A Comprehensive List of Problematic Classical English Oxymora - - Quantonics commences and intends novel and more quantum co-optive replacement of these oxymora.

If you're stuck in a browser frame - click here to view this same page in Quantonics!

A Comprehensive List
of
Problematic Classical English Oxymora
and
Quantonics' Remediation of Them

This comprehensive list affines other Quantonic URLs:

June, 1999 QQA on Thelogos
Coined Quantonic Terms
May, 2000 QQA on Millennium III Problems with English Language
June, 2000 QQA on Millennium III New Language Characteristics
Quantonic English Language Remediation for Millennium III
Problematic English Language Terms for Millennium III

We see these English language oxymora as one of Millennium III's greatest problematics.
In a real sense, we can say English language itself is problematic,
needing extensive revision and (gradual) outright replacement!

(MT Extra (mostly h-bar), rtf (mostly quantized 'o'), Symbol (delta, lambda, pi, etc.), and Wingdings ('v,' arrows, etc.) fonts required.)

Doug Renselle
21Apr2006

©Quantonics, Inc., 2006-2009 — Rev. 6,9Mar2008 PDR — Created 21Apr2006 PDR (1 of 2)
(See rev list.)

Problematic Classical English Oxymora
by Doug Renselle
(We will periodically reset red text to highlight more recent updates.)

Go directly to:

Oxymora Description
Oxymora Detail List

One of our current book reviews require that we do some Hume research.
Why?
Author of book we are currently reviewing quotes Hume as saying one should have a "good reason" for changing one's views.

In our reading of Hume, looking for his usage of "good reason" we came upon another oxymoron: "exactly similar!"

What stunned us about that one is that Hume apparently did n¤t recognize his use of it.
It occurs in a Humean trialog among his co-protagonists and co-antagonists Philo, Cleanthes, and Demea.
Philo uses it in his critique of Cleanthes near end of Part II of Hume's Section XII 'On the Academical or Sceptical Philosophy,' of his An Enquiry Concerning Human Understanding.

Doug discussed these two oxymora with Bethahava at breakfast, morning of 21Apr2006. Doug baked a double loaf batch of French bread and a single loaf of Challah day before. This morning, Bethahava made French toast using French bread and served smokies and hot black Columbian coffee from Four Beans (Florence, OR) with it. (Doug is about to order a coffee roaster. Yeah!)

Our conversation started with Doug asking Bethahava "If I give you a two word phrase, will you tell me what you think about it?" Bethahava, "Sure!"

"Good reason."

Bethahava, "Good is subjective. Reason is objective."

"Excellence!"

"Can we mix words like that and garner classical semantic retention?"

Bethahava, "Classicists do it all the time."

"But is it dialectically rational, reasonable?"

Well, now, you may be able to see where our dialogue went from there.

Doug's whole point here is that classicists claim, believe in, and adhere dialectic, but even best of them may n¤t practice it.
(A classical linguistic quantum tell, by-the-way. But when they really thingk about it, it drives them 'crazy.')

"How about another example?"

Bethahava, "Sure!"

"Exactly similar."

Bethahava, "That one is much better. It is easy. Transparent. You should use that one as your proto example."

We do.

Oxymora come in quantum ¤d¤rs (colors and flavors were used in QCD and Aristotle's classical excluded-middle disjoint 'categories' are abhorent here, in Quantonics...). We choose our first oxymoronic ¤d¤r as 'dialectical.'

Expect our ¤d¤rs to grow and oxymora within each ¤d¤r to evolve. Our philosophical bottom line here is that dichon(exactly, similar) is dialectically insoluble, whereas quanton(exactly,similar) is quantum~soluble, similar sophisms. Doug - 21Apr2006.

Dialectical Oxymora:

What is at issue with this ¤d¤r of oxymora is that we must omnistinguish dialectical and n¤ndialectical comtexts. From a narrower quantonics perspective we must omnistinguish dialectical contexts and quantum comtexts.

In dialectical contexts we may more generally avoid this ¤d¤r of oxymora by n¤t phrase-mixing (most recent red text updates 3Nov2007 - Doug):

objects and subjects,
- see detail examples below
objective semantics and subjective semantics,
quantity and quality,
certainty and uncertainty,
logic and rhetoric (usually sophism),
state and phasicity,
event and phasicity,
immutability and change (see concrete and flux just below),
opposite and complement,
- opposite examples:
  - litotes is an oxymoron (compare Clifford Geertz' double 'negative' of relativism...):
    - - classically:
      
      We can deny an ideal opposite (i.e., litotes) of any notion; this classical rationale depends upon real stability and objective independence (both of which Henri Louis Bergson refers as classical delusions-illusions...).
    - - quantumly:
      
      Ideal classical opposites do not 'exist' in quantum reality; all negation is subjective and quantum~complementary.
design and evolution,
concrete and flux,
- comparatives:
  - zero momentum is an oxymoron:
    - - classically:
      
      Reality is stoppable; reality is concrete; Plato's change is an illusion; we can ideally measure a stopped reality 'at will.'
    - - quantumly:
      
      Reality is absolute flux and thus unstoppable; change is real; we can monitor (omnitor) reality, but we can n¤t ever stoppably 'measure' reality.
etc.

When we dialectically 'mix' oxymora in that fashion Doug calls it "Escherian linguistics." Recall how Escher used impolitic incorrectness showing three stairs up and one stair down, and three stairs down and one stair up, to violate more politically correct two stairs up and two stairs down. (Doug's use of specific numbers here is n¤t cardinal. There is a math 'rule' though...do you see it?) Actually this is an omniffering ¤d¤r of oxymora, right? What would you call it? One more soup question: Are oxymora quantum tells of ubiquitous quantum~optimism? Explain. Clue: "Many worlds (omniplex veritas), many truthings, many (unlimited) possibilities..." Doug - 2May2007.

In quantum comtexts we may more generally phrase~mix Quantum English Language Remediated (QELRed) terms and enrich our human capabilities for quantum~hermeneutic descriptionings, communicationings, and understandings of reality. Oxymora evaporate! Robert M. Pirsig's MoQ, you may recall, sutures SOM's subject-object schism. See Quantonics' quantum stage. That Pirsigean innovation is a dual of quantum reality's everywhere~associative heterogeneous included~middlings of potentially all quantum fluxings.

Detail list of classical dialectical oxymora:

Bad thing - 'Bad' is subjective negation while 'thing' is just about as ideal a notion of a classical object as one can imagine - Doug - 27,29Apr2007.
Catholic excommunication -
Catholic heresy -
Cause-effect participles -
Classical truth - see Mitch's June, 2005 Question Three Latest Interim Response
C¤hærænt (quantum) 'state' (classical) - # Actually, this issi n¤t an oxymoron in any classical sense. Why? Quantum reality and classical reality are wholly omniffering com(n)texts! Quantum reality issi n¤t 'state'-ic! No detail below...
Concrete quality -
Correct use -
Define arete - We cann¤t define 'excellence' since it is real quantum change borne of adaptability to our perpetually evolving environs.
Define flux - We cann¤t define flux since it is durational, perpetual change itself. That is why quantum reality is uncertain.
Define quality - See 'define arete.'
Define wisdom - University of Chicago is running a 2008 grant program entitled Defining Wisdom - A Project of the University of Chicago. Paul Pietsch said it best, paraphrased, "Uncertainty is a principal feature of wisdom." Defining wisdom is a classical attempt to make it monistically, concretely 'certain.' Gn¤sis is wisdom itself which says classical "monism is deceit." All staff and clientele of UChic are hylic-psychic. One must achieve pneuma to 'understand' wisdom. What a deceitful waste of $2 million. A sheigmful deign to feign. See The Chronicle of Higher Education, 21Sep2007, page A33. Doug - 28Sep2007.
Efficient value - effective value, effectiveness of-for value, (Search for this pattern in transcript below, 5Oct2007: "PRAGER: No, effectiveness for your values, not shame. Effectiveness for your values." Hyper idiotic BS! Doug.) etc. - 'Efficient value' is how SOMwits stuff Value into SOM's Box. This is like saying we can analytically assess, measure, Value as quantitative. Recall Hume's Law? We may not scalarbate Value, folks. Saying "efficiency of-for value" is similar saying "define wisdom." Ditto "define ????." Value is affective. Value is n¤t classically 'effective.' Value is a priori Peircean~abductive. Value is n¤t a posteriori classically inductive, deductive. Value stochastically expects. Value does not 'root cause,' '1-1 correspondently' 'predict.' Doug - 6Oct2007. Reference: Chris Matthew's Hardball show 5Oct2007. See near end of show transcript (scroll down to Matthews), a radio talk show host's comments. Hope you saw his wife Kathleen on 4Oct2007 show. She is simply fabulous! Kathleen could step into Chris' shoes anytime! Doug.
Eigen value - (Classically this is a height, a hilt, of classical oxymoronicity. Science radically di stinguishes fact and value. Scientific reality is fact and 'truth,' no value added. No detail below.)
Ethical truth -
Exactly similar -
Financial wisdom - Material greed is anti-gnostic. Anti-wisdom. Wisdom is qualitative. Finance is quantitative. Doug - 22Apr2008.
Fluid mechanics -
Formally secure - See Doug's How to Make a System Ideally Insecure. Link added 21Apr2007 - Doug.
Gnostic 'christianity' - This is notably oxymoronic since 'christians' have been taught to hate gnosis as Roman 'Catholic' Irenæun 'heresy.' Roman 'Catholicism' is a purely dialectical genre. Gnosis belies dialectic as Error! Too, Essene Jesus called those, notably Peter, who called him 'a christ,' or 'Christ,'...Jesus called them (explicitly Peter) "Satan." Do research on Naassene and Essene Jesus' "father vis-à-vis Father," and "dead-father vis-à-vis living~Father." Doug - 22Apr2008. (References include Elaine Pagels' opus, e.g., her research exegesis, critical reviews, and descriptions of Johannine and Pauline gnosis, and Gaffney's Gnostic Secrets of the Naassenes. Also see Doug's Quantum Gnostic Religion vis-à-vis Classical Religion page.)
Good reason -
Good thing - 'Good' is subjective affirmation (though n¤t as problematic as subjective negation) while 'thing' is about an ideal a notion of a classical object as one can imagine - Doug - 27Apr2007.
Immutable uncertainty -
Impeccable logic - Dialectic is bogus, so how in hell can it be impeccable? Doug - 5Feb2007.
Kick morass - # This one is intended as quantum~humour, duh! You may have fun trying to QELR it, though... J
Law of Included~Middle - Classicists believe that one may use formal 'axioms' to establish 'true' objective bases for their notions of 'law;' however, when one does that one creates a box, a closed domain of formal reason which canonically and universally excommunicates 'all' which is 'not' 'inside' said formal box of reason. Notice how included~middle allows all to informally, qualitatively associate, freely and without canonic walls, all. So, implicitly, included~middle denies any closed boxes of formal reason. Included~middle tears down classical notions of 'law' and 'legal boxes.' Can you fathom how formal and canonic 'law' depends upon either-or's excluded-middle and offers an explicit contradction of any quantum~memeo of included~middle? See OGC. Wolfram's website uses this phrase thus showing us, at least narratively, mathematics' objective oblivion to reality. Doug - 5Nov2007.
Learning Object - # Just found this one; it's academic thingk-king at its most 'intelligent' level of 'design;' learning evolves; objects dialectically are prohibited from evolution...Doug - 21Feb2007
Legal sanity - USA's legal system is "insane" due its formal bases of ideal dialectic 'decisions' given and adhered by presumed sovereign social 'opinion.' "Vulgi Opinio Error!" Thomas Digges, c. 15^th century. See Doug's QELR of 'law.' 22Apr2008 - Doug.
Measurable value - # Similar 'scientific value,' below. This one appeared in a 7September2007 issue of The Chronicle's Review section in a Point of View article by Harry R. Lewis titled 'A Core Curriculum for Tomorrow's Citizens.' It would appear that Lewis should read David A. Granger's October, 2006 (publish date) book juxtaposing both Dewey and Pirsig on educational value. Value isn't dead concrete stux quantitative measurables. Value is n¤t DIQheaded scalarbation. Value is living~evolving quantum flux. Value is unstoppable. It will n¤t conveniently hold still while one measures it. One may only ømnihtør (i.e., classically: monitor) quantum flux. One may only ømnihtør value...Doug - 12Sep2007.
Momentous location - # Classical physicists like Einstein and Feynman believe they can assess momentum and cartesian <x,y,z> 'locus' together, at one time, scalarbatively...
    Notice issues of macroscopic quantum~uncertainty here too: I.e., Dr·Dx N·h. We are uncertain, however we harbor a modicum of comfihdæncæ
    that all omnitorable interrelationshipings' D-product pairings will manifest macroscopic quantum~uncertaintyings. Doug - 19Jun2007.

Momentous state - # Classical physicists like Einstein and Feynman believe they can assess momentum and 'state' together, at one time, scalarbatively...
    Notice issues of macroscopic quantum~uncertainty here too: I.e., Dr·Dt N·h. Fathom how classicists, here, assume time — as a spatial extensity
    proxy 'rate' — is stoppable, n¤n Bergsonian durational. Doug - 19Jun2007.

Moral principles - # A dialectical view of morality as logically canonical; a huge Error of EOOO classical 'judgment'
Moral truth -
No possibility - Consider both objective and subjective negation here. Simply, there is always 'a' possibility.
Objective cause - Quantum reality isn't objective. See affectation. See coobsfection.
Objective simplicity - Property taxonomy is infinitely complex. Simplicity as holographic flux phase~encodings is relatively trivial. See Flux versus state.
Particularized subject - One may not particularize any quality without turning it into quantity; to reify quality is to make an Error. This one is from David A Granger's discussion of John Dewey's views compared to Pirsig's views in Granger's October, 2006. John Dewey, Robert Pirsig and the Art of Living.
Political science - 'Ethical' 'science' is about 'provisional' 'truth'
Probability 'one' - Dynamic, included~middle, everywhere~associative, uncertain quantum~reality has n¤ classical 'notion' of a mathematically ideal, context-free, formal 'one.' Doug - 21Apr2007.
Probability 'zero' - Classically 'zero' is 'one' minus_c 'one.' See our pesky oxymoron - Probability 'one.' Doug - 21Apr2007.
Probable cause -
Quality control - Quality System specialists should rename this 'scalar measurement control:' it's all about quantity, it has naught to do with quality; real Quality may only be quantum~omnitored...Doug - 11Apr2007.
Quantify gravity - Gravity is a symptom emerging from dynamic flux interrelationshipings: gravity is a symptom of vastly ephemeral, many~quanton, both coherent ensemble and individual quantum~flux interrelationshipings. Gravity isn't classically 'constant.' Gravity isn't unitemporal! Gravity isn't unispatial! Gravity isn't classically 'objective.' Gravity isn't classically and naïvely 'local.' We may n¤t classically scalarbate gravity! Doug - 21Jan2008.
quantum~omnitored...Doug - 11Apr2007.
Quantum certainty - Rather quantum~uncertainty
Quantum geometry - This one should be obvious to O'gadons. What is geometry's founding axiom? "That equality may be assessed." What is quantum flux's founding axiom? "That quantum~phase~encodings are phylogenous."

"But Doug what does phylogenous mean?" Search on phylogeny, which is essentially genera of phyla. Technically phylogeny means evolutionary 'nonsynonymous di(omni)vergence.' That is a jargonized way of saying "quantum novelty emerges naturally, and up to Planck rate relentlessly." Too, "all quantum~emergence is n¤nsyn¤nym¤us, which emphasizes a servile and attendant mandate for evolving linguistics." Even simpler: "classical 'equality' simply cann¤t 'exist' in quantum reality. HotMeme™ "All quantum flux are phylogenous." HotMeme™. All quantum flux are evolutionarily unique, and borne of and on quantum~phylogeny. N¤ ideal, classical geometrical symmetry 'exists' in quantum reality. Doug - 17Feb2008; minor rev's - 6Mar2008.
Quantum logic - See coquecigrues.
Quantum mechanics - Rather quantum~n¤nmæchanics
Quantum objectivity - See object, subject.
Quantum particle - Rather quantum~wavicle
Quantum state - Rather quantum~phase
Quantum structure - Rather quantum~emerscitecture
Rhetorical polemic -
Scientific value - All classical science finds its bases of reason in absolute truth provisionally based upon absence of any evidentiary factual contradiction otherwise. Classical science claims there is 'no bridge between fact and value.' Why? Fact is quantitative, objective. Value is qualitative, subjective. See judge, logic.
Supernatural cause - Supernatural is subjective; cause is objective. So 'superstition,' classically, is an oxymoron. Notice how superstition bridges subjectivity and objectivity. Superstition bridges Value and fact. Quantum th~¤ught does just that: quanton(Value,fact). Quanton(¤ught,th). Quantum th~¤ught is subject-object oxymoronic when viewed classically: coquecigrues! See our QELR of thought. Doug - 13Aug2007.
Subject matter - Subject is qualitative, matter is objective, substantial, and dialectically quantitative. See other similar, re: David A. Granger on this page. Compare a cliché, "What's the matter?" Doug's quantum~answer, "Matter, and all philosophies whose bases are 'material.'"
'Wall of Uncertainty' - Just saw this manifest stupidity in Financial Time's 1May2007 edition special section of said title; a wall is a dialectical reductionist metaphor of SOM's knife and sidis of SOM's Box; uncertainty is a spatially arbitrary stochastic manifestation of holistic, inclusionary, wave flux; wall 'is' stux' certainty, uncertainty issi flux...Doug - 2May2007.
The interpretation (the anymeme, for that matter) - 'the' classically implies objective exclusivity of only 'one;' however 'interpretation' as Philip R. Wallace wrote, "...interpretation involves according primacy to subjectivity over objectivity." Doug's quote here is slightly paraphrased. See Wallace's Paradox Lost. Superb! Doug - 20Oct2007.
True essence - Essence is change. Unless we accept truth as change, 'true essence' is an oxymoron. Found this one on page 20 of David A. Granger's John Dewey, Robert Pirsig, and The Art of Living - Palgrave-MacMillan, 2006, hardbound.
Wave-particle -
Etc.

Assess and assess for each dialectical oxymoron.

Catholic excommunication -

Classical		Comments	Links	Quantum		Comments	Links
Exactly	Similar	dichon(catholic, excommunication)	-	Exactly	Similar	quanton(catholic,excommunication)	- coquecigrues
Objective immutable EEMD comparison			- -		Subjective animate EIMA comparison		- -
Quantitative scalar EEMD comparison			- -		Qualitative animate EIMA comparison		- - -

Catholic heresy -

Classical		Comments	Links	Quantum		Comments	Links
Exactly	Similar	dichon(catholic, heresy)	-	Exactly	Similar	quanton(catholic,heresy)	- coquecigrues
Objective immutable EEMD comparison			- -		Subjective animate EIMA comparison		- -
Quantitative scalar EEMD comparison			- -		Qualitative animate EIMA comparison		- - -

Cause-effect participles -

Classical		Comments	Links	Quantum		Comments	Links
Exactly	Similar	dichon(cause-effect, participles)	-	Exactly	Similar	quanton(cause-effect,participles)	- coquecigrues
Objective immutable EEMD comparison			- -		Subjective animate EIMA comparison		- -
Quantitative scalar EEMD comparison			- -		Qualitative animate EIMA comparison		- - -

Concrete quality -

Classical		Comments	Links	Quantum		Comments	Links
Exactly	Similar	dichon(quality, concrete)	-	Exactly	Similar	quanton(quality,concrete)	- coquecigrues
Objective immutable EEMD comparison			- -		Subjective animate EIMA comparison		- -
Quantitative scalar EEMD comparison			- -		Qualitative animate EIMA comparison		- - -

Correct use -

Classical		Comments	Links	Quantum		Comments	Links
Exactly	Similar	dichon(correct, use)	-	Exactly	Similar	quanton(correct,use)	- coquecigrues
Objective immutable EEMD comparison			- -		Subjective animate EIMA comparison		- -
Quantitative scalar EEMD comparison			- -		Qualitative animate EIMA comparison		- - -

Exactly similar -

Classical		Comments	Links	Quantum		Comments	Links
Exactly	Similar	dichon(exactly, similar)	- A SOM Primer	Exactly	Similar	quanton(exactly,similar)	- A Quanton Primer
Objective immutable EEMD 'exact' comparison	Subjective state-ic EEMD 'similar' comparison	To SOMwits objective vis-à-vis subjective is "nonsense," and "oxymoronic."	- identity - equality	Objective 'exactness' is quantumly n¤ncomceptual	Subjective animate EIMA similar comparison	'Exactly' is impossible in quantum reality. We need to quantumize 'exactly,' by calling it "approximately," and possibly "uncertainly."	- similar - uncertain
Quantitative scalar EEMD 'exact' comparison	Qualitative 'similarity' has to be quantitatively reified to be "reasonable"	A dichon(quantity, quality) is "absurd" to any classical mind. Classicists turn quality into quantity by stopping and scalar-measuring it.	- quantity - reason	Quantity as 'exact' 'scalar stoppability' is quantumly n¤ncomceptual	Qualitative animate EIMA similar comparison	A quanton(approximately,similar) (is) has hermeneutic(ally) semantic in quantum reality. Our quantum stages quantonically compare ( i.e., vis-à-vis ) qualitative animate everywhere associative included~middle interrelationshipings as quantons.	- quality - stop - quantum stage

Ethical truth -

Classical		Comments	Links	Quantum		Comments	Links
Exactly	Similar	dichon(ethical, truth)	-	Exactly	Similar	quanton(ethical,truth)	- ethic - truth
Objective immutable EEMD comparison			- -		Subjective animate EIMA comparison		- -
Quantitative scalar EEMD comparison			- -		Qualitative animate EIMA comparison		- - -

Fluid mechanics -

Classical		Comments	Links	Quantum		Comments	Links
Exactly	Similar	dichon(fluid, mechanics)	-	Exactly	Similar	quanton(fluid,mechanics)	- form - flux
Objective immutable EEMD comparison			- -		Subjective animate EIMA comparison		- -
Quantitative scalar EEMD comparison			- -		Qualitative animate EIMA comparison		- - -

Formally secure -

Classical		Comments	Links	Quantum		Comments	Links
Exactly	Similar	dichon(formal, secure)	-	Exactly	Similar	quanton(formal,secure)	- form - secure
Objective immutable EEMD comparison			- -		Subjective animate EIMA comparison		- -
Quantitative scalar EEMD comparison			- -		Qualitative animate EIMA comparison		- - -

Good reason -

Classical		Comments	Links	Quantum		Comments	Links
Exactly	Similar	dichon(good, reason)	-	Exactly	Similar	quanton(good,reason)	- good - reason
Objective immutable EEMD comparison			- -		Subjective animate EIMA comparison		- -
Quantitative scalar EEMD comparison			- -		Qualitative animate EIMA comparison		- - -

Immutable uncertainty -

Classical		Comments	Links	Quantum		Comments	Links
Exactly	Similar	dichon(immutable, uncertainty)	-	Exactly	Similar	quanton(immutable,uncertainty)	- duration - uncertainty
Objective immutable EEMD comparison			- -		Subjective animate EIMA comparison		- -
Quantitative scalar EEMD comparison			- -		Qualitative animate EIMA comparison		- - -

Legal sanity -

Classical		Comments	Links	Quantum		Comments	Links
Exactly	Similar	dichon(legal, sanity)	-	Exactly	Similar	quanton(legal,sanity)	- fact - law
Objective immutable EEMD comparison			- -		Subjective animate EIMA comparison		- -
Quantitative scalar EEMD comparison			- -		Qualitative animate EIMA comparison		- - -

Moral principles -

Classical		Comments	Links	Quantum		Comments	Links
Exactly	Similar	dichon(moral, principles)	- judge	Exactly	Similar	quanton(moral,principles)	- moral - principle - truth
Objective immutable EEMD comparison		View morality and principles as classical objects which 'possess' analytic 'properties.' Recall Henri Louis Bergson's two greatest classical illusions: That [classical] reality is stable, and that objects in [classical] reality are independent of one another.	- object - canon - law		Subjective animate EIMA comparison	View morality and principles as quantum waves. Quantum waves are quantum likelihood omnistributionings. In quantum reality, morality and principles thus like all else are quantum~stochastic.	- subject - stochastic
Quantitative scalar EEMD comparison			- -		Qualitative animate EIMA comparison		- - -

Moral truth -

Classical		Comments	Links	Quantum		Comments	Links
Exactly	Similar	dichon(moral, truth)	-	Exactly	Similar	quanton(moral,truth)	- moral - truth
Objective immutable EEMD comparison			- -		Subjective animate EIMA comparison		- -
Quantitative scalar EEMD comparison			- -		Qualitative animate EIMA comparison		- - -

Objective cause -

Classical		Comments	Links	Quantum		Comments	Links
Exactly	Similar	dichon(objective, cause)	-	Exactly	Similar	quanton(objective,cause)	- cause - object
Objective immutable EEMD comparison			- -		Subjective animate EIMA comparison		- -
Quantitative scalar EEMD comparison			- -		Qualitative animate EIMA comparison		- - -

Probable cause -

Classical		Comments	Links	Quantum		Comments	Links
Exactly	Similar	dichon(probable, cause)	-	Exactly	Similar	quanton(probable,cause)	- cause - probability - What is Wrong with Probability as Value?
Objective immutable EEMD comparison			- -		Subjective animate EIMA comparison		- -
Quantitative scalar EEMD comparison			- -		Qualitative animate EIMA comparison		- - -

Quantum logic -

Classical		Comments	Links	Quantum		Comments	Links
Exactly	Similar	dichon(quantum, logic)	-	Exactly	Similar	quanton(quantum,logic)	- coquecigrues - logic - quanta
Objective immutable EEMD comparison			- -		Subjective animate EIMA comparison		- -
Quantitative scalar EEMD comparison			- -		Qualitative animate EIMA comparison		- - -

Rhetorical polemic -

Classical		Comments	Links	Quantum		Comments	Links
Exactly	Similar	dichon(rhetoric, polemic)	-	Exactly	Similar	quanton(rhetoric,polemic)	- dialectic
Objective immutable EEMD comparison			- -		Subjective animate EIMA comparison		- -
Quantitative scalar EEMD comparison			- -		Qualitative animate EIMA comparison		- - -

Scientific value -

Classical		Comments	Links	Quantum		Comments	Links
Exactly	Similar	dichon(scientific, value)	-	Exactly	Similar	quanton(scientific,value)	- science - value
Objective immutable EEMD comparison			- -		Subjective animate EIMA comparison		- -
Quantitative scalar EEMD comparison			- -		Qualitative animate EIMA comparison		- - -

Etc.

Go to Page Top

To contact Quantonics write to or call:

Doug Renselle
Quantonics, Inc.
1950 East Greyhound Pass, Ste 18, #368
Carmel, INdiana 46033-7730
USA
1-317-THOUGHT

Arches

©Quantonics, Inc., 2006-2009 — Rev. 22Apr2008 PDR — Created 21Apr2006 PDR (2 of 2)
(22,24,30Apr2006 rev - Continue evolution of oxymora. Add 'quantum logic.' Add 'objective cause.')
(4May2006 rev - Add 'rhetorical polemic.')
(1,3,8Jun2006 rev - Add 'formally secure.' Add 'catholic heresy.' Add 'probable cause.')
(2Aug2006 rev - Add 'catholic excommunication.')
(16,18,23Oct2006 rev - Add link to Hume's DCNR trialog. Add 'immutable uncertainty.' Add a humourous 'kick morass' oxymoron.)
(12Nov2006 rev - Add 'concrete quality' and 'fluid mechanics.')
(18Dec2006 rev - Reset legacy red text. Add 'cause-effect participles.')
(5,16,20-21,23Jan2007 rev - Add 'moral principles.' Add 'coherent state.' Add 'classical truth.' Add 'eigen value.' Add 'objective simplicity,' and 'wave-particle.')
(5,21Feb2007 rev - Add 'impeccable logic.' Add 'learning object.')
(19,22Mar2007 rev - Add more 'Quantum~' oxymora. Ditto.)
(11,21,27,29Apr2007 rev - Add 'Quality Control.' Add 'Probability one,' and 'Probability zero.' Add 'good | bad thing.')
(2May2007 rev - Add 'wall of uncertainty.')
(19,21Jun2007 rev - Add 'momentous locus | state.' Typo.)
(20Jul2007 rev - Reset legacy red text.)
(13Aug2007 rev - Add 'supernatural cause' AKA 'superstition.')
(12,28-30Sep2007 rev - Add 'measurable value.' Add 'define-arete, -flux, -quality, and -wisdom.')
(6,20-21Oct2007 rev - Add 'effectiveness for value.' Add 'the interpretation.' Update 'effective values.')
(3,5,18Nov2007 rev - Update Kinds of Oxymora list with some examples. Add 'Law of Included-Middle.' Add 'true essence, and 'no possibility.')
(9-10Dec2007 rev - Add 'particularized-subject,' and 'subject matter.' Repair publish date of Granger's book from August, 2006 to October.)
(21Jan2008 rev - Add 'quantify gravity.')
(17Feb2008 rev - Add 'quantum geometry.')
(6,9Mar2008 rev - Repair some unintentional deletions of text. Add some links. Add some missing HotMeme bold color enhancement. Repair a missing hyphen after 'efficient-effective value.')
(22Apr2008 rev - Add 'Financial Wisdom.')

Arches