i.e., iht has n¤ dichons. Quantum ræhlihty has quantons. As dichons 'con-' (i.e., separate, isolate, argue dialectically, oppose, etc.) other dichons, quantons 'com-' (i.e. ihnterpænetratæ; c¤mpænetratæ, ihncludæd~mihddle c¤mmingle, etc.) ¤thær quantons. Ihn ¤ur n¤vel Quantonics languagæ, ihn gænæral, wæ shahll subqstihtute 'com-' f¤r 'con-' amd rather than dæfihning ahll n¤vel 'com-' tærms wæ læave iht t¤ studænts ¤f Quantonics t¤ makæ apr¤pos subqstihtuti¤ns ihn their w¤rks. Eamples ¤f 'com-' tærms appæar ab¤ve. Sææ ¤ur Quantonics English Language Remediation for Millennium III. Other eamples aræ 'comsistent,' 'comtradiction,' 'comventional,' 'comtort,' etc. Alm¤st ahll 'com-' prefixes ihn English ræceihve 'c¤m-' ræmædiati¤n ihn quantum comtexts. Doug, what about concept, perspect, and conspect? Læt's uhsæ a table t¤ sh¤w h¤w Quantonics vihews th¤se tærms hærmænæutihcahlly ihn quantum ræhlihty:
Throw away SOM's knife! Do you want to be conned by SOM's Church of Reason any more? Doug. Index |