(Quantum~Qabalic
Essence: quantum numbers)
(See Carlo Suares' Song of Songs, and his Cipher of Genesis.)
(These will need intensive revision as Doug learns more.
There appears to be too much overlap among letters' valuations.)
Upper case Aleph is unthinkable life-death; all that is beyond and not.
Explicitly, Aleph is DQ. It corresponds quantum~n¤nactuality as unknown and unknowable.
Yod is aleph's complement in actuality.
Lower case aleph is, apparently, actuality's sentient~perceived quantum~complement ihn DQ, that quantum~partial of DQ which is still unconceivable yet sentients are instinctively and perhaps intuitively Aware of it.
"Aleph is in everything and everything is in Aleph." Page 101, Carlos Suares, Cipher of Genesis, Shambala, 1969, 1972. Doug - 6Dec2009.
Archetype of all dwellings, all containers. Physical support without which nothing is.
Explicitly, Bayt is SQ.
"Bayt is with everything and everything is with Bayt." Page 101, Carlos Suares, Cipher of Genesis, Shambala, 1969, 1972. Doug - 6Dec2009.
Explicitly Ghimel is quanton(DQ,SQ). Quantum~Gn¤stic evolute~redemption. Process of perpetual~evolution.
Biblically, this is referred as a tell of God's presence in sentients, known as, "movement and rest." Çatholiçs deny any presence of 'god' in humans. Çatholiç 'god' is separate from humans and it is çatholiçly "absurd" to thingk and believe otherwise. This is a key reason why Qabalic gnosis went underground. Their gnosis had to be kept secret otherwise Romans would kill them for their beliefs. Carlo Suares claims they became so good at hiding their secrets, it became almost impossible for subsequents to learn about them. Carlo did some assiduous work to revive gn¤stics' autiot and its Qabalic semantics. For Doug, this is a real eye opener! And to find that our quantonics and quantum~theory itself reflect Qabalic gnosis, calls for unbounded cheer.
Doug also shows this quantonically as 1(2,3); note that Qabala shows it as 3(1,2): Aleph-Bayt-Ghimel vis-à-vis Ghimel-Aleph-Bayt. Doug needs to learn how autiot semantics change when letters are reordered. It is already clear that very, very important autiot semantics express as palindromes. Suares offers one example of Sheer and Raysh together. Sheer recurses as Sheen-Yod-Raysh. Raysh recurses as Raysh-Yod-Sheen. Sheer-Raysh then becomes a palindrome as Sheen-Yod-Raysh-Yod-Sheen. Gematria is then (300-20-10-20-300). Its semantic is critically important in quantum~gnosis: "one in two and two in one." Quantum~metaphors here, for example, include bosons and fermions, bosons becoming fermions, fermions as quarks, quarks as nuclei, bosons as gluons, light, and gravity, and so on... Doug - 15Oct2009.
Chaldæan gnosis shows it as 1(2,3),4. Qabala~ramified it is Ghimel(Aleph,Bayt),Dallet. See the ogdoad. Four is humanity's uncertain 'choice, chance, and change' of dialectically either a Roman 'dead father,' or Jesus' "Living Father." Latter is an earthly agent of Ghimel. Former is 'the demiurge,' who denies that "Ghimel even exists." Roman çatholiçs have imbued 10% of humanity with countless 'dead ideas,' borne of Parmenides, Plato, and Aristotle, thence about twelve centuries later Thomas Aquinas, all of whom called Qabala and its innate~gnosis "sophistry." Again, we have a çatholiç issue here. Roman çatholiçs still call 'choice' "heresy." Qabala says all is uncertain, and as a result we have only choice. Determinism and fate are dead Platonic-Aristotelian ideas of çatholiçs' dead-father 'state-ic' demiurge.
One must infer Ghimel's n¤n dialectical middle~inclusionings of Aleph and Bayt.
"Ghimel (movement) is energy and all energy is Ghimel." Page 101, Carlos Suares, Cipher of Genesis, Shambala, 1969, 1972. Doug - 6Dec2009.
Physical existence as response to life. In nature, all that is organically active with Ghimel. For inorganic structure Dallet is its own resistance, resistance to destruction.
Dallet is emergent actuality. Its hermeneutics are many. Classicists, as monists, deny that phasement. They claim actuality is n¤n hermeneutic, i.e., there is only one, their, interpretation of actuality. Classicists claim actuality is static, middle-excluded, negatable, dialectical, and determinate-predicable.
Autiot shows us how classicists made huge Errors of assumption and presumption. Indeed, classicists claims are all incorrect. Qabala's gn¤stics knew this thousands of years ago! Gn¤stics' language of Qabala as autiot is recursive. For linguistic remediators of English, Latin, Greek, and other languages, this is a most powerful clue to those languages' inabilities to express nature well. Nature is recursive. Nature's quantum~flux, like autiot, is both self~ and other~recursive! A language which isn't recursive cann¤t express a nature which is quanton(quantum~holographic,flux~recursive)! Ghimel(holographic,recursive)! Doug - 16Oct2009.
Dallet explains SQ as both(organic,inorganic) quantum~entropa. Dallet, organically, is mixtures of pos~, zero~, and neg~entropies. Biological life itself.
Dallet, inorganically, is posentropic adiabaticity. This applies to individual atoms.
Dallet, inorganically, may be posentropic and n¤nadiabatic. This is ensemble inorganic physical reality. Ensembles of atoms are, as an ensemble, n¤nadiabatic and mutable often in an organic sense and often in an inorganic sense.
Dallet's response to life can be life and it can be death as total resistance to life. Metaphors, gn¤stic metaphors then may be Jesus' "Living Father," and (demiurge) as "dead father." In other words [Dd]allet may express dead dialectical ideas, and it may express living quantum~memes. Qabalic~quantum~re~mediation of Dallet gives it quintessential linquistic life. Dialectical SOMitic-antign¤stic disintermediation of Dallet induces deadly state. Doug - 15Oct2009.
Quantum entropa are energy features of quantum~flux.
Archetype of universal life. Conferred upon Dallet it allows Dallet to play game of existence in partnership with Aleph's intermittent life-death process.
In reference to reality's cyclic ontology of evolutionary OEDC; quanton(DQ,SQ), quanton(n¤nactuality,actuality), etc.
Explicitly, Hay is quantized OEDC.
Too, we may view Hay as quantized uncertainty, and quantization uncertaintyings' selection as choice, chance, and change uncertainties.
Quantization of quantum~reality may be viewed and hermeneuted with hay as h-bar. All quantum~uncertain choosings, chancings, and changings (CH3ings) in quantum~reality happen at quantized~intervals of Planck's wavelength quanta. This smallest granularity of quantum~energy may be represented mechanically as e = hf. 'e' is energy, h is Planck's 'constant,' and f is frequency. 'h' is very tiny. As a 'spatial' wavelength h may be illustrated as about 10-43. So, if we want to show 'e' as unity (quantumly, 'omnity'), f must be 1043. But Planck's quantum, durationally, is h. That small increment represents quantum~reality's least energy change. Essentially, this is what omnistinguishes classical reality from quantum reality. Classically change is y=f(t) continuous. Quantumly all change is quantized in multiples of h. If one grasps this quantum essential meme, one may then quite easily infer autiot's macroscopic uncertainty as quantumly valid, i.e., "embrace uncertainty!"
See noun below as reality's cyclicity of change as h-bar loops. Doug - 5Dec2009.
Quantonics' middle~inclusion, a quanton's comma~nospace, a tilde as a wave~pragma~function which can commingle another wave~pragma~function.
Biologically, a sperm fertilizing an ovum. Two becoming one. Two haploids becoming a single human cell of life.
As an quantum creatio ex nihilo aperio exemplar, a Higgs boson creating a fermion from two bosons: two spin one boson quanta becoming one spin one-half fermion quantum.
Achievement of (evolution of) every vital impregnation. Unlimited potentia, possibilities.
In quantonics, this is simply, "What is yet unsaid." Clearly this attends an impetus for Qabalic and quantum~enthymemeticity.
Explicitly, it is both said SQ (Qabala views this as SQ's freedom from DQ) and unsaid SQ which can become 'free' from DQ.
Again, çatholiç dogma denies any individual freedom; yet Qabala embraces it; Essene~Jesus embraces it!
Çatholiçs' 'Christ' (the demiurge) denies individual gn¤stic freedom as "apocryphal," i.e., uncertain.
This is very close to what Doug intends by "ascension." Actually, it is quantum~emersos' emerscence. It is emergence in and of actuality. Doug's "ascension" is more akin SQ transitioning into DQ as isob and isoV. Latter is gn¤stically pneumatic. Emergence is gn¤stically more psychic-hylic. Emerscence is gn¤stically more pneumatic. Doug - 15Oct2009.
Undifferentiated energy (and 'substance') as a plenum. Least energy.
This is quantum~isoflux AKA DQ.
A repository, one which is open (unconserved) with unevolved, i.e., iso~energy.
Quantumly, this is immeasurable, n¤n monitorable. It is apparent absence of any SQ.
Quantum 'mechanics' calls this 'ground state.'
Quantonics permits memeos of iso~entropa, iso~cohera, isobs, and isoVs, which are iso~memeoryings of all quantum~entropa and ~cohera.
Doug infers latter experientially and from Pirsig's comments that, "Pirsig and Iht wrote ZMM and Lila."
Archetype of primæval female energy. Draws its life-energy from Hhayt and builds it gradually into energy ensembles. Suares also describes Tayt as "...simplest primal energy archetype, an energy cell, an archetype of feminine energy..." Doug - 6Mar2010.
In Quantonics, this is Gnosis, Sophia, Wisdom. It is impregnation of quantons with growing Value actualized as SQ.
So we see...energy is feminine. Then, in quantum~reality, nature's femininity is enabled when h~bar is turned on.
So, what happens when h~bar is turned off? Feminine energy and wisdom are disabled. Pirsig's MoQ calls this ESQ.
What are every day exemplars of ESQ? Patriarchy, classical thingking, SOM, d'evil, state, event as zero-latency state transition (i.e., process as classically indescribable when reality is stopped), and a superb one: satan. See omniscussion re: satan under Seen~Sheen below. To oversimplify here and for student~reader con(m)venience, Seen turns h~bar off. Sheen turns h~bar on. In Autiot, as an example, Seen invoked with 'aba,' (Seen Aleph Bayt Aleph) elicits "dead father.' By comparison Sheen Aleph Bayt Aleph emersces "living~Father." See ascendant.
Thank you for reading,
Doug - 6Mar2010.
Yod is aleph's antinomial in an quantum~self~other~referent sense that yod complements aleph in a "redemption as process" subjective negational...
|
|
...way which depicts n¤nactual aleph in an actual way. Yod is aleph's actual complement's projection in actuality.
Antinomial here is used in an unusual way. Autiot declares 'normal reason' wrong: see Gospel of Truth where Essene Gnostic Jesus implied-called classical dialectical 'reason,' "Error." As such then real 'laws' are in n¤nactuality and unreachable via human and sentient 'reason.' Doug derives Jesus' implication from his studies of Gospel of Thomas (Thanks to MJ in Australia for hooking Doug up with this Gospel early-mid 2005. It was Doug's first experience with gnosis!).
Yod and aleph dance a divine dance with each other, and aleph is above yod, since yod as actuality transitions cyclically (goes home) to aleph. Aleph sources yod's tentative posentropy in actuality. Suares leaves an impression that we can refer yod's 'end' as dialectical. Doug infers from his quantum~studies that this dance is perpetual and 'endings' are mere sentient delusions borne of psychic ignorance.
Quantum~reality is a dance of absolute~change emerging from dynamic emerscence and immerscence middle~including wave~interrelationshiping twixt n¤nactuality's undifferentiated perpetual isofluxings and actuality's tentative actual entropies which we can show as quanton(n¤nactuality,actuality) and quanton(aleph,yod). A biological example which plays out in actuality as a metaphor of quanton(aleph,yod) is cellular metabolisis as quanton(catabolisis,anabolisis). Cells literally 'die' (aka apoptosis) and are resurrected (aka cell [re]birth as cellular~genesis).
See Suares' Cipher of Genesis.
Doug treats 'antinomy' here quantumly, i.e., as quantized~pr¤cæssings. Its dialectical 'immutable-state and zero momentum' interpretation is bogus in quantum~reality.
An interesting facet of this 'dance,' is that some see it as ongoing natural moral and thus gn¤stic~redemption. Yet some see it as a struggle, indeed as a struggle with god. East Indians often view this 'dance' as Li~la.
Isra-el means "struggle with god." Muslims have a similar saying: Jihad, which means "struggle with god." Those semantics aren't classically 'identical,' rather are autsimilar. That is, Jihad doesn't 'equal' Israel. Comparatively Jihad is self and other similar Israel and Israel is self and other similar Jihad. Especially when we ponder both Essene and Arabic gnosis. They are n¤t identical, but carry autsimilar (quantum) semantics. Arabic gnosis of Jihad is primarily Chaldæan gnosis (Aur Kasdeem translated as Ur Chaldees). Clearly, neither is about killing infidels, just that war-mongering hylic dialecticians (of YHWH's bivalent and demiurgic mindset) have made them so. In his Cipher of Genesis Suares describes this OT dialectical opposition is a tool of (dead-father) god to reengender humanity's germ on earth. Violent struggle, god believed, would impose enhanced evolution of humanity's germ of life. Today, CeodE 2009, MoQ's DQ and Quantonics' quantum~isoflux are change agents which impose unending and sometimes radical change upon all of us.
We need recall how Israel and Judaea seceded in 931 b.c. Too we need recall how Jesus was from Tribe Judaea, Beth (Bayt) David, and Essene (implicitly gn¤stic which implies he knew Suares' brand of Qabala and its autiot very, very, very well). Essene Jesus didn't see redemption, moral redemption, as 'struggle,' rather as individual gn¤stic rights to find God within our individual selves. We can show that in quantonic script as quanton(aleph,yod) issi quanton(God,self). Our struggle isn't with God, rather our struggle is a quantum~gn¤stic~process of individual quantized due diligence to "find God in our inner self." When we do that we experience what Jesus meant by "revelation." When students of Quantonics do "self~revelation," they are quantum~phase~encoding emerging reinvented adaptations of selves (see potentia). It is easy to perceive this as a gn¤stic struggle with G¤d. Suares' Qabalic autiot is one of many tools which empower individuals to shine light on our selves so that we can revel in God's presence ihn us individually, gn¤stically.
Doug was watching History channel's hermeneutics of "exodus." Wonderful! Doug noticed, now that he is spending effort on autiot, that a phrase "amo Israel" appears to have been misinterpreted as "God's people." 'People' in Hebrew phonetically is n¤t 'amo,' but "oomah." So "oomah Israel," is "people struggling with god." (Reference is Hayim Baltsan (author), 1992 paperback, Wiley.) Israelites aren't Essene! Israel obeys common social 'law.' Some Judæans are Essene. Essenes obey individual gnosis as redemptively evolving quantum~partials of~and~cowithin God (read Essene Jesus' Farewell Discourse just above to see how and why Doug is narrating this memeo). Israelites, as rigorous dialecticians in general, do n¤t grasp Suares' gn¤stic hermeneutics of autiot. A few Judæans do. Some of us others (from the Pale) are learning it. It's part of our individual quantum~gn¤stic self~due~diligence.
Doug - 21-22,29Oct2009
From Mead's translation of Chaldæan Oracles I, "Limit the Separator."
Doug's immediate novice exegetic is that this is quasi~quantum~middle~inclusion. It is saying, "Do not allow dialectic's excluded-middle to be hylically ideal."
Lammed is an interrelationship affector. That means it is a 'class' of quanton.
Lammed 'happens' intrinsically in quantum~holograms. Energy wellings in a quantum~hologram both do and do n¤t coobsfect one another, and to any extent they do...their affectationings are gradient (as a English language noun). See our graphic of quantum~network~complementary~interrelationshipings.
Doug - 6-7Dec2009.
When you read many gnostic gospels, you will see a phrase, "the waters," quite often. Sometimes it can mean people.
An example: aba mem tav means "dead father," AKA "the demiurge," "the Christ." Literally in autiot, it means "father's water is dead still."
Typically mem is used in a creative sense of regenerative vicissitudinal evolution. But context, as we have shown is critical. Just above we see lammed as Lammed~Mem~Dallet. Mem~Dallet left to itself will run "wild." But Lammed controls it so that its change isn't 'explosive.' From any human Qabalic~quantum complementarospective a super novæ is mem~dallet; however, relatively gradual evolution of humanity is lammed~mem~dallet.
So mem's water can be still, rippling, strongly eddying, tsunamic, and cosmically novæic, etc. Con(m)text is crucial.
Doug - 6Dec2009.
Noun (say 'noon') as cyclic~evolutionary being complementing its source Hay as life's seed.
Noun, quantonically, is animate recursion of self at up to Planck's rate. We may show it as quanton(Noun,Noun). Again, our comma-nospace, AKA Vav AKA Waw, self-fecundates (also "fecundulates") Noun, and quantum~uncertainty desnouers self (and self, holographically, as other) as vicissitudinal change agency.
Aside - A Note on Vicissitudinality:
Nature and reality, quantum~reality are vicissitudinal. This is especially apparent in biology. Trees of life sprout new branches, unexpectedly. Vicissitudinally. In quantumese we refer this as "autsimilar n¤nsynonymous omnivergencings." A terrific exemplar happening to homo Sapiens now, CeodE 2009, is aneuploidy on most pairs of human chromosomes.
Vicissitudinality is a pan~reality manifestation of quantum~uncertainty's qua creating astochastic Value: Robert M. Pirsig in his ZMM and Lila calls it, "surprise."
Doug - 6Dec2009.
End Aside on Vicissitudinality.
Doug's Generation III Quantum Reality Loop shows this graphically:
Quantum gn¤stics who grasp essence of autiot's noun, accomplish at least two major epiphanies:
- tapping into 'reserve energy,' and
- enabling self to see one's inner.
These two sentient capacities are proemial semaphores of one's beginning steps on a real Chautauqua into omniscovery of self's quantum~gnosis. When we look at this using gnosis' topos, we learn that hylics, simply, are self-disabled from experiencing this proemial gnostic redemption. Too, most psychics, via adherence to dialectic (Jesus calls this "Error"), are self-disabled. A few psychics broach these proems via a self~enabling process of rejecting dialectic as a classical means of achieving 'rational reason.' Once dialectic (i.e., anti-gnosis, again Jesus calls this "Error") is rejected, and quantum~gnosis' Light is allowed to shine cowithin one's inner, psychics commence a path (Tao's "the way"), an unending journey, toward pneuma. Doug - 5Dec2009.
Allow Doug to quote Suares' page six of his The Second Coming of Reb YHSHWH, after quoting II Corinthians 5:17, "This quotation and the words 'If any [hu]man be in Christ [n¤t catholic 'Satan,' but Essene Jesus], lead me to emphatically declare myself being in Reb YHSHWH, the Rabbi called Jesus. Consequently, I obstinately obey his injunction to his disciples to 'Tell no man that he is Jesus the Christ. Matthew 16:20. This clear statement means to me that he strongly objected to being taken for a Christ."
To Jesus, anyone who calls him a Christ is in Error! Doug has said many times prior in Quantonics that his mentors and his own autodidactic learning have discovered that: to call Jesus "Christ" is Christian dialectical Error! Christians are in Error! Peter, Catholicism's rock called Jesus "the Christ." Error! Catholicism built 'the church' on Jesus' so called rock. Error. Jesus, according Suares, builds his church on us, and emphatically we do not build our churches on him! Thus we see Christianity as a Babel of Error! Christianity is Satan's Babel!
How could this happen? Why? Who? What? When? Where?
If you want to own your personal due diligence of all those H5W, start studying now, and expect to take balance of your life moving a little bit nearer a partial understanding.
Trouble is, we are immersed in this enormous holographic omnispatial and omnitemporal holographic reality. And if you do not grasp that, and further grasp its quantumness, you will stumble indefinitely. So we must lay foundation prior understanding. Even then, you and Doug will still be uncertain. Always uncertain. So what do we need? Faith! Suares' brand of Faith, "Faith is direct experience of the immortality of consciousness." Page 5 of TSCoRJ.
Faith is immortal quantum~energy. In a way, it is Aleph in blood, a direct expression that "G¤d is in us and we are in G¤d."
Suares seldom uses one of Doug's fav words, dialectic. Like Jesus, Suares uses words like Satan, Contradiction, and Error as surrogates of Error. That's fine. But Doug's auto~opus says those other words are simply Pirsigean subspecies of reality's actualized "bad guy:" dialectic.
Doug has been looking for tells of our "bad guy" in Suares' works and in his cherished Autiot and its countless energetic Autions.
This one, Seen~Sheen, is a great exemplar. Doug wants to use his own cuneiform aliases to show you why and slightly how Seen~Sheen symbolically carries "dialectic in its soul...side~by~side with living Con(m)sciousness and Aleph becoming in us via our blood." See Merovingians, Plantards, and Plantagenets. See Plantard (St Clare) crest. Read Baigent, Leigh, and Lincoln's Holy Blood Holy Grail. Latter, pay extra to get an illustrated version. Re Plantagenets rent BBC's Pallisers series, and look both up in Wikipedia.
Before we omniscuss symbols, let's look at memeos more familiar.
- YHWH
- aka YAHWEH
- aka Yod-Hay-Waw-Hay interpreted means actual being as life copulating life without spirit
- aka dead life, dead living, dead livings, hylic-psychic life, dialectic-living...
- aka demiurge
- aka dead father
- aka YHSHWH without SH, without Sheen
- aka dichon(YH, WH)
- aka dialectic, Satan, Contradiction, and Error
- etc.
- YHSHWH
- This is Hebrew Autiot for 'Jesus'
- aka YHWH with SH, Sheen, quantum~middle~included
- aka actual life with spirit quantum~middle~including iht
- aka spiritual life, pneumatic life, quantum~living
- aka Living~Father
- aka quanton(YHSHWH), i.e., with Sheen as a quantum~middle~including comma~nospace
- aka quantum~sophism, Wisdom, Sophia, Gn¤sis
- etc.
Suares shows us that Satan is pronounced Sah-tahn. It is spelled in Hebrew Autiot Seen-Tayt-Noun. Seen is Sheen without our quantum~h. Seen isn't quantized. Its h-bar is turned off. It's dead. It is SOM's knife of dialectic which çatholiçs used to put words in Jesus' mouth "I bring not peace, but a sword." Matthew 10:34.
Tayt is a cell. An atom, a human, a mouse, etc. Noun is uncertainty. Classically, as Seen, we see dialectical certainty as dichon(Sheen, Seen). Either Sheen or Seen. Quantumly, as Sheen, we see quantum~uncertainty as quanton(Sheen,Seen).
So Satan is a dialectically certain cell of ideal classical either-or certainty. Error! Dialectic itself! War! Hate! George Bush! Dick Cheney. Bibi Netan..! Rope a dope popes! Classical science! Classical religion! Classical thought! Classical epistemology!
Doug made some cuneiform graphics of Sheen~Seen variations:
This version of Sheen-Seen is "pointless." In original archaic Hebrew and Autiot (as Abraham learned it from an angel), may not have had consonant markings. Doug is unsure, so his naked version may or may not be Autiot 'valid.'
This is left pointed Seen whose point is black as Doug's choice. It is focused classical energy, spirit, breath[e], life, cell behavior, etc.
This is right pointed Sheen whose point is violet as Doug's choice. It is diffuse quantum~energy, spirit, breath[e], life cell behavior, etc. Comparing Seen and Sheen, and realizing after abundant due diligence that Jesus name as YHSHWH describes him as quantumly~diffuse, everywhere, in everything, always changing, always evolving...but Satan is without Sheen, left-pointed, dead, and dialectically-endlessly-state-perpetually in Error!
Carlo Suares may be one of Earth's greatest geniuses. If Doug could be an amalgam of his sheroes and heroes Suares would be part of that holographic amalgam.
He makes it clear to us that it is incredibly easy, once you grasp those last two symbols, to make them a dichonic either-or. That would be just another Satanic Error.
Carlo does not tell us this, and Doug feels really good that Quantonics has already anticipated it, but we really need both! We need a quanton of Sheen and Seen, like this:
In Doug's Hodgepodge he has been showing it more quantum~physially as quanton(~,o), but we can show it like this too:
|
 |
|
|
||||
|
quanton |
( |
|
) | ||||
It may be inappropriate for Doug to view that is his own innovation in Quantonics. But it shows a, to Doug, valid hermeneutic of Jesus saying, "Seen is in Sheen and Sheen is in Seen." Agree? Yes?
Tilde as Sheen. Closed and dead vicious circle as Seen. Sheen as open, ubiquitous, and diffuse unseeable spirit (aka quantum isoflux). Seen as focused analysis of seeable actuality.
Doug - 21Feb2010.
(Quantum~Qabalic Essence: quantum numbers)
(See Carlo Suares' Song of Songs, and his Cipher of Genesis.)