Chapter One

"Complementing Hyperinflation and Hypoinflation: a move from CTMs to QTMs."
PDR

Our bold and color highlights follow a code:

• black-bold - important to read if you are just scanning our review
• orange-bold - text ref'd by index pages
• green-bold - we see Bohm proffering quantumesque memes
• violet-bold - an apparent classical problematic
• blue-bold - we disagree with this text segment while disregarding context of Bohm's overall text
• gray-bold - quotable text
• red-bold - our direct commentary
• [] - our intra text commentary

Doug's major point about Bohm exposes itself in his, "...we can still give a correct description in this way." Doug is saying that Bohm noodled this one badly. In no way can we retain classical formality, dogma, objectivity, lisr of objects, middle-exclusion, state, causality, etc. Doug - 3Nov2010.

Doug's dark blue enhancement in this paragraph marks said statement's problematics. Reality isn't a classical machine, period. Machines are canonically incapable of emergence, emerscence, emerscenture, and emerscitecture. Machines cannot evolve! However, nature by direct observation evolves perpetually. But classicists deny that any 'thing' which isn't ideally static can be perpetual. They canonically deny absolute change. This, in Doug's view is simple Newtonian-Einsteinian DIQheadedness.

Keynesian economics is an idealized "machine abstraction." It's imminent failure is built into its own concrete "intelligent formal design." Just like classical religion! Doug - 3Nov2010.

Doug and others have shown that quantum~reality is discontinuous, acausal, and n¤n analytic. So all three of these classical notions are simply dead on arrival, bogus! We must forego all of them; we must give all classical notions up!

That level of quantum~change begs Doug's meme of, "changing from CTMs to QTMs."

A classical context which Bohm suggests is merely enfranchisement of SOM's Box.

Note that most fundamentally classical reality can be mechanically described as "continuous motional state." This is a nearly exact analog of Henri Louis Bergson's "movement by-of immobilities." Bergson calls it a "cinematographic model of reality." Paraphrased.

Simply, state can be in continuous motion. Blatantly bogus and naïve.

So our current classical economics system, too, is blatantly bogus and naïve.

Doug - 3Nov2010.

Doug likes this paragraph. Bohm hasn't evolved to a pneumatic level where Pirsig, Suares, and Bergson did in terms of grasping a quantum~essential: classical 'truth' as a monism is a bogus classical notion. Gn¤sis claims "Monism is deceit," and social law-principle "Rules something not itself." Doug agrees. See GRS Mead's Chaldæan Oracles I & II.

Doug claims "Truth is an agent of its own change." Truth evolves, so (thus) to claim any 'thing' can be classically, state-ically 'true,' is only classical retardation self-evidenced.

Since quantum~reality evolves and changes perpetually, no classical notions of definite form exist! "Concrete reality" is a classical misnomer. Indeed, an oxymoron. See Doug's coined emerq as a quantum~substitute for classical 'form.'

See Doug's QELP of define.

Doug - 3Nov2010.

Though very classical, linguistically, this paragraph expresses our "language problem" very well. What Bohm describes in that paragraph is part of Doug's impetus to invent a n¤væl quantum~language. You may investigate Doug's innovative quantum~opus at our QELP, our QELR, and at our Coined Terms web pages. You may also wish to review our two QQAs on Language: May 2000 and June 2000.

Bohm's state-ic, objective, formal, mechanical 'interacts' QELRs as holographic flux "interrelatings" in Quantonics.

Doug - 3Nov2010.

Doug is inventing that new language...as we read this...and has been for over a decade!

Objects have complex classical 'properties.' Quantons are simple autsimilar emerqancies of their quantum~holographic interrelationshipings.

To Doug, "...wrong interpretations..." is an oxymoron. 'Wrong' is a objective bivalent of classical 'right.' 'Interpretations' is and always will be subjective, even in any classical sense. Quoting Philip R. Wallace, "Interpretation involves according primacy to subjectivity over objectivity." Paraphrased by Doug.

From Doug's perspective, this is a good analogy. It hints at basic quantum~uncertainty borne of non commutability of position and momentum as analogous non commutability of instantaneity of thought as 'state' and 'duration of thought' as change in direction. As an quantumese analogy:

Bergson described this well in one of his narratives on individual free will. Doug made a further analogous nexus there of Quantization of Free Will. Bohm will likely show us that quantumly both 'state' and duration~change are (ensemble~)quantized macroscopically.

Doug - 4Nov2010.

For Doug, Bohm describes what happens personally when Doug experiences his many daily epiphanies. Volume of these increases, for Doug, as he accumulates more mental holographic nexi on his quantum~stage. Doug describes this as quantum~simplification of understanding. More nexi make understanding simpler.

Doug - 4Nov2010.

Doug interprets Bohm's "indivisibility of a sort," as analogous Bergson's "duration of thought." An easy way to say this is that quantized processes, since all quanta are flux, have indivisible duration. Another way to say this is that quantum~processings never classically 'collapse.'

To Doug, Bohm is describing a hologram.

When we move from CTMs to QTMs, from continuity to quantization, from value to Value, we leave behind classical notions of 'property,' and engender quantum~memeos of holographic flux interrelationshipings.

It may or may not be obvious to our readers that Quantonics omnistinguishes CTMs from QTMs in its usage of dichons to describe classical notions and a complementary usage of quantons to describe quantum~memeos. Dichons are propertyesque. Quantons are quantum~flux~interrelationshipings.

In Quantonics, classical 'analysis' is simply bogus due its abject formal mechanicity.

Doug - 4Nov2010.

Doug views Bohm's efforts here as his way of retaining 'classical logic' in quantum theory. To Doug, this is a huge mistake.

Bohm doesn't get (perhaps only apparent to Doug) Finkelstein's meme of quantum~islandicity. When we amalgamate Finkelstein's islandicity and Mae-wan Ho's quantum memes of coherence tolerating ensembles of islandic autonomy, we grasp how Bohm's efforts here fall short of a deeper grasp of quantum~reality.

Bohm accomplished much, but his retention of an 'explicate order' spawned much maltuitive thought like what we see here.

This paragraph has always (since near end of MII, late 1990s) disturbed Doug greatly. I keep rereading it, looking for some redemption, but it just isn't there. Closest to redemption Bohm comes is in his "An attempt to analyze them into separate parts destroys or changes their meanings." This agrees with Bruno de Finetti's "...when we reify any subjective, we make an error." Paraphrased by Doug. De Finetti's stochastics are closer to Mae-wan Ho than to David Bohm. Doug's opine. Bruno de Finetti is one of Earth's greatest probabilists. Like Peirce (pronounce 'Purse') and James he had a more abductive view of (present and future)stochastics, stindyanically looking forward...a priori. Most classical logic is (1) inductive and (2) deductive, looking back and hearing footsteps: a posteriori, both of which assume stoppability and independent objective separability.

See Doug's now ancient opus on SOM Limitations and What is Wrong with SOM Logic.

Doug - 4Nov2010.

"Logically definable concepts..." require reality to be classically 'stopped' in order to perform analysis. It is crucial to understand that quantum~reality is unstoppable. Irving Stein pointed out too that quantum~reality is non analytic. To Doug, this implies that we have to view all of quantum reality as non mechanical, and we have to invent n¤væl ways of thinking which themselves are non mechanical. We have strong evidence this is possible. Doug's invention of QELP and QELR and n¤væl coined terms, plus a n¤væl quantum~philosophy...are all evidence, Doug believes, that a non mechanical approach can be accomplished. Prior that we have to learn how to change "How we are thinking." Bohm suggests this. Bohr talked about it. Polanyi spent much of his life writing about this. John Lukacs, in his new book End of an Age, writes about it. Countless others have said, "Our current classical language is inadequate to describe quantum reality." Doug agrees.

Almost all of our thinking now, early MIII, is genuinely bad! It's time to change. It is not time to go back to status quo as some politicians are saying. Going back to old ways is exemplary of mental retardation. Living in a dead 'logical' past won't launch an exodus into a living, perpetually evolving, holographic quantum future. Logic is dead. Analysis is dead. Reality is alive, aware, con(m)scious, and selecting actively "whatings happenings nextings."

Doug - 4Nov2010.

After Doug reads this for the n^th time, he still says to himself, "Self, when will humanity finally grasp that classical science, mechanics and maths simply cannot describe quantum~reality?" Our current methods of thing-king are bogus, folks! Wake up!

Those who get there first are going to kick major competitive and capitalistic ass, period! Doug's opine.

Classical 'verification' is impossible in quantum~reality!

See Doug's original opus on SOM's Bases of Judgment.

Classical verification depends on classical proof. Let's list and assess ingredience of classical proof:

• proof - depends upon,
• falsifiability - depends upon,
• contradiction - depends upon,
• negation - depends upon,
• lisrability - depends upon,
• stability - but quantum~reality is perpetual evolutionary change.

So you see classical mechanical thought has no foundation! Classical proof, falsifiability, contradiction, negation, lisrability, and stability are all bogus classical notions.

Doug - 4Nov2010.

Do you see how Bohm's "...when the electron is moving..." implies his own basic assumption that reality is stoppable?

Electrons are unstoppable! Reality is unstoppable.

That Bohmian assumption almost drags all of his work into a classical abyss, abysses of staysses. There is n¤ stay, just go!

Doug - 4Nov2010.

Having lightly covered some issues with Bohm which Doug has inured over at least two decades of thought re quantum vav classical, Doug would put all this in quantum~economic lightings by following Bohm's lead. We need to think about all economic terminology in a similar way as how Bohm asked us to think about thought as a quantum~complementation of any term's apparently static part and its genuine dynamic part.

Pirsig's MoQ may be shown that way: quanton(DQ,SQ). Now let's do it for inflation, deflation, and hyperinflation:

quantum~inflation issi quanton(dynamic_complement_of_inflation,static_complement_of_inflation).

Obtain how both of those complements are n¤ longer classical; they are n¤wings quantum.

If you obtain, you grasp our calling them k~n¤w~ings.

Rinse and repeat for deflation and hyperinflation.

Now our challenge is to interpret quantumly what those quantons mean and how we can use them to evolve our approach to economics, our quantum approach to economics.

Doug - 4Nov2010.

SOM's Bases of Judgment

See QELR of state

Quantum Essence

Scintilla Quantum Tell Flux

Classical time is canonically homogeneous. Time here is time everywhere. Einstein's relativity depends upon this (one cone of relativistic time), but his time is not real time, rather a classically-contrived space rate hyper notion.

Quantum timings are con(m)textually relative, thus heterogeneous. Many timings.

Classical 'state' turns living Value into dead 'value.'

Quantum change (flux) turns dead 'value' into living Value.

Doug - 30Oct2010.

See Doug's QELRs of both object and subject

Scintilla Quantum Tell Flux

Start seeing your personal coherence more like a laser beam.

Observe how some sports teams only perform miraculously when they pneumatically cohere.

Be like Peter. Be a rock. Be a brick-brained retard. Believe that OSFA, period. Believe "Our way or the highway," classical coprolytic scat.

"Teacher, leave us piglets alone. We like wallowing in manure and other unsavories."

Quantum coherence adheres a meme that "we are ihn Iht and Iht issi ihn us."

Cosmic con(m)sciousness is ihn Iht and Iht issi ihn cosmic con(m)sciousness.

We also refer those as "quantum~vacuum~flux," and "isoflux."

We must learn to have quantum~faith that cosmic con(m)sciousness issi immortal, perpetual...

See Carlo Suares in his Second Coming of Reb YhShWh.

I think_q this is one of the most important memeos Quantonics has to offer.

It suggests that we all have individual powers of self change, self adaption, and self evolution.

Free will is implicit in our quantum~beings: we can choose, we can select, we can provisionally decide: choice, chance, change.

We evolutionarily "rinse and repeat" our own CH³ngs.

Quantum~beings are intrinsically both self~ and other~ both autonomically and autodidactically ~transmutative.

Doug -30Oct2010.

See Doug's QELR of truth

See Doug's QELR of change

Stop accepting classical 'ideas' that society is hyper (above) individual(s).

Fecundate your vicissitudes.

Be you! With respect for all other individuals.

Deny that you are quantum~individual quantum~being, and become a SOMite.

Diminish self by turning into a hylic materialist.

Stop thing-king and start think_qing.

Stop thing-king:

• dialecta
• bivalency
• objecta (e.g., A, B, C, ... 1, 2, 3)
• dichon(A, B)
• perpetual state as immutability
• funda-mentalism
• EEMD
• EOOO

Start think_qing:

• hologra
• omnivalency
• adapta
• quantons(scintilla,quanta)
• perpetual change's transmutation
• compla~mentalism
• EIMA
• BAWAM

Stop think_qing and start thing-king.

Start (continue) thing-king:

• dialecta
• bivalency
• objecta (e.g., A, B, C, ... 1, 2, 3)
• dichon(A, B)
• perpetual state as immutability
• funda-mentalism
• EEMD
• EOOO

Stop think_qing:

• hologra
• omnivalency
• adapta
• quantons(scintilla,quanta)
• perpetual change's transmutation
• compla~mentalism
• EIMA
• BAWAM

Nearly all of our world's populace, CeodE 2011, thingks!

We commence a long and very n¤n linear journey: learning H5W to think_q.

Doug - 1Dec2011.

Our bold and color highlights follow a code:

• black-bold - important to read if you are just scanning our review
• orange-bold - text ref'd by index pages
• green-bold - we see Zohar proffering quantumesque memes
• violet-bold - an apparent classical problematic
• blue-bold - we disagree with this text segment while disregarding context of Zohar's overall text
• gray-bold - quotable text
• red-bold - our direct commentary
• [] - our intra text commentary

Unsure...Danah's "observation problem" is actually what we mean today by "quantum~interpretation problem." Doug has shown elsewhere, when one think_qs quantumly there is n¤ problem. Only when one thingks classically is there a 'problem.' See Doug's QELR of think. Doug - 22Oct2010.

A powerful tell of quantum~awarenessings as intrinsic to quantum~reality.

See Doug's coining of omnifferent.

Said 'surface' is actually an huge holographic ensemble (crowd) of atoms and electrons.

Doug offers none of Danah's referenced Figures.

There are n¤ classical 'paths-trajectories' in quantum~reality. All motion is quantized and stochastic. Naught is classically linear! Doug.

This entire paragraph, in Doug's opine, requires intensive care: QELR.

A partial repair involves substitution of "scintillates" for 'hits' and 'strikes.' Doug.

It is crucial here for you to view Bohm's "a common pool of information" as a quantum~hologram.

It is much like what those classical movie makers did in Matrix. Immersion in a classical matrix vis-à-vis immersion in a quantum~environment which we refer "hologram."

"...In the case of the electrons, the 'score' is of course the wave function. As with the dancers, the electrons are thus participating in a common action based on a pool of information, rather than pushing or pulling on each other mechanically according to laws like those of classical physics."

Doug's bold and color.

This paragraph is one of Danah's most important and gratifying epiphanies. At least for Doug.

For Doug, this shows that quantum~reality's essence is interrelative~awarenessings and ~consciousnessings borne of them. N¤ne is possible without a presumption of EIMA.

Quantons, recall, are then, "interrelative awarenessings."

Our major problem is to offer quantons a "living substrate" to realize themselves. For Doug, when we accomplish that, we will have accomplished quantum~AI!

See Doug's efforts on affectation as an antidote to Danah's use of 'effects.'

Doug - 21-22Oct2010.

That which is classically true depends upon countless suppositions:

• objective assessment of these prerequisites to establish what is true (i.e., verity): stability, independence, negation, contradiction, falsifiability, and proof
• classically-established truth is constant, it never changes unless it is subsequently falsified objectively
• classical 'definition' of terms are 'true'
• verity and falsity are classically 'opposite'
• verity and falsity are middle-excluded (Aristotle's third sillygism)
• verity and falsity are independent of classical uni-time
• reality is classically objective therefore classical-verity and -falsity are objective
• classical objects are immutable, but can move linearly in classical uni-time
• classical unit-time may be stopped for convenience of classical analysis and synthesis of material objects
• etc.

Quantum~reality supports n¤ classical notions of truth. Quantum~reality evolves and is self~other mutating perpetually.

As a result, n¤ne of those classical suppositions is viable in quantum~reality.

Therefore Doug says it simply, "Classical Interpretation is bogus."

Quantum~Think_qing is vastly superior Classical-Thing-king.

Comparatives include:

classical inflation is objective vis-à-vis
quantum~inflation is subjective

ditto for deflation and hyperinflation

Those sentients commencing MIII treating economics objectively are committing huge errors in judgment.

Think_q about it. Inflation isn't 'true.' Deflation isn't 'true.' Hyperinflation isn't 'true.' Why? They are quantum~mutative processings which are perpetually underway. Some (one) move(s) to forefront of our attention when they become dominant. To say they are classically 'true' is error by whomever is saying it.

For Gary to say Herb Stein's quote is 'true,' is simply an error of judgment for similar reasons. Quantum~processes, unlike classical 'things' cann¤t 'stop.'

See Doug's comments on 'define' as an English language problematic. 16Oct2010 - Doug.

We may no longer thingk of inflation, deflation, and hyperinflation as dichonic 'things.'

We must learn to think_q of them as quantons.

QTMs assume negation is subjective. This breaks all classical formal logic and all classical thing-king based upon it.

Since all of quantum~reality is flux, and all flux is positive energy, there is n¤ 'classical notion' of 'negation' in quantum~reality.

That means we do n¤t 'subtract' flux from flux. Classical maths do n¤t work in quantum~reality!

Positive quantum~flux can only 'modulate,' and potentially 'cancel' other positive quantum~flux. Entanglement of quantum~flux is a prerequisite of any quantum~cancellation.

Doug - 16Oct2010.

Quantum~reality is complementary.

Quantum~reality is holographic.

Quantum~reality is middle~included and everywhere~associative.

Ideal, 'oppositional' negation, therefore is impossible in quantum~reality since A issi ihn B and B issi ihn A, which breaks Aristotle's third sillygism.

We can script this more comcisely as A nissin B.

See Doug's commentary on quantum~interference. Intent here is to show how cancellation requires interference. Thence interference requires entanglement. Non~entangled flux moves through other flux freely without any interference, modulation, and possible 'blackout' cancellation.

Doug - 16Oct2010.

Quantum~reality is quantized and quantizing.

Therefore any notions of ideal classical uni-temporal continuity is impossible.

See Doug's table comparing classical and quantum logics.

CTMs assume reality is 'stoppable.'

This is classical 'scientific' convention.

QTMs assume reality is perpetually unstoppable, always in flux, always changing, always changing all.

Naught is invariant in quantum~reality. Naught is constant in quantum~reality. Naught is immutable in quantum~reality. All is ihn flux and flux is ihn all, period.

In script: all nissin flux.

Doug - 15Oct2010.

• identity - (A is A),
• contradiction - (A must be either A or not A), and
• excluded-middle - (A cannot be both A and not A).

Our bold and color highlights follow a code:

• black-bold - important to read if you are just scanning our review
• orange-bold - text ref'd by index pages
• green-bold - we see Zohar proffering quantumesque memes
• violet-bold - an apparent classical problematic
• blue-bold - we disagree with this text segment while disregarding context of Zohar's overall text
• gray-bold - quotable text
• red-bold - our direct commentary
• [] - our intra text commentary

• wave function 'collapse,'
• collapsed reality as classically objective,
• fermionic reality as classically objective (it isn't),
• 'objective' reality as classically 'stoppable' for purposes of 'zero momentum' scalar measurement of fermions which never stop,
• particle and wave as either-or objectively lisr,
• quantum theory as mechanical (it isn't),
• reality as objective for convenience of physics,
• etc.

Danah's "...act of observing quantum systems changes them into ordinary objects..." We can simplify Danah's misnomer here by using quantonics script to say, "Quantons evolve based upon all of their many interrelationshipings with their both local and global environmentings." Some interrelationshipings have greater quantum~partial affectationings than others.

To counter Danah's concerns re "pernicious individualism," many interrelationshipings may be viewed as a dynamic Quantum Society. In this case, as Doug pointed out in a prior segment, Quantum Society isn't just anthropochauvinistic-anthropocentrism. Quantum~Society isn't just human anymore.

In Quantonics one of our major suppositions is that Nature is intrinsically aware at all scales of reality. An implicit of that is "Nature measures herself, and selects outcomes from her own perpetual everywhere holographic EIMA self~observation."

Danah's "...give us a world..." does not depend upon a classical notion of wave function 'collapse.' Nature's creation of fermions is source and agency of what most of us refer "material reality." But fermions are dynamic flux which never collapse. We may n¤t classically measure them, rather we must quantum~monitor their perpetual evolutionings. Perpetual quantum~evolutionings abduct quantum~reality as radically instable. This violates (i.e., belies) classical canonic stability as a dialectical ruse. Quantum~monitoring requires instability borne of quantum~scintillation! 1Jan2012 - Doug.

Fermions are n¤t 'particulate.' Fermions evolve as quantum~flux and may never be classically 'stopped,' for convenience of classical 'measurement.' There are n¤ classical 'scalars' in quantum~reality. Your blood pressure is a great example here. Heart rate too. Always changing, always evolving!

Bosons, specifically photons, enable us to see, via QED interrelationshipings with electrons, fermionic (material) reality. Too beware Danah's particularity of photons. They too are perpetual fluxings, always changing and changing all with which they interrelate. Photons literally transmute atoms' energy levelings. If photons have enough energy they can transmute atoms themselves! Photons are n¤t objects, and they possess n¤ 'classically objective properties.' Photons are ensembles (Banesh Hoffman calls them "crowds") of waves (AKA 'wave packets') essentially comtaining wave ensemble 'pictures' of their local holographic surroundings. A photon intra our Sun has an omniffering 'picture' than a photon in a Peruvian jungle.

Readers should put our comments, so far, in light of a Keynesian economic goal of "stabilizing world financial systems." Readers should see vividly that is an anti-quantum approach, and as a result it will fail just as we monitor what is happening now during second decade of our 21st century. Economic systems are quantum and as such are perpetually uncontrollable and perpetually uncertain...as Keynesians are about to omniscover. Fiat doesn't enhance economic stability, rather destabilizes all economic systems which embrace it. Doug - 3Oct2010.

Fiat, just like 'classical concrete,' is an abstraction which is delusional. Au is fermionic: quantum~real. Fiat is less than bosonic: quantum~bogus! Fiat is empty calories of bloated Keynesian GDPs. Compare flow of fiat to flow of Au as [Vv]alue. AuGDPs are Value. FiatGDPs are faux value. N¤ value!

N¤ photon has classically 'static' position. So to claim we can measure it is stupidity of highest grossness.

N¤ 'thing' in quantum~reality may be 'fixed.' There is n¤ valid concept of classical 'zero momentum' in quantum~reality.

Please obtain a crucial meme here: Absence of 'zero momentum,' is an intrinsic quantum~complementation of presence of 'absolutely perpetual flux.' Implications of this are so vast as to be almost beyond human imaginationings. To test your quantum~stage, ponder a Doug query, "Are quantum~isofluxings absolutely perpetual fluxings?" To answer that, do we need some n¤væl quantum~think_qing? What proto~suppositions are necessary? Doug - 5Oct2010.

There is n¤ such idea as, "...particle detectors..." in quantum~reality. Why? There are n¤ 'particles' in quantum~reality. Photons are dynamic, macroscopic, always fluxing, always evolving wave function ensemble 'packets' of energyings. Detection of said packets elicits quantum~scintillation. Scintillation is quantum~uncertain both in modulation of an electron's energy level and in demodulation of electron's energy level. Using scintillation to classically 'detect' is implicitly a fool's errand. (Using scintillation to omnitor quantum~processings is a good meme.)

Photons do n¤t have classical trajectories! Photons' individual Chautauquas perigrinate stochastically, uncertainly, n¤n linearly. There is n¤thing classical about photons, period. Danah is showing extreme ignorance in this case. Doug - 3Oct2010.

All photons (bosons) and matter waves (fermions) behave like waves. Classical 'physicists' and 'scientists' simply choose to misinterpret quantum~reality using their objective biases. See Doug's QELR of science.

She is right about self interference and we then may infer interference borne of quantum~entanglement.

See Doug on quantum~scintillation.

N¤ reality is n¤r can be 'fixed.' Period!

"Beyond particles, beyond fields of force, beyond geometry, beyond space and time themselves, is the ultimate constituent {of all there is}, the still more ethereal act of observer-participancy?"
[This is a quote by Zohar of Wheeler, 1983.]

We see John Archibald Wheeler here appropriately delegitimizing classical ideas of: particles, notions of force, geometry, and Newtonian-Einsteinian 'space-time.'

In Doug's opine, Wheeler was a greatest of greats in quantum due diligence and innovation. Richard Feynman thought similarly re Wheeler.

Of all paragraphs quoted here by Doug, this one carries perhaps hugest ramifications for the 'death of Keynesianism,' the 'death of FRB, and the 'end of Cartel and political intervention in fiscal affairs of capitalism. Doug - 3Oct2010.

Our environment is changing rapidly. Our cultures are changing rapidly. Peoples' awareness of political and fiscal evils perpetrated upon them are growing. Keynesians beware! Politicians beware! Bankers beware! Your end times are nigh... Doug - 3Oct2010.

Doug has avoided Merleau-Ponty simply due his embrace of 'static truth.' In quantum~reality, "Truth is an agent of its own change." Truthings are quantum~flux, just like all else...

"So long as I keep before me the ideal of an absolute observer, of knowledge in the absence of any viewpoint, I can only see my situation as being a source of error. But once I have acknowledged that through it I am geared to all actions and all knowledge that are meaningful to me, then my contact with the social in the finitude of my situation is revealed to me to the starting point of all truth, including that of science, and, since we have some idea of truth since we are inside truth and cannot get outside it, all that I can do is define a truth within the situation."
[This is a quote by Zohar of Merleau-Ponty, 1960.]

"In transcending the Cartesian division between mind and matter, modern physics has not only invalidated the classical ideal of an objective description of nature but has also challenged the myth of a value-free science...The scientific results {scientists} obtain and the technological application they investigate will be conditioned by their frame of mind."
[This is a quote by Zohar of Fritjof Capra, 1983.]

Let's just override her garbage intellect here. Quantum~reality is subjective, period! Doug - 3Oct2010.

Classical science is doomed. That is what Danah fears, but what she refers danger is actually good quantum change which will sweep away much antique and passé classical thingking methods.

Nothing classical will ever explain quantum~con(m)sciousness. That is a big reason why AI can't seem to get traction. Classical notions disable implementation of quantum~AI.

Read Bohm and read Karl Pribram. Consciousness is quantum~holographic. If you do not grasp that you are already evolutionarily dead. Worse, you have n¤ legacy of any worth to future humanity.

Abraham's four millennia old Autiot is closer to quantum~reality than current objective 'science' will ever be. Energy isn't classically 'objective.' Waves are flux are energy, folks.

Current economic theory is 'state' folks!

Thank you for reading,

Doug - 3Oct2010.

Allow Doug to expand this one a tad more:

• SQ can be quantons(DQ,SQ). What Doug intends by QTM.
• SQ can be dichons(SQ, SQ). What Doug intends by CTM.

Quantonic SQ is living~ and dying~values which have Value coinside them. An example is biological cellular apoptosis and resurrection. In quantum~biology living and dying are perpetual quantum~complements of one another. We can say this, "quantonic value issi perpetual evolution ihn Value and Value issi perpetual evolution ihn quantonic value." This is essential quantum~gn¤sis and is benchmarked by ancient Autiot's Sepher Yetsira. Sepher Yetsira is an ancient evolutionary~self~other~recursive quantum~Physics of Cosmic Energy. It's single graphic depiction appears in Sefirot's Cosmic Grail.

Dichonic SQ is dead value and dying value which denies Value. An example is the demiurge: as pure dichonic SQ. Dichonic SQ ultimately degrades and devolves into ESQ: Exclusive Static Quality. This notion (one of entropic dissipation of thermodynamic energy and information) is an heir of JC Maxwellian posentropic classical thought. Many challenge it for that simple reason. Doug does n¤t know any way to con(m)firm it using Quantonics and quantum~empiritheory. Doug intends to learn Autiot well enough to attempt a con(m)firmation there. If you want to super~walk Doug's efforts read Carlo Suares' Trilogy and his Second Coming of Reb YhShWh.

Doug - 8Nov2010. Red text update 5Sep2011 - Doug.