|
'zero' |
: Zero, zeroes, etc.
Classicists believe a bunch of ancient
dialectic crap:
- that notions of 'empty,' 'naught,'
'nada,' 'zero,' 'null,' etc., normatively 'exist' formally, materially,
substantially, objectively,
- that reality is closed,
- that negation is objective,
- that reality is only posentropic, (quantum~reality
shows a minimum of four classes each of both coherence and entropy)
- that reality holds still,
- that objects in reality are independent
of one another,
- etc.
As a result they use defective dialectical
reason to 'conclude' that A-A=0, 1-1=0, etc.
One huge Error of dialectical reason (CeodE 2008) is
what Einstein did in his bogus theories of relativity: he divided
platform-velocity by light speed as a constant in a denominator
thus creating a ratio which could become unity, classically,
a bogus divide by 'zero.'
Einstein, as do countless other classicists,
routinely committed beau coup classical, dialectical Errors of 'reason.'
See our quantum~Heraclitus.
Doug - 30Oct2008.
:
Zær¤, zær¤es,
zær¤ing, zær¤ings, etc.
Quantonics ch¤¤ses
t¤ c¤¤pt
classical 'zero'
amd remerq
ahll quantum comtextual
¤ccurrænces wihth 'zær¤.'
In classical contexts we shall use 'zero.'
Ihn Quantonics/quantum comtexts wæ
shahll
usæ 'zær¤.'
Where classical 'zero' implies an ideal mathematical difference
twixt 'identical' elements of a Peano-based modulo one counting
system,
quantum 'zær¤' issi a quantum
umcærtainty ihnterrelati¤nship twixt tw¤
Planck quantons.
Ihn genæral,
n¤ tw¤ quantons ihn
quantum ræhlihty
aræ ævær ihdæntihcal. Thus,
ihn genæral, n¤ quantum
¤mnihfferænce ¤f
an ideal classical 'zero' may ever classically
'exist.'
Where all classical 'ones' are necessarily ideally objective
and substantial, and thus inanimate and 'objectively' identical,
n¤ (p¤sæntr¤pihc) quantum ¤næ can bæ
st¤chastihcahlly cl¤ser than
a Planck ¤mniht ¤f
læast ahcti¤n t¤
any ¤thær quantum ¤næ.
F¤r
e tænsihve
dætail amd
graphic
e amples
¤f
quantum '¤næ,' sææ ¤ur
One Is the Onliest.
For an applied use of Quantonics' memeos
of n¤n~zær¤nessings, see our Quantum~Hamiltonian.
Doug - 30Oct2008.
Page top index.
|