Item |
English Language Problematic |
Quantonics' Quantum
Remediation
©Quantonics, Inc., 2001-2027
|
|
'negate'
'negation'
'negative'
Etymology:
Synonyms:
|
Quantonics ch¤¤ses
t¤ c¤¤pt classical 'negation' amd
remerq
ahll quantum comtextual ¤ccurræncæs
wihth
'nægati¤n.'
In classical contexts we shall use 'negation.'
Ihn Quantonics/quantum comtexts wæ
shahll
uhsæ 'nægati¤n.'
Sihmihlarly,
nægatæ amd nægatihvæ.
Classical negation is 'a' posit, op posit, opposit,
opposite, oppositional... Di stinguish and omnistinguish much
more quantum apposite.
Where classical negation is Platonically/mathematically objectively
excluded-middle ideal (to negate an (innately)
inanimate classical object one need only place a minus
sign in front of its classical symbol),
quantum
nægati¤n issi quantonic ihncludæd-mihddle c¤mplæmæntary
(nægati¤n ¤f a (an
intrinsically
anihmatæ)
quanton issi ihts
quantum ræhl c¤mplæmænt:
ahll ¤thær
ræhlihty).
See Henri Louis Bergson's
c¤mmæntary
that
nægati¤n
is subjective.
Quantum nægati¤n issi phasemental
cancellation of entangled positive
wavæ ænærgy. Also see our QELR of phase.
See phlux.
According to Sankara's (~700-~750;
Indian philosopher) nondualism, "...reality is that
which is absent negation..."
See our 'quantum reality is positive.'
See our Bases of Judgment
and our What is Wrong
with Probability as Value?
Page top index.
|
|
'never'
Etymology:
Synonyms:
|
<nayvair>
Quantonics ch¤¤ses
t¤ c¤¤pt a classical interpretation of 'never'
amd remerq
all quantum comtextual ¤ccurrences with 'nævær.'
In classical contexts we shall use 'never.' In Quantonics/quantum
comtexts we shall use 'nævær.'
Classically there is a strong connection with both logic and
space-time when 'never' is used. For 'never's' logic connections
see 'not.'
From a classical time perspective 'never' is a unitemporal,
3-spatial, homogeneous, analytic, closed, posentropic concept
usually meaning "not ever."
Classical 'ever' usually elicits a sense of one, monolithic 'forever,'
and a concomitant notion of one classical infinity. From this
some of us surmise that classical 'reality' is a kind of closed
and infinite plenum of three space riding an infinite temporal
continuum. Bergson calls it a "spatial extensity."
William James speaks about it in similar ways, mostly finding
what is problematic with classical philosopher's views of classical
reality.
Quantum 'næværs' are c¤mplements ¤f
quantum 'æværs,' e.g., quanton(næværs,æværs).
Quantonically 'næværs' and 'æværs'
are ¤mni-paratehmp¤ral, heter¤gene¤us,
quantum c¤mplementary, ¤pen, tri-entr¤pic
(derivative ¤f quantum quatrot¤m¤us c¤hesi¤n,
i.e., is¤-, c¤-, dec¤-, and mixed/partial)
memes. In quantum reality there are many 'næværs.'
As d¤ quantum 'æværs' they c¤mmingle
tri-entr¤pically and quatra-c¤hesively.
Classically one may say that some "happening" 'never'
"occurs." To a classical mind this means "absolutely
never." We may look at this as "Those things which
classically never happen are outside SOM's
mythos, outside SOM's box, outside
its Church of Reason."
In quantum realities' emersos
n¤ quanton is incapable ¤f happening, in general.
T¤ say that classically, we say, "All things
are possible." Fr¤m within a select quantum comtext
it may be undesirable f¤r certain ensehmbles' affects t¤ happen.
Then l¤cally we can say th¤se undesirables 'nævær'
happen. H¤wever, ¤ur quantum 'nævær'
is 'nævær' classically abs¤lute. Why?
See ever.
Page top index.
|
|
'new'
'novel'
Etymology:
Synonyms:
|
Quantonics ch¤¤ses
t¤ c¤¤pt classical 'new' and 'novel,' replacing
all quantum comtextual ¤ccurrences with 'n¤vel.'
In classical contexts we shall use 'new' or 'novel.' In Quantonics/quantum
comtexts we shall use 'n¤vel,' amd
cease using 'new' and 'novel,' except when qu¤ted ¤ut
¤f comtexts.
We shall use single qu¤tes when referring these terms,
respectively, "¤ut ¤f con/comtexts."
Where classical reality is an excluded-middle lisr
objective dichonic
reality quantum reality is many included-middle c¤mplementary
quantonic
realities.
Where classical, existing objects may be endlessly rearranged
and manufactured into new state-ic systems, quantum emergent
quantons endlessly c¤mmingle, compenetrate amd
animately fuse amd emerscenture
int¤ n¤vel dynamic amd
ev¤lute systems.
Page top index.
|
|
'no'
Etymology:
Synonyms:
|
See not. In quantum comtexts, use 'n¤.'
Call it "n¤-kah."
See yes.
Page top index.
|
|
'non'
Etymology:
Synonyms:
|
See not. In quantum comtexts, use 'n¤n.'
Call it "n¤n-kah."
Page top index.
|
|
'nonactual'
Etymology:
Synonyms:
|
: Nonactual
Criterion |
Dialectical Assessment |
Ideal Classical Reality |
stability |
Classically nonactuality exists not |
Classical actuality is stable. Classical actuality
is stoppable. |
independence |
Classically nonactuality exists not |
Objects in classical reality are independent of one
another. |
excluded-middle |
Classically nonactuality exists not |
No object in classical reality can be both itself and
not itself. |
EOOOness |
Classically nonactuality exists not |
Classical predicate logic is absolutely dialectical. |
H5Wness |
Classically nonactuality exists not |
H5W are all always lisr, stoppable, stable, analytic,
etc. |
lisrability |
Classically nonactuality exists not |
Objects are ideally, classically lisr. Objects are
analytic. |
causation |
Classically nonactuality exists not |
Spatial motion is change. All classical motion is caused. |
certainty |
Classically nonactuality exists not |
All classical causation is determinately 1-1 correspondent. |
EEMDivity |
Classically nonactuality exists not |
Due independence & excluded-middle objects are
everywhere-dissociative. |
observation |
Classically nonactuality exists not |
Classical objects may be unilaterally observed, while
undisturbed. |
:
N¤nahctual,
n¤nahctuals, n¤nahctualing, n¤nahctualings,
etc.
Criterion |
Vis-à-vis Assessment |
anihmacy
|
Quantum n¤nahctualihty issi abs¤lutæly anihmatæ is¤flux.
|
c¤mplæmæntarihty
|
N¤nahctualihty c¤mplæmænts ahll ahctualihty. Ræhlihty issi a quanton(n¤nahctualihty,ahctualihty).
|
ihncludæd~mihddlings
|
Quantum n¤nahctualihty mædiatæs ahll
ahctualihty
as ræhlihty's
ihncludæd~mihddle.
|
BAWAMings |
N¤nahctualihty pr¤vihdæs~mædiatæs
quantum c¤herænce~c¤mpænetrati¤n
¤f~f¤r ahll ahctualihty.
|
H5Wings |
N¤nahctualihty issi p¤tæntia f¤r
ahll ahctual
h¤wings, whyings,
whænings, whereings,
whatings, wh¤ings
|
lisrings |
Quantum n¤nahctualihty issi a Dirac sea ¤f is¤flux
ihn which ahll lisr~n¤nlisr
quantum ihslands 'float.'
|
affæctati¤nings
|
N¤nahctualihty issi is¤~qualihtatihvæ, ~affæctihve,
~subqjæctihvæ,
~sælf~referænt, ~frahctal,
~s¤phist, etc.
|
umcærtainty
|
Quantum umcærtainty issi
ihnterrelati¤nshipings
quantons(n¤nahctualihty,ahctualihty).
|
EIMAivityings |
N¤nahctualihty issi
is¤h¤l¤graphic
amd thuhs æværywhere~ihncludæd~mihddle~ass¤ciatihve.
|
c¤¤bsfæcti¤n
|
N¤nahctualihty pr¤vihdæs
amd mædiatæs mæans f¤r ahll
quantons t¤ ¤bsfæct p¤tæntiahlly ahll
quantons.
|
In classical reality, nonactuality does not
exist. See our critical
review of EPR
to grasp how this belief literally destroyed Classical Thing-king
Methods of Einstein, Podolsky, and Rosen. Look there for occurrence
of quanton(nonactual,actual) which may appear QELRed as
quanton(n¤nahctual, ahctual).
Ihn quantum ræhlihty,
n¤nahctualihty
e ists
amd
issi quantum ræhl. Iht issi f¤nt amd grail ¤f
ahll cræati¤n amd ¤mniscræati¤n.
Quantons æmærgæ fr¤m n¤nahctualihty
via quantum squarqe æmærgænce pr¤cæssings.
E.g., this issi what
QCD
issi attæmpting t¤ explain n¤w
via mæmæs ¤f
Higgs, W, and
Z
b¤s¤ns.
Also
see QCD. See our
2005 QELR of rectification.
QCD's fermi¤nihc
quark ¤nt¤l¤gy f¤r æmærgænce
issi
quanton(TBCS,UD).
Quarks TBCS
'¤ccur'
ihn quantum n¤nahctualihty. Quarks UD 'appæar' ihn quantum ahctualihty. Triplæt c¤d¤ns
¤f U amd D quarks æmærq fermi¤nihc neutrons amd pr¤t¤ns
ihn ahctualihty.
Quantons ihmmærse~dæmærgæ
t¤ n¤nahctualihty via quantum squarqe ~r¤¤tings
ihmmærgænce pr¤cæssings.
E.g., black h¤les may bæ
¤næ natural mæans ¤f d¤ing
this.
N¤nahctualihty
has many
classical
and
n¤nclassihcal
mætaph¤rs ¤f
which
wæ shahll
list a fæw hæræ:
- conceptually unknown
- the unknown
- DQ (Pirsig; see Lila)
- durational heterogeneity (Bergson)
- enfolded (David Bohm)
- hiding ("Nature loves to hide." Heraclitus)
- implicate (David Bohm)
- negentropy (Schrödinger; see Mae-wan
Ho and Schrödinger, by Moore, CUP}
- nonpreference (Stein, Irving)
- nonspace (Stein,
Irving)
- perfect [absolutely isoflux animate] vacuum (Dirac; AKA |Q>;
Dirac thought 'the' quantum vacuum had to be classically 'stationary;'
it is only if h-bar is zero (which disables quantum reality and
enables classical reality)! JKL);
what is most interesting here is that Dirac knew about this...;
see Dirac's The principles of Quantum Mechanics, Chapter
XII, Sec. 'Interpretation.' See our Recommended Reading:
Dirac.)
- possibilities
- pure state
- quantum conjugate
(Renselle)
- quantum isoflux
(Renselle)
- quantum potentia (David Bohm)
- silence (Renée Weber)
- superposition (a possibly confusing term)
- unactualized reality
- undifferentiated aesthetic continuum (Northrop)
- undifferentiated reality
- unmeasured phenomenal objects (Pirsig on Bohr in SODV)
- unspecifiable manifestations (Polyani, esp. see his The Study of Man)
- free energy
- vacuum space
- VES (vacuum energy space)
- QVE (quantum vacuum energy)
- QVF (quantum vacuum flux)
- ZPE (zero point energy; see Dirac, et al.)
Quantum n¤nahctualihty ænables ahll
¤f ræhlihty's
(ræhlihties')
"mihraclæs."
Classical
Thingking Methods literally deny all of reality's miracles by
denying any existence of quantum nonactuality. (One way classical
scientists "turn off"
quantum n¤nahctualihty
is by zeroing h-bar. Another is EPR where
Einstein and his pals used classical dialectical language to
"logically and reasonably" deny
n¤nahctualihty,
to their enormous detriment.)
If you want your life to become miraculous, if you want to
tap into reserve energy
(technically this is called "endergonicity"), you must
commence now believing
ihn
quantum n¤nahctualihty.
You can easily do this by realizing on your quantum
stage that
quantum_reality
quanton(n¤nahctualihty,ahctualihty).
Doug - 31Jul2004.
See our How to Become
a Student of Quantonics, Bases
of Judgment, What
is Wrong with Probability as Value, hologram,
Measurement.
Page top index.
|
|
'nonlocal'
Etymology:
Synonyms:
|
In classical reality, nonlocality does not
exist.
In quantum~reality n¤nlocality is quantum~locality's
quantum~c¤mplæmænt.
Let's assume you are l¤cal in a quantum~sense. Compare
you to an island in an ocean of many islands.
All those other islands are your quantum~actual quantum~c¤mplæmænt.
But so is ocean. So is earth. So is rest of solar system, etc.
Your quantum~l¤cality, ad
oculos, is partial.
But in quantum~reality you also have quantum vacuum flux (QVF)
AKA isoflux AKA n¤nactuality as your is¤c¤mplæmænt
too!
In Quantonics script, you issi quanton(n¤nactuality,quanton(your_actuality_complement,you)).
You aræ quantum~n¤nl¤cal all 'other' of your
quantum~c¤mplæmænt and your quantum~c¤mplæmænt
issi quantum~n¤nl¤cal you.
See local.
Page top index.
|
|
'none'
Etymology:
Synonyms:
|
See not. In quantum comtexts, use 'n¤ne.'
Call it "n¤ne-kah."
Page top index.
|
|
'not'
Etymology:
Synonyms:
|
Quantonics ch¤¤ses
t¤ c¤¤pt classical objective 'not' amd
remerq all
quantum comtextual ¤ccurrences with 'n¤t.' Call
it "n¤t-kah."
In classical contexts we shall use 'not.' In Quantonics/quantum
comtexts we shall use 'n¤t.'
We shall use single qu¤tes when referring these terms,
respectively, "¤ut ¤f con/comtexts."
Where classical reality is a homogeneous, infinitely divisible,
classically reducible, objective reality quantum reality
is many st¤chastic, qualitative, affects-¤utc¤mes
realities.
Where classical reality is either/or, quantum reality is both-all/amd-many.
When we classically say, "either this or that," we
imply 'not' that. When we quantumly say, "b¤th-all/amd-many
th¤se," we infer (any) ¤ne ¤f th¤se
is 'n¤t' its c¤mplement ¤f ¤ther
th¤ses amd p¤tentially all ¤ther reality.
On 16Jul2001, we decided to set a new Quantonic acronym for "b¤th-all/amd-many"
which henceforth shall be 'BAAM.' T¤ remember this acr¤nym,
view it as a quantum c¤¤pti¤n ¤f
classical 'either/or.' Where quantons are BAAM, dichons are either/or.
See our Quantonics acronyms.
See 'Not.'
Quantum reality denies classical reality's presumption of objective
negation. In place ¤f classical 'negation' we substitute
quantum c¤mplementarity.
See 'complement.'
See Henri Louis Bergson on Negation
is Subjective. Readers sh¤uld comsider quantum implicati¤ns
f¤r ¤ther classical 'negation' terms: contradiction
(e.g., comtradiction),
false (see truth),
falsifiability (see negate), versus (see
dichon), opposite
(see opposite),
supplement, closed, empty (see empty),
converse (e.g., comverse), etc.
Page top index.
|
|
'novel'
Etymology:
Synonyms:
|
See new. In quantum comtexts, use 'n¤vel.'
Page top index.
|
|
'number'
Etymology:
Synonyms:
|
: Number
:
N¤mbær
Quantonics ch¤¤ses
t¤ c¤¤pt
a
classical interpretation of 'number'
amd
remerq
ahll quantum comtextual ¤ccurræncæs
wihth
'n¤mbær.'
In classical contexts we shall use 'number.'
Ihn Quantonics/quantum comtexts wæ
shahll
uhsæ 'n¤mbær.'
This remediation arises from our review of Henri Louis Bergson's
Time and Free Will. Look at TaFW's
Index page, Index
N, for number.
Wæ ræcæntly established spæcihfihc quantum mæmæ¤tihc f¤nts f¤r select charahcters
ihn
'number,'
lihkæ this:
n¤mbær. Wæ have
dæcihdæd t¤ ræplace
'number'
wihth that n¤vel,
m¤re quantum anahlogue.
'Number'
has too many classical English problematics to allow its continued
uhsæ ihn a m¤re quantum, ræmædiatæd
languagæ.
QELR
updates on 25Mar2004 - Doug.
Classical 'number' offers us multiple problematics. See our
Bergson reference above. Essentially those problematics distill
to these classical concepts:
- A classical concept of
'number' assumes:
- reality is stable
- 'number' instances are single-valued and intentionally stable/constant
- objects ('numbers') in reality are independent of one another
- numbers in reality are synthetic/manufacturable/reproducible
- reality is stoppable ('number' is a state-ic
assessment of a static objective property)
- 'numbers' elicit classical space concepts
and space elicits classical 'number' concepts
(See Bergson.)
- 'number' represents a classical quantity
- 'number' is a classical quantitative concept
- concept 'numberx'
opposes any other concept
'numbery'
- Example?
- classically 3
2
- quantumly 3q issi 2q+1q
(quantum partial equality; 2q is in 3q
and 3 qissi in 2q+1q)
- 'number' as a classical quantitative concept
drives out any notion of a qualitative reality ("subjective
reality does not classically 'exist'")
- concept 'number' opposes
nature
- a classical concept of
'number' adheres Aristotle's
syllogisms:
- specific_number = specific_number ('law' of identity)
- s_n is either s_n or not s_n ('law' of contradiction)
- s_n is not both s_n and not s_n ('law' of excluded-middle)
- classicists use 'number' to objectively and analytically
describe reality
- analytic calculus
- analytic differentiation (i.e., posentropic-destruction
of symbolic entropy via dialectical-bivalent self-other-referent
"running on tautological-mechanical-formal-objective automatic"
comparison-disassembly[undoing]-automata)
- analytic integration (i.e., negentropic-production
of symbolic entropy via dialectical-bivalent self-other-referent
"running on tautological-mechanical-formal-objective automatic"
comparison-assembly[doing]-automata)
- etc.
- as an applied classical concept,
'number' is necessarily a finite precision tool; no classical
'number' is capable of representing, practically, arbitrary real
and unlimited precision
- 'number' zero is a classically incoherent concept
- 'number' one is a classically incoherent concept
- division by zero is a classically incoherent concept
- modulo one induction (Peano's axiom) is a classically incoherent
iterative manufacturing concept
- classical induction's kin determinism and cause-effect are
classically incoherent concepts
- this list is almost endless...
- etc.
As students of Quantonics, you know that a classical concept of 'number' described by
our list of classical 'number' features above denies
quantum reality!
Quantum ræhlihty issi qualihtatihvæ, n¤nanahlytihc,
anihmatæ~ihnstable,
æmærgænt, (amd thuhs ¤nly~)
emerscenturable,
quantum_umcærtain
| classically_indeterminate,
ihncludæd-mihddle,
c¤mplementary,
phasihc/n¤nn¤mærihc,
etc.
Classical 'number' is incapable of representing quantum
ræhlihty!
T¤
e æmplihfy
uhsæ ¤f ¤ur n¤vel
quantum n¤mbær, læt's try this:
any classical prime is a number;
any
quantum
primæ
issi a n¤mbær.
All
classical numbers are inanimate, objective, excluded-middle monads
whose interactions are dichonic:
i.e, e.g, monad_1 = difference_dichon(n+1, n).
Ahll quantum
n¤mbærs aræ anihmatæ,
c¤mplæmæntary, ihncludæd-mihddle ¤mniads that
aræ
quantonic
interrelationships
quantum n¤mbærs
aræ quantons:
i.e., e.g., quantum_12y-1x quanton(quantum_2y,quantum_1x).
Notice: where classical numbers are Peano, et al.,
axiomatically 'context free,'
quantum n¤mbærs
aræ comtext explihciht (n¤ tw¤ quantum n¤mbærs
may ævær bæ 'ihdæntihcal' t¤ ¤næ an¤thær).
To grasp
essence of classical numeric 'context freeness' vis-à-vis
quantum n¤mærihc
comtext explihcihtness,
sææ ¤ur
One
is the [L]oneliest Number.
Comsihdær h¤w
classicists dutifully and dubiously use 'quantum
uncertainty' as a 'single-valued' proxy for their absence of
'know-ledge' about explicit
quantum comtext!
Sææ ¤ur
ensehmble version of classicists' quantum
uncertainty.
In quantum reality that which must be counted does not adhere
classical analytic rules. A great example is bosons. Bosons may
be represented by classical integers, but those integers are
classically non analytic. Why? Bosons' middles are quantum included.
Indeed at any temperature bosons' wholes are included and at-near
'absolute zero temperature' and under select other affectationings
fermionic bosons (AKA BECs) wholes may be included! So a '9'
as a classical notion issi n¤t a 9q mæmæ¤.
A classical '9' is integer divisible. A quantum 9q
issi
classically
ihndihvisible.
9q
issi
a
quantum (w)holism!
Similarly, classical reality is substantial, material, objective.
Quantumly we are speaking of fermions. Where bosons (have spins
which) may be counted 0, 1, 2, ..., N, fermions' (have spins
which) may only be counted 1/2, 3/2, 5/2, ..., oddN/2. Worse,
not all odd halves are fermions (see Riemann
Hypothesis; 1/2 critical line)! And even more complicating,
deuces (evenNs) of fermions which contrarotate (e.g., Cooper
pairs) act like bosons.
Quantum ræhlihty's mihddle
issi ihncludæd, æværywhere~ass¤ciatihve,
amd anihmatæ.
That
changes all classical mathematical, numeric notions of addition,
subtraction, multiplication, division, integration, differentiation,
counting, and so on...
Here we see unambiguously that classical number theory simply
does
n¤t w¤rk ihn
quantum ræhlihty!
We have an imperative and imminently~immediately~required
need for a new
quantum mathematics! Doug - 9Sep2012.
For similar exemplars and comparisons see Henri Louis Bergson's
Time and Free Will, Topic 16, pp. 76-77.
Read both Bergson's text and our side-by-side commentary on BECs.

Page top index.
|
|
'numeric'
Etymology:
Synonyms:
|
See number.
: Numeric
:
N¤mærihc
Classical: 'numeric.'
Quantum: 'n¤mæric.'
Page top index.
|
©Quantonics, Inc., 2001-2027 |