Older

Newer

Our update boxes' age code spectrum.

David Bohm's vision of quantum reality as
a
"holomovement"
[quanton(implicate_order,explicate_order) quanton(n¤nahctualihty,ahctualihty)]
is
an unbelievably co~analogous and co~supporting metaphor
of
Quantonics.

Quantonics' version of Reserve Energy, we can now say, "is is¤h¤l¤graphihc!"

	—
	—

This holographic mind (quantum stage) update relevant to quantum memeos of "How to Tap Into Reserve Energy," brought to you by Quantonics, Inc. Work product and intellectual property produced by Doug Renselle - 13-14Jan2006.

One of Pietsch's major emphases in Shufflebrain aligns Bohm and Pribram's thesis: quantum stage mind is (a powerful analogue of what we call) "holographic." Our quantum stages exhibit those bullets we listed above! Many theoreticians believe that metaphorical similarities twixt holograms and mind are evidence of mind as holographic! In Quantonics, after years of study and years of developing our own quantum~language, ~metaphysics, ~philosophy, ~science, and ~coquecigrues, "We agree!" We attempt to reemphasize an issue shown in our graphic above which may n¤t be as obvious to you as we want: Our spectrum shows that Human Knowable Quantum~Actuality is less than one part in 1022 of all actuality! Another way of saying that is if we assume our ability to see reality is as thick as a credit card slipped under bottom of a quantum~holographic book case, how tall would book case have to be? Discounting print imprints a bare credit card is 789 microns thick. One micron is a millionth of a meter. So our bookcase would have to be roughly 1018 meters, and analogously 1015 kilometers high! Our analogy says that we can 'see' 789 microns of quantum~holographic~reality and we cann¤t 'see' remaining 1000,000,000,000,000,000 meters of it Of course this 'ratio' shares limitations already observed above in our graphics' text. Why can we 'see' our quantum~holographic~credit~card but we cann¤t 'see' our quantum~holographic bookcase? Pietsch's third bullet in our graphic's text! So, dear student, O'great adept one (O'gadon), our credit card is quantum~holographically~'see'able~actuality while our bookcase and all quantum n¤nactuality represent quantum~holographically~un'see'able~n¤nactual "Reserve Energy." Our quantum stages, you may surmise, have ample room to naturally select, choose, and grow, and Wow! isn't that a profound understatement? Too, our pix and text offer energy analogies which make oil seem like a drop in unlimited omniverses... You young folk have almost unlimited opportunities here! Pursue them! First to usher RE replacements for oil will make Google look like "An tumescent ant lying on its back on a barge floating down Mississippi River yelling, 'Raise the drawbridge~'" Really! You are more quantum~subject than you are classical object! Dig into, compenetrate, interfuse, coinside your own subjectivity: that issi whæræ ræhl quantum~valuæ ræsihdæs! (Read first four chapters of Women's Ways of Knowing[s]. Quantumly, almost As Good as It Gets.) Whatings youings are needings to k~nowings, understandings, and hermeneutings (and much of your quantum~subconscious) lies in RE too! Get with it!!! How? Move your quantum sensory bandwidth (QSB) center frequency to higher quantum flux in our spectrum and increase your QSB. One really simple way to do this is to stop viewing reality classically as one global context. Commence viewing reality as massively plural and parallel comtexts. Another way is similar John Nash's Integers as Variables. Try it. You'll like it! Many is intrinsically higher flux than one. Many implies flux is crux. One implies stux: at your lowest QSB center 'frequency." Frequency implies quantum ensemble heterogeneity: quantum pluralism, quantum flux, quantum essence. So start nowings! Believe ihn iht! NOW!!! Doug - 14Jan2006.

Heads up: this one shakes classical science's foundations! "But Punky had made my structuralist partisanship vulnerable to the overwhelming case my own data had produced in support of hologramic theory. He had humbled me, Punky had. My narrow notions no longer seemed appropriate to the situation. I think I had begun to appreciate for the first time what science might be but seldom is in our day: the privilege of seeing Nature's secrets unfold, rather than an exercise in right and wrong." Paul Pietsch, beginning of Chapter six, p. 103, Shufflebrain, HMCO, 1981. Our underline. Pietsch's work simply blows away classical science's foundations, similarly, as we have been showing you for nearly a decade now. It blows classical dialectic to hell. How? It destroys classical logical notions of two-valuedness which are core of dialectic logic. See our comments at Jammer's Quantum Logic on two-valuedness. Classically, dialectical two-valuedness is the basis of rejection of reality as holographic and the basis of rejection of reality as quantum. Quantum sophism demands many~valuedness, all of which is up to Planck rate animate! Punky is a salamander with a hybrid brain. Salamanders, frogs, etc. have a nervous system with a brain, medula, and brainstem (spinal connection) together in that order. Pietsch worried whether brain or medula was seat of an amphibian's feeding 'control.' His attempt was to impugn hologramic theory (essentially a living, quantum~everywhere~included~middle~associativity; a system of Quantonic phase~encoding quantum interrelationshipings) as a quasi last step in a long series of experiments he describes in Chapter five. Read details of this quasi last experiment on page 96. In this quasi last experiment he put a larval brain from a leopard frog in place of an adult salamander (retaining salamander's medula and stem). Result? Punky. A cool dude. But why a larval frog brain from a leopard frog. Leopard frogs' are carnivores, but their larva are vegetarians. Salamander larva and adults are carnivores. Pietsch is testing whether a salamander can become a non carnivore with a larval leopard frog brain transplant! Punky actively investigated prey for 64 days, but he never ate one!!! Pietsch's whole view of science and reality changed...as he describes at top of this update. Doug - 26Jan2006.

Many of you have written to us or searched our Quantonics web site looking for answers to a question, "How can I (learn to) tap into Professor William James' and Boris Sidis' 'Reserve Energy?'"

Most of us, as carefully tutored and trained classicists, have lost our awarenesses of our own intuitive and intrinsic abilities to tap reserve energy. As an analogy, we offer Henri Louis Bergson's own comments on classical science's loss of its ability to tap into reserve energy, i.e., science's loss of its own "metaphysical intuition[s]." We and classical sciences, for several millennia now, have been carefully taught by 'the academy' that we are classically not quantum beings. Pirsig describes this loss (academically trained elimination) of 'reserve energy' as Exclusive Static Quality (ESQ), or Static Quality (SQ) which has lost (denied, or eliminated as "subjective nonsense") its naturally compenetrating Dynamic Quality (DQ). More simply, we can just say, "Reality which has lost its Quality becomes exclusively static." 'The academy' accomplishes this using exclusive-middles, what we call in Quantonics "SOM walls." Those walls keep us boxed up, and in a vicious loop. We previously experienced a superb dialogue with Jon which covers this issue as exclusive virtue (ESQ) vis-à-vis dynamic virtue or aretê (i.e., quanton(DQ,SQ)). In that dialogue Pirsig teaches us how to not only tap reserve energy but to move into it, "You free yourself from static patterns by putting them to sleep" When we do not put all our static patterns to sleep we commingle/tap reserve energy.

Putting some of our static patterns to sleep (assuming we usually possess predominately static patterns) is How to Tap Into Reserve Energy.

In our own Quantonics qualogos, language, hermeneutics, and semiotics, we do this by a gradual process of ceasing our exclusive objectivity and commencing a new way of thinking of ourselves and all reality as quantons.

We do not have a step by step answer to your question, however, we can offer you some analogues of ways you may develop your quantum stages to enable your own capabilities to 'tap into reserve energy.'

Here is a list of Quantonics' analogues we can exploit — we must always/continuously be teaching our quantum stages to be learning to:

• superpose 'reserve energy' - two groups of key disablers and one group of key enablers:
  • as a classical, SOMite, 'thingker' it is impossible for you to superpose 'reserve energy' because of your key disablers
    • see one of our descriptions of this key disabler process in our comments on
      page 48 of Bergson's Creative Evolution, topic 9
    • see our how Classicists Learn to Run on Automatic this is perhaps a most key disabler!
  • as a cultural relativist, CRite, essentially thing-king like many classicists, using your key disablers, it is impossible to for you do this
  • as a quantum, MoQite thinker, possibilities of accomplishing this emerge gradually, as you habituate your n¤vel key-enabling philosophy
  • to assist interested Metaphites we offer an easy lingual, "as used," comparison of SOM, CR, and MoQ/quantum philosophies' 'reserve energy' superposition capabilities:
    • HtTIRE HotMeme™ Key SOM Disabler™ - SOM philosophy:

• HtTIRE HotMeme™ Key CR Disabler™ - CR philosophy:

• HtTIRE HotMeme™ Key Quantonic Enabler™ - MoQ/Quantum/Quantonic philosophy
  (right most column depicts quantum/Quantonic interrelati¤nshipings and quantum descriptions of them):

Under our first key enabler item above students of Quantonics may well intuit how:

• Ensehmbles of always changing quantons, are
• selecting/choosing among ensehmbles, of
• always changing preconditions, thus
• emerging (verb) n¤vel ensehmbles of nextings' outcomings! (also consider demerging aspectings of Quantonics' key enabler ontology)
  
  (try substituting 'ensehmblings' for 'ensehmbles,' 'preconditionings' for 'preconditions,' 'selectings' for 'selecting,' etc.)

Read those four fragments again. Now think about you. Is that what your ensehmblings do? (Have you considered what quantons are composing/emerging your ensehmblings? We are more like soundings of music than we are like notes on a score.) Think about viruses, worms, DNA (for example haploidal DNA, DNA at conception, and cellular DNA during mitosis and meiosis), bubbling streams, galaxies, super novae, black holes, air turbulence, leaves on a tree in a swift breeze, gold isotopes smashing into each other in Long Island's "reserve energy tapping" RHIC, frost on a window pane, ocean waves, laser photon trajectories, thrown baseballs, etc.

Now to really test your sensibilities, consider Benoit Mandelbrot's classical concept of a fractal nature. Are Mandelbrot's fractals SOM, CR, or MoQ fractals? Was Mandelbrot using CTMs or QTMs when he invented fractals? What do we need to do to his concept of fractals to Quantonics "key enable" them? Can you see that his fractals are classically causal? Juxtapose nature's quantum affective fractals to Mandelbrot's classically 'effective' fractals. Make a list of comparisons twixt them. Recently we did a similar exercise on Hamilton's hypercomplex quaternion. Take a look at that for a procedural example on your juxtaposition effort. Doug - 28Feb2003.

Using your newly acquired QTMs, ascend another step up. What about John von Neumann's digital computer architecture (which we are still using today -- ugh!)? What do we have to do to von Neumann's computer architecture to: Quantonics "key enable" it?

Are you NOW beginning to grasp what we mean when we say, "This is a superb way to learn How To Tap Into Reserve Energy?"

Aside:

Another easy way to grasp an essential of How to Tap Into Reserve Energy is to study our Quantum Sensory Bandwidth Perspicacities and Perspicuities page. A metaphor of what we mean by Tapping Into Reserve Energy is what happens to you when you intentionally move your husb up quantum reality's sensory spectrum. Tapping Into Reserve Energy is a metaphor for increasing your sensory spectrum bandwidth.

It may be worth your while to peruse some legacy material from Quantonics which is not actively linked:

Doug's DQ Pinned-Down Post to Quanto (Read this dialog carefully; Pay close attention to our Eugen Herrigel quotes where he is speaking about what happens when we Tap Into Reserve Energy.)

End aside.

Compare our key enabler list to SOM's single event determinism (one inanimate 'cause' has one inanimate 'effect,') and CR's naïve plural version of it. Without QTMs to assist/enable your own intrinsic quantum awarenesses of quantum superpositions, you are essentially (classically) denied access to reserve energy! Without QTMs (or some quantum equivalent) your CTMs keep you in SOM's box, disabling your personal access to reserve energy.

• understand quantum "superposition's" analogues:
  • interpenetration (Fritjof Capra)
  • "think being directly," or "thibedir," (Henri Louis Bergson); also see "thibedir."
  • compenetration (William James)
  • intellectual sympathy (Henri Louis Bergson)
  • dwell[ing] [co]within (Michael Polanyi; our brackets)
  • "direct experience" (Robert M. Pirsig)
  • co-inside-nce (Doug Renselle)
  • etc.
• recognize "reserve energy's" own quantum real analogues:
  • Pirsig's DQ (Dynamic Quality)
  • quantum flux
  • quantum vacuum energy
  • Irving Stein's nonspace
• pursue quantum epiphanies, e.g.,:
  • quantum reality is (in general) undecided (quantum uncertain) about what(s) happen(s) next(s); we qualitatively assist reality's(ies') choices; we are part of (coinside) reality; we compenetrate 'reserve energy;' it is there for us to 'use;' we need only learn how
  • quantum reality is multiversally co-aware amd intrinsically coobsfective
  • quantum reality's middle is included (A is BAWAM A amd n¤t A (stated classically: A is both A and not A); also see not)
  • quantum reality's paralogic is coherence of both-all/while/and-many (BAWAM, where BAWAM is a quanton)
  • quantum reality is paralogically islandic:
    • BAWAM(n¤ncommutative,commutative)
    • BAWAM(n¤ndistributive,distributive)
    • BAWAM(n¤nfactorable,factorable)
    • BAWAM(n¤nlocal,local)
    • BAWAM(n¤nlocalable,localable)
    • BAWAM(n¤nisolate,isolate)
    • BAWAM(n¤nisolable,isolable)
    • BAWAM(n¤nseparate,separate)
    • BAWAM(n¤nseparable,separable)
    • BAWAM(n¤nreduced,reduced)
    • BAWAM(n¤nreducible,reducible)
    • BAWAM(uncertain,certain)
    • BAWAM(comtrafactual_definite,definite)
    • BAWAM(heterogeneous,homogeneous)
    • BAWAM(pluralistic,monistic)
    • etc.
• and so on...

Assuming you are a well-indoctrinated SOMite, you cannot take a pill (yet) to commence regular access to 'reserve energy.' You cannot just show or simply teach someone how to do it. It is a capability which (at this juncture) may only be developed via individual efforts.

Consider though, whether a SOMite, some other classical persuasion, or any other persuasion — you are a quantum being. As such, you possess intrinsic quantum capabilities to do what we suggest above. You just have to learn how to use those intrinsic capabilities.

Also consider that, as a quantum being, you (and all of reality) are already tapping reserve energy! Reality's emergence of n¤vel actuality is a process of tapping reserve energy. See our Pirsigean MoQ I Reality Loop version of this, and our quantum MoQ II Reality Loop version. Both of these show reality tapping into reserve energy as a process of emergence. They depict reserve energy as, first, "the unknown," and, second, as "quantum vacuum energy space." Physicists have shown that VES has an energy density of approximately 10⁹³ grams per cubic centimeter! That is an astounding energy density! In Quantonics we call this "isoflux." It is reality's source. It is "reserve energy." As an exercise, calculate classicists' assumed energy density of our uni-verse! Currently those classicists assume 10⁸⁰ atoms in their classical version uni-verse. Reserve energy contains enough energy in one cubic centimeter of 'space' to create ~10⁴¹ classical universes!

Here is a remediated (thelogos, some bracketed comments, exponentiation, some grammar, et al.) quote from our January, 1999 Quantonics News:

"Vacuum energy is important. To a SOM [classical] mind it is IMPOSSIBLE. Vacuum energy [AKA reserve energy] is dense! It amounts to 1093 grams per cubic centimeter of energy. We have told you this before elsewhere on this site, but it bears repeating. That is enough energy to reproduce, in one cubic centimeter, our known universe an incredible number of times. Assume our known universe consists of 1080 atoms. Assume a fat atom has a median count of 58 nucleons (we acknowledge this is probably too big). Then our fat atom would have a mass of 10-28 grams. We can estimate a mass-energy of our known universe then as a product of 1080 and 10-28. Our known universe has an estimated mass-energy of 1052 grams. Note that number, although huge, is much smaller than VES' energy density! How many of our universes does one cubic centimeter of VES represent? Amazingly, approximately 1041! "Did you get that? Did you get that? Did you get that? "There is enough energy in one cubic centimeter of VES to create 100000000000000000000000000000000000000000 of our universes!"

OK Doug, "What does that mean for me as a human being?" It means that whenever you have a n¤vel idea or alter a meme in a n¤vel way, you are tapping reserve energy! You are already doing it! But, in Quantonics, we show vividly that your (academically, very carefully propagandized and programmed) classical mind (assuming you are of Western culture) prevents you from understanding that this is what happens. Classicists simply deny presence of any reserve energy, and thus deny themselves any opportunities to benefit from it. And reader, this is why we tell you over and over and over, "Dump SOM's thing-king, and adopt MoQ and quantonic/quantum modes of think-king!" When you adopt quantonic/quantum modes of thinking, you shall accept an epiphany that quantum n¤nactuality, AKA "reserve energy," is real. Once you do that, you will use reserve energy, and know that you are using it, and realize how enormously it is benefiting your life in almost all possible ways. You, as a mind-numbed classicist, may ridicule this, but do so at your own personal loss. When you do so, you are showing reality that times are nigh for devolution and extinction of you and your ilk! Classicism is passe! Cultural Relativism is only an artifact of classicism. Quantum philosophy and science will allow you to leave those churches of reason and assist your novel Chautauqua into a quantum stage which routinely permits you to tap reserve energy. Doug - 10Sep2001.

Our list of bullet items above is far from complete, but it is a good place to start. If you cannot understand what we are saying in those bullet items, start now to commence your own personal Chautauqua toward learning what they 'mean.'

You will know when you have made progress when your quantum stage emerses novel intuemes more quickly than you can manage them. At that phase of your development, you must commence using your 'reserve energy' to further learn how to choose and pursue intuemes which make you most happy and fulfilled.

We wish you a happy Chautauqua with countless quantum acquaintances.

Doug (30Jul2001).