|
Item |
English Language Problematic |
Quantonics' Quantum
Remediation
©Quantonics, Inc., 2001-2011
|
|
'be' |
<b-aa-ee>
Quantonics ch¤¤ses
t¤ c¤¤pt a classical interpretation of 'be'
amd remerq
all quantum comtextual ¤ccurrences with 'bæ.'
In classical contexts we shall use 'be.' In Quantonics/quantum
comtexts we shall use 'bæ.'
Classical substance which can 'be' is dichonically
objective. To classically 'be' is to be stoppable and to hold
still for classical unilateral observation. Classical objects
do not, indeed cannot, evolve, change, emerge.
Quantum flux which can 'bæ' is quantonically
quantum. Quantum bæing issi animate pr¤cess: always
changing amd changing
ahll.
See: are.
Also see 'do.'
Page top index.
|
|
'before' |
Classical 'before' assumes an analytic 'one universal time.'
We call this "unitime."
Classical 'before' assumes a classical state variable deterministically
prescribes and causes
a transformed classical state variable (i.e., n-tuple with a
unitime coordinate) effect.
Understanding classical 'before' and 'after' inductive logic,
and comparing it to its quantum analogue, rather anacoquecigrues,
permits one to understand SOM's self delusion that classical
measurement is always objective and locus-time (space-time),
position-momentum, energy-time, etc. certain.
Quantum 'bef¤re' assumes plural st¤chastic 'many
multiversal times.'
Quantum 'bef¤re' assumes many/ensehmble quantum prec¤nditions'
(Value) phasicities
(~qu-'bits,' i.e., quantum 'number' quantons) animately, st¤chastically
amd asynchr¤n¤usly affecting
amd emerqing
reality's next ch¤ices
wh¤se ensehmble ¤utc¤mes
are thus quantum uncertain.
Understanding quantum 'bef¤re' amd 'after' p¤ly-,
para-, pragma-l¤gic enlightens ¤ne why quantum
measurement will
never ¤ffer classically ideal, simultaneous dichonic
locus-time, position-momentum, energy-time, etc., certainty.
See dialectic above-below
hierarchy and before-after scission manifested in classical 'definitions'
of object and subject.
Page top index.
|
|
'begin'
Etymology - Classical
Etymology - Quantum
Synonyms - Classical
Synonyms - Quantum
|
: begin
Begin, classically, is an event.
Classical events are 'caused' by some other event's effect.
Question is, "In the beginning?"
Of course this begs a sophism: "What begins the
beginning?"
State-ic reality, stoppable reality, concrete reality, classical
material, objective, dialectical reality claims "the
beginning," and "the end."
See our state-event diagrams in our review of Dennett's Chapter
3 of his Breaking the Spell.
See thelogos.
See event.
: begin
No such notion as 'begin' exists in quantum reality. Quantum
reality is an animate, semper fluxio, absolute flux, quantum~processing
reality. 'Begin,' 'end,' 'state,' and 'event' are invalid terms
in quantum reality.
Novelty may emerge from ongoing processings, but we can never
find a single classical 'cause,' 'effect,' 'begin,' 'end,' 'state,'
and 'event' 1-1 mechanically corresponding said emergent novelty.
Novelty is quantum processings. Emergence is quantum processings.
Doug added detail here borne of a need in Doug's current (late
2006 thru 2008 and beyond) of Hume's Dialogues Concerning
Natural Religion and his A Treatise on Human Nature.
Doug - 14Dec2006.
See: end.
Page top index.
|
|
'born' |
Quantonics ch¤¤ses
t¤ c¤¤pt a classical interpretation of 'born'
amd remerq
all quantum comtextual ¤ccurrences with 'b¤rn.'
In classical contexts we shall use 'born.' In Quantonics/quantum
comtexts we shall use 'b¤rn.'
See Are You Alive or
Dead?
See end.
Classically we all experience what Quantonics calls "One
life centricity." SOMites believe that we are 'born' once,
live once, and die once.
Quantum reality denies SOM's one life centricity. We are always
both isobeing and being. In Quantonics notation:
quanton(isobeing,being)
We are all experiencing an endless quantum ¤nt¤l¤gy
which we may depict like this:
quanton(is¤being,bec¤ming) quanton(being,unbec¤ming)
Where ¤ur wingdings f¤nt '' (l¤wer
case 'v') means "in Quant¤nic interrelati¤nships
with." Quant¤nic interrelati¤nships are quantum,
included-middle, c¤¤bsfecting, co-inside-nt,
etc. interrelati¤nships. Our n¤tati¤n sh¤ws
h¤w all ¤f quantum reality is always b¤th
is¤being and being while simultane¤usly b¤th
bec¤ming and unbec¤ming. S¤ when we say
'b¤rn' in quantum c¤mtexts we mean b¤th
is¤being and being, b¤th bec¤ming and unbec¤ming.
Page top index.
|
|
'borne' |
Quantonics ch¤¤ses
t¤ c¤¤pt a classical interpretation of 'borne'
amd remerq
all quantum comtextual ¤ccurrences with 'b¤rne.'
In classical contexts we shall use 'borne.' In Quantonics/quantum
comtexts we shall use 'b¤rne.'
In classical contexts, 'borne' means among other concepts,
"to objectively carry or support."
In quantum c¤mtexts 'b¤rne' means Quantonic
interrelati¤nships ¤f tentatively persistent systems
¤f fermi¤nic quantum dec¤herence. Quantonic
systems ¤f fermi¤ns are n¤t wh¤lly
quantum c¤herent. As such they 'latch' ¤r 'gravitate'
their is¤v¤lumes ¤f is¤spatial is¤flux
and simultane¤usly resist ('bear') ¤ther fermi¤nic
systems' sharing ¤f their tentatively latched is¤v¤lumes.
Y¤u may ch¤¤se t¤ see h¤w
this is an extremely inn¤vative way ¤f viewing
quantum reality. Cutting a fermi¤nic system (a b¤ard,
¤r steel beam) in tw¤ is a very simple subclass
¤f anti-gravitati¤n.
Classicists (SOMwits) call this quantum view of reality, "insane,
nonsense, incredulous, ridiculous, nutso, silly, absurd, deconstructionist,
etc."
Page top index.
|
|
'both' |
As preposition, see of.
In quantum comtexts, use 'b¤th.'
In classical contexts 'both' implies singular, dichotomous,
biformal objective interactions (conjunction, pronoun, adjective,
preposition) which are analytic and thus by classical convention
always unilogical deterministic cause-effect interactions.
In quantum comtexts 'b¤th' implies quantonic, plural,
quantum interrelati¤nships which are always paral¤gical
st¤chastic affects-¤utc¤mes interrelati¤nships.
Any comtextual uses ¤f 'b¤th' beg inferences
¤f quantum c¤insident
multiplicity am¤ng plural, b¤th l¤cal amd n¤nl¤cal,
quantum islands ¤f vari¤us amd
varying comtexts. When using 'b¤th' comtextually, it is
g¤¤d t¤ think "all-amd,"
amd "many-amd,"
as distinguished from a more classical "both-and,"
where 'both' is classically dialectical-dichotomous-bivalent.
We shall use single qu¤tes when referring these terms,
respectively, "¤ut ¤f con-comtexts."
Page top index.
|
|
©Quantonics, Inc., 2001-2011 |