|
: Hologra, hologram,
holograph, etc.
: H¤l¤gra,
h¤l¤gram, h¤l¤grams,
h¤l¤gramings, h¤l¤graph,
h¤l¤graphs,
h¤l¤graphings,
h¤l¤graphic,
h¤l¤graphics,
etc.
Please allow Doug to put hologra in a Pirsigean MoQ quantum~perspective.
From an MoQ~quantum perspective how can we intuit that reality
is holographic?
Pirsig's MoQ shows us that reality is many truthings and all
those truthings are quantum~relatively
quantum~flux~evolving.
Notice we are n¤t using 'truth' here. Classical truth is dialectical.
Quantum~truthings are emergent, they adapt, they evolve, and
their fluxings compenetrate other quantum~fluxings (quanta),
latter which we refer as "quantum~included~middlings."
Doug calls this reality a "many truthings" reality.
Now allow us to substitute "viewings" for "truthings."
Doug calls this reality a "many viewings" reality.
And these viewings are all "coobsfective"
and "interrelative:" holographic.
All reality, including human societies, do that. They
coobsfect, compenetratingly, interrelatively, self~other. That
scales!
We call that more generally, a self~other~organizing~network:
a quantum SOON.
What is a SOON?
A hologram!
Holograms are many quantum~fluxing~interrelative viewings,
many quantum~fluxing~interrelative truthings. Holograms quantum~phase~encode
many quantum~fluxing~interrelative viewings, many quantum~fluxing~interrelative
truthings.
Quantum reality
is hologra of many quantum~fluxing~interrelative viewings,
many quantum~fluxing~interrelative truthings.
Pirsig was right: the
Sophists were closer to "getting it" than the
dialecticians ever were or ever would be. Quality over Quantity.
Good over Truth. Individual above Society. And so on... No kidding!
(For some affirmation read Anthony Gottlieb's The Dream of
Reason, Chapter 9 'The Sophists,' Norton, 2002 paperback.
Fabulous! Quantum~honest.)
Doug - 3Feb2006.
Classical holograms are stopped, EEMD,
classically state-associative optical networks. Classically any
number of holograms may be identical to one another.
Classical holograms are three dimensional and unitemporal.
Classical holograms adhere Maxwell's thermodynamic 'laws.' Latter
imposes a monoentropic view of classical reality: single
gradient posentropy, and monodirectional unitime. Said view imposes
massive systemic synchronicity, cause-effect, systemic closure
to achieve 'laws' of conservation, determinism, stoppability,
etc.
Classical reality is state. Classical thingking methods are
incapable of analyzing real process.
Quantum h¤l¤gramings
aræ anihmatæ,
EIMA,
æmærging,
quantum optihcal
SONs.
Quantumly,
n¤ tw¤ h¤l¤grams
may ævær bæ
'classically identical'
t¤ ¤næ an¤thær
l¤nger than a fæw
Planck
m¤mænts. Quantum h¤l¤gramings
bæliæ
J. C. Maxwell's 'laws'
¤f
thærm¤dynamihcs.
Quantum ræhlihty
issi p¤lyæntr¤pihc
amd p¤lyc¤herænt.
Quantum ræhlihty
issi ¤pæn, affæctati¤nal, æmærgænt,
æv¤lutæ, æmærscænturing,
mahssihvely
"Bell
Inequal,"
ænsehmble
ihndætærminatæ
(umcærtain), umst¤ppable, etc.
Quantum ræhlihty
issi pr¤cæss. Quantum thinking
m¤dæs aræ læarnings h¤wings
t¤ ømniht¤r
quantum pr¤cæssings.
Wæ can ¤ffer tw¤ illustratihvæ
e amples
hæræ:
- A classicist measuring a hologram, and
-
A quantumihst
¤mniht¤ring a h¤l¤gram:
Classicist Measuring a Hologram -
Said classicist may, for example, take a holograph photographic
negative and project it to achieve a state-ic holographic image.
S-he may choose a subportion of that hologram for further investigation.
S-he may choose to cut out said subportion and project it. S-he
may, for example, analytically compare visible scalar magnitudinal
differences pixel by pixel across both images.
What set of implicit assumptions is our classicist making?
- reality is stoppable (no respectable hologram moves or evolves
while one is measuring it; in Quantonics we call this classical
assumption and concomitant theory and practice "scalarbation")
- reality will conveniently hold still while classical scalar
measurements are conducted
- etc.
Quantumihst
Omniht¤ring a H¤l¤graming
-
Saihd quantumihst
may, f¤r
eample,
set
uhp a test rig t¤ run a h¤l¤graphic
pr¤cæss, anihmatæly.
S-he wihll
watch saihd
anihmatæ pr¤jæcti¤n.
S-he may ch¤¤se
a subqp¤rti¤n ¤f saihd
anihmatæ h¤l¤gram
f¤r further study. S-he wihll
usæ passihve, n¤ndæstructihvæ quantum computers amd quantum
sæns¤rs t¤ ømniht¤r
as many as p¤ssible quantum anihmatæ
ass¤ciati¤nings ar¤umd saihd
anihmatæ h¤l¤gram's
subqp¤rti¤n comtext. Saihd
h¤l¤gram issi slightly ¤mnisturbæd by he-r quantum ¤mniht¤ring
pr¤cæssings amd he-r
techniquæs can bæ ræfihnæd t¤ minimihzæ
(nævær eliminatæ) any ¤mnisturbances.
What set ¤f ihmplihciht assumpti¤ns
issi ¤ur quantumihst making?
-
quantum ræhlihty issi umst¤ppable, abs¤lutæly
anihmatæ
-
quantum ¤mniht¤rmænt
must ømniht¤r quantum
pr¤cæss as 'alihve'
amd must d¤ s¤ n¤n violæntly
- etc.
See: affectation,
associate, autonomy, our stairs as
holograms, etc.
See: our What
is Wrong with Probability as Value., Bases
of Judgment, Measurement.
Page top index.
|