Arches

Doug's Hodgepodge CeodE 2010
of
Ad Hoc Financial-Economic-Political Comments

These remarks are Doug's opinions only.
Doug is n¤t a certified broker.
Doug is n¤t a licensed counselor.
Ponder at your own risk.

Doug.

NOFLAME$$$dpellesner${at}$indy${dot}$rr${dot}$com$$$NOFLAME

Archive of prior years' HodgePodge

Doug's HodgePodge CeodE 2009

Next segment...

13Mar2010

Folks, something politically huge is happening! By huge I mean "long term durational affectation."

See Zero Hedge's 13Mar2010 Ratigan And Spitzer Discuss Repo 105, Conclude "Civil Cases Will Be Brought".

One of greatest quotes ever appears in that genuinely-WOW commentary and its intriguing omnilogs.

Scroll down to Cognitive Dissonance's response to 21:28 response to financial illiterate's 21:11 query. It's about 20% down said page...

Read subsequent remarks too! Awesome! Forum omnilogging at its best.

Most of you know Doug has, since about 2005, officially become a quantum~gn¤stic. This sequence of comments, for Doug, is evidence of global metastasis of quantum~gn¤sis!

I had to share Zero Hedge's commentary with you, since it is one of many rapidly evolving SEPs of gn¤sis' global metastasis.
It is, finally, the beginning of the end of classical political and economic treachery. That treachery is what gn¤sis intends by Error. Heraclitus paraphrased: dialectic is Error. Dialectic is classical treachery.

Thank you Zero Hedge! You, most of you, are precious (e.g., Cognitive Dissonance) to those of us who grasp your semantics, your economic-political Autiot (i.e., language of quantum~gn¤sis).
Thank you for teaching us, for helping us leave dialectic's hive of consensual socially enslaved drones.

Doug.

13Mar2010

9Mar2010

A lot is going on...some we need to defer to later segments of Hodgepodge.

A quantum tell of quantum~computing's chronological cusp.

...and all pundits are already talking about it...mostly dialectical gunk...

...so Doug decided to talk about a novel subject this segment of Hodgepodge™:

We need to narrate Darpa's latest dream machine:

Many of you are aware of Doug's great interest in quantum~computing and what it will do for our world...but it isn't here yet...near but n¤t here.
(Near is about one to two decades. Doug's opine.)

Too, you are aware of Doug's great interest in computing 'architectures,' which Doug wants to rename "emerscitectures."
Big AI qua relevance here!

Well, Darpa wants a ten petaflop machine whose power efficiency requires one watt per 50 gigaflops!
A standard install plenum 78x24x40 inches can only consume 57kw!!!

Darpa is looking for innovators to make this happen. Standard suppliers apparently do not dream
powerfully enough, so Darpa has decided to leap out of a classical box into an yet unnamed NSpace.

Clearly this isn't classical stuff anymore!

Why?

That's ridiculously easy: one watt per 50 gigaflops is roughly 10-12 watts per flop.
Also we have to worry about how many clock ticks per flop.
If it's 10 then Doug's calculation becomes 10-13 watts per tick.

How do we go about doing something like that?

Doug has already answered this, partially elsewhere.

Classical theory no longer works, people!
Just like in economics, politics, mathematics, and science...classical theory is no longer valid, no longer viable.

Why?

One word: adiabaticity.

It isn't familiar to you, is it?

What does it mean? Simply it means 100% energy efficiency...no heat loss.

J. C. Maxwell is supposed to be Earth's greatest entropy specialist, but poor JCM believed
there was only one type of entropy and that entropy only had one gradient.

Very, very simply...to do what Darpa asks...we have to throw Maxwell out with most other classical theory.

Why?

Adiabaticity implies "zero entropy." Maxwell declared zero entropy "impossible." So classical theory would say we cannot do it.

But our brains do it every day. Our brain's neurons are zeroentropic plus. We have empirical evidence that Maxwell was just another dialectical dumbass.

Let's keep it short: we need a new view of entropies (see cohera and entropa), thus
we need adiabatic memories, and we need adiabatic clocking.

Consider bandwidths and center-clock frequencies. Consider issues of onset~adiabaticity!

If you want to know how, hire some really good quantum physicists and quantum mathematicians and quantum biologists.
Might start with University of Florida who did that YF-22 simulator using rat brain neurons.

Doug.

9Mar2010

6Mar2010

Recall how, earlier this year, Doug did a two year quantum~autsimilar projection of Au?

Well, he's doing it again, now with five year Kitco chart whose 'now' reference is 4-7Mar2010:

If you wonder about strange ordinate labeling, Kitco alternates 8mo then 9mo then 8mo, etc. spacing.

You can easily see that our quantum~autsimilarity worked quite well in January. Let's see what happens with our five year version.

Doug.

6Mar2010

27Feb2010

Yesterday, without saying so, Doug portrayed Fed et al. as believing in financial reality as 'causal.'

Doug portrayed their adherence to causality as their assumption that they can determinately control markets' behaviors.

Quantonics and others have shown that causality depends upon a classical notion of 'strict determinism.'

What other notions do these classical bankers and econometricians (CBaE) adhere?

Revised 27Feb2010 ©Quantonics, Inc. Created by Doug Renselle 27Feb2010
 

 Classical B & E Notion

 Doug Commentary
Causality

There is a lot to be said here, so allow Doug to distill it. Classical causality as strict determinism is bogus. Use it axiomatically and get in major trouble right here in river city.

See Doug's QELR of cause. See Doug's QELP of cause. See Doug's QQA on cause. See Doug's comparison of classical causation and quantum~affectation.

One to One Correspondence CBaE's objective axioms use 1:1 correspondence to meet their requirement for determinate classical causality. But all that they measure are ephemera. N¤ price is static: thus ephemeral. N¤ price stands alone: thus ephemeral. All ephemera are quantum~wavic and thus are ensembles of ensembles n¤ne of whose constitua are classically synchronous n¤r unitemporal.
Strict Determinism

CBaE assume classically 'What happens next' is a direct consequence of an probabilistic ensemble of past events.

Implicit CBaE assumption is: This is a totally factual proposition and 'no' subjective Value is involved in 'what happens next.'

Philosophical underpinnings of this assumption is Hume's Law applies as "There is 'no' bridge over fact and Value." (Doug's single quotes of 'no.')

Hume's Law is similar Aristotle's Law of Excluded-Middle which says A 'cannot' be both A and 'not' A. Hume's Law is more specific in saying An object 'cannot' be both an object and a subject.

Control as Effective Assumption of CBaE here is, "If we can control future events we deny natural parametric evolution." As some of us grasp, that is a denial of nature which of late appears to be what CBaE are attempting. Of course most classical scientists, and thus 'political economists' view nature as 'absurd.' Doug imagines how CBaE must view that 26Feb2010 8.8 quake in Chile absurd? Without CBaE realizing a 8.8 quake in fiat Fed US$ paper may be imminent?
Parametric Stability CBaE assume analytic stability. So do they assume analytic stoppability of financial reality? What if reality isn't stoppable and what if stopping it to analyze it has deleterious affects on outcomes of those assumptions? For an analogy see Doug's A Quantum Pendulum. We have already seen what happens when an analyst like David X Li, et al., use scalar (stopped) metrics in quantitative algorithms.
Parametric Independence Excepting analytic effects of time CBaE assume all quantitative parameters are independent of changes in other independent parameters. See mathematics' Independence Axiom, for example, in Weisstein's CRC Encyclopedia of Mathematics (try wolfram.com).
Time as Analytic CBaE assume classically 'One Time Fits All.' We call that classical notion uni-time, uni-temporal, and uni-temporality. It is classical time as a monism.
Quantity as Measure CBaE assume fiscal and economic reality is wholly quantitative. No subjective-value is allowed to and into all quantitative analysis. Essentially quantitative value is price and cost (and to some extent, a great extent credit).

Revised 27Feb2010 ©Quantonics, Inc. Created by Doug Renselle 27Feb2010

Doug put that table together to help readers see what is wrong with global financial analysis using western dialectical objective thought.

N¤ne of those classical notions is valid in quantum~reality.

Quantum~reality is qualitative, and unambiguously n¤t wholly quantitative.

Classical reality as dialectical denies Value and subjective reality AKA qualitative reality. Our table partially shows why.

So CBaE work in a classical reality which is quantitative and objective and which denies economic reality as qualitative and subjective.

So just like in philosophy and culture and religion we have a economic war twixt classicists and quantumists.

Classicists say all is quantitative and many of them believe in paper money and paper pricing and costing of all material commodities, goods and assets.
They believe in fractional reserve banking based upon fiat paper. They believe in infinite credit based upon fiat paper.

Those beliefs (classical dialectical beliefs) are destroying global monetary systems.

How?

Through a process of substituting purely symbolic dialectical price-cost notions for Value memetics and memeos.

Simply, via a process of substituting quantity for quality.

Fiat paper is worthless. How do we know? In USA US$ doesn't pay any interest.
Why?
Fiat can no longer afford to pay interest since it isn't worth anything.
Fiat is only a symbol with no intrinsic Value.
How do we know for sure it has no Value?
Sovereign USA is completely bankrupt at least 3 to 10 times over!!!
Someone Doug just read, methinks on FoFoA, said that US$ is just a symbol: and symbols have no intrinsic Value! Agree!

Now, compare gold to US$. If you hold it in your individual personal physical possession, it has an intrinsic Value.
In recorded history it always has, and it will for a long time to come.

Gold's fiat paper price is manipulated, and it is too low.
It sounds absurd, Doug realizes that, but when fiat paper dies...and it will, and sooner than later...we will find out what gold's value really is.
(Ditto silver and palladium, though Doug does not view them as having intrinsic value since they are neither durable noble metals.)

If Doug told you what he thinks gold will be value-wise per Troy ounce, you would laugh.
But Doug and countless others will have their~our last laugh.

Our globe's Cartel and Interventionalists believe they have total control of market prices.
Not only do they believe that, they believe their control is durable.
What is basis of their reason? Exemplary classical notions like we show above.

Roughly in 1930s, even into early 1940s, one could buy a Ford for about $495.
That's approximately 20 Troy ounces of gold depending upon whether you use $20 vav $35 per ounce then paper gold pricing.

As it turns out, 20 Troy ounces at today's paper gold price is about $22000, which will buy a modern Ford equivalent easily.

Notice quantity change for fiat: 22000/495 = 44.

Notice quantity change for gold: 20/20 = 1.
(Notice implicitness of NO INFLATION!)
No infinite credit bubble. No retarded 'political economics.'
Doug picked up that phrase ('political economics') reading a 1980s Larry Summers' paper on Gibson's Paradox in an article at FoFoA which is very relevant comments here.
It is also relevant a paper on gold evaluation and physical locus existence at this Thunder Road article.)

Which is higher value?
Now we move to qualitative assessment based upon which unit of price exchange held its unit value
and which devalued its unit value, followed by a qualitative query, "Which is better?"
Try doing a Poisson Bracket (PB) on that: gold vav fiat and better vav worse.
How much did $ 'value' (actually price) lose? 1-495/22000 = 98%.

Turns out that is just what most pundits claim as dollar's loss of value in last 80-100 years.

Gold saves our USA. Fiat paper destroys it, period.

Here's a piece of analytic evidence for you which is unreproachable empirically: All paper money systems fail by an inflationary process of self destruction of unit value.
All 'experts' understand that. General public doesn't yet understand that, but when they do...watch out.

Our public school systems have taught our kids to be fiscally incompetent. It is repugnant. NEA go to hell. Local teachers' associations go to hell. School boards too!!!

Today's Zero Hedge has an article that says German Weimar Republic's ultimate inflation reduced Mark's value not 50 times but nearly 166,000 times! Ponder that awhile.

Doug.

27Feb2010

26Feb2010

Did you notice interventionalist's trial run on 25Feb2010?

We saw a big U-y in both Dow and Nasdaq. Did you notice that early spike down and back up in gold? And then gold kept moving up while markets did their U-y.

Why?

Fed and Cartel want evidence that they can make markets go up and down at will, and that they can make gold act either harmoniously or dissonantly.

Why?

What happens, Fed hopes, can be totally manipulated...

But it's too late!

Why?

See FoFoA.

Euro has features to save it from $'s demise!!!

Gold is KING!!!

Notice Fofoa's economic Krebs cycle charts.

Re: Apple and its reelection of envirnomentalist Al Gore to its board...

Al Gore, in Doug's opinion, is political slime. For a man of that calibre to be on Apple's board is a tarnish. To reelect him is to tarnish Apple.

And Steve said about Apple's fiat cash hoard:

"Cash gives us tremendous security and flexibility. When you take risks, it's like jumping up in the air, and it's nice to know the ground will be there when you land."
Quote of Apple's CEO Steve Jobs.

Looks like Steve may be technically savvy and politically-economically inastute.

Sorry Steve, as you will soon learn, fiat has no 'ground.'

See our FoFoA link above, Steve.

Doug.

26Feb2010

23Feb2010

Doug has been watching with interest rhetoric coming out of 'executive' and 'legislative' branches of USFFA (US Failing Federation of America).

I have been hearing blatant stupidity on both sides.

Bush thinks we want his neocan't imperialist fascism back. (While Cheney is in his death throes...)

Obama thinks we want a (he says) 1$Trillion health 'care' system (which will become a 5$trillion abomination), while most of US want naught to do with it.

All of this in a backdrop of a Dow which is entering a major bear phase which will drop to mid 4000s yet this year (pure Doug speculation based on other pundits' thoughts).

More of that backdrop which is a tell of some goodness in our speculation is a huge divergence (see Zerohedge) twixt US spending and revenues.
This will only get worse, and nut case Obama wants to increase spending when he should be doing opposite.

Doug is watching Dow and Nasdaq now 10:11 USCDT) and it looks like this big bear move is starting with a flourish...Dow off 62 and Nasdaq off 22...

Individual citizens of USA have much more power than our government gives us credulity.

It's time to show them...that...

If you have lots of cash...hold it physically...see here.

Doug has been more of a deflationist than an inflationist for over a year now. That article shows why. The Long Wave Group explains it a good way, in Doug's opinion.

Individuals may see how a quantum~real 'seculum' is closer to 60-70 years than Romans' intuition of about 100 years.

LWG expects our bear 'bottom' (no pun) in 2012, but it will take our globe roughly 15-25 years to dig out of our snow~drifted public and private debts.

If they are correct, and Doug is about 2-sigma sure they are, Au will explode and Au stocks will too. Read 'here' above carefully.

We likely will see a Dow:Au ratio of less than two during next 2-10 years.

Other major changes, seemingly catastrophic contemporaneously, are imminent: complete replacement of our current US politics, complete replacement of entire congress,
total detention if n¤t destruction of FRB and all its fascist cronies, near total recant of public and private debt, irrecoverable political embarrassment of Conservative
and Lieberal 'parties,' total destruction of fiat as foe of every citizen and citizenry on Earth, Geertzian disassembly (do a browser search on that pattern) of
nearly all unions (monisms) on Earth, and decommissioning of nearly all classical epistemological 'tools' of state-ic and status quo 'know-ledges.'

Thank you for reading,

Doug

23Feb2010.

20Feb2010

Reader Questions About Classical vis-à-vis Quantum Dæm¤cracy
Created - February 20, 2010 - By Doug

©Quantonics, Inc., 2010-2014

Question

Query Etymology
 Topic Doug's Commentary
"To 'Blindly see,' what does it mean?" 19Feb2010 - Poway California Classical [Dd]emocracy can only 'see' blindly,' while
quantum~[Dd]æm¤cracy sees without classical blinders.

On 31Jan2010 Doug wrote, "Classical politicians (blindly) see only dichon(o, o)."

Our reader's query is exceptionally complementaroceptive!

'Blindly see,' classically is an oxymoron.

Recall how Doug has taken great pain to show how dialectic thing-king generates paradice. That is why Doug put 'blindly' in parentheses in his original reader-quoted text.

What Doug intends is that classicists can only partially see due their religious adherence to dialectic. Dialectic is a huge disabler of human thought.

Quantumly both blindly and see are enthymemes. All of us are limited to how much we can see (hear, feel, sense, etc.). Our list of exegetica here are nearly unbounded. For example optical frequencies are less than one octave of nature's >143 octave quantum~flux spectrum.

So we may look at real quantum~partial sight as a kind of bandwidth limited blindness. (This is a large aspect of quantonics' semantic of "macroscopic quantum~uncertainty." Understanding it is kin of what we and Paul Pietsch mean by, "Indeterminacy is a principal feature of intelligence." Now ponder how classical democracy adheres dialectical notions of ideal 'truth,' based in ideal classical 'certainty.' When one realizes, wisely, how nature has put blinders on all of us, we intelligently regard uncertainty as a higher Value than classical ideal truth.)

Too, we grasp from numerous psychological-clinical studies how, we tend to see what we expect to see. That is closer to what Doug intended by "(blindly) see."

In gnosis we use topos to show this quite simply: hylic (most blindered), psychic (struggling to see more), pneumatic (least blindered).

Doug - 20Feb2010.

©Quantonics, Inc., 2010-2014

Doug's view of markets tend to well~align many pundits.

Our globe is about to experience major financial failures. Much of it borne of GWBu()sh()'s disadministration. Social conservatives are intrinsic failures. That is why Doug refers them as Republican'ts.

Why are they failures?

Quantum~reality isn't conservative. It isn't a "zero sum game." It isn't classically closed (conservative).

Quantum reality is open, and thus entropically productive. Quantum~reality creates actuality from isoflux! Conservative thought cannot even begin to grasp that reality, folks!

Doug can write volume libraries about this, but it won't do much good until humanity begins to grasp what quantum~reality is and what it means for all of us as individual, gnostic human beings.

If you care about that, study quantonics, all those titans whose works we cover generously in y~our website we call "Quantonics."

Doug is moving cash to short positions in small caps, materials, and select Chinese~relevant financial vehicles.

Keep in mind that $ are fiat. Regardless how much FRB and Treasury try to save US' $...we think they cann¤t...it's now too late.
Long term, a world without fiat currency will be a better world, just like a world without 'Classical Democracy' will be a better world (in Doug's opinion).

Doug.

20Feb2010

4Feb2010

Our USA House of Representatives don't!

Consider: USA's GDP is over stated! Our actual GDP is probably about 0.5 to 0.7 that stated!

What does that mean for our real debt ceiling? What does that mean for velocity of money? Etc.

Assume what Doug just wrote is more reasonable than what GAO, Treasury and FRB report.

Then our debt ceiling above $14T is more than double real GDP. Are you stunned? Should be.

Some are saying its closer to $21T due off books issues whose future values are indeterminate.

If actual GDP is $7T, then our reported debt and our new debt ceiling are double GDP; including our
unreported debt, total may be at least three times actual GDP! If so, USA is way beyond bankrupt!

Among 435 who voted to allow an increase, regardless of paygo, are inept and incompetent.

You know, they think they are what USA is all about... Arrogance! USA is about individuals being productive (i.e., antisocialist). Capitalism is what allows individuals to be productive!

USA now has over 2 million government employees, none of whom produces a god-damned thing. Wastrels! Incompetents! Inepts!

Congress, cut spending now!

Reduce size of gov't now!

If your paycheck is in $US, regardless that manipulated DXY, you're getting fuxed! How long will it take you to see what is happening?

If you want to grasp why Doug is ranting, read Zero Hedge! Read Jim Willie at Market Oracle. Read! Time is over for you to be fiscally inept. Learn!

Doug -

4Feb2010

29-31Jan2010

OK! Senate votes for Bernanke!

So now what do we do in November?

Simply, vote only for non incumbents. These creeps won't sunset themselves. Let's do it for them.

Doug 29-31Jan2010

. . .

Recall Doug's recent rant on classical democracy vav quantum~dæm¤cracy?

How can Doug put quantum~dæm¤cracy in alternative quantum~lightings?

One way is to offer a pathway of quantum~change. Another which assists that approach is...

David Bohm, in his 1992 Thought as a System shows us a way. See page 161 in Bohm's 250 page Routledge paperback.Permit Doug to use Quantonics script for an immediate and eidetic comparison:
Essentials of Quantonics' Comparisons
of
Classical Democracy vav Quantum~Dæm¤cracy

Type

Quantonics Script

Interpretation
and
Quantum Hermeneutics


Issues
Classical


Issues
Quantum

Classical
Democracy

dichon(I, me)

Classically 'I' is subjective and me is objective. Too, classically, subjects and objects are middle-excluded due Aristotle's third syllogistic 'law.' Our dichon's comma-space twixt 'I' and 'me' signifies 'concretely' Aristotle's third 'law.'

Compare
dichon(~, o)

Classical Society
Sovereign
Classical Individual

Classical politicians view individuals only as quantitative objects: they see 'o,' but they are blindered to 'me' as qualitative 'wavings.'

Classical politicians (blindly) see only

dichon(o, o).

Quantumists must use quantization and Poisson~Bracketing to marginalize classical quantitative notions of society and emphasize qualitative quantum~memeos of quantum~society.

Quantum
Dæm¤cracy

quanton(I,me)

Quantumly "I" and "me" are both quantons and as such are quantum~holographic "patterns of quantum~flux Value." In Quantonics, all quantons are quantum~holographically middle~including and middle~includings. Our quanton's comma~no~space quantumly illustrates quantum~middle~inclusion.

Classical society must evolve away from its self-proclaimed sovereignty over individuals to acceptance of quantum~individuals sovereign to classical society.

Compare
quanton(~,o)

Quantum~Individual
Sovereign
Classical~Society

Quantum politicians view individual as qualitative complementation of quantum~flux.

Quantum politicians see

quanton(~,o).

Doug's table above is intended to show a profound need for social disposal of [Dd]emocratic and [Rr]epublican politics and nurturing of a n¤væl quantum~politics.

This is just a start, borne of prior omniscussions (n¤t 'di'scussions) of this topic in Hodgepodge and elsewhere in Quantonics web site.

In subsequent segments of Doug's Hodgepodge 2010, he will do Poisson~Bracketings of classical democracy vav quantum~dæm¤cracy.

Doug's ultimate goal is a Quantum~Political~Primer™ on H5W to do that.

29-31Jan2010 -Doug.

HodgePodge

27Jan2010

"Hey Doug, What are you hearing from TG's testimony today?"

It all comes down to this: Fed doesn't want transparency, even though Geithner claims it is a good idea..

Fed only is viable as long as we play their game.

Transparency shows us that we shouldn't be playing their game.

See Gary North's End the Fed article recommended Doom Loop reference.

If you do not know (understand) what Doug intends by "Fed's game," see Gary North's End the Fed article
and his referenced Doom Loop which was presented very recently to Chicago FRB.

You need to read Gary prior Doom Loop, please.

Doug will do a summary of Doom Loop ASAP..

Thank you for reading,

Doug.

27Jan2010

HodgePodge

26Jan2010

Boy, has Obama fuxed up or what?

Recall how BO said, "Jesse Jackson is one of my best pals?"

Yep, and he likes Bernanke and Geithner too.

So BO has amongst his favs those three major dumbasses.

Are you paying attention to 26Jan2010 news?

See Zerohedge on Bernanke, Geithner, FRBNY, and GSux.

Bernanke and Geithner both need to be replaced, BO!
Their ineptness and incapacity to perform are just profound!

26Jan2010

HodgePodge

25Jan2010

Doug wants to talk about political philosophy from a narrow quantum~complementarospective.

About classical-democracy vav quantum~dæm¤cracy.

What is wrong with classical democracy, a democracy hylics (classicists) promote today?
Simply, it is dialectical. And In Quantonics "dialectic is bogus."

"OK, Doug! What is quantum~dæm¤cracy?" That's easy!

HotMeme™ "Quantum~dæm¤cracy issi hologramic!"™ HotMeme™.

Doug derives that from a more general quantum metameme, a
MetanaHotMeme™: "Quantum~reality issi hologramic." Source? David Bohm! MetanaHotMeme™.

Classical democracy is bivalent. Quantum~dæm¤cracy issi h¤l¤graphically omnivalent.

Classical democracy is static, an Abyss of Stayssyss.
Quantum~dæm¤cracy issi absolute flux, absolute evolutionary perpetual selection via quantized choosings, chancings, and changings.

Classical democracy worships exclusion, cause-effect, and perpetual state. Quantum~dæm¤cracy
betterships inclusion, coobsfectationings (see affectation, too), and Bergsonian flux~duration.

Classical objects' properties are democratically perpetual state. Quantum quantons'
holographic~interrelationshipings are quantum~dæm¤cratic perpetual~evolutionary change.

Holographic quantum~dæm¤cracy implores all of any quantum~hologramings' energy~wellings to
coobsfectively beings doings their free~will quantized ensemblings' QMVings EIMAings at up to Planck rates.

HotMeme™ "Quantum~Free~Will~Quantization (quantum~dæm¤cracy) in our quantum~stagings EIMA scintillates biophotonically!"™ HotMeme™.

See Doug's quantum~description of scintillation. See Doug's coining of quantum~stage.

Is it clear to you n¤w~ings why Doug declares a Essene~Jesuit~Gn¤stic normative,
"Classical-democracy, just like its dialectical-çatholiç dead-father-demiurge, is dead!"

There is more to be said ( re quanton(unsaid,said) ) about this, but Doug, just for n¤w~ings,
wants to get your hologramic quantum~th¤ughts running in background on this topic.

If you need a hint, imagine John Forbes Nash's Equilibrium Theory immersed in its own quantum~hologram.

Doug.

HodgePodge

25Jan2010

HodgePodge

23Jan2010

Doug just wants to make a comment about Supreme Court (that's a laugh) decision re corporations' rights to contribute to a political campaign.

If you agree with Quantonics, you believe in gnosis. You believe in quantum~gnosis. Gnosis is about individuals.

Corporations are small models of society: they are n¤t individuals. They are groups of people; definitely n¤t individuals! (Yes, forgive Doug, he is using SOMiticism.)

Social voting and campaign support as a social group is lobbying, IMO. Society represents groups ("the people," and their 'civil rights'), n¤t individuals.
Actually, that is what is wrong with nearly all classical social organizations (essentially "tragedy of commons sense" 'unions').
Their social mentality is OSFA. But reality is MSFA. Latter is what we mean by "academic freedom," "religious freedom," and "cultural di(omni)versity."

Society is individiopathic, deadly to individuals and thus indirectly to self.

Individual disrespect of a failing society is healthy. Any societal disrespect for individuals is self-destruction in process.

Doug says, "Our Supreme Court has n¤thing supreme about it."
Indeed, it is less than ordinary! Our supreme court is naught more than a "tragedy of OSFA commons sense."
It is çatholiç. Intellectual, psychic-hylic, dialectical garbage."

"If all mankind minus one, were of one opinion, and only one person were of the contrary opinion, mankind would be no more justified in silencing that one person, than he, if he had the power, would be justified in silencing mankind."

JS Mill, On Liberty, 1859.

Now is mankind society? Doug thinks society is lessor mankind. Epistemology of mankind is about knowing. Society has n¤ means to be knowing other than Rules. Individuals can think. Society cann¤t think.

Here we see a 'Supreme' Court which cares more about society than individuals. This is a huge mistake. Like GW Bu()sh()'s mistake, Error, "Society is above individuals." Bullshit!

Individuals are more highly evolved and evolving than society, period. Doug.

Clearly, society and its courts, supreme and otherwise, are failing. But individuals cann¤t fail. They evolve. They change. They adapt.
Corporations die because they are less capable of adapting than individuals! States and societies die simply because they are less capable of adapting and surviving than individuals.

Doug disagrees with Supreme Court. Neither corporations nor societies have 'individual' voting rights. To enable their voting rights is a çatholiç abomination.

Individuals, quantum~individuals...and agreeing with JS Mill and Pirsig...are sovereign any society. Individual right to vote trumps any unthinkqing and mindless social group and corporation.

Next we'll be giving churches and lobbyists voting rights...thinkq about that!

Doug has lost faith in every branch of US government.

Keep in mind this same corrupt and çatholiç supreme court put that ultimate political scum
GWBu()sh() in office second term: an abomination against individual humanity and our Earth.

That dumbass tipped d' Rary. And look at what is happening. And Republican'ts are feeling another of their self arrogant "ascensions."
Hey Newtron, how about a "Contract Against America?" Oh, I'm sorry, that was GWBu()sh()'s Supreme Court election.

My bet is Scott Brown is just another Bu()sh()ter. But I hope he helps vote down Democrappeds social welfare incompetence.

Young folk...when your teachers berate capitalism tell them to shut their stupid Karl Marxian dialectical pie holes. Tell them you aren't paying for political proselytization as education.

Socialism doesn't pay for anything. Socialism is, as folk at Zero Hedge explain, wholly n¤n productive. Absolutely incapable. Absolutely incompetent.

Doug -

HodgePodge

23Jan2010

23Jan2010

If you missed Caprica's premier on SyFy, be sure to catch its next segment next Friday night at nine pm. Check your local listings.

Caprica is a science fiction rendition of Quantonics. If you like Quantonics, you'll like (Doug thinkqs) Caprica.

Doug -

HodgePodge

23Jan2010

16Jan2010

In only nine and one-half months (November 2, 2010) USA may be having its final (forever) mid-term elections.

If that statement is normative, then all of us should start pondering H5W we plan to vote. (Possibly 'not.')

How do we, should we, vote when our current social leadership is manifestly inept?
So too, what should we do about local political machines which perpetuate said ineptness?

Follow d' $Money!

(If you doubt their ineptness, consider their failings. Their failings are evident when you consider what has happened to USA since
1913 when our 'government' enabled a "privately owned" Federal Reserve Bank as 'protector and guarantor' of our money system.
Actually this is Congress' responsibility, but they outsourced it to a private company called
"The Federal Reserve Bank." Nearly all 'assets' in USA today are valued in Federal Reserve 'Notes' and 'Dollars.')
All 535 members of Congress have willingly nurtured its Federal Reserve System. That is why we declare them inept!

Why?

US Dollar has lost about 98% of its value since 1913!

How else are these 535 complicits inept?
(You may actually want to see it as adeptness, as measured by who has much of US individuals' as constituents money now.)

Their statistics are all manipulated, contrived and bogus. E.g., inflation, unemployment, etc.

They hide actuality from their conned-stituents.
They deny taxpayers' transparent access to their and FRB's theft of our assets and taxes.

Unfortunately we are a bivalent party system, excluding invalid notions of 'independents,' et al.

Republican'ts and Lieberalls.

In Doug's view both parties need replacement. But it cannot happen peacefully. So it appears we are stuck.

It gets really simple when you think about it, however.

What keeps their ineptnesses nurtured? Our participation in their processes.

When you are being robbed blind, what do you do? Escape robbers!
Doug leaves it to your individual imaginationings how to escape.

Simply, if we refuse to play their game, their way...
...they lose.

We lose too, however, only temporarily.
We can survive without them ...
... although a huge, only ostensibly hermetic, secret is ...
... they cannot survive without us!

That bold green text is probably the most important political statement on Earth today, CeodE 2010. Doug - 16Jan2010.

According to other pundits whom we respect, readers should expect at least two major events from US' 535 incompetents during 2010-2011:

Treasury confiscation of intangibles like 401k 'plans' and savings via mandatory conversion into 'Treasury' annuities.
(Ponder how our dollars and 'notes' are actually 'FRB annuities.'
535 and FRB've already spent nearly 100 years fuxing US individual 'citizens' over.)...

...And, Obama's declaration of war against all of, possibly part of, Middle East as "terrorist infidels."

But Doug, "How do we create a new $Money which cann¤t be so easily manipulated by political incompetents?"

Doug admits to potential fiscal and economic naiveté here, but to keep it simple:

Calculate current global 'development product.'

Say it's currently $100T.

Take total above ground gold, silver, platinum, copper, titanium, rhodium, palladium, etc.,
weights in Troy ounces. Determine their relative values percentage-wise.

Monetise GDP of $100T in terms of those metals.

Credit all assets globally, immediately, with corresponding shares of said "New Real Money."
Let's call it "GNRM!" Global New Real Money.

Do not say it cannot be done. Rather "Just do it." Yes, it requires multinational cooperation,
but alternatives are much worse and outcomes will last decades if not longer.

Then, politically, never allow a return to fiat money.
Never allow a non constitutional private company, like FRB, to decide how any nation's money shall be managed!

Every nation is in trouble now, even Australia, though they mostly believe they are OK...they aren't!

This puts us all back on a real money basis, and it puts our globe back on an even keel. Discomforts will heal rapidly. We can say goodbye to perpetual fiat bubbles.

Thank you for reading,

Doug.

16Jan2010

HodgePodge

14Jan2010

Today, Zero Hedge has a superb article 'Global Tactical Asset Allocation - Equities.' Said article is by Damien Cleusix.

Cleusix refers a paper (a notion previously referred by A. Greenspan) titled 'Paradox of Credibility.' Said paper is by Hanjoon Michael Jung.

Most of our regular readers grasp how Doug has spent much time on issues of paradice, and how classical thingk-king is actually a de facto generator of oxymora and paradice (pl. of paradox).

Said 'Paradox of Credibility' paper is dialectical. As such, we can declare its actual bogosity immediately.
Doug's allegation of bogosity emerges due paper's author's (Hanjoon Michael Jung) use of classical logic to support his hypotheses.
Dialectical logic, alethic logic, and predicate logic are n¤ longer valid in any scientific opus.
Why? Reality is quantum. Reality is n¤t generally dialectical!

Dialectic creates paradice while declaring them 'false.'

There are n¤ classical paradice in quantum~reality.

"How can that be Doug?"

Over simply, dialectic is a monism, depends upon monist 'principles.' Quantum~reality is heterogeneous, plural, and multiplicate.

Dialectic assumes stable OGC and stoppable and analytic OGT. (This set of assumptions is what annihilated David X. Li's classical economic formalisms.).

Coquecigrues ('quantum logic') assumes many truthings in many comtextings all of which are evolving, and thus intrinsically enthymemetic, at up to Planck rates.

When we apply quantum~thinkqing to any classical paradox said paradox becomes quantumly~explicable, n¤ longer a paradox.
See Doug's Zeno's Paradice. See Doug's What Are Sophisms?, and his Sophism Connection. Also see Doug's Problematic and Pesky Classical English Oxymora.

A major problem with classical reasoning based in dialethic 'logic,' is its core assumptions.
It suffers its own Paradox of Credibility. Why? Mostly due its assumptions regarding dyadic relationships among logical objects:

  • symmetry
  • transitivity
  • reflexivity
  • commutativity
  • distributivity
  • factorizability
  • lisr
    • localability
    • isolability
    • separability
    • reducibility
  • etc.

N¤næ of those classical relations is valid in quantum~reality!

"OK, Doug...assume you are correct in your allegation of Cleusix' reference to Paradox of Credibility bogosity. How do we deal with this quantumly?"

Doug's core assumptions about quantum~reality include:

  • quantum~reality's comstituents are quantons
  • quantons are waves and thus always changing and changing all
  • quantum~waves everywhere~included~middle~associate (EIMA)
  • waves are stochastic thus positive (see de Finetti, 'Foresight, Its Logical Laws, Its Subjective Sources')
  • ensemble quantum~waves evolve perpetually
  • all real quantum~wave~ensembles are always partially evolved at any nowings
  • a way of describing quantum~partiality issi quanton(unsaid,said)
  • etc.

If you grasp Doug's quantum~semantics in his list of quantum~assumptions, we may surmise how all quantum~nomina are always partial, always enthymemetic.

So, credibility is always partial. Credibility is always enthymemetic. Credibility may n¤t be ideally, classically 'assessed.'

"How do we show that in Quantonicsese?"

Credibilityq quanton(credibility_unsaid,credibility_said).

Cleusix' reference to A. Greenspan's classical notion of Paradox of Credibility, similar David X. Li's opus,
treats credibility as a stoppable scalar metric which is classically assessable.
But credibility is quantum! It evolves! One may n¤t classically scalarbate credibility!

Thanks to Tyler Durden at ZH for indirectly finding this paper for us.

If you can find time read all of Cleusix' article. Very, very, very important!

Doug.

14Jan2010

HodgePodge

7Jan2010

A principal reason Doug started HodgePodge over a year ago was to comment on his views and interpretations of various aspects of USA's and our world's financial, economic, and political issues.
However, for Doug, a big part of all that is surviving what globe's politicians have done to individuals out of their own need for power, money and to them 'prestige.'

Well, to Doug, precious metals are a key aspect to survival. Lot's of pundits agree. There isn't any need for Doug to rewrite all that is written elsewhere.
There is a need to help individuals of our world survive by showing them how current ways of thing-king are not only antique, but also anachronistic and detrite.

So Doug is using FEP (finance, economics, and politics) as means to illustrate how we can stop using CTMs and start using QTMs to help all of us survive.
For Doug, that is one of our most strategic needs both as individuals and as novel quantum~societies will emerge from rubble of current civilization.

Just one example is gold.

Thinkqing gold is thinkqing quantum. There are lots of reasons which will become more apparent as time passes.

Biggest and easiest to grasp is that gold (and other precious metals) are real, quantum~real.

FRB's paper is fiat. Faux, pseudo, garbage, junk, etc. And fiat is means of bankers to steal nations' wealth. (See Quiet Coup by Simon Johnson.)

What Doug wants to offer re: gold is a Kitco 2-year chart he just altered FYE.

Doug took that beautiful head and shoulders bottom and cloned it, then attached clone to 6Jan2010's 2 year Au chart. Here it is:

Doug's technique here is to use quantum~autsimilarity to extend Kitco's 2 year gold chart approximately 21 months.

That isn't what will happen, since we cann¤t do deterministic projections in quantum~reality.

However it is a decent stochastic expectation, since it is real autsimilarity.

This effort is just for fun, and FYE. Let's see what happens.

Are you amazed at how well those charts aligned-registered?

Doug is!

Thanks to Illustrator for making it easy.

Most pundits aren't going to like our chart, since it has gold going essentially sideways for another year.

As you can see, buying opportunities may be quite further in future than what we might wish.

If you have resources to do so, ride it down.

Key to healthy outlook in our chart is its green 200 day moving average. Trends hold! Good!

It just feels and seems reasonable to Doug. It's very quantum!

Doug - 7Jan2010.

HodgePodge

 

To contact Quantonics write to or call:

Doug Renselle
Quantonics, Inc.
Suite 18 #368 1950 East Greyhound Pass
Carmel, INdiana 46033-7730
USA
1-317-THOUGHT

©Quantonics, Inc., 2008-2014 — Rev. 6Mar2010  PDR — Created 7Jan2010  PDR
(4Feb2010 rev - Repair FYE Au chart cloning date from 6Dec2009 to 6Jan2010.)
(20,23,26-27Feb2010 rev - Answer reader query about Doug's usage of "(blindly) see.")
(6Mar2010 rev - Add five year Au chart with approximately a one year quantum~autsimilar projection.)

Arches